• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • Hindi can't be used for official purpose.

Latest News

Back

Hindi can't be used for official purpose.

Courtesy/By: Aman Jaisawal  |  09 Sep 2021     Views:491

 

The Central government is duty-bound to communicate in English with those States that have not adopted Hindi as their official language, the Madras High Court emphasized recently (S Venkatesan v. Ministry of State for Home Affairs and Others).

This is in line with the Official Languages Act 1963 and the Official Language Rules 1976, the Bench of Justices N Kirubakaran (now retired), and M Duraiswamy observed.

The court said that once a representation is given in English, it is the duty of the Union Government to give a reply in English only which will also be in consonance with the statute, viz., the Official Languages Act. In this regard, the Court relied upon Section 3 of the Official Languages Act 1963. The Bench further commented that different ethnic, linguistic, and cultural identities have to be protected and any attempt to destroy and disturb the same may become sensitive issues. The court said that any kind of fanaticism is not good for any society. Fanaticism, in any form, is to be condemned, if it is exhibited. Linguistic fanaticism is more dangerous as it would give an impression that one language alone is superior and being imposed upon the people speaking different languages.

Against this backdrop, the Court also expressed appreciation for the Central government’s recognition of the importance of one’s mother tongue or language in the National Education Policy. The court said that when such is the importance given to the languages of the country, it seems that a few officials in the Respondent Government either without understanding the sensitivity of the issue or by inadvertence, are bent upon using Hindi in communications and other official matters. With respect to the present case, the Court also referred to Section 8 of the Official Languages Act, 1963 which excluded the application of the Official Languages Rules, 1976 in the State of Tamil Nadu, thereby making it clear the central government is expected to use English for official communications with Tamil Nadu.

The Court further noted that Article 350 of the Constitution of India entitles any person to submit a representation to Union or the State government in any of the languages used in the Union or State. Pertinently, the Bench went on to express hope that the Central government will seriously consider amending Article 350 so that, replies given to such representations are also given in the language used. The court said that if a representation is given as per Article 350 of the Constitution, a reply should be given in the same language, so that, the people could understand the information. This Court hopes that the Central Government would seriously consider amending Article 350, so that, not only representation is given in the languages of the Union or the States, but also reply is given in the same language used by the citizens. The Bench was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition filed by Lok Sabha Member of Parliament from Madurai, Su Venkatesan who approached the Court after he received a reply from the Central government in Hindi to a representation made by him in English.

Venkatesan told the Court that he had written back to the Union government, calling for the reply to be sent again in English. However, upon failing to receive any response to this additional communication, he moved the Court. His petition had urged the Court to direct the use of English in all communications between the Central government and the State of Tamil Nadu. Before the High Court, the Central government admitted that there was a mandate to use English in communications between the Centre and States that have not adopted Hindi as their official language. Appearing for the Centre, Assistant Solicitor General L Victoria Gowri further submitted that the reply to Venkatesan had been inadvertently written in Hindi. There was no intention on the part of the Central government to violate any provision of the Official Languages Act, 1963 or Rules, the Court was told. The Court, however, was not convinced that it was a bona fide error on the Centre’s part. The Bench opined that if the mistake had really been inadvertent, the Central government would have immediately replied to Venkatesan in English after the issue was raised.

The Court observed that there were other instances reported where the Centre had only responded in Hindi to the State of Tamil Nadu. Commenting on the importance of communicating in the vernacular as well, the Court noted that even notifications prior to land acquisitions have to mandatorily be communicated in the vernacular. The court said that The purpose of publication in vernacular languages is only to see that the information regarding cases reaches the local people, particularly, the landowners who are likely to be affected. With these observations, the Court proceeded to allow the petition, while cautioning the Union government and its officers and instrumentality to follow the provisions of Official Languages Act 1963 and the Official Languages Rules 1976.

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Aman Jaisawal  |  09 Sep 2021     Views:491

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:5441
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:4875
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:4858
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:4648
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:4673
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4328
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:4704
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:4697
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:4814
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:4994
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:4702
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:4679
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:4632
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:4748
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:4710
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5026
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:4860
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:5687
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:4822
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5166
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5067
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5257
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5112
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5230
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5014
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:8381
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:6943
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:6984
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:6783
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:7734
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7080
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:5622
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:6396
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:5661
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:5666
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:5911
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:5611
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:5593
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:5644
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:5609
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:5964
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:5469
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:5492
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:5939
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6132
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:5713
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6148
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8110
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6145
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:5810
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:11444
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:5534
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6381
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:5958
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:5658
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:5894
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:5539
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:5986
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:5660
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6108
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6315
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:6542
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:10436
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:5760
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:5624
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:6747
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:5470
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:5486
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7062
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6010
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:5570
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:5612
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:5552
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:7657
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:5830
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:5477
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5328
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:6413
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5355
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:5767
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:5609
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5296
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5296
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:5451
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:7881
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:6491
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:5577
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5290
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:5495
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5065
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5279
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5115
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:5708
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:5833
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:5561
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6041
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5345
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:5480
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6063
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:5805
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:95793
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73352
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:70772
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:69910
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59264
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.