Latest News
Back
UK Court on scammer Nirav Modi
On Thursday, fugitive diamantaire Nirav Modi lost his legal battle against extradition after a UK judge ruled that he must face the Indian courts on charges of fraud and money laundering in the estimated $2 billion Punjab National Bank (PNB) scam case.
The 49-year-old appeared via video link from Wandsworth Prison in south-west London as District Judge Samuel Goozeehanded handed down his verdict at London's Westminster Magistrates' Court.
I'm fulfilled on the proof that a by all appearances instance of misrepresentation and illegal tax avoidance is set up, said Judge Goozee, as he read out pieces of his judgment in court and presumed that he will send his decision to the UK's secretary of state, Priti Patel.
Patel is approved to arrange removal under the India-UK Extradition Treaty. She includes two months inside which to settle on that choice.
The home secretary infrequently conflicts with the court's decisions, as she needs to think about just some limited bars to clear removal, including the conceivable burden of capital punishment, which are probably not going to apply to Nirav's situation.
After her choice, Nirav has 14 days to move toward the high court and look for leave to offer, which, whenever in all actuality, will be heard at the Administrative Division of the High Court in London.
Nirav was captured on a removal warrant on 19 March 2019 and has shown up by means of video connect from Wandsworth Prison for a progression of court hearings.
His numerous efforts to look for bail have been consistently turned down, both at the Magistrates' and High Court level, as he was considered a flight hazard. He is the subject of two arrangements of criminal procedures, with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) case identifying with huge scope extortion upon PNB through the deceitful acquiring of letters of undertaking (LoUs) or credit arrangements, and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) case identifying with the washing of the returns of that misrepresentation.
He likewise faces two extra charges of "causing the vanishing of proof" and scaring observers or "criminal terrorizing to cause passing, which was added on to the CBI case.
During a progression of hearings throughout the removal case a year ago and early this year, Westminster Magistrates' Court has heard point by point contentions from the two sides regarding why Nirav's "disintegrating" emotional well-being condition does or doesn't meet the Section 91 edge of the Extradition Act 2003 which was most as of late been utilized in the UK to impede the removal of Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange on its grounds being "crooked and abusive" as he is a high self-destruction hazard.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), contending in the interest of the Indian government, had tested the protection position and had required an autonomous assessment of clinical records by an expert therapist for fitting affirmations to be procured by the experts as far as his consideration in India.
Jail conditions at Barrack 12 in Arthur Road Jail in Mumbai, where Nirav is to be held, have additionally been in concentration as the Indian government presented a refreshed video recording of the cell to feature that it meets all basic liberties prerequisites of regular light and ventilation.
Nirav' Modi's legal battle marks one of a number of high-profile extradition cases involving accused Indian fugitive offenders in the UK. While former Kingfisher Airlines boss Vijay Mallya remains on bail as a "confidential" matter related to his extradition to India is resolved, accused arms dealer Sanjay Bhandari's extradition case is scheduled for its next hearing in April.
