• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. State Of Maharashtra, 2013

Latest News

Back

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. State Of Maharashtra, 2013

Courtesy/By: Nishiket Dave  |  11 Nov 2020     Views:1902

 

 

INTRODUCTION

This case is connected with the matters have been directed against the final orders and judgments of conviction and sentence passed on various dates by the Presiding Officer of the Designated Court under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (in short ‘the TADA’) for Bombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No. 1 of 1993. 

 

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra, 2013 Cri. No. 1728 of 2007

FACTS

The instance of the prosecution is as per the following:

(a) Babri Masjid at Ayodhya was wrecked on 06.12.1992. After its destruction, savagery broke out all through the nation. To deliver retribution of the said destruction, Tiger Memon (AA) and Dawood Ibrahim, an inhabitant of Dubai, defined a trick to submit a psychological oppressor act in the city of Bombay. Incompatibility of the said object, Dawood Ibrahim consented to send arms and ammo from abroad. Tiger Memon, in relationship with his men, especially, the denounced people, gotten those arms and ammo through ocean shorelines of Bombay. In continuation of the said scheme, Tiger Memon sent a portion of the denounced people to Dubai and from that point to Pakistan for preparing and taking care of in arms and ammo.

(b) On 12.03.1993, the business center of the nation, the city of Bombay, seen a phenomenal psychological militant act sending stun waves all through the world. In a range of around two hours i.e., between 13:33 to 15:40 hours, a progression of 12 bomb blasts occurred consistently at the accompanying twelve spots in Bombay, to be specific, Bombay Stock Exchange, Katha Bazaar, Sena Bhavan, Century Bazaar, Mahim Causeway, Air India Building, Zaveri Bazaar, Hotel Sea Rock, Plaza Theater, Juhu Centaur Hotel, AirPort Bay-54 and AirPort Centaur Hotel. In the abovesaid episode of sequential bombings, 257 human lives were lost, 713 people were genuinely harmed and properties worth about Rs. 27 crores were obliterated. This was the first since forever fear monger assault on the planet where RDX (Research Department Explosive) was utilized for a huge scope premise after World War II.

(c) The previously mentioned determined demonstration of fear was completed with absolute negligence to human life and poise. The object of the wrongdoing was to impel mutual viciousness and to overawe and debilitate the administration, upset social concordance, and to separate the social, political, and monetary request of the nation. This obvious demonstration of viciousness caused physical and mental harm as well as left a mental effect on society all in all as the lives of a few residents were totally pulverized.

That being the reason, it must be seen in the current composition of realities. The Court saw that the standards would be material however for the current situation, the said standards can't be extended to express that the issuance of a warrant by the TADA Court would be void based on the rebelliousness of one of the features of methodology. The Supreme Court held on the off chance that the candidate had profited arrangement of occasions to attack the conviction and as acknowledged he was offered ten days when the audit request was heard. The Supreme Court managed current realities of the second kindness appeal which had been submitted on 22.07.2015. It was presented that it is a protected right according to Articles 72 and 161 of the Constitution. For the situation, it was seen by the court that the sibling of the candidate showed presented the benevolence request to the President of India. The applicant was totally in information on the equivalent. He was imparted by the able position that the President of India had dismissed the request. It was fought that it was the sibling of the solicitor who showed presented the benevolence request and not the candidate. The reality was acknowledged by the court and was additionally clear from the correspondence to the Superintendent, Central Jail, Nagpur. There couldn't be any carp that another benevolence request can be recorded in specific circumstances

 

HELD BY COURT

The Supreme Court expressed that managing the leniency appeal is by the Executive. Despite the fact that on some restricted grounds, it very well may be tested. After the principal kindness request was dismissed, the solicitor didn't attempt to challenge that. He showed presented the kindness request, according to his variant, on 22.07.2015. The Court held that issuance of execution order was all together and there was no illness in the equivalent. The Supreme Court reasoned that the corrective appeal which was chosen by three senior-most Judges of the Supreme Court couldn't be imperfect and the issue of execution order by the TADA Court couldn't be criticized. Subsequently, the writ appeal was excused.

 

CONCLUSION

Supreme Court must be saluted the manner in which it has worked to guarantee that equity is finished. "Complete admittance to equity was given to Yakub Memon throughout the previous 22 years. Equity has been done and the Supreme Court must be saluted," A healing appeal was recorded and was excused on July 21, 2015. Another writ request was gotten from July 27 till Wednesday. Indeed, even the Maharashtra lead representative and the President dismissed his (Yakub's) forgiveness requests once more. At that point, new petitions were moved at 12 PM in the Supreme Court. Mukul Rohatgi, Attorney General while conversing with India Today TV, prior in the day, stated, "Capital punishment can not be abrogated in India now of time. There must be some sort of prevention."

Apparently, the legislators and some personal stakes in the public arena clamored more for this individual as he had a place with so alluded minority network, especially in recently overcharged society, in view of religion intensity and limited contemplations anticipating the whole case practice as a type of planned and made one with certain thought processes in any event, including the courts up to the most elevated Court of the land. On the off chance that an adjudicator gave a disagreeing view, it was erupted and considered valid by all methods at the expense of greater part consenting judgment. The equivalent didn't occur maybe in endless instances of such nature. In spite of uncommon move of the Supreme Court, by opening up the Court at midnight and giving rehashed moves to audits and therapeutic petitions, it very well may be sensibly summarized that all discussions of the hole of 14 days is an eyewash as by use, everything being equal, the hole is to be tallied from the day the principal survey appeal which was dismissed.


Document:


Courtesy/By: Nishiket Dave  |  11 Nov 2020     Views:1902

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:3159
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:2648
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:2677
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:2499
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:2593
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:2297
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:2489
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:2485
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:2623
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:2759
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:2491
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:2483
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:2451
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:2550
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:2514
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:2799
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:2651
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:3415
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:2632
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:2963
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:2864
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:3089
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:2941
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:3056
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:2829
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:6091
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:4756
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:4792
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:4630
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:5519
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:4904
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:3461
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:4195
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:3478
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:3494
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:3728
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:3441
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:3423
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:3452
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:3460
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:3791
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:3320
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:3323
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:3754
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:3941
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:3542
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:3987
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:5823
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:3986
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:3674
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:9207
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:3403
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:4187
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:3787
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:3501
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:3743
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:3401
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:3836
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:3512
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:3999
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:4157
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:4397
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:8270
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:3648
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:3479
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:4569
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:3348
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:3383
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:4922
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:3902
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:3487
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:3518
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:3462
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:5575
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:3732
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:3393
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:3243
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:4312
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:3272
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:3672
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:3525
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:3216
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:3248
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:3376
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:5781
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:4400
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:3540
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:3250
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:3444
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:3045
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:3236
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:3098
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:3655
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:3807
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:3536
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:4021
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:3342
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:3459
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:4045
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:3791
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:93795
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:71237
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:68691
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:67890
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:57174
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.