• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Vicarious Liability not in Contempt cases.

Latest News

Back

Vicarious Liability not in Contempt cases.

Courtesy/By: Aditya BAgrawal  |  25 Nov 2021     Views:554

 

The Supreme Court recently comprising of a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundresh observed that vicarious liability as a principle cannot be applied to a case of contempt. (Dr. U.N. Bora, Ex. Chief Executive Officer vs Assam Roller Flour Mills Association)

Merely because a subordinate official acted in disregard of an order passed by the Court, a liability cannot be fastened on a higher official in the absence of knowledge, the bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice MM Sundresh observed.

 

Facts of the Case

The present appeal has been filed against the order of the Division Bench of the High Court finding the appellants guilty of willful disobedience of the order passed in Writ Petition in respect to the levy made while upholding Section 21 of the Assam Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1972. In appeal, they contended that there was absolutely no material to implicate the appellants with the alleged action of their subordinates.

Learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the second appellant was transferred on 23.07.2008 and the appellant no. 1 was in-charge only till 21.01.2009. The first appellant died on 27.02.2017. There is no willful and deliberate violation of the order involved. The High Court has erred in going into the facts in appreciating evidence. It exceeded its jurisdiction which it declined to exercise even while invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It could have relegated the members of the respondent no.1 to go before the committee constituted. There is absolutely no material to implicate the appellants with the alleged action of their subordinates. The concept of vicarious liability is alien to a contempt jurisdiction.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the press release followed by the failure on the part of officials working under the appellants would clearly show the intention to circumvent the orders passed by the Court. Materials were accordingly produced. It is a case of deliberate attempt to overcome the judgment of the Court, notwithstanding the adequate knowledge. As the High Court has considered the relevant materials, there is no need to interfere with the reasoned order passed.

Court’s observation

The bench, at the very outset, observed, "We are dealing with a civil contempt. The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 explains a civil contempt to mean a willful disobedience of a decision of the Court. Therefore, what is relevant is the "willful" disobedience. Knowledge acquires substantial importance qua a contempt order. Merely because a subordinate official acted in disregard of an order passed by the Court, liability cannot be fastened on a higher official in the absence of knowledge. When two views are possible, the element of willfulness vanishes as it involves a mental element. It is a deliberate, conscious, and intentional act. What is required is proof beyond reasonable doubt since the proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature. Similarly, when a distinct mechanism is provided and that too, in the same judgment alleged to have been violated, a party has to exhaust the same before approaching the court in the exercise of its jurisdiction under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. It is well open to the said party to contend that the benefit of the order passed has not been actually given, through separate proceedings while seeking appropriate relief but certainly not by way of a contempt proceeding."

The bench said that while dealing with a contempt petition, the Court is not expected to conduct a roving inquiry and go beyond the very judgment which was allegedly violated. The bench then referred to observations made in  Hukum Chand Deswal v. Satish Raj Deswal.

The court observed that there is no material to either establish their knowledge on the action of their subordinates, or that they acted in collusion with each other.

The bench setting aside the High Courts order observed, "10....Vicarious liability as a principle cannot be applied to a case of contempt. The question as to whether the drivers of two members of respondent no.1 showed the order passed by the court and the documents produced are true and genuine being in the realm of adjudication, ought not to have been taken up by the High Court while exercising contempt jurisdiction."


Document:


Courtesy/By: Aditya BAgrawal  |  25 Nov 2021     Views:554

News Updates

Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:694
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:655
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:525
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:618
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:685
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:595
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:352
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:436
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:343
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:325
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:479
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:347
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:376
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:342
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:372
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:337
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:345
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:341
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:360
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:402
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:419
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:408
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:807
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:468
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:427
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:2670
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:381
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:555
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:367
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:389
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:420
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:358
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:460
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:393
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:469
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:565
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:881
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:2441
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:361
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:398
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:729
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:294
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:388
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:1205
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:712
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:585
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:558
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:467
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:368
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:578
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:463
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:393
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:698
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:427
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:341
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:505
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:387
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:379
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:363
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:1188
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:1005
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:512
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:389
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:550
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:345
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:410
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:395
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:538
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:982
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:819
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:1195
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:698
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:775
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:997
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:918
Supreme Court sends a notice about a petition for ...
09 Jan 2023     Views:992
The Meghalaya High Court's hold on the MoU definin...
08 Jan 2023     Views:995
Google's appeal of the ?1,337 crore fine from the ...
04 Jan 2023     Views:404
SC Issues Notice In A Batch Of Pleas Challenging T...
03 Jan 2023     Views:522
The Supreme Court rejects appeals against the 2016...
02 Jan 2023     Views:512
Chanda Kochhar and her husband Deepak Kochhar rema...
01 Jan 2023     Views:590
Gender Discrimination in intestate succession unde...
29 Dec 2022     Views:863
Section 300 CrPC BarTrial of a Person Not Only for...
29 Dec 2022     Views:749
Centre Informs Rajya Sabha That There Is No Propos...
28 Dec 2022     Views:526
Calcutta High Court: Depriving wife of her Stridha...
27 Dec 2022     Views:734
Sec 498A: An Apology should be tempered with genui...
24 Dec 2022     Views:523
Kerala High Court: Search engines like Google cann...
23 Dec 2022     Views:657
Rules of the Game Cannot be Changed After the Game...
23 Dec 2022     Views:3087
Bombay High Court: Social Media has become an impo...
21 Dec 2022     Views:644
Calcutta High Court Grants Bail to Murder Accused ...
19 Dec 2022     Views:594
Sec 438 CrPC: Anticipatory Bail Plea is Not Mainta...
19 Dec 2022     Views:995
Rights of secured creditors under SARFAESI, Recove...
18 Dec 2022     Views:499
Can a man accuse his wife of domestic violence? De...
17 Dec 2022     Views:889
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BAIL PROVISIONS UNDER THE IND...
15 Dec 2022     Views:967
Guardianship of an illegitimate minor granted to h...
14 Dec 2022     Views:507
Under the POCSO Act, rehabilitation of the victim ...
14 Dec 2022     Views:522
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BAIL PROVISIONS UNDER THE IND...
13 Dec 2022     Views:1372
The current collegium system shouldn't be abandone...
10 Dec 2022     Views:531
Framing of a uniform marriage code applicable to a...
09 Dec 2022     Views:776
Telangana High Court: Appropriation of a Decree of...
07 Dec 2022     Views:564
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:90916
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:64684
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:64291
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:63776
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:52248
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

Allow Cookies!

By using our website, you agree to the use of cookies

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1127 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.