• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • Compensation for custodial death: Bindita @ Bindikta Devi v. State of Jharkhand & Ors. (2019)

Latest News

Back

Compensation for custodial death: Bindita @ Bindikta Devi v. State of Jharkhand & Ors. (2019)

Courtesy/By: Ashwin Satheesh  |  30 Oct 2020     Views:1068

Date of judgement: 13/12/2019

Court: High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi

 

Facts:

Manraj Tirkey was arrested on the 22nd of December 2005 by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sector XII, Bokaro. He was thereafter brutally assaulted in custody and later admitted to a hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries on the 28th of December, 2005. In 2006, the matter went to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and was subsequently handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), for its report. The Report affirmed the allegations of unlawful detention in addition to assault under custody. The action was taken against the responsible officers under the Indian Penal Code, and the State of Jharkhand compensated the victim’s family for a sum of Rs. 5,00,000 on directions by the NHRC.

The present case is a writ petition by Bindikta Devi, the mother of the victim, seeking a compensation of Rs. 50,00,000 from the State of Jharkhand for the custodial death of her son.

 

Judgement:

The two police officers responsible for the incident were already held liable for criminal conspiracy under section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, voluntarily causing hurt under section 323 and wrongful confinement under section 343 by a court of competent jurisdiction. The counsel for the petitioner contested that it was a proven case of custodial death in light of the orders passed under multiple documentary evidence, charge-sheet by the CBI and the payment of Rs. 5,00,000 by the State. However, they submitted that it was a settled principle not to award compensation for custodial deaths but sought exemplary damages to act as a deterrent against the public officers.

The respondents countered the claim by stating that a Trial Court in 2010 had acquitted the accused of the charge under section 304 and refuted the claim of it being a custodial death. The Honourable Court recognised that the victim was subjected to illegal detention by the authorities and the same was supported by evidence from lie detection tests. The verdict passed by the Trial Court on 10/05/2010 also made it evident that the proceedings were unable to establish the essential ingredients for murder under Section 304 whereas they were held liable for Sections 120B, 323, 343. The petitioners’ claim on the same being custodial death was derivative and relied on the Charge sheet by the CBI and verdict by the NHRC whereas the offence under 304 was negated by the Trial Court.

The Court was posed with the issue of comparing and weighing the material evidence on record supporting custodial death on one hand and the verdict of the Tribunal that acquitted the accused from Section 304 on the other. It was opined that the matter could not be seen as a matter of custodial death due to the conclusive evidence reached by the Trial Court with regard to section 304. The petitioners later brought to the notice of the court that they had challenged the verdict passed by the Trial Court and the High Court had the jurisdiction to pass an appropriate direction in that regard.

It was held that while passing an order in this regard, the court could do so only on the basis of material evidence and undisputed facts and it was not the jurisdiction of the court to pass a direction under writ jurisdiction when there was a controversy. The learned judge also added that the mere fact that an appeal was pending against the Trial Court order could not be treated as a replacement to the actual verdict. A presumption of merit of fact attributable to the petitioner was not sufficient ground for the court to use its extraordinary jurisdiction of awarding compensation.

The petitioner was already paid a sum of Rs. 5,00,000 by the State of Jharkhand and the court deemed it appropriate not to interfere with the monetary damages already compensated and held it would not provide any aid to the petitioner as it had already been given.

The right to compensation under Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution was established in the case of Rudul Sah v State of Bihar wherein the learned judges held that the compensatory amount was to act as a palliative. [1] Infringements of fundamental rights are retributed by means of compensation by the imposition of tortious liability on the state and thus precluding the state from seeking the defence of sovereign immunity. [2] Punishments that are too cruel and torturous are prima facie unconstitutional and cannot be defended. [3] Illegal arrests and detentions are flagrant violations of a person's fundamental rights, for which the state is strictly liable.

The late Manraj Tirkey was subject to cruel punishment and inhumanely treatment in addition to being illegally detained resulting in his untimely death. A plethora of his rights and liberties were forsaken as a result of the state's action and even by causing hurt, the sacred nature of his human rights was infringed upon. However, the inability to attribute the offence under Section 304 of the IPC resulted in the High Court’s viewing of the matter, not as one of custodial death.

 

Conclusion:

The learned single judge bench of the High Court deemed it appropriate not to interfere with the compensation already paid by the State by virtue of the directions of the NHRC but also added that it would not order the additional compensation of Rs. 50,00,000 sought by the petitioner due to the conclusive findings of the Trial Court. This case tackles the issue of the weighing of two sources of evidence whereby on the one hand there are supporting documents whereas, on the other, a competent court has upheld the same. Nonetheless, it was added that the petitioners could file against the order seeking compensation if the appeal against the decision of the Trial Court could attribute affixation of penalty under section 304 of the IPC against the accused.

Quantum of compensation is one that varies on a case to case basis. [4] From the perspective of the findings of the Trial Court and the NHRC, Rs. 5,00,000 was awarded for unlawful detention, causing of hurt and gross violation of fundamental rights. India currently lacks a statute for ascertaining the quantum of compensation and this has resulted in a lack of uniformity while awarding damages. [5] Articles 20, 21 and 22 are in a Trinity with regard to the matter of arrests. Violation of provisions under these articles or the guidelines set out in DK Basu v. State of West Bengal encompasses the right of compensation to an aggrieved. With regard to the present matter, had the issue of custodial death remained undisputed, the court would have had the power to pass an award for greater compensation.

 

 

[1] Rudul Sah v. State of Bihar, AIR 1983 SC 1086.

[2] Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa, (1993) 2 SCC 746.

[3] Inderjeet v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1979 SC 1867.

[4] Sube Singh v. State of Haryana and Ors., AIR 2006 SC 1117.

[5] Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Upahaar Tragedy Victims Association & Ors., (2011) 14 SCC 481.


Document:


Courtesy/By: Ashwin Satheesh  |  30 Oct 2020     Views:1068

News Updates

Judging the Judges: India's Three-Year Practice Ru...
15 Jul 2025     Views:548
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Torts: A Modern ...
09 Nov 2024     Views:5102
The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:6274
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5670
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5652
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5453
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5474
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:5122
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5486
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5475
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5599
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5781
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5491
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5452
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5405
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5530
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5482
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5817
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5638
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6491
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5601
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5944
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5846
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:6030
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5881
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5993
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5783
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:9202
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7721
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7759
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7544
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8532
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7857
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6386
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:7184
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6436
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6442
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6700
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6385
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6369
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6414
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6390
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6740
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6228
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6266
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6714
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6918
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6493
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6926
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8940
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6918
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6579
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:12262
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6293
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:7161
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6730
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6442
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6672
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6303
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6759
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6422
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6864
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:7095
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7326
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:11210
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6514
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6391
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7534
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6233
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6242
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7835
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6773
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6317
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6363
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6314
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8413
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6600
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6234
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:6085
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:7178
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:6109
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6539
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6366
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:6046
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:6037
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:6207
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8653
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7252
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6318
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:6034
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6253
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5804
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:6034
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5860
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6470
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6590
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6310
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6785
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:6090
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6236
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96549
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:74140
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71552
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70691
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:60066
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.