• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • Manohar Lal Sharma v. Narendra Damodardas Modi A case analysis

Latest News

Back

Manohar Lal Sharma v. Narendra Damodardas Modi A case analysis

Courtesy/By: Surya J N  |  27 Nov 2020     Views:1764

FACTS OF CASE

The case is popularly known as the “Rafale Fighter Jet Case.” The background of this case dated back to 2007 in which the Ministry of Defence of India at the time of the UPA Government, requested to purchase 126 Rafale air jets from Dassault Aviation of France.

It was agreed that 18 jets would be purchased by the Dassault in a “Fly-away” condition and 108 jets to be manufactured by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) in India. Even after the agreement, it did not conclude for so many years.

After the 2014 elections when the power changed at the center with the arrival of a new Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, a new inter-governmental deal was sought between the Indian Prime Minister and the French President.

The new deals related to the deal of only 36 Rafale Jets in a ‘Fly-away’ condition from France in place of the old deal of 126 Aircraft was withdrawn by the Defence ministry. The new deal amounted to Rs. 60,000 Crore. Further, a private company was given authority to come up with a joint venture with Dassault Aviation to become India’s Offset Partner as Anil Ambani’s Reliance Group and Dassault later announced a joint venture in the name of Dassault Reliance Aerospace Ltd.

Controversy regarding the new deal started arising and several petitions were also filed before the Supreme Court of India on the ground of irregularity in the Rafale fighter jet deal in 2018. The irregularities filed in the petitions were-

1)  Procedural irregularity.  

2) Selection of Reliance for the Joint Venture.

 3) Change in price of the old and the new deals.

 

ISSUES RAISED BEFORE THE COURT

Whether the process followed by the Government in procuring  36 Jet Aircraft instead of 126 amounts to procedural irregularity?

Whether the new Rafale Fighter jet deal brings with it pricing irregularity as the new price of per jet is more than that decided by the UPA Government?

Whether the deal is an inter-governmental deal between India and France?

Whether the Central Government proposes the Reliance Defence Ltd as Dassault Aviation’s Indian Offset Partner without the consent of the Defence Ministry as required under clause 8.6 of Defence Offset Guidelines?

 

ARGUMENTS  BY  THE PARTIES 

Petitioner-

The petitioner contended that there is an irregularity in the contract as the price which was decided during the UPA tenure and in the new deal are not the same. Further, it says that the decision-making process also had some ambiguity in it. The selection of Anil Ambani’s Reliance as the Indian Offset Partner was also in question.

Respondent-

The respondent argued that the central Government agreed on better terms and negotiated the price of the fighter jet and its delivery of it. They also claimed that there was a commercial advantage in purchasing 36 Rafale fighter jets in place of 126 agreed earlier. Further contended that the agreement conforms with the procedure to be followed.

 

JUDGMENT

The Court in the verdict stated that the Rafale Fighter Jet deal had no irregularities in it and nothing was found against the purchase of 36 Fighter jets by the Indian Government. The prayer sought for ordering an investigation by Central Bureau of Investigation to file an FIR and investigate regarding the deal was also dismissed.

The verdict further added that the Court could not interfere in the matter of the Defence contract as it has a limited scope of judicial scrutiny in it. The court held that in the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India, the scope of judicial review is restricted especially in matters of defense procurement contracts. Court held that the old contract was between the UPA Government and Dassault Aviation which was for the purchase of 126 Aircraft and was not concluded due to unsolved terms between Hindustan Aeronautic Limited and Dassault Aviation due to which it was withdrawn in 2015. This was the reason that the NDA government undertook new intergovernmental agreements for the purchase of 36 Rafale Jets.

The talk between the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, and the French President was the fresh deal with a fresh procedure. In the matter of selection of Indian Offset Partner(IOP), the court held that as per the Defence Offset Guideline, there is a choice to select any Indian Company as its Indian Offset Partner and the joint venture agreed was valid and is purely a commercial agreement.

 

REVIEW PETITION AGAINST JUDGMENT

Challenging the verdict of the Supreme Court, three review petitions were filed against the judgment. The petitioners prayed to revise the judgment and claimed that the judgment passed suffers from the errors in it as the court had not taken into consideration critical facts submitted by the petitioner. Further, the petitioner took a plea that the court had not dealt with the consideration of the petitioner's main prayer during the previous proceedings.

Court’s view  on the review petition

While dealing with the review petition-

  • The Court held that there was no substantial err0r in the judgment.
  • It again emphasized that the court has a limited scope of review in matters of defense contracts.
  • The court said that it had allowed all counsels of parties to make their elaborate submissions.
  • The court also dismissed the claim of procedural irregularity as it did not find any investigation required in the decision-making process.

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Surya J N  |  27 Nov 2020     Views:1764

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:5922
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5345
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5325
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5114
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5138
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4786
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5180
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5172
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5288
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5471
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5178
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5153
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5104
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5223
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5182
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5504
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5334
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6166
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5297
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5641
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5542
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5731
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5584
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5700
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5485
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:8863
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7414
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7456
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7254
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8207
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7551
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6092
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:6868
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6131
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6137
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6384
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6084
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6064
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6114
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6079
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6434
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:5937
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:5963
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6409
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6605
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6183
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6616
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8581
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6617
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6280
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:11921
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6001
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6850
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6428
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6127
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6362
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6004
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6454
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6126
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6574
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6785
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7009
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:10901
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6224
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6088
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7216
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:5936
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:5949
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7524
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6471
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6028
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6070
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6014
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8117
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6293
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:5936
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5788
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:6873
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5811
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6225
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6067
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5751
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5752
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:5908
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8341
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:6949
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6033
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5748
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:5952
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5519
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5739
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5571
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6167
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6290
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6015
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6496
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5798
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:5936
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6520
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6261
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96248
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73813
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71232
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70369
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59729
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.