• Services For Users/Clients
      • Business Registrations
      • GST Registration (Person)
      • GST Registration (Company)
      • Importer Exporter Code
      • Trade License
      • FSSAI Registration
      • Udyog Aadhaar/MSME Registration
      • Shops & Establishments Registration
      • Partnership Firm Registration
      • Private Limited Company Registration
      • Producer Company Registration
      • Instant Legal Advise
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Email)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Analysis (By Email)
      • Contracts & Agreements
      • Business Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • Affidavits, Notary, Wills & POAs
      • Affidavit
      • Notary
      • Will
      • Codicil
      • General Power of Attorney
      • Special Power of Attorney
      • Attestation
      • Legal Research & Judgement Analysis
      • Judgments Search
      • Related Judgements Analysis
      • Laws/Reports/Acts Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Pleadings & Petitions Analysis
      • Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • High Courts & State Forums
      • Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Application Analysis
      • Exhibits Analysis
      • Evidence Analysis
  • Services For Lawyers
      • Online Office & Case Management
      • Assisted Online Case(s) & Calendar Management
      • Assisted Online Billing & Invoicing Assistance
      • Assistance in Recruiting Associates, Juniors, Staff
      • Assistance in Recruiting Interns
      • Translation, Transcription & Typing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • On-call Typing
      • Typing
      • Trial Preparation
      • Opening & Closing Statements
      • Pointers & Charts
      • Drafting & Document Management
      • Drafting Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Document Conversion (Jpeg to Word/PDF, PDF to Word etc)
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Drafting Wills/POAs/GPA/SPA/Affidavits
      • Legal Research
      • Judgment search
      • Laws, Acts & Reports Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Related Judgments Search
      • Pleadings & Petitions Drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - High Courts & State Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Applications & Affidavits drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder Proof Reading
      • Indexing & Table of contents
      • Preparing & Marking Exhibits
      • E Filing
  • +91 9632247247
  • Sign In/Sign Up
Menu
  • +Users/Clients Back

    • Get Fee Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Assistant
  • +Lawyers

    • Display Boards
    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Petitions & Pleadings Templates
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Secretary
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Legal News
  • The Euthanasia Judgement: Common Cause (A Registered Society) v. Union of India (2018) 5 SCC 1

Latest News

Back

The Euthanasia Judgement: Common Cause (A Registered Society) v. Union of India (2018) 5 SCC 1

Courtesy/By: Sanyam Agarwal  |  29 Nov 2020     Views:106

The Common Cause in the year 2005, knocked the doors of the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India intending to declare 'Right to Die with Dignity' as a fundamental right under Article 21 and to issue directions to the Union Government to allow terminally ill patients and the patients in Persistent Vegetative State (TWS) or in state of permanent comas to execute ‘living wills’ for appropriate action in the beginning when they are admitted to hospitals. On 25th February 2014, the matter was referred to a larger bench, to issue a proper judgement in the matter of in conformity between the Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs. Union of India & Ors (2011) 4 SCC 454. and Gian Kaur vs. the State of Punjab (1996) 2 SCC 648. The attention was also brought to the 241st law commission report titled “Passive Euthanasia – A Relook”. The constitutional bench was formed consisting of Hon’ble CJI Dipak Misra, Justice A.K Sikri, Justice D. Y Chandrachud, Justice Ashok Bhushan & Justice A.M Khanwilkar who summed up the matter to the following concerns where the petitioner’s side was represented by Adv. Prashant Bhushan.

The issues before the court were as follows:

  • Can euthanasia, as per the Gian Kaur Judgement, be made legal only through legislation?
  • To sum up the differences between passive euthanasia and active euthanasia?
  • Can individuals be allowed to give ‘Advance Directives’, i.e. directives on medical treatment if they become incompetent or unable to communicate in the future or ‘living will’?

These contentions were demanded to declare the “right to die with dignity” within the ambit of “right to live with dignity” which is guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

While determining the question upon the subject of the right to die with dignity within the ambit of Article 21 the reliance was levied on the case of Aruna Shanbaug judgement where the question of the constitutionality of Section 309, IPC was discussed and emphasis was laid down that in cases of Persistent Vegetative State (PWS) the Right to Die could come into existence but denied the inclusion of the additional drugs which support the death of that individual. The constitutional bench in the present case came on the conclusion of inclusion of Right to Die with Dignity as part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The ruling permitted the removal of life-support systems in those cases where the patient is in a permanent coma or is terminally-ill and also laid down guidelines where the patient cannot speak for themselves or are not in the condition to express their will. Liberty was also granted by the Supreme Court to decide on the matter of artificial life-saving machines in the living will of the patient. The court disregarded certain excerpts of the Gian Kaur judgement in question in the present case by clearly stating that the Aruna Shanbaug Judgement mistakenly interpreted it in the wrong way and disregarded the impugned excerpt that stated ‘the euthanasia can only be legalised by the legislature’. The court in this matter also upheld the individual rights over the state responsibilities. The court ordered for the formation of a committee which would decide on the final approval of the living will and the execution of euthanasia.  

The Bench also laid down the procedures and essentials for executing a living will or advance directive and came up with the guidelines in order to give effect to passive euthanasia. The court also came up with certain principles governing the directives. The court in the exercise of the power under Article 142 of the Constitution and the law stated in Vishaka and Others v. State of Rajasthan and Others (1997) 6 SCC 241 directed that the directives and guidelines laid down shall remain in force till the Parliament brings legislation in the field. The bench thereby laying down a distinct line of difference between the active and passive euthanasia held the former as illegal and unconstitutional. Additionally, specific guidelines were provided for implementing passive euthanasia in cases where there is no existing valid living will. The pressing need for the right balance of prolonged life along with the quality of life was sought from the matter since either one is totally meaningless without the other one. However, one important social aspect which was addressed by this judgement was that the profits of commercial private hospitals derived from the protracted hospitalisation of terminally ill individuals with no medical recourse and that affected the financially weak families to meet their ends in case they had no other options but to keep the patients in that state and pay for the medical bills for years and years.

Still the 500 pages judgement fails to address some of the practical challenges such as the mandatory components, scope and rightful implementation of the ‘living will’. Most importantly, legislation is needed to protect the right of terminally ill patients to refuse life-prolonging treatment where still after a long time after judgement there is no legislation to that effect.

 

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Sanyam Agarwal  |  29 Nov 2020     Views:106

News Updates

Delhi HC issues notice on petition challenging Ins...
18 Jan 2021     Views:47
Petition before the Supreme Court challenges All-I...
18 Jan 2021     Views:71
Person unable to find a surety can take benefit of...
18 Jan 2021     Views:45
Delhi High Court Stays Mohit Saraf's Termination F...
18 Jan 2021     Views:45
If The Parties Agrees To Admit To Talaq Without An...
18 Jan 2021     Views:43
Patients cannot be deprived of treatment due to ex...
18 Jan 2021     Views:64
Seventeen Sub Judges Appointed as District Judges ...
18 Jan 2021     Views:44
State of Gujarat liable to pay Rs.25,000 for its i...
17 Jan 2021     Views:47
A Person Can Be Discharged on Bail Under Sec. 445 ...
17 Jan 2021     Views:68
MP High Court Adjourns Hearing In Comedian Munawar...
17 Jan 2021     Views:53
Notice Issued By Delhi High Court To The Center In...
17 Jan 2021     Views:49
Calcutta High Court Issues Contempt Notice To The ...
17 Jan 2021     Views:169
Delhi High Court Allows Reopening of Spas, Wellnes...
17 Jan 2021     Views:41
WhatsApp messages to hold evidentiary value only u...
17 Jan 2021     Views:66
FIR Registered Against Over 10 People For Compromi...
17 Jan 2021     Views:59
Delhi HC hikes amount of compensation to parents o...
17 Jan 2021     Views:59
BSES-RPL liable for damages not on basis of proof ...
16 Jan 2021     Views:68
Reconsider decision to physical hearing: Letter to...
16 Jan 2021     Views:55
Disclosure of interest in the information sought u...
16 Jan 2021     Views:78
Stay Order Issued Against GST Notice Served on Adv...
16 Jan 2021     Views:62
Karnataka Government directed to reconsider circul...
15 Jan 2021     Views:57
Karnataka District Courts to resume normal functio...
15 Jan 2021     Views:49
Constitutional Rights is at Stake: Kerala HC on De...
15 Jan 2021     Views:51
Same gender sexual harassment cases maintainable u...
15 Jan 2021     Views:82
The Delhi High Court issues notice in petition reg...
15 Jan 2021     Views:66
The state is not ready to deal with the demographi...
15 Jan 2021     Views:64
Mandatory investigation of all custodial deaths: N...
15 Jan 2021     Views:61
Accused should be subjected to blood test or breat...
15 Jan 2021     Views:73
Order Terminating Arbitration Proceedings Under Se...
15 Jan 2021     Views:83
Allahabad High Court tells UP government to come u...
15 Jan 2021     Views:89
Cannot Maintain Writ Petition Against Purely Priva...
14 Jan 2021     Views:54
Plea seeking live streaming of open court proceedi...
14 Jan 2021     Views:40
Calcutta High Court : Have the power to set aside ...
14 Jan 2021     Views:58
11 Benches of the Delhi High Court to resume physi...
14 Jan 2021     Views:48
The prudent citizen should abide by the order of t...
14 Jan 2021     Views:45
Parking facilities in malls liable to pay service ...
14 Jan 2021     Views:112
Madras High Court indicates close nexus between ri...
14 Jan 2021     Views:62
SEBI Boycotts Anchor Hemant Gahi, His Wife And His...
14 Jan 2021     Views:141
Supreme Court registers Suo moto case on “Remed...
14 Jan 2021     Views:246
Mandatory publication of notice inviting objection...
14 Jan 2021     Views:59
Directions issued towards timely service of notic...
13 Jan 2021     Views:50
Delhi HC allows termination of pregnancy after 20 ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:44
Andhra Pradesh High Court Suspends Schedule For Lo...
13 Jan 2021     Views:50
Delhi High Court Upholds The Constitutionality Of...
13 Jan 2021     Views:46
Progress in Sonu Sood's Plea Against BMC Notice: B...
13 Jan 2021     Views:45
Supreme Court Dismisses The Plea Against The High ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:57
Central Government notifies establishment of Natio...
13 Jan 2021     Views:79
Criminal liability of non-political executives can...
13 Jan 2021     Views:55
Rs. 20,000 Costs Imposed on Defendant who Cited th...
13 Jan 2021     Views:58
Notice issued to centre by Karnataka HC on plea ch...
13 Jan 2021     Views:173
Supreme Court refuses to entertain special leave p...
13 Jan 2021     Views:62
Sexual harassment on digital platform constitutes ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:65
SC refuses to set aside conviction, life term of 7...
13 Jan 2021     Views:51
SC directs demolition of a hotel-cum-restaurant in...
12 Jan 2021     Views:58
Delhi HC quashes GST order to attach bank account ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:46
CBDT declines extension of due dates for filing re...
12 Jan 2021     Views:48
Calcutta High Court imposes cost on defendant for ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:53
The Counter Affidavit Filed In The Supreme Court B...
12 Jan 2021     Views:53
Allahabad High Court to Decide on Plea for Relaxat...
12 Jan 2021     Views:46
Stay on Kerala HC’s order of setting aside the a...
12 Jan 2021     Views:48
High Court arrest should be the last option and sh...
12 Jan 2021     Views:75
Delhi HC issues notice on plea seeking child marri...
12 Jan 2021     Views:58
India proposes a Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolutio...
12 Jan 2021     Views:83
NCLT allows Josco to reduce share capital structur...
12 Jan 2021     Views:67
Kerala High Court Unhappy With DOC's Enquiry Into ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:67
Supreme Court acquits accused on death row, deems ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:70
Non-payment of Stamp duty on commercial contract d...
12 Jan 2021     Views:74
Supreme Court to stay on implementation of Farm la...
12 Jan 2021     Views:60
Karkardooma Court denies bail to woman accused of ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:62
Right to have access to drinking water cannot be d...
12 Jan 2021     Views:136
Ordinance for Religious Conversions Passed by Madh...
11 Jan 2021     Views:63
Death row of Balwant Singh Rajoana will be decided...
11 Jan 2021     Views:54
There Should Be No Criminal Contempt - Justice Mad...
11 Jan 2021     Views:60
Supreme Court examines whether it is necessary to ...
11 Jan 2021     Views:59
Force Majeure Clause Allowed to Suspend Payments M...
11 Jan 2021     Views:67
Scope for Interpretation of Covid-19 Duty Insuranc...
11 Jan 2021     Views:61
Exercising PT Order to keep prisoners in detention...
11 Jan 2021     Views:64
Plea in Delhi HC seeking directions for exempting ...
11 Jan 2021     Views:130
The Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Ordinance, ...
11 Jan 2021     Views:76
Sonu Sood Moves Bombay High Court Against BMC Noti...
10 Jan 2021     Views:71
Blocking of Public High Ways and Roads Caused by F...
10 Jan 2021     Views:48
Victims Of 1975 Emergency Move Supreme Court Seeki...
10 Jan 2021     Views:97
Trials delayed endlessly due to deliberate absence...
10 Jan 2021     Views:69
Review petitions against the Aadhar Project to be ...
10 Jan 2021     Views:67
Gujarat HC directs CBDT to take decision to extend...
10 Jan 2021     Views:78
Madras High Court permits conduct of Kanuparivetta...
10 Jan 2021     Views:92
Review petition filed in the Supreme Court against...
10 Jan 2021     Views:69
All the subordinate courts shall start functionin...
10 Jan 2021     Views:66
Arrest Only the Last Resort: Allahabad High Court...
10 Jan 2021     Views:93
A Division Bench of Justices K Vinod Chandran and ...
10 Jan 2021     Views:58
Patna High Court suspends Chief Judicial Magistrat...
10 Jan 2021     Views:111
Karnataka High Court strikes down rules of KMMCR a...
10 Jan 2021     Views:63
Bar Council of Delhi increases enrolment fee effec...
10 Jan 2021     Views:68
Tamil Nadu Government Withdraws January 4 GO: Iss...
09 Jan 2021     Views:60
Ebrahim Kunju Gets Bail from Kerala High Court in ...
09 Jan 2021     Views:57
Have not issued guidelines directing people to wea...
09 Jan 2021     Views:61
Bombay High Court shows concern over difficulty to...
09 Jan 2021     Views:70
Calcutta High Court to allow home imprisonment of ...
09 Jan 2021     Views:60
Amicable Settlement can be a factor for reducing t...
09 Jan 2021     Views:60
Bail Granted After Injuries Were Caused by Jail Au...
09 Jan 2021     Views:55
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Misusing Religion for Electoral Gains: PIL in SC for Action against Parties, Candidates
    On 31 May 2018    Views:11965
  • Bci Directs To Supply Of The Details Of Every Practising Advocate As Per The Format Required By The E-committee Of The Supreme Court Of India.
    On 01 Aug 2020    Views:11220
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:10504
  • Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt
    On 22 Jul 2020    Views:10067
  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:7758
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile
  • Demo My Legal Assistant
  • Demo My Legal Secretary

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Campus Ambassadors
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1122 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.