• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Refund of the fines collected by the UP Govt against the Anti-CAA Protestors.

Latest News

Back

Refund of the fines collected by the UP Govt against the Anti-CAA Protestors.

Courtesy/By: Sindhu S  |  20 Feb 2022     Views:456

Refund of the fines collected by the UP Govt against the Anti-CAA Protestors.

Uttar Pradesh government informed the Supreme Court on Friday that they have withdrawn the recovery notice issued against the anti CAA protesters. The Supreme court appreciated the gesture of the state government and ordered UP Government to refund the fines collected from the protestors in lieu of damaging Public Property during the Anti CAA protest.

Facts and background of the case:

  • In December 2019, the State government of UP sent recovery notices to the anti CAA protestors who were accused of damaging the Public Property
  • The state government arbitrarily sent recovery notices to anti CAA Protestors and collected the fines from the protestors and also attached their property for recovery of fine
  • Aggrieved by this arbitrary act of the state government Parwaiz Arif Titu filed a writ petition against the state of Uttar Pradesh in 2020
  • above petition was filed by the petitioner Parwaiz Arif Titu claiming that the actions taken by the state government are against the guidelines given by the Apex court
  • In Re: Destruction of Public and Private Properties v. Govt of A.P. and Kodungallur Film Society v. Union of India apex court has given guidelines to be followed by the state government while taking actions against the damages caused by protestors to public property
  • In the above cases, the court provided that whenever there is no legislation regarding the collection of fine or recovery of fine in connection to the damages occurred to public property
  1. The state government must constitute a committee
  2. The committee should consist of retired Judges as a claim commissioner
  3. The sitting or retired high court judge i.e., the claim commissioner should assess damages in public property and fix the liability
  • The petitioner filed the above writ petition claiming that the UP government did not follow the above guidelines issued by the Apex court because the recovery notices and the liability of damages were fixed by the Additional District Magistrate (ADM) who has no authority to do the same as the retired judge must act as claim commissioner and fix the damages
  • When the court questioned the UP government regarding the same Garima Prasad advocate general appearing for the UP government submitted that 106 FIRs was registered against 833 protestors who participated in the anti CAA protest and issued 247 recovery notice to those who were part of the mob in accordance with the order passed by the ADM.
  • After the dues submissions made by the advocate general the court asked the state government that “you have become complainant, you have become witness, you have become a prosecutor and then you attach properties of people. Is it permissible under any law?”
  • On 15 February Court ordered the UP government to “withdraw the recovery notices or we will quash it for being in violation of the law laid down by this court”
  • On 19th February the advocate general appeared on behalf of the UP government and informed that the 247 recovery notices are withdrawn then the court-ordered UP state to refund the fine collected by the UP government from the alleged protestors.
  • Garima prasad argued before the court that the public will get a wrong message if the fine collected against the damages caused to public property is Refunded instead, she asked the court to issue status quo because, according to the new bill i.e., Uttar Pradesh Recovery of damages to public and private property Bill the tribunals are set up to decide the matter hence until tribunal access and fix damages the court may issue status quo instead of refunding the fine.
  • The court was not impressed by these arguments and ordered the government to refund the fine as the recovery notices are issued against the due process of law. Recovery notices were issued to people who were dead 6 years back and to people of 90 years of age and fines are collected by very poor people like vegetable vendors hence the court asked up government to refund the same as it is against the due process of law.
  • The court has given the liberty to UP State Government to issue fresh recovery notices in accordance with the new Act i.e., Uttar Pradesh Recovery of damages to public and private property Bill and to follow due process of law while issuing recovery notices and claiming damages.

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Sindhu S  |  20 Feb 2022     Views:456

News Updates

Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:61
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:62
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:54
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:65
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:88
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:83
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:149
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:87
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:131
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:128
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:203
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:157
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:114
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:147
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:128
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:98
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:109
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:228
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:304
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:194
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:238
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:172
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:166
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:265
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:208
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:172
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:225
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:244
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:135
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:243
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:147
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:208
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:151
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:201
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:245
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:284
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:202
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:315
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:159
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:203
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:202
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:205
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:805
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:580
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:950
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:464
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:542
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:573
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:527
Supreme Court sends a notice about a petition for ...
09 Jan 2023     Views:767
The Meghalaya High Court's hold on the MoU definin...
08 Jan 2023     Views:779
Google's appeal of the ?1,337 crore fine from the ...
04 Jan 2023     Views:239
SC Issues Notice In A Batch Of Pleas Challenging T...
03 Jan 2023     Views:313
The Supreme Court rejects appeals against the 2016...
02 Jan 2023     Views:304
Chanda Kochhar and her husband Deepak Kochhar rema...
01 Jan 2023     Views:330
Gender Discrimination in intestate succession unde...
29 Dec 2022     Views:550
Section 300 CrPC BarTrial of a Person Not Only for...
29 Dec 2022     Views:420
Centre Informs Rajya Sabha That There Is No Propos...
28 Dec 2022     Views:308
Calcutta High Court: Depriving wife of her Stridha...
27 Dec 2022     Views:461
Sec 498A: An Apology should be tempered with genui...
24 Dec 2022     Views:288
Kerala High Court: Search engines like Google cann...
23 Dec 2022     Views:384
Rules of the Game Cannot be Changed After the Game...
23 Dec 2022     Views:1161
Bombay High Court: Social Media has become an impo...
21 Dec 2022     Views:436
Calcutta High Court Grants Bail to Murder Accused ...
19 Dec 2022     Views:372
Sec 438 CrPC: Anticipatory Bail Plea is Not Mainta...
19 Dec 2022     Views:538
Rights of secured creditors under SARFAESI, Recove...
18 Dec 2022     Views:296
Can a man accuse his wife of domestic violence? De...
17 Dec 2022     Views:575
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BAIL PROVISIONS UNDER THE IND...
15 Dec 2022     Views:579
Guardianship of an illegitimate minor granted to h...
14 Dec 2022     Views:279
Under the POCSO Act, rehabilitation of the victim ...
14 Dec 2022     Views:292
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BAIL PROVISIONS UNDER THE IND...
13 Dec 2022     Views:773
The current collegium system shouldn't be abandone...
10 Dec 2022     Views:336
Framing of a uniform marriage code applicable to a...
09 Dec 2022     Views:421
Telangana High Court: Appropriation of a Decree of...
07 Dec 2022     Views:281
Appointment Cannot Be Denied Merely Because The Ca...
06 Dec 2022     Views:484
FIR has been Lodged for Settling Monetary Dispute-...
06 Dec 2022     Views:339
Form 16 Issued By Employer Is Reliable Evidence To...
06 Dec 2022     Views:754
Bombay high court issued instructions in a PIL loo...
06 Dec 2022     Views:576
CA Cannot Be Prosecuted for ingenuine documents su...
05 Dec 2022     Views:485
Bombay High Court Slams Maharashtra's State Mental...
04 Dec 2022     Views:206
Ex-parte order passed by Delhi High Court for prot...
04 Dec 2022     Views:266
AFTER HAVING CONSENSUAL INTERCOURSE, DECLINING TO ...
30 Nov 2022     Views:460
Allahabad HC Rules That Marriage Certificate Issue...
29 Nov 2022     Views:493
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT ASKS BCI TO REPLY TO THE PLEA ...
28 Nov 2022     Views:215
Second and Successive Anticipatory Bail Applicatio...
26 Nov 2022     Views:302
Court Sentences Man To Six-Month Imprisonment For ...
26 Nov 2022     Views:215
Delhi High Court awards grande legal costs of Rs. ...
24 Nov 2022     Views:314
What Will Happen If Lawyers Go on Strike and Meet ...
23 Nov 2022     Views:274
KERALA HC HELD THAT HUSBAND IS LIABLE FOR SEX WITH...
23 Nov 2022     Views:1250
SC Refuses To Entertain Plea Seeking Two Child Pol...
22 Nov 2022     Views:247
DUE TO DISTRICT JUDGES' RELUCTANCE TO GRANT BAIL O...
21 Nov 2022     Views:208
Supreme Court seeks Union Government to answer a p...
21 Nov 2022     Views:285
SOCIETY'S OUTRAGE NOT GROUND TO SUPPRESS FREE SPEE...
20 Nov 2022     Views:254
Plea for guidelines on seizure of digital device...
19 Nov 2022     Views:285
MLA Poaching case...
19 Nov 2022     Views:211
Supreme Court stays Bombay High Court's observatio...
18 Nov 2022     Views:309
P&H HC SAYS, CHEQUE BOUNCE COMPLAINT FILED ON THE ...
16 Nov 2022     Views:245
J&K will always be part of India; Civil society gr...
15 Nov 2022     Views:250
POCSO not meant to criminalise consensual romantic...
14 Nov 2022     Views:296
CONTEMPT OF COURT CAN’T BE ISSUED ON THE SHEER G...
14 Nov 2022     Views:311
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:90588
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:62902
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:62838
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:56652
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:50903
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

Allow Cookies!

By using our website, you agree to the use of cookies

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1127 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.