• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT: THE REMEDY OF APPEAL IN CRIMINAL CASES CAN'T BE ALLOWED TO BE DEFEATED ON TECHNICAL PROBLEMS.

Latest News

Back

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT: THE REMEDY OF APPEAL IN CRIMINAL CASES CAN'T BE ALLOWED TO BE DEFEATED ON TECHNICAL PROBLEMS.

Courtesy/By: Muskan Vaswani  |  28 Oct 2020     Views:626

Vipin Sharma-convict filed this criminal review against the judgments of 11.01.2017 and 16.01.2019 passed by the appellate court, which permitted, first, the removal of his application for a two-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against the judgment of 08.12.2016 handed down by the court of appeal and, subsequently, the dismissal of the appeal No. CRM/13/2017. The trial of the applicant was launched by FIR No.28 of 28.05.2010, according to Sections 392, 342, 34 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act, Police Station, Behram.

It must always be kept in mind that there is only one remedy of appeal in criminal law, so it is of considerable significance and the remedy cannot be rejected for technical reasons, "the Punjab and Haryana High Court recently noted."

The Constitutional Bench of Justice Manoj Bajaj was considering a criminal revision against the directions issued by the appeal court (Nawanshahr) dated 11.01.2017 and 16.01.2019, wherein, first, the appellant's plea for pardon of two days of delay in filing the criminal appeal against the judgment of his conviction was allowed to be removed and, subsequently, the appeal was also rejected when the petition was lodged.

The petitioner pleaded that the petitioner was put on trial in the above-mentioned FIR with his co-accused and that the same resulted in his conviction and the convicts were sentenced to three years of rigorous imprisonment.

Aggrieved against the above verdict of the sentence, the two convicts collectively lodged an appeal, which was postponed by two days, and a separate plea for pardon was also filed.

Subsequently, only on the argument of his lawyer, the motion for a stay was allowed to be dismissed by the Court below and, at the same time, the notice of appeal qua co-convict was submitted to the State. It was also submitted to the Court that, because his motion for a stay in condonation had been rejected, his petition was eventually also denied by the appellate court.

It was argued that his lawyer (before the Appeals Court below) withdrew the application on the basis that he (accused / appellant) had not approached him. It was argued that the appellant should have been informed by the appellate court before approving the Council's request. It was further found out that the claimant was negatively impacted by the granting of the motion by the appellant's lawyers, as the petition was eventually rejected without the appellant's hearing.

 

Observations by the Court

The Court has taken into account the fact that, regularly, counsel make prayers before the Courts for the removal of applications or petitions and that such jurisdiction is bestowed upon them by the execution of the power of attorney, but, at the same time, the Court has recognized that the Courts must be vigilant before accepting such a prayer and must analyze the implications of the removal.

In that sense, the Court said,

" In circumstances where the dissent of a movement for withdrawal of a request or an appeal is improper to the litigator by taking off him without a plan of action, that's to propose, instance, the Court must not only demand a clarification from the lawyer who makes the plea but must also give preference to the basis for granting in the order."

In the view of the present case, the Court noted that

" This has harmed the respectful right of the indicted individual and ought to in this way have been informed to the indicted individual by the offers court. Appellate Court, without recognizing the effect of the removal of the motion for the delay, approved the prayer of his lawyers and continued with the appeal of the co-convict."

Further, the Court also opined,

" Simply because the accused had not consulted his lawyer, he would not have given a basis for the prosecutor to extinguish the right of the convict to appeal, as alternatively the board may have had the right to appeal requested for withdrawal of the power of attorney, for no instructions. The prayer made by the counsel for the appellant for withdrawal of application for condonation of delay was against the interest of the appellant, as it attached finality to the judgment of conviction, thereby leaving no remedy for him, but to serve the sentence."

" Separated from the previously mentioned, it is evident from the actualities and circumstances of the case that the challenged orders are in stark difference to the Actus Curiae Neminem Gravabit principle, which not only guarantees fairness and good judgment but also serves as a reference for the administration of justice. It is also clear that the appellate court did not exercise the requisite restraint before approving the motion for dismissal of the application and consequently rejecting the appeal based on delay without understanding that the only legitimate recourse open to the prisoner has been made ineffective. Consequently, the Court had no reservations in holding that the orders of 11.01.2017 and 16.01.2019 suffer from serious illegality and impropriety as a result of serious discrimination on the part of the petitioner (applicant)."

Importantly, the Court observed that it would not refer to common sense that, once the defendant had decided to contest the verdict of guilt, he would abruptly forfeit his constitutional right to accept the sentence recorded by the Court of Justice.

As a result, the motion for revision was allowed and the appealed orders were set aside and it was requested that the appeal submitted by the petitioner be determined on the merits in conformity with the statute after the convict or his pleading was heard.


Document:


Courtesy/By: Muskan Vaswani  |  28 Oct 2020     Views:626

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:5317
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:4751
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:4735
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:4522
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:4552
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4207
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:4578
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:4573
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:4687
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:4868
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:4577
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:4554
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:4508
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:4624
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:4585
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:4901
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:4735
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:5561
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:4697
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5040
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:4942
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5132
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:4987
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5105
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:4890
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:8253
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:6820
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:6858
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:6658
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:7610
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:6955
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:5498
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:6271
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:5535
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:5543
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:5789
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:5487
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:5469
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:5520
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:5484
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:5840
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:5346
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:5368
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:5813
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6009
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:5590
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6025
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:7985
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6022
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:5687
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:11315
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:5411
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6257
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:5835
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:5535
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:5772
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:5416
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:5863
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:5536
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:5986
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6191
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:6420
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:10315
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:5638
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:5502
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:6623
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:5348
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:5363
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:6941
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:5887
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:5449
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:5491
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:5431
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:7536
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:5708
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:5356
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5207
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:6292
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5234
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:5646
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:5489
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5175
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5175
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:5330
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:7760
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:6368
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:5456
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5167
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:5374
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:4944
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5157
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:4994
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:5587
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:5710
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:5440
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:5920
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5224
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:5360
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:5944
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:5686
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:95674
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73232
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:70651
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:69790
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59145
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.