• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • The NOTA judgement: People’s Union for Civil Liberties vs. Union of India (2013) 10 S.C.C. 1

Latest News

Back

The NOTA judgement: People’s Union for Civil Liberties vs. Union of India (2013) 10 S.C.C. 1

Courtesy/By: Sanyam Agarwal  |  30 Nov 2020     Views:6629

The concept of Right to Vote for all has been mooted for more than a century back with the existence originating from the reforms in Britain. The concept was lately accepted widely in every democracy that guarantees every citizen of every gender, caste, race, ethnicity etc. of that nation ‘equal voting rights’. India guarantees Universal adult Suffrage to every citizen and equal voting rights and at the same time, the futile ‘right not to vote’ under the Rules 41(2) & (3) and 49-O of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. The right was termed futile because the person demanding the same had to state the reasons for availing the right in front of the returning officer who had to keep the record of the same. Some petitioners in 2009 reached out to Supreme Court with the question that if Section 128 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 guarantees free and fair voting and the secrecy of such vote as per the Rules 39 and 49-M of the 1961 rules.

The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of the Rules 41(2) & (3) and 49-O of the 1961 rules on the inconsistency with the Section 128 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 and further with Articles 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Constitution of India. The other issue raised before the court was whether the judgement of Kuldip Nayar & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2006) 7 SCC 1 overruled or reiterated the majority judgement of the People’s Union for Civil Liberties vs. Union of India (2003) 4 SCC 399.

The issue, in this case, was contended by the counsel for the Union of India by corroborating that the right of not to vote is not a fundamental right and such conclusion of violation with the constitution stood null and void to the extent that the right to secrecy is only given to the ones who exercise their right to vote but not to the one who don’t choose to vote to any of the nominated candidates. However, the counsel for the Election Commission of India submitted explicitly that the impugned provisions of the 1961 rules are violative of RTP Act. The petitioner in its submission demanded the inclusion of the “None of the Above” (NOTA) in the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) so that the voters who come to the polling booth and decide not to vote for any of the candidates, are able to exercise their right not to vote while maintaining their right of secrecy.” The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court also referred to the Article 21(3) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 25(b) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights while discussing on the matter.

The court on the issue of the Kuldip Nayyar case clearly substantiated that the constitutional bench only laid down a distinction between the right to voting within the ambit of the constitutional or statutory right and held that the right to vote is purely a statutory right and added that the bench only tried to defy the contradicting view in the PUCL (2003) judgement and upheld the majority view.
However, the issue arose of maintainability of the matter in the view of the court that the right to vote is a statutory right and the petition was filed under Article 32 which is for the establishment of the Fundamental Rights under Part III of the Constitution of India. The court over this replied while referring to the PUCL (2003) judgement stated that “The casting of the vote is a facet of the right of expression of an individual and the said right is provided under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution…” and therefore has the right to exercise Article 32.

The court while referring to the main issue said that the secrecy of the ballot is a principle which has been formulated to ensure a voter that in no case it shall be known to the candidates or their representatives that in whose favour a particular voter has voted so that he can exercise his right to vote freely and fearlessly.

However, over the issue of the infringement of the Article 19, while referring to the S. Raghbir Singh Gill vs. S. Gurcharan Singh Tohra and Others 1980 (Supp) SCC 53 and the Nayyar judgement held that the right to secrecy is a major right to establish the ‘free and fair elections’ and above it and this stance can only be overturned when the question arises as to the credibility over free elections. The court also referred to the 170th law Commission Report which stated the need to introduce the concept of the negative vote under which a panel would be introduced below the EVMs, similar to the ones through which other candidates are voted, for counting of votes opting not to vote for any candidate. The Election Commission added that the panel named as None Of The Above (NOTA) could be added as per the Section 79(d) under the electoral rights. The court also referred to the Indira Nehru Gandhi vs. Raj Narain, 1975 Supp 1 SCC 198 judgement where the free and fair election was added to the basic structure of the Constitution and held the impugned parts of the 1961 rules to be violative of Article 19(1)(a) and 14 of the Constitution of India and ordered for the inclusion of NOTA as the last panel of the EVMs and Ballot Papers.

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Sanyam Agarwal  |  30 Nov 2020     Views:6629

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:6080
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5502
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5484
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5277
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5302
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4947
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5322
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5312
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5431
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5617
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5326
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5293
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5244
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5367
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5320
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5651
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5477
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6320
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5440
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5787
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5683
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5872
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5726
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5838
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5627
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:9021
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7560
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7600
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7391
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8360
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7698
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6234
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:7017
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6276
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6280
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6531
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6229
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6211
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6258
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6227
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6582
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6076
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6108
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6552
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6754
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6327
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6765
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8743
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6760
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6425
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:12080
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6143
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6998
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6572
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6281
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6511
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6148
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6598
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6268
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6713
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6929
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7159
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:11049
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6366
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6233
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7366
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6080
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6092
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7672
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6619
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6169
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6214
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6161
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8262
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6443
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6081
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5934
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:7023
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5957
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6377
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6213
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5900
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5892
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:6054
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8493
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7100
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6175
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5890
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6100
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5661
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5884
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5712
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6315
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6436
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6162
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6638
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5943
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6082
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6673
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6408
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96396
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73975
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71388
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70523
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59889
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.