Latest News
Back
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolution Explored at Young-OGEMID
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolution Explored at Young-OGEMID
Artificial intelligence's (AI) future, possible advantages and disadvantages, and role in conflict resolution. AI-powered processing tools, such as Google's Bard and ChatGPT, are becoming more and more popular and are predicted to completely transform the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) industry. In international arbitration, language obstacles can be surmounted with the use of AI-based language translation systems, facilitating effective communication and comprehension between parties with disparate linguistic backgrounds. Nonetheless, there are difficulties with privacy and secrecy, interpretation and context, and prejudice and fairness.
Though there are ethical questions, Professor Schmitz thinks AI will be helpful in training specialists, consultants, and witnesses. When using AI to help with witness or expert preparation, attorneys must exercise caution, while secure tools can be accessible. Dr Damien Charlotin highlights the value of educating law students about the "mundane utility" of artificial intelligence and how it may support human labour. Giving AI the best that robots can achieve while protecting the best that people can do is the aim.
A Practice Direction issued by the Chief Justice of the Manitoba Court of King's Bench mandates that any use of AI in court preparation materials must be disclosed. This need extends beyond the language used in legal pleadings made by solicitors. ChatGPT and other AI tools may mimic deductive reasoning, which can be predictive, similar, or generalized. However because AI algorithms are biased by the data they are trained on, they may provide unjust results. Arbitral awards have a smaller data collection, and interlocutory rulings are rarely made public. As a result, using AI for data analytics and predictive support becomes more difficult. It is the responsibility of legal educators to assist students in comprehending responsible usage of AI. Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques are getting increasingly complex and precise. One example is Lexis + AI, which combines generative AI's conversational tone with legal facts.
Because AI finds it difficult to translate witness testimony from French to English, Joseph Siyaidon expressed worries about the possible disparity of arms for arbitration practitioners from less developed nations. Prof. Schmitz pointed out that our perceptions of AI are greatly influenced by our technical expertise, and that various people would see different benefits from employing AI in international arbitrations. She also noted that in certain affluent nations, AI can aid in increasing access to justice, but she expressed worries about jurisdictional biases and the "new digital divide." She believed that greater equalizing forces that create value in developing nations would emerge as a result of the widespread use and increased accessibility of these technical instruments. Using artificial intelligence (AI) in arbitral decision-making has different consequences depending on how the word and method are used.
In a recent research, the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) examined the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in legal systems. The study makes the case that increased disparity between parties and a wider gap in access to justice result from data availability. AI tools may be used to complete crucial jobs with amazing quality, accuracy, and suitable replies during both the procedural and substantive aspects of an arbitral procedure. However, the study also poses ethical concerns regarding AI's application in arbitration, especially when one party has greater access to force-multiplying technology than the other. According to the study, things would be different if one party could use more human resources than the other without raising moral questions. This also applies to situations where one party could use more technology resources than the other.
The "black box" issue with AI is that even skilled programmers are unable to decipher how it concluded. AI can nonetheless carry out comparable tasks in arbitration, and attorneys can use analogy to comprehend any potential ethical concerns. The ability of AI to understand human thoughts and function as an oracle may bring up new ethical concerns. Wider use of AI may be hindered by a lack of confidence, and stringent AI regulation in international arbitration (IA) may exacerbate mistrust. Preserving human agency over AI technology and working to stop AI from emerging for harmful reasons is essential. Concerns regarding ethics may also arise from the emergence of generative AI and phoney images, movies, and documents. It might not be kosher for the uninformed or unlicensed, but according to Dr. Cohen, penalizing AI for the unlicensed practice of law is unquestionable.
Prof. Strong suggested that subscription providers permit pro se litigants to utilize their databases as a public service to address equal protection problems in AI arbitration. Concerns are raised, nonetheless, regarding the advantages for solo practitioners and small legal practices. Professor Strong argued that before binding laws and regulations are made, guidelines and soft laws should be established. AI technologies are becoming more and more important in arbitration for tasks including document authoring, legal analysis, and arbitrator selection. But it's important to take into account AI's changing nature and reliance on data. Instead of completely replacing human knowledge, AI should be used to supplement it to preserve faith in the arbitral process. It is best to include human experience and knowledge in the process rather than adding more review phases. The intersection of intellectual property, AI, and public interest calls for careful consideration, investigation, and sensible legislation. A comprehensive and cooperative effort is needed to fully use AI while preserving human rights and moral principles to strike a balance between the well-being of society and technical developments.
