• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • K.S. PUTTASWAMY AND OTHERS V UNION OF INDIA

Latest News

Back

K.S. PUTTASWAMY AND OTHERS V UNION OF INDIA

Courtesy/By: Smaranika Sen  |  21 Nov 2020     Views:858

This case is one of the landmark cases in the history of India. This case is popularly known as the AADHAAR case. This case mainly deals with the constitutional validity of the fundamental right I.e. the Right To Privacy and it also deals about the validity of AADHAAR in our lives. This case is considered one of the lengthiest and longest-running cases in the history of the Supreme Court of India.

The issue of this case or the challenges regarding this case can be divided into two parts; first, the challenges to Executive's Scheme dated 28.01.2009, notified by the Government of India, by which the Unique Identification Authority of India also referred as UIDAI was constituted to implement the UIDAI scheme. Secondly, the challenge to the AADHAAR Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services Act 2016.

AADHAAR being the crucial factor of the case, let us analyze the meaning of it or what does it aim. Unique makes you the only one is the central message of AADHAAR and it is the altar facing a constitutional challenge in these petitions. National Identity Project was authorised by UIDAI. In simple words, in AADHAAR, the biometric information of Indian residents are collected like the fingerprint scan, retina scan, facial scan etc, and also demographic information is collected and thereby a twelve-digit unique identification number is given. The main aim of the AADHAAR was to enhance efficiency in public service and to curb corruption. The information was stored by the Government of India. Later on, the Government started to use AADHAAR in a compulsory form and in a mandatory way in different welfare schemes such as Public Distribution System Schemes, Mid Day Meal Schemes, MGNREA Scheme etc. However, after this step of Government, a lot of debates and disputes took place among the citizens. The step by Government regarding AADHAAR faced a lot of criticism from the different sections of the society. According to the people, use of AADHAAR in such a way was a serious invasion into the right to privacy of persons and it tended to lead to a surveillance state where every individual would be kept under surveillance.

In the year 2012, the honourable retired judge of Karnataka High Court, Justice K.S Puttaswamy and Mr Pravesh Khanna filed a writ petition before the honourable Supreme Court of India. In the writ petition, the AADHAAR Scheme was challenged on the ground of violation of fundamental rights of the innumerable citizens of India namely the Right to Privacy which is falling under the scope of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. However, at that, the AADHAAR was not under legislative authority. In a counter-affidavit filed by the Union of India as well as UIDAI, the respondent stated that Right to Privacy is not guaranteed under the scope of a fundamental right or in the Constitution of India. To establish their detention, they referred to the eight bench judge judgment in MP Sharma and 4 others v Satish Chandra District Magistrate Delhi and 40 others. 

On the 11th of August 2015, this matter was first heard by a three-judge bench who felt it appropriate to refer it to a Constitutional bench. A five-judge bench was set up to look on this case. On the 18th of July, 2017, the five-judge bench after considering the matters of the case referred the same to a nine-judge bench.

The nine-judge bench started looking into the facts of the case again. At first instance, they started to analyze what is the structure of AADHAAR and how does it operate. The AADHAAR was mainly the unique identity to the Indian citizens. Section 2 of the AADHAAR Act 2016, contained the definition of AADHAAR and other certain definitions that were required to be analysed. The Act of 2016, also contained a certain provision which gave power to the government to update the biometric and demographic information of the AADHAAR holders. The main purpose of such collection was to update the unique information of citizens. The Court also looked upon the detention of the petitioners. The petitioners mainly stated that AADHAAR was violating the privacy, and eventually leading to a totalitarian state. When in the year 2016, AADHAAR Act was passed several other petitions along with the petition of K.S. Puttaswamy was also filed by stating that such schemes were affecting the democratic nature of the country. The respondents in this regard have stated that minimal information had been stored in CIDR. It was stored mainly for authentication and no other data are stored. The Court also opined that the main plank of the challenge is that in the AADHAAR Project, there is an infringement of privacy. The view of Justice Nariman stated that a person himself or herself guards the rights related to one's physical body. He further stated that human dignity is treated not only as a facet of Article 21, 14 but also Article 21. , Thus, privacy as a right is intrinsic of freedom, liberty and dignity. It has both a positive and negative aspect. The negative content restrictions on the State from committing an intrusion in private life and in positive it imposes an obligation on State to take all necessary measures to protect the privacy of the individual. And other judges also gave a similar view.

Finally, the nine-judge bench of the honourable Supreme Court of India gave a unanimous judgment regarding the case.  They stated that Right to Privacy is a fundamental right that is guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution and it is also an integral part of Article 14, Article 19. The Supreme Court also overruled the judgment that was previously given in Kharak Singh v State of UP Case, MP Sharma v Union of India case, where it was stated that Right to Privacy is not guaranteed under Constitution. The SC also stated that sexual orientation and the right to food falls under the ambit of Right to Privacy. The Court also laid down a triple test to analyse if any scheme is invading privacy. The triple test is the test of the existence of the law, A legitimate state interest and test of proportionality. On this test, the AADHAAR was declared constitutional. This judgment has also put a great impact on the decriminalisation of Section 377.

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Smaranika Sen  |  21 Nov 2020     Views:858

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:5994
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5418
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5397
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5189
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5213
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4861
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5245
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5235
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5353
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5538
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5244
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5219
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5171
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5289
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5247
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5572
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5400
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6237
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5364
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5707
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5608
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5799
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5650
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5764
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5551
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:8936
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7481
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7522
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7319
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8274
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7620
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6161
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:6935
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6199
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6205
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6451
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6153
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6133
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6181
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6147
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6505
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6003
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6031
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6477
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6674
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6250
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6687
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8659
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6685
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6347
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:11990
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6068
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6920
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6496
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6198
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6431
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6071
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6521
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6194
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6640
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6853
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7080
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:10971
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6290
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6156
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7283
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6003
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6017
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7594
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6542
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6094
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6138
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6084
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8185
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6364
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6006
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5857
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:6945
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5881
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6296
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6136
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5821
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5819
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:5979
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8411
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7020
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6102
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5815
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6023
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5588
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5808
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5640
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6238
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6358
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6086
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6564
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5868
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6006
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6593
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6332
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96317
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73887
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71303
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70439
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59802
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.