• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, and Key Management Personnel to Prevent Regulatory Misuse

Latest News

Back

SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, and Key Management Personnel to Prevent Regulatory Misuse

Courtesy/By: Khushi Jain  |  08 Oct 2024     Views:11487

Introduction

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has issued a detailed checklist for Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs), along with their managers and Key Management Personnel (KMPs), to ensure that AIF structures and operations are not misused to bypass existing regulations. The circular, issued on October 8, outlines specific measures to curb the misuse of AIFs by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)-regulated entities, ineligible investors, and foreign investors from countries sharing land borders with India. These steps are part of SEBI’s broader effort to tighten oversight of AIFs and protect the integrity of India's financial markets.

Purpose of the Checklist

SEBI’s checklist aims to ensure that AIFs are not being used by regulated entities and investors to sidestep regulatory requirements or hide stressed assets. This directive has been developed in response to concerns about AIFs being used to "evergreen" stressed loans of RBI-regulated entities or by ineligible investors to bypass regulations related to Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs) and Qualified Buyers (QBs). It also seeks to address concerns about foreign investment from entities located in countries bordering India.

Key Areas of Concern

  1. Evergreening of Loans and Hiding Stressed Assets: A major concern outlined in the circular revolves around the evergreening of stressed loans or hiding stressed assets. This issue occurs when RBI-regulated entities use AIFs as a tool to avoid income recognition norms, asset classification rules, and provisioning requirements that would otherwise apply. SEBI has implemented stringent guidelines to prevent such practices.

To address this, SEBI has specified that thorough due diligence must be conducted for every AIF scheme that involves an entity regulated by the RBI or where investors contribute a significant portion of the fund's corpus. SEBI has outlined specific parameters for determining whether an AIF is being misused for this purpose, such as when an RBI-regulated investor has a substantial stake (25 per cent or more) in the AIF’s corpus or holds voting control over investment decisions. This ensures that regulated lenders/entities do not indirectly acquire or hold an interest in companies they are not permitted to engage with directly.

  1. Ineligible Investors Acting as QIBs or QBs: Another key concern SEBI seeks to address is the misuse of AIFs by ineligible investors attempting to operate as Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs) or Qualified Buyers (QBs). These categories of investors enjoy certain privileges under the regulatory framework, such as access to specific investment opportunities. By using AIFs to circumvent the criteria for QIBs or QBs, ineligible investors could gain undue advantages and bypass regulatory scrutiny. SEBI has made it clear that AIF managers and KMPs are responsible for ensuring that their investors meet the eligibility criteria and are not using AIFs to evade these rules.
  2. Foreign Investment from Land-Bordering Countries: SEBI has also expressed concern about investments coming from countries that share a land border with India. Under Rule 6(a) of the Non-Debt Instrument (NDI) Rules, entities or individuals from such countries can invest in Indian companies only with prior approval from the Indian government. The regulator has introduced specific measures to ensure that AIFs are not used as a backdoor for these investors to enter Indian markets without the required approvals.

SEBI has outlined a due diligence process for AIFs where 50 per cent or more of the corpus is contributed by investors from countries sharing a land border with India. These investors or their beneficial owners must undergo thorough scrutiny to confirm compliance with the NDI Rules. The guidelines also mandate that if an AIF scheme holds 10 per cent or more of the equity or equity-linked securities in an investee company, it must report the investment details to its custodian, who will then report the information to SEBI. This additional layer of reporting is intended to monitor and regulate the flow of foreign funds from these regions more effectively.

Detailed Provisions of the Checklist

  1. Due Diligence for Evergreening Concerns: SEBI has issued detailed criteria for AIF managers and sponsors to ensure that their schemes are not being used by RBI-regulated entities to evergreen stressed loans. For any scheme that meets specific conditions—such as a sponsor or investor being an RBI-regulated entity or holding significant voting power—rigorous due diligence must be conducted. This includes verifying that the AIF does not indirectly invest in companies that the regulated entity is restricted from engaging with directly.
  2. Ensuring Compliance with Land-Bordering Countries’ Rules: SEBI has laid out a stringent process for monitoring investments from entities based in countries that share a land border with India. AIF managers must ensure that such investments comply with the NDI Rules and report any significant holdings (10 per cent or more of an investee company's equity) to their custodians, who will forward this information to SEBI. This rule is aimed at maintaining transparency in foreign investments and preventing backdoor entry of funds from restricted regions.
  3. Increased Oversight of Investor Eligibility: The circular requires AIF managers and KMPs to carefully evaluate the eligibility of their investors, particularly in cases where investors may be attempting to use the AIF structure to gain unauthorized access to investment opportunities reserved for QIBs and QBs. SEBI requires managers to implement due diligence procedures to ensure that all investors comply with the regulatory framework.

Implementation Standards and Reporting

SEBI has mandated that AIF managers follow implementation standards formulated by the Self-Regulatory Organization for Alternative Investments (SFA) to ensure compliance. These standards will cover the necessary checks and due diligence for each scheme, including those involving RBI-regulated entities or investors from land-bordering countries.

The circular also specifies the timeline for reporting, particularly in cases where AIF schemes hold a significant share of an investee company's equity. AIFs must provide detailed reports to their custodians, who will compile the data and submit it to SEBI on a monthly basis.

Conclusion

SEBI’s new checklist and guidelines for AIFs, their managers, and KMPs aim to tighten oversight and prevent misuse of AIF structures to circumvent regulatory requirements. By addressing concerns such as the evergreening of loans, ineligible investors acting as QIBs or QBs, and foreign investments from land-bordering countries, SEBI is taking a proactive approach to maintaining the integrity of India’s financial markets. The detailed due diligence and reporting requirements will ensure greater transparency and accountability within the AIF ecosystem, further strengthening regulatory compliance.


Courtesy/By: Khushi Jain  |  08 Oct 2024     Views:11487

News Updates

News
Judging the Judges: India's Three-Year Practice Ru...
15 Jul 2025     Views:2772
News
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Torts: A Modern ...
09 Nov 2024     Views:12857
News
The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:13290
News
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:12448
News
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:12319
News
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:12107
News
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:11566
News
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:11109
News
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:11487
News
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:11450
News
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:11572
News
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:12014
News
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:11553
News
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:11378
News
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:11265
News
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:11575
News
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:11326
News
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:12044
News
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:11654
News
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:12936
News
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:11543
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:102230
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:80421
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:77703
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:76557
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:66537
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims
Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.