• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • Judgement Analysis: Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. Office of the Attorney General of India 2015 SCC OnLine Del 7896

Latest News

Back

Judgement Analysis: Subhash Chandra Agrawal v. Office of the Attorney General of India 2015 SCC OnLine Del 7896

Courtesy/By: Sanyam Agarwal  |  06 Dec 2020     Views:398

The present petition was filed by two petitioners following a letter from Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) addressed towards these two petitioners in separate RTIs filed by these to seek some information from the Attorney General of India’s (AGI) Office. The applications were filed by the petitioners to the office of AGI under the Right to Information Act to seek some information. But the same was rejected by saying that the AGI office has no CPIO as it didn’t fall under the RTI act. The same was challenged before the Central Information Commissioner challenging the order by the CIC. In another letter dated 29.01.2013 stated that as per the full Bench decision of the CIC, the AGI is not a “public authority” and not amenable by the RTI act. The petitioner, therefore, challenged the judgment of CIC and prayed for the issuing of appropriate orders regarding the RTIs filed by the petitioners seeking the information sought in those applications.

In the case, the bench of the High Court took notice of the impugned judgment by the CIC which was based on the previous ruling of Supreme Court Som Prakash Rekhi v. Union of India and Anr. (1981) 1 SCC 449 which laid down a distinction between whether an office be termed as an ‘Authority’ or not and whether it is a public office or not. The CIC interpreted it in a way that ruled the office of AGI not bound by the RTI act.

The petitioners in the present case took reference from the case of B. P. Singhal v. Union of India (2010) 6 SCC 331 and based their arguments on Article 88 of the Constitution of India which inscribes within the AGI some rights and duties and the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 that etch upon the AGI with statutory duties. Against these arguments, the respondent submitted that the office of AGI is sui generis in nature and can’t be termed as the authority under the bounds of the Supreme Court judgment in Sukhdev Singh v. Bhagatram (1975) 1 SCC 421 which termed an ‘authority’ as one which has the power to alter the relations and rights of others. The respondent’s counsel also weighed on the fact that the AGI office is a single-person office and it wouldn’t be feasible for holding it as ‘Public Authority’ as the same person holding the same office as CPIO and AGI would not be practicable.

However, the bench took notice of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, which describes the public authority as one which is an:

“institution of self-government established or constituted-

(a) by or under the Constitution;

(b) by any other law made by Parliament;

(c) by any other law made by State Legislature……”

The court besides also referred to Article 76 of the Constitution of India which describes the appointment of AGI. Following this the bench took notice of the fact that the AGI has the right to move a motion in case of criminal contempt before the Supreme Court, the mandate of the AGI to perform the constitutional functions, is an ex-officio member of Bar Council of India and leader of the bar. The court also took notice of the Law Officer (Condition of Services) Rules, 1987 set under the proviso under Article 309 of the Constitution of India.

The court thereby held the AGI as the Constitutional Functionary, but based on the petitioner’s arguments refrained from terming the AGI office as a ‘Public Authority’. But the court continued to say that the Section 2(h) of the RTI Act which talks about the ‘Public Authority’ can’t be interpreted in a limited or restrictive way just because the duty is advisory in nature as it not less authoritative in nature than any other constitutional functionaries and the Article 76(2) of the Constitution expressly provides that the AGI would perform the duties of a legal character and also discharge the functions conferred on him under the Constitution. The court specifically disregarded the decisions of the Supreme Court in Sukhdev Singh and Som Prakash Rekhi case as the questions were major to determine the offices’ consideration as ‘other authorities’ under Article 12 of the Constitution and not the RTI. However, the court regarded the functions of the AGI in nature of the public functions in virtue of Article 76(2) of the Constitution and regarded B. P. Singhal's judgment to declare the office of AGI as public office.

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Sanyam Agarwal  |  06 Dec 2020     Views:398

News Updates

Judging the Judges: India's Three-Year Practice Ru...
15 Jul 2025     Views:558
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Torts: A Modern ...
09 Nov 2024     Views:5120
The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:6284
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5684
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5664
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5463
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5484
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:5131
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5495
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5484
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5609
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5792
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5502
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5462
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5414
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5540
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5491
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5827
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5649
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6503
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5612
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5953
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5857
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:6040
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5892
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:6002
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5794
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:9214
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7731
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7769
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7553
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8542
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7866
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6396
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:7196
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6445
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6451
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6709
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6395
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6379
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6425
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6399
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6750
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6237
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6277
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6725
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6927
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6504
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6941
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8950
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6927
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6588
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:12273
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6303
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:7172
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6739
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6455
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6682
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6312
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6769
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6433
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6873
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:7104
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7335
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:11219
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6523
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6401
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7543
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6243
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6251
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7846
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6783
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6326
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6374
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6324
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8423
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6610
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6244
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:6097
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:7190
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:6119
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6547
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6375
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:6055
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:6045
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:6215
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8664
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7262
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6326
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:6042
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6262
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5812
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:6043
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5868
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6479
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6599
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6319
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6794
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:6100
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6244
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96557
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:74150
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71562
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70700
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:60075
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.