• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • IPR cases moved last-minute unfair to other litigants, must stop: Bombay HC while rejecting interim plea to injunct Zee from using

Latest News

Back

IPR cases moved last-minute unfair to other litigants, must stop: Bombay HC while rejecting interim plea to injunct Zee from using

Courtesy/By: Labhesh Aldankar  |  04 Oct 2020     Views:1164

 

 

The Bombay High Court recently observed that it is unfair to other litigants when IPR cases are moved last minute, constraining the Court to push aside other matters to hear such a case at the eleventh hour.

 

“…parties in IPR matters cannot expect Courts to push aside all other cases. This happens repeatedly, whether it is movie releases or otherwise. It must stop. It is unfair to courts and it is unfair to other litigants waiting their turn.”

Bombay High Court

 

Justice GS Patel made the observation while rejecting an urgent interim application moved by Plex Inc. on Thursday to injunct Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. (Zee) from using the word ‘PLEX’ in an online movie channel service which was to be launched on Friday.

 

Justice GS Patel heard the matter as the assigned Bench of Justice KR Shriram was unavailable.

 

Plex had moved the application to seek an injunction alleging passing off and damages for misleading the consumers to believe that Zee had tied up with Plex.

 

Justice Patel declined to grant those reliefs, noting that Plex had not registered its trademark with the Indian registry even when Zee had announced the launch of its new service, which was a month prior to moving Plex's application.

 

Justice Patel noted that the consumers are not likely to be misled as the manner of providing services for Plex and ZEEPLEX was very different.

 

He also observed that Plex failed to establish its reputation, registrations and sales at least within India.

 

He added that “In contrast, there is the much greater reputation and standing of Zee amongst subscribers across the length and the breadth of the country with a large number of channels in various languages.”

 

Further it was noted that Plex was unable to prove what injury will be caused to them as their user base in India and that its domestic sales were not able to show how Zee is acting in deceit to pass off its new channel as an association from Plex.

 

In terms of the question of delay in approaching the court, Patel observed that,

 

"Where a plaintiff has had enough notice and yet chooses to move at the eleventh hour — and makes no allowance at all for any adjustment that may be required — the plaintiff must be prepared to face the consequences."

Justice GS Patel

 

Justice Patel added,

"If something has happened in the last few days, then moving with pressing urgency is perfectly understandable; but not where a plaintiff indulges itself in taking time to bring suit and then seeks to impose on the court’s time to the unaccounted and unaccountable cost of others. I am letting it go this once, but will not be so minded in future."

 

Patel however specifically clarified that he was not rejecting ad-interim relief on the ground of delay. Rather, in addition to the above reasons, he observed that “the grant of the injunction Plex seeks would, on the other hand, cause immense and immediate financial loss and harm to Zee.”

 

Patel also clarified that the use of the Plex is subject to further orders in the interim application. The order was only for the limited purpose of deciding on the plea for ad-interim injunction.

 

Plex moved the interim application a month after Zee announced that they are launching a ‘cinema-to-home’ pay per view service.

 

Senior Advocate Virag Tulzapurkar, for Plex, pointed out to the Court that with the service of Plex, a subscriber could essentially share media content over a server which the subscriber could later ‘take wherever he went.’

 

Plex had obtained international trademark registration for the word 'Plex', but not in India.

 

Tulzapurkar proceeded to refer to a tweet to show how the two words were launched as disjunctive words, "ZEE PLEX." Later, Zee combined them into one word as "ZEEPLEX".

 

Senior Advocate Janak Dwarkadas pointed out to the Court that Zee used the word ‘Zee’ as a prefix which they invariably used for all their other offerings and marks.

 

He argued that 'plex' was used to specifically connote the niche or specialized service which Zee was offering to the subscribers on a pay-per-view basis.

 

Patel observed that in his understanding the matter is that Plex had a problem with Zee using Plex in any service and in any manner.

 

He pointed out that to get relief, Plex has to point out the domestic sales to give evidence of reputation and goodwill.

 

Tulzapurkar argued that Zee cannot use Plex just like it cannot use names like Sony, Disney or Hotstar.

 

Patel retorted that Plex will have to prove it has the same brand equity, recognition and reputation. He emphasised that, merely pointing to other established and reputed players in the field is not enough, adding that there is no one-size-fits-all-approach in these matters.

 

In line with an undertaking made by Zee to this effect, the Court has recorded that “Zee will not claim any equities arising from its use of the word or mark PLEX between now and the final hearing of the Interim Application.”

 

Leave was granted to Plex to amend the suit to which Zee sought time to reply. The Court granted leave to parties to file their appropriate proceedings and approach the assigned Bench.

 

Senior Advocate Virag Tulzapurkar with Advocates Ramesh Gajria, Gairav Mukherjee and Amol Dixit from Gajria & Co. appeared on behalf of Plex.

 

Senior Advocates Janak Dwarkadas and Sharan Jagtiani with Advocates Rashmin Khandekar, Vishal Narichania, Anushree Raut, Parul Sharma and Pranita Sahoo appeared for Zee.


Document:


Courtesy/By: Labhesh Aldankar  |  04 Oct 2020     Views:1164

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:5145
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:4580
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:4565
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:4349
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:4380
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4037
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:4403
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:4398
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:4513
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:4694
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:4403
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:4379
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:4335
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:4449
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:4412
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:4727
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:4561
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:5388
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:4523
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:4867
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:4768
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:4958
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:4814
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:4932
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:4717
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:8079
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:6647
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:6683
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:6486
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:7436
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:6783
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:5327
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:6099
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:5358
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:5371
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:5616
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:5314
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:5297
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:5348
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:5312
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:5668
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:5175
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:5195
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:5641
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:5836
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:5419
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:5854
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:7808
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:5851
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:5517
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:11141
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:5240
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6084
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:5663
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:5363
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:5601
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:5246
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:5691
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:5367
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:5817
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6020
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:6250
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:10144
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:5469
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:5331
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:6452
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:5178
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:5194
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:6769
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:5717
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:5280
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:5321
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:5260
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:7366
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:5538
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:5186
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5035
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:6121
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5064
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:5474
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:5318
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5005
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5005
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:5158
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:7588
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:6195
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:5286
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:4996
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:5203
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:4774
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:4987
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:4824
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:5415
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:5539
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:5270
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:5750
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5053
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:5189
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:5773
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:5514
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:95504
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73059
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:70477
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:69619
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:58971
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.