• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • Vetindia Pharmaceuticals v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

Latest News

Back

Vetindia Pharmaceuticals v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

Courtesy/By: Azhaan Kamaal  |  19 Nov 2020     Views:1160

The appeal has been filed in the Supreme Court by the appellant, who is aggrieved by the indefinite order of blacklisting dated on 8th September 2009. The High Court dismissed the writ petition only on the ground of delay, as the Writ petition was filed after 10 years.

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant holds a valid license under the Drugs and Cosmetic Acts, 1940 hereinafter referred to as the Act in Form 28, Rule 76 issued by the Drugs Control Administration. Private limited had obtained supplies from Vetindia Pharmaceuticals in the year 2007 and in return supplied tender to the respondent under a tender notice dated 4th October 2006. The label on the injection 'XYO 701' was an unintentional error. The brand name correctly mentioned was 'OXY 125'. The component was correctly mentioned as Oxytetracycline IP Vet 125 mg. Only word Hcl was only missing on the label. Because of that, it was a case of an unintentional printing error which turned into a misbranding. The product was not substandard or fake veterinary medicine.

The appellant was served with an order of blacklisting dated 8th September 2009 by the office of Director, Animal Husbandry Department, declaring the batch supplied by the appellant to be substandard quality, violating clause 8.12 and 8.23 of the tender of 2006-2007. Misbranding was referred to as an unintentional error. The respondents required certain clarification which was given to them on 4th May 2019 but there was no outcome to that. The blacklisting order caused a great loss to the appellant as the tender was rejected by the government of Rajasthan because of the blacklisting reasons. The respondent did not initiate proceedings against the appellant under Sec 23,25,26 and 27 of the Act.

The explanation given for the delay has not been properly considered. The blacklisting order is violative of the principles of natural justice. The learned counsel has relied on the judgement of Gorakha Security Services v. Government NCT of Delhi and ors (2014) to submit that the show cause notice did not meet the requirement of the law. Further, the counsel relied on Daffodils Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. the State of U.P and ors (2019) that the debarment of four years is sufficient.

The learned counsel for the respondents submitted the Writ petition was dismissed on the ground of inordinate delay of 10 years in challenging the blacklisting order. The medicine was misbranded in terms of Sec 9 of the Act supported by the report of the analyst. Therefore, the impugned orders merit no interference.

Court after listening to both the parties are satisfied that the petition is to be allowed. Since the appellant has a license for manufacturing. The drugs which are in question have been misbranded and not fake. The appellant took the plea of an unintentional printing error on the label. The appellate tried to clear the matter with the respondents. The appellant requested for allowing them to participate in further tenders. The respondent rejected the request on the ground that there was a violation of clause 8.12 and 8.23 of the tender. Because of the blacklisting order, the appellant was not allowed to participate in the tender given by the government of Rajasthan.

According to the facts of the case, it is clear that the injection was not supplied to the respondent by the appellant. The show-cause did not state the action why blacklisting was to be taken or was under contemplation. Invoking clause 8.12 and 8.23 is a fundamental flaw in the absence of any supply. Even after the appellant brought the facts to the attention of the reapondents, they refused to pay attention.

There is no doubt that the High Court in its jurisdiction may decline the Writ petition on the ground of delay in filing the petition. The power vested in the Court under Article 226 of the constitution has to be exercised after considering all the pros and cons of the matter, including nature and the explanation for the delay in filing the petition and to see if any 3rd party rights have been intervened. The Supreme Court in case of Basanti prasad v. Bihar School Examination Board and ors (2009), referring to Maharashtra SRTC v. Balwant Regular Motor Vehicle Service (1969), Moon Mills Ltd. v. Industrial Court (1967), held that if the delay is properly explained to the court and is reasonable and without the interference of any 3rd party rights being effected, the Court may excise the delay.

Further, the Court is of the view that the contention of the respondents that they have acted by the Act followed by the report of the misbranded product has no merit of consideration.

After carefully examining the circumstances and facts of the case the Court has concluded that the Writ petition is not barred by unexplained delay as the appellant has been pursuing the matter with the authorities. Further, the High Court has been mistaken in dismissing the writ petition on the ground of delay. Further, the order dated 8th September 2009 of the respondent to be set aside.

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Azhaan Kamaal  |  19 Nov 2020     Views:1160

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:5994
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5418
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5397
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5189
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5214
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4861
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5245
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5235
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5353
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5538
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5244
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5219
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5171
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5289
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5247
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5572
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5400
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6238
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5364
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5707
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5608
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5799
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5650
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5764
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5551
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:8936
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7481
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7522
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7319
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8275
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7620
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6161
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:6935
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6199
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6205
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6451
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6153
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6133
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6181
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6147
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6505
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6003
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6031
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6477
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6674
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6250
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6687
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8659
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6685
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6347
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:11990
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6068
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6920
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6496
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6198
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6431
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6071
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6521
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6194
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6640
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6853
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7080
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:10971
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6290
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6156
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7283
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6003
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6017
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7595
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6543
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6094
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6138
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6084
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8185
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6364
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6006
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5857
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:6945
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5881
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6296
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6136
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5821
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5819
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:5979
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8411
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7020
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6102
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5815
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6023
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5589
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5808
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5640
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6239
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6358
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6086
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6564
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5868
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6006
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6593
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6332
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96317
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73888
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71303
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70439
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59802
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.