• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.

Latest News

Back

Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.

Courtesy/By: Nishiket Dave  |  07 Oct 2020     Views:93484

.

“Men, their right, and nothing more; women their right, and nothing less”. A verdict that set an example to crush all the taboo that demoralise the women in society, in article 14 of Indian Constitution a term ‘person’ means gender and transgender both, they are entitled to legal protection of laws in all the sphere of the state activity, including opportunities in different area, employment, health care, education as well as equal civil and citizenship rights, as enjoys by any other member as the citizen of the country.

The whole world is suffering from discrimination on very different grounds, all living creatures are made by God and all have equal right to worship so, an unreasonable restrictions imposed on women, that they cannot enter in the Temple of Sabrimala the bar on the entry of women into the popular temple was a kind of discrimination on the ground of sex and based on the assumption that menstruating women are “polluted”, which is totally unjustifiable and unreasonable. On the note of equality, It is the basic feature of the constitution any treatment of equals unequally or unequal as equals will be the violation of the basic structure of the Constitution of India.

Discriminating women on the ground of menstruation as an impurity leads to treating women’s as untouchables:

Women here putting bar on their entry into the temple is resulting in treating the women unequal only on the basis of physiological factor which is constitutionally invalid because it is a natural process which cannot be treated as the ground to make a differentiation. The basis of differentiation is a factor which inherent in a women (menstruation) who are in between the age of 10 to 50 are not allowed to enter in the Temple of Sabrimala on the ground that at the time of menstruation they were impure and they cannot worship the lord ‘Ayyapa Swami’(Ram). Treating women as such and prohibiting them from entering into the temple leads to treating them as untouchable which is against the constitution because it is physiological processes which is a part of their life which make them complete and given that untouchability is abolished from Sentara from a very long time ago this is violating the basic and most important aspect of the Constitution which is Article 17. Also according to Hindu mythology menstruation restrictions were used as a means in the custom for providing rest to women, who otherwise indulged in physically demanding household tasks in the past, and who suffered from pain, stress, and discomfort during the menses. Therefore, the belief of menstruation as a period of rest that the women need, owing to stress and physical discomfort, is clearly recognized by Hinduism and some menstrual practices like preventing women from doing household work are aimed to serve that purpose.

Likewise the object that has been claimed is to prevent the deity from being polluted, which, runs counter to the constitutional object of justice, liberty, equality and fraternity as enshrined in the Preamble to our Constitution. That apart has submitted that even if the classification based on menstruation may be intelligible, yet the object sought to be achieved being constitutionally invalid, the question of nexus need not be delved into.

 Women are the part of the society they do have all the rights which men have they both are the creations of god and all the physiological processes are also given by God or by nature to both of them, so why does god only gave one of their child to their right to worship and not to the others, So making any law which boycott the whole class of women from entering into any place whether it is of worship or of other on their biological problems which are not at all in her hands is clearly the violation of their fundamental right. 

As it is a societal taboo which led to face women many discriminations in the society and here also this can be seen in form of barring women from entering into the temple on the ground of their physiological problem on the ground that it will lead to disrupting the celibacy of the Lord "Ayyapa Awami", but how can a physiological process of the women who are the creation of god can be a problem for them and this type of taboos in the society at this time will somewhere discourage women in the society as they were discriminated from entering in a public place which shall be open to all but because of the physiological issues they can’t enter this seems to be illogical and unreasonable and also a violation of their fundamental rights.  

 

Violation of basic Fundamental Rights of the women by restricting them to move freely throughout the territory of India

The underlying purpose of Article 14 in above is to treat all persons similarly circumstanced unlike, both in privileges conferred and liabilities imposed. And here this classification must not be arbitrary but must be rational that is to say that it must not only be based on some inequalities or characteristics which are found in all the persons grouped together and not in others who are left out, but those qualities and characteristics which must have a reasonable relation to the object sought to be achieved. Constitution itself provides the rights to every person to move freely throughout the territory of India, in which a person does includes the men, women and transgender. So by these laws, women’s have the rights to enter into the temple by their own choice and worship the Lord "Ayyapa Swami."

Putting restriction on the entry of women leads to a violation of their right to life and personal liberty

Women are the respected citizens of the society they do have right to enjoy their freedom without any restriction and to enjoy their privacy restricting them to enter into the temple only on their physiological factors will lead to violation of their basic fundamental rights. As today they were boycotted from entering to one place this will give a bad impression on the society that lowers down their position shows that they are lesser to men. They are very important part of the society irrespective of what is their physiological problem they do have all the right to enjoy their life and personal liberty it is irrelevant to bar them to enter in to temple. Living in a society is not just about a mere animal existence they do have right to enjoy their life it is their personal liberty that where they want to go they can go, restraining them to do so will lead to violation of fundamental right provided under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. And hence the verdict respected the women right and now no bars stop them to enter and worship Lord "Ayyapa Swami."


Document:


Courtesy/By: Nishiket Dave  |  07 Oct 2020     Views:93484

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:2785
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:2276
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:2310
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:2149
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:2279
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:1993
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:2117
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:2116
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:2254
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:2391
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:2123
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:2119
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:2084
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:2182
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:2148
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:2432
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:2284
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:3041
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:2268
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:2593
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:2496
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:2723
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:2577
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:2691
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:2463
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:5724
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:4389
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:4426
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:4265
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:5148
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:4538
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:3098
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:3826
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:3113
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:3132
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:3367
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:3078
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:3062
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:3089
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:3099
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:3430
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:2957
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:2963
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:3390
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:3579
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:3174
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:3617
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:5450
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:3621
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:3314
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:8829
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:3043
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:3824
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:3424
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:3139
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:3382
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:3038
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:3472
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:3150
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:3639
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:3794
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:4035
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:7906
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:3290
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:3118
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:4203
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:2988
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:3024
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:4565
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:3545
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:3132
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:3161
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:3107
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:5221
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:3378
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:3039
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:2886
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:3959
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:2921
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:3323
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:3172
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:2867
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:2901
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:3029
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:5433
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:4049
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:3198
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:2907
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:3106
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:2713
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:2904
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:2771
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:3327
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:3484
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:3214
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:3704
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:3022
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:3146
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:3732
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:3485
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:93484
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:70919
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:68380
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:67579
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:56854
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.