• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • COURT DECLARED GUJARAT COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES (AMENDMENT)ACT AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Latest News

Back

COURT DECLARED GUJARAT COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES (AMENDMENT)ACT AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Courtesy/By: Aman Jaisawal  |  21 Sep 2021     Views:495

The Gujarat High Court on Friday ruled that the Gujarat Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2019, which effectively took away the State's responsibilities when it came to conducting elections of cooperative sugar factories is unconstitutional, discriminatory, absurd, manifestly arbitrary and not in the public interest (Pravinsinh Indrasinh Mahida v. State of Gujarat).

By the said amendment, sugar factories had been deleted from the list of specified cooperative societies in Section 74C (1)(v) the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, 1961 (1961 Act). With such deletion, the State was no longer required to hold the elections in accordance with the provisions of the Gujarat Specified Cooperative Societies Elections to Committee Rules, 1982.

As such, the elections were to be conducted by the cooperative sugar factories itself and no independent government officer would be required to conduct the elections.

A large number of writ applications were moved before the High Court, registering protest over such exclusion of sugar factories from the list of cooperative societies in the 1961 Act. The writ applicants raised concern that, after the amendment, elections may be held as per the whims and caprice of the concerned cooperative societies.

The amendment was defended by the State and the Gujarat State Federation of Cooperative Sugar Factories Limited.

The State submitted that the aim was to reduce its expenses and administrative burdens. There were 13 sugar cooperative societies as on date in Gujarat which were taken out of a list of 343 specified cooperative societies. The State also added that over the years, the government's stake (in terms of share capital) has been reduced to nil. Therefore, the element of public interest is no longer present in sugar cooperative factories, it was asserted. Sugar cooperative factories were also sought to be set out as unique, in the sense that they were not federal cooperative societies.

A Gujarat High Court Bench of Chief Justice Vikram Nath and Justice JB Pardiwala, however, was not convinced.

At the outset, the Bench rejected the stance that Article 14 of the Constitution (right to equality) is irrelevant when it came to the present case since it was not a case of classification but rather one of de-classification.

The Court went on to hold that the challenged amendment was discriminatory given that (i) it did not disclose an object that was reasonable or in public interest and (ii) the differentiation sought to be made had no connection or nexus with the object sought to be achieved.

"The object and reason for the impugned legislation, as is evident from the stance of the respondents, is to save money and administrative exigency. It goes without saying that none of the two objects could be said to be in public interest or are reasonable. We are at one with all the learned counsel appearing for the writ applicants that the object of the legislation is not only petty, but the same is not in public interest nor reasonable," the Court said.

Addressing the contention that sugar cooperative societies can be treated differently since they are not federal, the Court further observed:

"The voters are now being told by the State that they would be left with what the society decides. Why because yours is not a federal society. Even at the relevant point of time, the Sugar societies were not federal. So, how would that be relevant for the purpose of exclusion? In other words, if the Sugar societies were included despite the fact of not being federal, then how is it relevant for the purpose of exclusion?"

The Court also went on to conclude that the amendment in question was manifestly arbitrary. The Court summarised its conclusions as follows ,First,the amendment is discriminatory as it fails to disclose the object which could be termed as reasonable or in public interest. The amendment is also manifestly arbitrary.Secondly, the differentiation pointed out by the State has no nexus with the object sought to be achieved. The classification in the present case between the federal and primary societies on the ground of administrative exigency and saving money could be termed as absurd, unreasonable and not in public interest. In view of the same, the classification itself has become irrelevant,Third,the Court may not look into the motive of the legislature, but, definitely, the object of the legislation can be looked into. Fourth,all the specified societies form one class / one homogeneous group for the purpose of its members to ensure free and fair elections under Chapter XI-A of the Act and the Rules, 1982.

Therefore, the writ applications were allowed.


Document:


Courtesy/By: Aman Jaisawal  |  21 Sep 2021     Views:495

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:6012
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5436
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5418
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5209
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5235
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4880
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5262
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5252
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5371
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5555
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5261
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5235
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5187
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5306
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5263
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5589
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5415
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6254
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5380
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5725
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5624
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5816
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5667
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5780
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5567
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:8955
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7497
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7539
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7334
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8293
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7636
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6176
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:6953
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6215
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6220
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6468
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6168
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6150
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6198
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6162
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6521
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6018
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6048
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6493
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6691
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6267
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6703
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8675
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6701
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6362
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:12011
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6084
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6938
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6512
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6215
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6447
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6087
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6537
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6209
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6656
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6870
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7097
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:10986
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6308
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6172
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7299
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6020
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6032
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7611
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6559
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6110
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6156
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6100
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8200
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6380
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6022
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5872
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:6961
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5898
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6314
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6152
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5838
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5835
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:5996
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8430
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7037
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6118
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5831
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6041
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5604
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5823
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5655
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6254
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6374
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6101
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6580
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5883
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6023
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6610
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6348
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96333
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73905
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71321
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70455
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59822
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.