• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it might cause a fatal accident can be prosecuted under section 304 Part II of IPC: Calcutta HC

Latest News

Back

Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it might cause a fatal accident can be prosecuted under section 304 Part II of IPC: Calcutta HC

Courtesy/By: PURVI GUPTA  |  12 Jan 2023     Views:3542

The Calcutta high courtroom on Wednesday declined to quash court cases below segment 304 component II of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in a motor coincidence case finding that the case become still at its research stage and that the petitioner might have had an "understanding" that his reckless driving would cause a deadly accident.
Justice Bibek Chaudhuri talked about how it became determined from the initial police report that the petitioner become riding the automobile at utmost high speed notwithstanding having expertise that such reckless use may purpose the demise of any by way of-stander, himself and his fellow passengers.
"consequently at this degree of research, I am no longer inclined to quash the registration of the case towards the petitioner under segment 304 part-II of the IPC. accordingly, the immediate crook revision being devoid of any material is disregarded on the contest."
The court was adjudicating upon a case in which a grievance had been lodged against the petitioner for allegedly inflicting an automobile coincidence with the aid of riding at a high velocity and in a risky way, ensuing in the loss of life of one of his co-passengers.
The complaint become lodged by using the father of the deceased and the police thereby registered a case towards the petitioner beneath section 279/304 part-II/308/427 of IPC.
consequently, the petitioner moved the courtroom praying to quash the lawsuits pending earlier than the leader Judicial Justice of the Peace.
Senior advocate Sekhar Kumar Basu performing on behalf of the petitioner advised that the FIR case should be registered below segment 304A of the IPC. He elucidated that previous to the lodging of the grievance, a GD access became lodged on the identical accident and a police officer had performed an inquiry at the identical. The senior suggest invited the court to don't forget this inquiry document and submitted that the materials on file in no way made out a case of the wilful and planned activities on the part of the petitioner to reveal even prima facie that he induced the death with know-how that it was possible to purpose death.
He argued that that is honestly a case of rash and negligent use causing the loss of life of the daughter of the de facto complainant and it needs to have been registered below section 304A. He stated a splendid court docket choice in the nation of Punjab vs. Balwinder Singh & Ors. [2012 (2) SCC 182] to boost his argument. It becomes in addition contended that phase 304 component-II cannot be attributed to the accused and hence registration of the case is terrible in law and investigational proceedings to this point as it relates to phase 304 part-II should be quashed.
alternatively, Senior advise Sudipto Moitra appeared on behalf of the de facto complainant and submitted that there's a clear distinction between the applicability of Sections 304 and 304A as laid down in Alister Anthony Pareira vs nation of Maharashtra [2012 (2) SCC 648]. He delivered that the spot inquiry discovered that the twist of fate and the consequent dying occurred due to the petitioner's rash and negligent use with the conscious knowledge that it may cause a fatal twist of fate. as a result, it changed into entreated that it'd no longer be right to quash investigational process underneath section 304 part-II.
It turned into also mentioned that the petitioner approached the court for quashing the case slightly two days after the incident without giving any possibility to the investigating officer to take into account the veracity of the case of the defacto complainant. the senior recommend contended that the case has to not be quashed at this nubile stage of investigation and depended on excellent court selections to buttress his argument.
The court referred to that an undeniable studying of phase 304 makes it clear that it's miles in two components. the first part applies in which the accused causes demise to the victim to cause such physical harm as is probable to the purpose of dying. component II on the other hand comes into play when death is because of doing an act below the knowledge that it is probable to cause demise, but with no intention to motivate demise or such physical damage as is likely to cause death.
The single choice additionally pondered over the statement of the makers of the Code concerning the importance of purpose or knowledge on this offence and concluded that before phase 304 part II may be invoked, it must be proved that the culprit had know-how that the bodily harm turned into in all likelihood to cause demise. but, segment 304A become inserted through the IPC (Amendment) Act and deals with homicidal dying by way of a rash or negligent act. It no longer creates a brand new offence and covers those instances in which loss of life has been precipitated without intention or understanding. It applies to activities which might be rash or negligent and are immediately the cause of the loss of life of another man or woman.
The court docket as a consequence concluded that there's a difference between phase 304 and phase 304A. segment 304A carves out a case wherein dying is resulting from doing a rash or negligent act which no longer amounts to culpable murder now not amounting to homicide in means section 299 or culpable murder amounting to homicide underneath segment 300.
"In other words segment 304A excludes all the ingredients of section 299 as also of segment three hundred. wherein aim or expertise is the "motivating force" of the act complained of, section 304A will make room for the graver or most extreme rate of culpable murder not amounting to homicide or amounting to murder because the records disclose. The segment has application to those cases where there's neither aim to motive loss of life or know-how that the act in all opportunity will purpose demise."
The petitioner argued that with the aid of no stretch of the imagination can or not it's said that while driving the auto he had the information that it'd cause death by using coincidence. On the opposite, the defacto complainant argued that the investigation has now not reached the degree wherein it could be gathered whether or not the petitioner had the information that his use would probably to purpose an accident ensuing in the death of a fellow passenger.
The judge recalled that there can not be any direct evidence of information of the perpetrator and it can be only ascertained thru circumstantial evidence. applying the check of prudent man or woman below the equal facts and occasions, it becomes located that a "prudent individual might not pressure a vehicle at a very high speed and in a risky way which he can not control due to the fact they have the understanding that there is an obvious chance of fatal coincidence if an automobile is driven at very excessive speed and in a dangerous manner."


Courtesy/By: PURVI GUPTA  |  12 Jan 2023     Views:3542

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:2558
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:2066
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:2096
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:1931
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:2080
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:1778
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:1910
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:1916
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:2053
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:2181
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:1924
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:1921
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:1883
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:1983
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:1950
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:2231
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:2084
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:2827
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:2072
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:2398
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:2297
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:2525
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:2379
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:2485
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:2261
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:5495
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:4190
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:4230
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:4073
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:4930
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:4339
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:2900
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:3620
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:2917
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:2937
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:3174
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:2873
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:2863
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:2890
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:2906
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:3234
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:2766
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:2769
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:3187
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:3376
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:2976
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:3419
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:5198
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:3426
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:3118
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:8613
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:2853
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:3612
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:3227
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:2934
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:3186
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:2841
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:3278
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:2951
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:3447
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:3586
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:3838
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:7685
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:3095
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:2909
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:3982
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:2795
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:2826
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:4363
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:3351
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:2943
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:2965
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:2915
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:5027
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:3188
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:2845
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:2696
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:3760
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:2734
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:3122
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:2981
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:2673
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:2711
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:2840
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:5220
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:3852
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:3011
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:2716
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:2920
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:2533
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:2714
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:2589
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:3137
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:3297
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:3026
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:3526
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:2839
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:2968
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:3542
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:3307
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:93296
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:70671
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:68185
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:67384
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:56642
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.