• Services For Users/Clients
      • Business Registrations
      • GST Registration (Person)
      • GST Registration (Company)
      • Importer Exporter Code
      • Trade License
      • FSSAI Registration
      • Udyog Aadhaar/MSME Registration
      • Shops & Establishments Registration
      • Partnership Firm Registration
      • Private Limited Company Registration
      • Producer Company Registration
      • Instant Legal Advise
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Email)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Analysis (By Email)
      • Contracts & Agreements
      • Business Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • Affidavits, Notary, Wills & POAs
      • Affidavit
      • Notary
      • Will
      • Codicil
      • General Power of Attorney
      • Special Power of Attorney
      • Attestation
      • Legal Research & Judgement Analysis
      • Judgments Search
      • Related Judgements Analysis
      • Laws/Reports/Acts Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Pleadings & Petitions Analysis
      • Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • High Courts & State Forums
      • Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Application Analysis
      • Exhibits Analysis
      • Evidence Analysis
  • Services For Lawyers
      • Online Office & Case Management
      • Assisted Online Case(s) & Calendar Management
      • Assisted Online Billing & Invoicing Assistance
      • Assistance in Recruiting Associates, Juniors, Staff
      • Assistance in Recruiting Interns
      • Translation, Transcription & Typing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • On-call Typing
      • Typing
      • Trial Preparation
      • Opening & Closing Statements
      • Pointers & Charts
      • Drafting & Document Management
      • Drafting Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Document Conversion (Jpeg to Word/PDF, PDF to Word etc)
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Drafting Wills/POAs/GPA/SPA/Affidavits
      • Legal Research
      • Judgment search
      • Laws, Acts & Reports Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Related Judgments Search
      • Pleadings & Petitions Drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - High Courts & State Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Applications & Affidavits drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder Proof Reading
      • Indexing & Table of contents
      • Preparing & Marking Exhibits
      • E Filing
  • +91 9632247247
  • Sign In/Sign Up
Menu
  • +Users/Clients Back

    • Get Fee Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Assistant
  • +Lawyers

    • Display Boards
    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Petitions & Pleadings Templates
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Secretary
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Legal News
  • University as a State for the purpose of Article 12: Dr. Janet Jeyapaul v. SRM University & Ors. (2015)

Latest News

Back

University as a State for the purpose of Article 12: Dr. Janet Jeyapaul v. SRM University & Ors. (2015)

Courtesy/By: Ashwin Satheesh  |  18 Nov 2020     Views:329

Whether a "Deemed University" that imparts education can be considered as a "State" against whom writ jurisdiction may be exercised.

Citation: (2015) 16 SCC 530.

Date of judgment: 15/12/2015

Introduction:

Part III of the Constitution confers fundamental rights to individuals that are integral and cannot be taken away by any State action. Nonetheless, these rights come with a catch, i.e., they can be availed only against a State and not private individuals. [1] For the purposes of Part III, the term “State” has been defined under Article 12 and includes the Central Government, Parliament, State legislature, all local and other authorities.

The Apex court has established various tests to determine which institutions can be treated as a “State” under the ambit of “other authorities” but there is no straitjacket formula that can be relied upon. [2] The predominant one being the Instrumentality Test established under R.D. Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (AIR 1979 SC 1628) and reiterated in Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib (AIR 1981 SC 487). The scope of institutions under the gamut of other authorities has expanded ever since, with institutions such as co-operative societies, transport corporations, nationalized banks, etc being considered as states against whom fundamental rights are available.

Facts:

The appellant, Dr. Janet Jeyapaul, was a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Biotechnology at SRM University (respondent). A series of memos and counter-replies was in motion as the respondents alleged that the appellant had failed to take classes for two batches. Later on, the respondent constituted an Enquiry Committee that communicated that the action was based on several complaints made against her by her students. However, the appellant was not given a reference to any of those documents or complaints. She was subsequently served with a notice dated 04/04/2012 informing her that the following month would be her one-month notice period and she would be terminated on 04/05/2012. The appellant contested that the said notice was received by her only on 16/04/2012. 

A petition was filed under Article 226 before a Single Judge of the Madras High Court which ruled in her favor by ordered her reinstating. The University in turn filed an appeal before a Division Bench of the Madras High Court against the said order. The Division Bench by its order dated 04/07/2013 reversed the order as it held that the respondent was not a State under Article 12, and thus could not be subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. However, there was no decision made as to the merits of the case.

The present case before the Supreme Court was a Special Leave Petition against the decision of the Division bench that viewed the University to not be a State for the purpose of Article 12.

 

Judgment:

The learned judges sought the assistance of Mr. Harish Salve as the matter involved a legal question whereas the appellant had no legal representative. Through his submissions, he expressed that the determining factor would be the object of the institution and the activities it performs in furtherance of that object. The general trend of the Courts was to decide based on whether the institution/body performed a public function or duty so as to affix public character.

It was highlighted that the phrase “any person or authority” under Article 226 was broad enough to encompass any person or a body performing a public function or a duty. The emphasis would thus lay on the nature of duty performed by that authority and not its form per se.

The respondent was engaged in the public function of imparting education to students and the same was contended to be subject to the jurisdiction of Article 226 in light of the established precedents. The respondent was a “Deemed University” and thus governed by the University Grants Commission. The respondent University contended that if the Court viewed them as a State, then all parties related to the respondents would start invoking writ jurisdiction against them.

The Court relied on the Amenability Test propounded by De Smith (Judicial Review, 7th Edition), which incorporated the complementary principles of - source of power and characteristics of functions. The Supreme Court while previously considering the status of a trust that received governmental aid and imparted education, held that the function was public in nature. [3] Mandamus could not be issued if the rights and duties were of a private nature. However, the trust derived its funds from the government and was regulated by its affiliating University who supervised its activities. Decisions of the University would be binding upon the Educational Trust and such a relationship could not be seen as private in character. The judgment also added that the term “authority” under Article 226 would have to be construed liberally as compared to the term under Article 12 as it entailed both fundamental and non-fundamental rights.

The essential ingredient would be the nature of the duty and the positive obligation it imposes and not the form by which it has been imposed. Reference was then made to the ratio in Zee Telefilms Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors., (2005) 4 SCC 649, which considered the status of BCCI as a state. Despite holding the answer in negative, the court held that an aggrieved party could always take the recourse of other remedies of law or the jurisdiction under Article 226 which is much wider than the power under Article 32.

It was thus held that the Division Bench of the High Court was erred in its opinion by holding that the respondent could not be subject to the jurisdiction of Article 226. The respondent was a “Deemed University” according to Section 3 of the UGC. This meant that the UGC’s decisions would be binding upon the respondent and that it would govern its functioning. The Court held that once an institution is declared a “Deemed University” it would be an authority under Article 12 as it carried out a public function of imparting education. Thus, the institution will be subject to the writ jurisdiction of High Courts under Article 226.

The respondent relied on the T.M.A. Pai Foundation & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors., (2002) 8 SCC 481, to hold that even if it was maintainable, it should not be heard on merits and instead be redirected to a District Judge. The Court acknowledged the same but decided against it as the Single Judge bench had entertained the petition. The issue was hence remanded to the Division bench of the Madras High Court to be decided on merits.

The Division Bench of the Supreme Court expressly held that it merely answered the question as to the maintainability of the petition and did not delve into the merits. The respondent University performed a public function by imparting education and being governed by the UGC resulted in it being another authority against whom fundamental rights and writs were exercisable. Interpretation of the term “other authorities” has undergone a fundamental shift as it has strayed away from the erstwhile application of ejusdem generis to a more progressive one that relies on the type of function and the level of governmental control.

 

[1] Sabeeha Faikage v. Union of India, AIR 2013 SC 189.

[2] Tekraj v. Union of India, AIR 1988 SC 469.

[3] Andi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandas Swami Suvarna Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust & Ors. v. V.R. Rudani & Ors., (1989) 2 SCC 691.


Document:


Courtesy/By: Ashwin Satheesh  |  18 Nov 2020     Views:329

News Updates

Jharkhand administration and the media receive dir...
22 Jan 2021     Views:39
Gujarat High Court orders immediate release of arr...
21 Jan 2021     Views:34
Perjury proceedings can be instituted upon complai...
21 Jan 2021     Views:34
No Unnecessary Adjournments Should be Allowed: All...
21 Jan 2021     Views:47
Bombay High Court rejects appeal by Sonu Sood seek...
21 Jan 2021     Views:46
A Judge Should Not Make Mistakes Due to Haste: All...
21 Jan 2021     Views:50
Review petitions challenging Aadhaar verdict dismi...
21 Jan 2021     Views:49
Supreme Court Issues Notice In The Petition Filed ...
20 Jan 2021     Views:43
Allahabad High Court Seeks Response Of UP Govt & N...
20 Jan 2021     Views:49
Father-son relation does not confer fundamental ri...
20 Jan 2021     Views:41
Karnataka High Court Issues New SOP: Advocates to ...
20 Jan 2021     Views:50
Relief under Probation of Offenders Act is not exc...
20 Jan 2021     Views:58
Bombay HC Rejects Republic TV's Contention ...
20 Jan 2021     Views:55
Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes FIR in Connectio...
20 Jan 2021     Views:63
Applicability of Notification on Increased IBC Thr...
19 Jan 2021     Views:71
Hindu Sena chief files complaint in Patiala House ...
19 Jan 2021     Views:38
Petition to Squash Complaint Under Sec.482 Of CRPC...
19 Jan 2021     Views:77
Promotion on the basis of Educational Qualificatio...
19 Jan 2021     Views:73
SCBA asks Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad to gran...
19 Jan 2021     Views:56
Interim Protection Granted To Man Who Called CM Yo...
19 Jan 2021     Views:75
Allahabad High Court quashes non-compoundable case...
18 Jan 2021     Views:65
The High court of Tripura refused to entertain the...
18 Jan 2021     Views:56
Supreme Court holds compensation can only be provi...
18 Jan 2021     Views:69
Read Supreme Court Judgements on Anticipatory Bail...
18 Jan 2021     Views:62
Delhi HC issues notice on petition challenging Ins...
18 Jan 2021     Views:56
Petition before the Supreme Court challenges All-I...
18 Jan 2021     Views:90
Person unable to find a surety can take benefit of...
18 Jan 2021     Views:61
Delhi High Court Stays Mohit Saraf's Termination F...
18 Jan 2021     Views:65
If The Parties Agrees To Admit To Talaq Without An...
18 Jan 2021     Views:47
Patients cannot be deprived of treatment due to ex...
18 Jan 2021     Views:73
Seventeen Sub Judges Appointed as District Judges ...
18 Jan 2021     Views:54
State of Gujarat liable to pay Rs.25,000 for its i...
17 Jan 2021     Views:52
A Person Can Be Discharged on Bail Under Sec. 445 ...
17 Jan 2021     Views:85
MP High Court Adjourns Hearing In Comedian Munawar...
17 Jan 2021     Views:57
Notice Issued By Delhi High Court To The Center In...
17 Jan 2021     Views:53
Calcutta High Court Issues Contempt Notice To The ...
17 Jan 2021     Views:177
Delhi High Court Allows Reopening of Spas, Wellnes...
17 Jan 2021     Views:44
WhatsApp messages to hold evidentiary value only u...
17 Jan 2021     Views:73
FIR Registered Against Over 10 People For Compromi...
17 Jan 2021     Views:67
Delhi HC hikes amount of compensation to parents o...
17 Jan 2021     Views:67
Committee Constituted By Calcutta High Court To En...
16 Jan 2021     Views:36
Advance paid to property owner by real-estate deve...
16 Jan 2021     Views:38
Karnataka High Court Directs Govt To Reconsider Ci...
16 Jan 2021     Views:38
High Court of Punjab and Haryana Orders for Allowi...
16 Jan 2021     Views:38
Karnataka High Court seeks information regarding ...
16 Jan 2021     Views:46
Kerala HC orders the state to consider the grievan...
16 Jan 2021     Views:39
BSES-RPL liable for damages not on basis of proof ...
16 Jan 2021     Views:79
Reconsider decision to physical hearing: Letter to...
16 Jan 2021     Views:66
Disclosure of interest in the information sought u...
16 Jan 2021     Views:89
Stay Order Issued Against GST Notice Served on Adv...
16 Jan 2021     Views:83
Karnataka Government directed to reconsider circul...
15 Jan 2021     Views:67
Writ jurisdiction cannot be utilized by a litigant...
15 Jan 2021     Views:39
Delhi HC issues notice on a plea on non-implementa...
15 Jan 2021     Views:36
Whether an arbitrator appointed by a person who is...
15 Jan 2021     Views:48
Karnataka District Courts to resume normal functio...
15 Jan 2021     Views:56
Constitutional Rights is at Stake: Kerala HC on De...
15 Jan 2021     Views:60
Same gender sexual harassment cases maintainable u...
15 Jan 2021     Views:89
The Delhi High Court issues notice in petition reg...
15 Jan 2021     Views:71
The state is not ready to deal with the demographi...
15 Jan 2021     Views:71
Mandatory investigation of all custodial deaths: N...
15 Jan 2021     Views:71
Accused should be subjected to blood test or breat...
15 Jan 2021     Views:79
Order Terminating Arbitration Proceedings Under Se...
15 Jan 2021     Views:90
Allahabad High Court tells UP government to come u...
15 Jan 2021     Views:101
Cannot Maintain Writ Petition Against Purely Priva...
14 Jan 2021     Views:68
Plea seeking live streaming of open court proceedi...
14 Jan 2021     Views:44
Calcutta High Court : Have the power to set aside ...
14 Jan 2021     Views:71
11 Benches of the Delhi High Court to resume physi...
14 Jan 2021     Views:53
The prudent citizen should abide by the order of t...
14 Jan 2021     Views:50
Parking facilities in malls liable to pay service ...
14 Jan 2021     Views:122
Madras High Court indicates close nexus between ri...
14 Jan 2021     Views:72
SEBI Boycotts Anchor Hemant Gahi, His Wife And His...
14 Jan 2021     Views:166
Supreme Court registers Suo moto case on “Remed...
14 Jan 2021     Views:255
Mandatory publication of notice inviting objection...
14 Jan 2021     Views:66
Directions issued towards timely service of notic...
13 Jan 2021     Views:57
Delhi HC allows termination of pregnancy after 20 ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:49
Andhra Pradesh High Court Suspends Schedule For Lo...
13 Jan 2021     Views:62
Delhi High Court Upholds The Constitutionality Of...
13 Jan 2021     Views:60
Progress in Sonu Sood's Plea Against BMC Notice: B...
13 Jan 2021     Views:52
Supreme Court Dismisses The Plea Against The High ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:64
Central Government notifies establishment of Natio...
13 Jan 2021     Views:83
Criminal liability of non-political executives can...
13 Jan 2021     Views:56
Rs. 20,000 Costs Imposed on Defendant who Cited th...
13 Jan 2021     Views:60
Notice issued to centre by Karnataka HC on plea ch...
13 Jan 2021     Views:179
Supreme Court refuses to entertain special leave p...
13 Jan 2021     Views:67
Sexual harassment on digital platform constitutes ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:71
SC refuses to set aside conviction, life term of 7...
13 Jan 2021     Views:53
SC directs demolition of a hotel-cum-restaurant in...
12 Jan 2021     Views:59
Delhi HC quashes GST order to attach bank account ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:52
CBDT declines extension of due dates for filing re...
12 Jan 2021     Views:57
Calcutta High Court imposes cost on defendant for ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:57
The Counter Affidavit Filed In The Supreme Court B...
12 Jan 2021     Views:57
Allahabad High Court to Decide on Plea for Relaxat...
12 Jan 2021     Views:60
Stay on Kerala HC’s order of setting aside the a...
12 Jan 2021     Views:52
High Court arrest should be the last option and sh...
12 Jan 2021     Views:78
Delhi HC issues notice on plea seeking child marri...
12 Jan 2021     Views:58
India proposes a Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolutio...
12 Jan 2021     Views:88
NCLT allows Josco to reduce share capital structur...
12 Jan 2021     Views:68
Kerala High Court Unhappy With DOC's Enquiry Into ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:69
Supreme Court acquits accused on death row, deems ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:71
Non-payment of Stamp duty on commercial contract d...
12 Jan 2021     Views:85
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Misusing Religion for Electoral Gains: PIL in SC for Action against Parties, Candidates
    On 31 May 2018    Views:11967
  • Bci Directs To Supply Of The Details Of Every Practising Advocate As Per The Format Required By The E-committee Of The Supreme Court Of India.
    On 01 Aug 2020    Views:11239
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:10675
  • Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt
    On 22 Jul 2020    Views:10231
  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:7766
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile
  • Demo My Legal Assistant
  • Demo My Legal Secretary

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Campus Ambassadors
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1122 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.