• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • [1996 Bombay Blasts] Advocates should not suppress material facts: Bombay High Court refuses parole after lawyer makes misleading statement

Latest News

Back

[1996 Bombay Blasts] Advocates should not suppress material facts: Bombay High Court refuses parole after lawyer makes misleading statement

Courtesy/By: YASHASVI SHARMA  |  28 Jun 2021     Views:267

The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court refused to provide emergency parole to 2 convicts in the 1996 Bombay Blast case at the floor that the advocates of the petitioners made deceptive statements and did now no longer reveal the proper function of regulation to the courtroom docket if you want to hoodwink the courtroom docket and steady a beneficial alleviation (Asgar Kadar Sheikh & Anr. v. Jail Superintendent). A Bench of Justices VM Deshpande and Amit B Borkar emphasized that the advocates are predicted to make correct statements as officials and now no longer suppress fabric information to get beneficial orders.

The Bench on the outset recounted that a lot of subjects on difficult issues are regularly disposed of with the aid of using courts on the premise of statements made with the aid of using advocates assuming it to be accurate and true. On expectation from advocates to confirm the function of regulation earlier than making the presentation to the Court, the Bench said, "We are of the view that during a given case, it is able to be because of the negligence of the suggestions, however, the effects could be a misguided judgment having precedential value, probable requiring charter of Larger Bench to accurate the mistake of regulation which crept in because of failure at a part of the suggestions to carry out his obligation."

The Court additionally emphasized thru their order that a message is needed to take delivery of to every suggest to be accountable and cautious in what's supplied to the Court. "Advocates are a category with a completely unique complicated of responsibilities to their customers and to the Court," the Court said. An Advocate, being an officer of the Court, should deliver to observe of the Court the proper function of regulation whether or not for or towards both parties, it added. "Even if there's any selection towards him, it's far the obligation of the suggestions to deliver it to the attention of the Court. He might also add in a while distinguish it at the information of the precise cause, or maybe contend that the selection does now no longer lay down accurate regulation," the order said.

The robust observations had been made with the aid of using even as listening to petition filed with the aid of using Asgar Kadar Sheikh and Mohd. Yakub Abdul Majid Nagul, filed for software looking for launch on emergency parole beneath neath Rule 19(1)(C)(ii) of the Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules. Advocate MN Ali, representing the petitioners, apprised the Court that the petitioners were granted parole on events. Sheikh had surrendered after his parole without a day's postpone, even as Nagul had surrendered after a postponing of eleven days.

Ali additionally mentioned an order surpassed with the aid of using a co-ordinate bench in a co-accused's case directing the prison governor to rethink his parole software. Relying on the statements of Ali and to keep judicial time, the Bench commenced dictating a comparable order withinside the petition in an open courtroom docket in part permitting the petition. However mid-dictation, they stated that each petitioner had surrendered overdue on in advance events. They additionally found an unreported judgment of a co-ordinate bench which in reality laid down that convicts who had surrendered overdue on in advance events aren't entitled to emergency parole.

The Court consequently adjourned the problem for a clean listening to. On the following listening to, Ali confessed to having been privy to the criminal function that postpones in surrendering did now no longer entitle the applicant for launch on emergency parole, he purposefully did now no longer divulge to get a beneficial order. The Court found that Ali desired to get an order from them with observations on deserves of the case in order that the Jail Superintendent of Nashik could pressure to launch the petitioners on emergency parole.

In mild of the development, the Court pulled up Ali for trying to lie to the Court with the aid of using suppressing fabric truth that each petitioner had been, in truth, now no longer eligible for launch on emergency parole. "We are of the opinion that the suggestion for the petitioners had attempted to curl the applicable information and suppressed the fabric truth to grab beneficial order," the Court said.

In view of the information and circumstances, the Court refused to supply emergency parole to the petitioners mentioning motives that the petitioners had now no longer surrendered on time throughout preceding events. The Court additionally stated that their conviction became beneath neath unique acts which withinside the context of different offenses (violence the use of risky weapons, mischief with the aid of using hearthplace and explosives with a goal to reason hurt) amounted to critical offenses.

"This case illustrates a strive at the part of the suggestions for the petitioners with the aid of using making a deceptive announcement which on the primary blush seems to be harmless however on deeper scrutiny well-known shows an try to twist information to get beneficial alleviation for his customers," the Court said.


Document:


Courtesy/By: YASHASVI SHARMA  |  28 Jun 2021     Views:267

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:6220
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5629
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5610
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5410
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5430
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:5080
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5446
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5437
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5560
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5744
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5454
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5418
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5370
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5494
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5448
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5776
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5601
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6450
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5564
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5907
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5810
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5993
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5847
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5957
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5749
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:9154
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7683
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7723
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7510
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8496
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7820
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6354
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:7142
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6397
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6405
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6661
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6348
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6332
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6379
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6352
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6704
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6195
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6228
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6677
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6878
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6450
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6888
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8891
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6882
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6545
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:12219
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6260
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:7125
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6695
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6406
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6634
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6268
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6722
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6386
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6831
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:7058
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7289
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:11172
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6480
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6353
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7490
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6199
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6209
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7796
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6740
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6283
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6330
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6278
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8381
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6564
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6198
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:6051
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:7141
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:6075
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6494
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6331
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:6014
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:6005
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:6170
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8613
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7218
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6286
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:6000
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6217
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5771
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5999
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5826
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6434
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6554
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6277
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6752
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:6058
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6198
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6790
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6527
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96511
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:74099
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71511
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70651
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:60022
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.