• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • BEST BAKERY CASE

Latest News

Back

BEST BAKERY CASE

Courtesy/By: Nithyakalyani Narayanan.V  |  21 Oct 2020     Views:2583

BENCH- Justice Doraiswamy Raju and Justice Arjit Pasayat.

 

Laws & Acts Applied in the case – Section 195 A of the Indian Penal Code, Section 15 of the Contempt of Court, Act, 1991, Article 129 of the Constitution of India,  Article 142 (2) of the Constitution,1949.


Section 60 of the Indian Evidence Act mentions that oral evidence must be direct. If a fact is an evidence submitted must be direct. If it is a fact that could be heard, it must be the evidence of a witness who is said to have heard it. The evidence submitted before the court can be of original or unoriginal. The original is when a witness states himself to have seen or heard through the medium of his own senses. Unoriginal/derivative/transmitted/secondary/hearsay is when a witness is just reporting but was not himself heard or seen.

In this case, except for two main witnesses, all other people have provided unoriginal evidence. Many witnesses turned against and the remaining witnesses were not found to be that reliable. When the main witness changed her statements multiple times the court imposed a fine on her for giving wrong statements many times and misleading the case.

 

FACTS:


In March 2002, the Best Bakery massacre happened as nearly 1000 rioters jumped in on the bakery/residence owned by Habibullah Sheikh. Within hours, 11 members of the Sheikh family and 3 bakery employees were either burned to death or chopped to pieces.

The defence argued that only the FIR of March 1 is acceptable and not that of March 4 since it was manipulated by the police. In April 2002, the National Human Rights Commission suggested the case be handed over to the CBI. In May 2003, Zaheera, her mother, and her brothers withdrew their statements in court. She stated that she was on the terrace while the incident happened and couldn’t identify the suspect. In June 2003, all the 21 accused were held not guilty by a local court due to a lack of evidence. The judge doubted whether the police may have involved innocents but there is no enough evidence to prove that the accused committed the heinous crime. By July, Zaheera told the media that she and her mother lied before the court due to fear of life. The NHRC moves Special Leave Petition in the Apex Court asking for a re-trial outside Gujarat and the court accepts it.

On this re-trial, the independent eyewitnesses were testified, which included the workers of the bakery.  Zaheera presented an affidavit to the High Court stating that she was compelled to lie in Court due to the fear of her’s and her family’s life. She stated that after the court held not guilty of the 21 accused, two Muslims barged into her house and threatened to change her statement in favour of the community, and hence she and her brother were taken to Mumbai.

By November 2004, Zaheera went into hiding and skipped a hearing although summons was issued to her and her brothers. Her cousin Yasmin Sheikh appeared as a witness and identified 11 of the 21 accused in the Best Bakery case. Her brother appeared in court to withdraw his earlier statement. He stated that someone hit him in the head had gone unconscious. By the time he could regain his senses the bakery had been burnt and so he does not recognize the accused. In August 2005, a Supreme Court-appointed committee headed by the Supreme Court Registrar General called Zaheera a “liar”.

 

COURT'S DECISION-

 

The Supreme Court on March 8, 2006, sentenced Zaheera Sheikh to one-year imprisonment and Rs. 50,000 fine for giving faulty evidence to Court, based on the report given by the Committee. In a prosecution of Zaheera, the court ordered the income tax authorities, to immediately attach her property and bank accounts.

The case is a typical example of hearsay evidence and on whether the statements given outside the court can be taken into consideration. Well now, this is in direct contradiction to the rule of courts to consider anything which is said in the court by a witness as evidence and nothing beyond it. Hearsay evidence can be understood as a statement made out of court and is submitted in court as evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

The rules that help the judge to determine whether the evidence submitted is credible:-
1. Before being testified, the witness generally must swear that his or her testimony will be truthful.

  1. The witness must be personally present at the trial to allow the judge to observe the testimony directly.
  2. The witness is subject to cross-examination at the decision of any party who did not call the witness to testify.

 

The case became controversial when Zaheera and her family admitted publicly that they lied in the Court. They said that they were intimidated by BJP MLA Madhu Shrivastav and his brother. The witnesses turning hostile in the Mumbai Court proceedings, i.e., on the same charges in two different High Courts of the same country, is a complete ridiculing of the judicial independence of a person and it proves how one can easily fool the Court and that the voice of a person does not hold any value.

 

CONCLUSION:

 

The Best Bakery Case is one of the landmark case judgments of the Indian judiciary. It was a heinous crime of genocide and had many issues including the involvement of media, hearsay evidence, witnesses turning away from their statements, etc. The judiciary tackled all the issues in a comprehensible way and paved the way for future regulations. Still, many questions remain unanswered like what can be done to stop witnesses from lying, is there always an influence of the police in every case and how can this influence be limited, what is the role of media, and do they have the right to judge any person without the knowledge of the law, do courts give their independent judgment or do they fall under the pressure of popular vote and sympathy?


Document:


Courtesy/By: Nithyakalyani Narayanan.V  |  21 Oct 2020     Views:2583

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:5994
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5418
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5397
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5189
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5213
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4861
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5245
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5235
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5353
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5538
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5244
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5219
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5171
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5289
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5247
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5572
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5400
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6238
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5364
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5707
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5608
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5799
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5650
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5764
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5551
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:8936
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7481
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7522
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7319
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8275
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7620
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6161
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:6935
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6199
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6205
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6451
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6153
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6133
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6181
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6147
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6505
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6003
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6031
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6477
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6674
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6250
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6687
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8659
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6685
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6347
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:11990
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6068
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6920
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6496
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6198
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6431
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6071
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6521
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6194
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6640
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6853
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7080
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:10971
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6290
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6156
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7283
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6003
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6017
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7594
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6542
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6094
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6138
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6084
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8185
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6364
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6006
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5857
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:6945
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5881
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6296
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6136
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5821
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5819
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:5979
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8411
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7020
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6102
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5815
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6023
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5588
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5808
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5640
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6238
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6358
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6086
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6564
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5868
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6006
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6593
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6332
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96317
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73888
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71303
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70439
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59802
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.