• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • SC overtuns landlord and tenant agreement are arbitrable

Latest News

Back

SC overtuns landlord and tenant agreement are arbitrable

Courtesy/By: Gowri  |  17 Aug 2021     Views:316

Introduction

an occupancy arrangement was gone into between the landowner and the inhabitant with respect to specific godowns and different constructions. The greatest time of occupancy was ten years. The tenure understanding gave a discretion statement. Following ten years, the property manager called upon the inhabitant to empty the premises. Upon the occupant's inability to empty the premises, the landowner gave a notification of discretion to the inhabitant.

Fact of the case

The property manager applied under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act for the arrangement of a judge. The High Court of Calcutta dismissed the occupant's protests identifying with the non-arbitrability of the debate and alluded the make a difference to discretion. 

 

In the mean time, the Court passed its judgment on account of Himangni Enterprises (deciding that property manager and inhabitant questions administered by the TP Act would not be arbitrable). In view of the judgment in Himangni Enterprises, an audit/review application was documented in the High Court of Calcutta against the request naming the referee. The High Court of Calcutta dismissed this application, against which an allure was liked under the watchful eye of the Court. 

Vidya Drolia I (2019)

At the point when a two-judge seat previously heard the allure in 2019 ("Vidya Drolia I"), the Court held that a question between landowner occupant represented by TP Act was never covered under either Natraj Studios (as this was a case under Bombay Rent Act) or Booz Allen (as this was a case including implementation of home loan which was a right in rem). The Court varied with its judgment in Himangni Enterprises and held that the choice did not depend on strong thinking. It held that only in light of the fact that the public authority could pull out the exception (from the materialness of Delhi Rent Act) would not deliver the question inarbitrable. 

 

The Court concurred that if the Delhi Rent Act becomes irrelevant, the question would be administered by TP Act. In any case, it was not persuaded that a referee couldn't choose property manager tenure issue represented under TP Act. Investigating the arrangements of the TP Act (especially Sections 111, 114 and 114A, which explicitly cover property manager inhabitants' privileges and liabilities), the Court held that the questions under TP Act can be chosen by a referee, and there isn't anything in the TP Act that precludes arbitrability. 

 

Having in this way wound up at chances with its judgment in Himangni Enterprises, the Court alluded the make a difference to a bigger seat of three adjudicators, which finished in the present Vidya Drolia II judgment. 

 

Vidya Drolia II (2020)

In the Vidya Drolia II Judgment, the Court set out a four-crease test to decide the arbitrability of debates. It held that a question would be inarbitrable when: 

 

it identifies with activities in rem or activities that don't relate to subordinate rights in personam that emerge from rights in rem. 

 

it influences outsider rights; have erga omnes9 impact; require unified settling, and common mediation would not be fitting and enforceable; 

 

it identifies with the basic sovereign and public interest elements of the state; and 

 

it is explicitly or by fundamental ramifications non-arbitrable according to compulsory statute(s). 

 

Applying the above standards to the current landowner inhabitant question under TP Act, and alluding to Sections 111, 114 and 114A of the Transfer of Property Act, the Court held that there isn't anything in the TP Act that explicitly or impliedly bars intervention. Such questions were not activities in rem, yet activities in personam that emerged from rights in rem. They didn't influence outsider rights or have erga omnes impact. They additionally don't identify with any sovereign elements of the state. 

Conclusion

As respects the grounds predicated on open approach, the Court held that the equivalent could well be raised before the referee as they could be raised under the watchful eye of a common court. As under different demonstrations of lawmaking body, the referee would be limited by the TP Act, and would need to choose questions in accordance with the advantages and insurances gave to occupants. The Court additionally held that an honor passed in a landowner inhabitant question would be enforceable like a pronouncement of common Court. Likewise, it held that landowner occupant questions covered under the TP Act would be arbitrable.


Document:


Courtesy/By: Gowri  |  17 Aug 2021     Views:316

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:6165
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5582
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5561
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5358
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5381
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:5032
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5396
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5387
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5510
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5691
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5401
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5365
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5317
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5441
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5392
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5724
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5551
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6397
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5515
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5860
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5759
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5946
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5798
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5910
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5703
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:9099
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7634
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7673
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7464
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8433
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7771
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6306
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:7091
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6350
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6354
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6607
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6301
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6282
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6330
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6300
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6656
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6149
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6182
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6627
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6829
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6403
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6838
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8830
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6834
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6497
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:12160
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6214
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:7074
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6646
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6355
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6584
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6221
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6673
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6340
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6785
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:7004
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7233
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:11122
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6438
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6306
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7443
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6152
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6164
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7749
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6692
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6241
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6284
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6232
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8335
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6517
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6153
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:6006
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:7096
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:6030
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6449
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6286
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5971
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5962
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:6127
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8567
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7175
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6244
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5959
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6172
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5730
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5955
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5783
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6387
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6508
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6234
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6708
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:6016
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6155
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6745
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6484
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96467
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:74048
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71460
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70601
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59968
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.