Back

Granting preference to “self-help groups” in allotment of fair price shop is unconstitutional- Allahabad High Court

Courtesy/By: YASHASVI SHARMA | 25 May 2021 Views:69

In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court on Monday held that granting preference to “self-help groups” in allotment of fair price shop is unconstitutional and ultra vires to the provisions of National Food Security Act and UP Panchayati Raj Act. The court said that the right to food is a fundamental right and no one should die of hunger. (Haripal v. State of UP)

In doing so, the Court held that the judiciary owes a legal obligation to ensure that the State supplies good quality food grains to underprivileged citizens.

Right to food is a fundamental right and no one should die of hunger and the Court would be failing in its duty if it fails to notice the plight of underprivileged people during the pandemic, the Court added.

A single-judge Bench of Justice AR Masoodi, therefore, quashed a government order of July 7, 2020, which gave preference to self-help groups in allotment of fair price shops, and excluded all other categories of persons.

"This Court, for the observations made above, has no hesitation to hold that the Government order dated July 7, 2020, insofar as it excludes the consideration of persons other than Self-help Groups is discriminatory and is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The impugned Government order dated July 7, 2020, also offends the mandate of Section 12(2(e) of the Act, 2013 as well as Clause 7(2) of the Control Order, 2016 issued by the State Government."

In this regard, the Court also requested the Supreme Court which is dealing with suo motu petitions, to "include consideration on the issue of distribution of food grains to the vulnerable section" of people and ensure the accountability of governance in relation to quantity and quality-related issues.

The following questions were taken into consideration by the Court to determine the validity of the government order:

(i) Whether for the grant of licenses for carrying out the objects of Public Distribution System, it is the government order dated August 5, 2019, which is to operate or the so-called supplementary government order dated July 7, 2020, running in conflict with the earlier government order occupying the field and as to whether the impugned government order stands the tests of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and does not offend the mandate of Section 12 (2)(e) of the Food Security Act, 2013;

(ii) Whether the contemplation and enforcement of exclusive preference in favor of self-help groups by means of the government order dated July 7, 2020, that too by sidetracking the role of Gaon Sabhas is not in violation of the mandate of Article 14 read with Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India as well as the relevant statute;

(iii) Whether a self-help group without having a juristic character would nevertheless be eligible and would fall within the scope of a public body or public institution for the purposes of allotment of fair price shop in the State of UP.

The Court in this regard opined that the rural population has suffered much on account of the non-supply of food grains which has ultimately led to food scams.

"The State Government has not projected any clarity in the matter of Self-help groups except that they are granted a unique identity number by some agency known as 'National Rural Livelihood Development Mission'. Mere allotment of a unique ID by National Rural Livelihood Development Mission for the purposes of grant of license to run a fair price shop on behalf of the State is not enough."

Summary

After considering the questions the Court said that the government order of July 7, 2020, offends the mandate of Section 12(2(e) of the Food Security Act, 2013 and Clause 7(2) of the Control Order, 2016 issued by the Uttar Pradesh State Government.

It ruled that the government order is against the competitive spirit of Section 12(2)(e) of the National Food Security Act, 2013 and seeks to "create a monopoly in favor of the self-help groups having a weak legal identity for the purposes of fixing accountability."

Hence, it held that any such body is susceptible to worsen the objects of the Public Distribution System instead of bringing about any reform.

It further ruled that the government order is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution since it excludes the participation of eligible village residents and other juristic persons such as cooperative societies or Gram Panchayats at par with the self-help groups.

Document:

Courtesy/By: YASHASVI SHARMA | 25 May 2021 Views:69

News Updates

Madras HC: “The Courts shall not provide an unne...

23 Jun 2021 Views:60

[Vikas Dubey Encounter] Allahabad High Court dismi...

22 Jun 2021 Views:55

Madhya Pradesh HC: "Adjudicating authority" is sta...

22 Jun 2021 Views:52

Gujarat liquor prohibition case...

22 Jun 2021 Views:57

Karnataka HC: “Merely because there are three ot...

22 Jun 2021 Views:79

Custody of Minor given to maternal Grandmother ove...

22 Jun 2021 Views:83

Personal laws not above POSCO: Karnataka HC denied...

22 Jun 2021 Views:67

DIN cannot be deactivated solely for disqualificat...

21 Jun 2021 Views:58

"Denial in trial constitutes denial in justice": C...

21 Jun 2021 Views:59

Journalist alleged of cheating depositors through ...

21 Jun 2021 Views:51

Delhi HC: Chinese women accused of smuggling Forei...

21 Jun 2021 Views:56

Uttarakhand High Court Seeks Details from the Stat...

20 Jun 2021 Views:49

Uttarakhand High Court: Directions Issued Under Se...

20 Jun 2021 Views:62

Society can’t interfere on individual’s decisi...

20 Jun 2021 Views:60

"Easy access to courts, especially through PIL, is...

20 Jun 2021 Views:53

Bombay High Court grants ad-interim relief in favo...

20 Jun 2021 Views:61

Punjab and Haryana court to form a panel to resolv...

19 Jun 2021 Views:65

Karnataka HC: “It cannot be expected that passen...

19 Jun 2021 Views:50

Madras High Court Observes: Petitioner Needs Psych...

19 Jun 2021 Views:122

"Advocates not above law:" Madras High Court...

19 Jun 2021 Views:118

The state of Madhya Pradesh has granted bail to a ...

19 Jun 2021 Views:157

Deputy Secretary working in the BDA allegedly accu...

19 Jun 2021 Views:73

Kerala High Court dismissed petition against Draft...

18 Jun 2021 Views:74

Karnataka HC quashes the proceedings against the C...

18 Jun 2021 Views:73

Child pornography can only be tackled by inculcati...

18 Jun 2021 Views:63

Delhi High Court :Pinjara tod Student activists r...

18 Jun 2021 Views:84

Bombay HC on Business Partner murder case. ...

18 Jun 2021 Views:62

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL For Action Aga...

18 Jun 2021 Views:63

Karnataka High Court grants default bail to 115 UA...

18 Jun 2021 Views:134

Karnataka High Court Dismissed A Bail Plea By A Ra...

17 Jun 2021 Views:84

Karnataka HC: “It is not in dispute with regard ...

17 Jun 2021 Views:103

Tussle between police and advocates over lockdown ...

16 Jun 2021 Views:87

Bombay High Court :BCCI Wins the Legal Battle Agai...

16 Jun 2021 Views:119

Center tells Supreme Court :...

16 Jun 2021 Views:82

CAT: Sunil Kumar vs. NPC...

16 Jun 2021 Views:71

Madras HC: Request for conversion to drawback-cum-...

16 Jun 2021 Views:71

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal could not refuse t...

16 Jun 2021 Views:80

Plea challenging Office Memorandum suggesting guid...

16 Jun 2021 Views:101

The Madras High Court orders the accused to pay t...

15 Jun 2021 Views:59

Delhi High Court: Law firm are not allowed to writ...

14 Jun 2021 Views:70

Failure to disclose liability of drawer, supply li...

14 Jun 2021 Views:71

Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To A Journalist W...

12 Jun 2021 Views:69

Ltd. Col. S. Bajaj vs. State of Uttarakhand & Col....

12 Jun 2021 Views:71

No encroachments should be allowed on footpaths...

12 Jun 2021 Views:81

Judgment of conviction and order passes by Trial c...

12 Jun 2021 Views:61

Law schools must mandatorily conduct end term exam...

11 Jun 2021 Views:58

"It would not be appropriate to keep the appellan...

11 Jun 2021 Views:55

Women Allegedly abused and defamed by police offic...

11 Jun 2021 Views:61

Detention order quashed after filing of Habeas Cor...

11 Jun 2021 Views:62

''No fundamental right is conferred on any religio...

10 Jun 2021 Views:116

Kerala HC: Bank account of petitioner cannot be se...

10 Jun 2021 Views:117

Kerala High Court ruled physicians qualified in ho...

10 Jun 2021 Views:103

Allahabad High Court grants protection to the coup...

10 Jun 2021 Views:92

Punjab and Haryana HC denies bail in view of causi...

10 Jun 2021 Views:106

Telangana High Court: Trial Court Orders u/s 239 C...

10 Jun 2021 Views:90

Manipur High Court: If an individual already works...

09 Jun 2021 Views:67

Punjab and Haryana Court said it's couple decision...

09 Jun 2021 Views:97

Ignorance is no justification for normalizing disc...

09 Jun 2021 Views:112

Delhi High Court: Filing of criminal charges again...

08 Jun 2021 Views:78

Information of Dominos Pizza customers hacked- Del...

07 Jun 2021 Views:96

'346 Journalists Died Due to COVID- 19': Plea in ...

07 Jun 2021 Views:60

Bombay High Court: Liability of the Union to Repl...

06 Jun 2021 Views:60

Delhi High Court grants interim bail to an inmate ...

05 Jun 2021 Views:61

Kerala High Court States That The False Accusation...

04 Jun 2021 Views:56

Supreme Court Upholds the Provisions of IBC Relat...

04 Jun 2021 Views:59

Delhi High Court Rules That Independent Evaluation...

04 Jun 2021 Views:54

Karnataka Court Denies Bail To A Police Sub-Inspec...

03 Jun 2021 Views:195

Gauhati High Court issues an order to assist sex...

03 Jun 2021 Views:76

Delhi High Court dismissed the plea seeking suspen...

02 Jun 2021 Views:112

Karnataka HC Allows Petition Relating to Retiremen...

02 Jun 2021 Views:149

Lakshadweep Protests : Kerala High Court Issues Or...

02 Jun 2021 Views:159

NCLT will have five acting Presidents in 11 days i...

02 Jun 2021 Views:114

Narada Sting case: Calcutta High Court hears CBI t...

02 Jun 2021 Views:138

Calcutta High Court grants interim bail to four Tr...

01 Jun 2021 Views:142

Extramarital affair not ground to assume woman wou...

01 Jun 2021 Views:110

Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To A Rape Accused...

01 Jun 2021 Views:140

PIL Highlighting New Issues Relating to COVID-19...

01 Jun 2021 Views:82

Order for an Investigation Against a GST offender...

01 Jun 2021 Views:82

Hoped that the target is met sooner than later:" ...

01 Jun 2021 Views:93

Gareeb Nawaz Mosque Demolition: Allahabad High Cou...

01 Jun 2021 Views:114

“No roll out till certified safe”. Juhi Chawl...

01 Jun 2021 Views:113

Delhi HC Quashes Two Orders Preventing Private Sch...

31 May 2021 Views:164

Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Government to Dis...

31 May 2021 Views:78

The Punjab and Haryana High Court Rebukes the Poli...

31 May 2021 Views:94

‘Order 3 Women Judges From Bar in Kerala High Co...

31 May 2021 Views:78

Allahabad HC Says "Compromise Or Marriage With Acc...

30 May 2021 Views:107

Karnataka High Court: ‘No Objection Certificate'...

30 May 2021 Views:109

All 13 convictions acquitted by the Patna High Co...

30 May 2021 Views:91

Supreme Court held that in exceptional situations,...

29 May 2021 Views:116

Delhi High Court remands Sushil Kumar to four days...

29 May 2021 Views:64

"Karnataka High Court pulls up police commissione...

28 May 2021 Views:114

Gauhati High Court seeks response from Assam gover...

27 May 2021 Views:78

Gauhati High Court: ‘Big-Hearted’ University P...

26 May 2021 Views:65

Bombay High Court: Section 11BB of the Central Exc...

26 May 2021 Views:73

Delhi High Court restrains the illegal circulation...

26 May 2021 Views:87

Right to be forgotten- Delhi High Court directs go...

25 May 2021 Views:74

Business Promotional Expense, Whether Effective or...

25 May 2021 Views:63

Allahabad High Court Allows One Surety for Nine Ba...

25 May 2021 Views:67

Granting preference to “self-help groups” in a...

25 May 2021 Views:69

Vacation Bench can only decide bail applications, ...

25 May 2021 Views:70

+Clients Back

+Lawyers

+Law Students

+Law Schools

Latest News

Granting preference to “self-help groups” in allotment of fair price shop is unconstitutional- Allahabad High Court

News Updates

Lawyers Network

Users

Cities Serving

Law Schools Network

Law Students Network