• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Framework and Current Practices

Latest News

Back

Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Framework and Current Practices

Courtesy/By: Fanuel Rudi  |  23 Oct 2024     Views:10567

 

Changing an arbitrator during ongoing arbitration proceedings is a complex issue governed by various legal frameworks, including national laws, institutional rules, and international treaties. This report outlines the conditions under which an arbitrator may be changed, relevant case law, and the prevailing standards in the international arbitration community.

Legal Framework

1. National Laws and Institutional Rules

  • UNCITRAL Model Law: Article 12 of the UNCITRAL Model Law stipulates that once proceedings have commenced, an arbitrator can only be replaced by mutual agreement between the parties or under exceptional circumstances. This suggests a strong preference for maintaining the integrity of the tribunal once it is constituted.
  • HKIAC Rules: According to Article 12.1 of the HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules, if an arbitrator is successfully challenged, a substitute will be appointed according to the rules applicable at the time of the original appointment. The arbitration resumes at the stage where the previous arbitrator was replaced unless otherwise decided by the tribunal.
  • ICSID Convention: Under Article 37(2) of the ICSID Convention, parties may replace any arbitrator appointed by them before the tribunal is constituted. However, once constituted, replacement requires mutual consent or must occur under specific conditions such as incapacity or resignation.

2. International Treaties and Guidelines

  • IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest: These guidelines emphasize that an arbitrator must maintain impartiality throughout the proceedings. If any circumstances arise that could lead to doubts about an arbitrator's impartiality, they are obliged to decline their appointment or continue acting in the case.
  • International Court of Justice (ICJ) Procedures: The ICJ’s rules also reflect a similar stance, allowing for replacement only under mutual agreement or exceptional circumstances once proceedings have begun

Case Law

Several notable cases illustrate how these principles are applied in practice:
  • Hrvatska Elektroprivreda d.d. v. Republic of Slovenia (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/24): The tribunal ruled that it had the authority to exclude new counsel if their appointment would create a conflict of interest with existing arbitrators. This case highlights how concerns over integrity can influence decisions regarding changes in representation during arbitration.
  • Neurosigma, Inc. v. De Salles (AAA Case No. 72 193 00792 13 JENF): In this instance, extensions were granted following a change in counsel, demonstrating that while changes are possible, they may lead to procedural adjustments to ensure fairness.

Current Trends in International Arbitration

The international arbitration community generally favours stability and continuity within arbitral tribunals once they are constituted. Here are some key trends:
  • Strict Adherence to Rules: Most institutional rules require that any changes to arbitrators must be justified and often agreed upon by all parties involved.
  • Focus on Impartiality: There is a growing emphasis on ensuring that all arbitrators remain impartial throughout proceedings. Any perceived conflicts can lead to challenges and potential replacements.
  • Procedural Safeguards: Institutions like HKIAC and ICSID have established clear procedures for challenging and replacing arbitrators to maintain fairness and integrity in arbitration processes.

Conclusion

In summary, changing an arbitrator mid-proceeding is generally permissible only under specific conditions outlined in national laws and institutional rules, primarily requiring mutual consent or exceptional circumstances. The prevailing view within international arbitration emphasizes maintaining tribunal integrity and impartiality throughout proceedings. As such, while changes can occur, they are subject to stringent scrutiny to prevent disruptions and ensure fairness in arbitration outcomes.
Share
Rewrite
 
 

Courtesy/By: Fanuel Rudi  |  23 Oct 2024     Views:10567

News Updates

Article
Judging the Judges: India's Three-Year Practice Ru...
15 Jul 2025     Views:1840
Article
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Torts: A Modern ...
09 Nov 2024     Views:10877
Article
The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:11251
Article
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:10567
Article
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:10477
Article
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:10230
Article
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:10302
Article
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:9915
Article
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:10270
Article
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:10269
Article
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:10381
Article
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:10607
Article
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:10277
Article
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:10212
Article
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:10131
Article
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:10287
Article
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:10213
Article
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:10598
Article
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:10396
Article
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:11378
Article
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:10368
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:101074
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:78921
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:76214
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:75304
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:64799
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims
Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.