• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • JANTAR MANTAR HATE SPEECH

Latest News

Back

JANTAR MANTAR HATE SPEECH

Courtesy/By: Aman Jaisawal  |  28 Aug 2021     Views:358

A man accused in the Jantar Mantar anti-Muslim sloganeering case has been denied anticipatory bail by a Delhi Court, which observed that he cannot absolve himself of all responsibility for the “inflammatory and incendiary” content in the speeches allegedly made during the event. [State v. Preet Singh]

In the course of its order, the Court acknowledged that the right to assemble and the freedom to air one's thoughts were cherished under the Constitution of India. However, it emphasised that such rights were not absolute. The court said that They are to be exercised with inherent reasonable restrictions. It is apposite to mention that the applicant (Singh) not only voluntarily organised the event but also actively participated and provided support to the views and contents of inflammatory speeches, which were being made by the participants / accused persons at that time, by acknowledging and endorsing via gestures and clapping intermittently.

In this case, Additional Sessions Judge Anil Antil further found that, on prima facie analysis of the inflammatory and incendiary content of the speeches or interviews of the participant's members of the event, comments especially those pertaining in express pejorative references to a religious community, and keeping in view that the applicant was an active organiser of the event, he cannot later absolve himself of the responsibility of the content or consequences arising therefrom.”

The Judge was of the view that the complicity of the applicant, namely, Preet Singh, in the alleged offences was “prima facie evident” from the material placed before the Court.

the Court further opined that Singh's contention that the essential ingredients of the offence under Section 153­A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion etc.) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) are not made out was totally unconvincing.

The Court also underscored that Singh was expected to act more responsibly in the matter. It was expected that he ought to have exercised his authority, in these circumstances, and prevented participants from airing such inflammatory opinions in the larger interest of the public/committee welfare. On the other hand, the applicant is clearly seen actively participating in the incendiary speeches along with his other associates.

Singh has been booked for various offences including, promoting enmity between different groups and criminal conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code, and the Epidemic Diseases Act. He was allegedly part of a rally that took place on August 8 in Delhi under the Bharat Jodo Movement against colonial-era laws in the country where anti-Muslim slogans were said to be raised.

The rally was organised by former BJP spokesperson and Supreme Court lawyer, Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.

Singh, his Counsel Azad Singh argued, had gone to the event only to inform the supporters not to gather as there was no permission and the event had been cancelled. It was also argued that Singh did not intend to cause harm to any person, public, any property concerning individual and government and spread any kind of hatred or enmity between the community and public. The authenticity of the alleged video clipping and transcript was challenged as well by Singh's counsel, who said that its veracity could only be tested during the trial, which was far away considering the COVID-19 pandemic situation.

Additional Public Prosecutor S K Kain opposed the bail plea, arguing it appeared that the hateful slogans were passed against a particular religion by Singh along with other co­-accused. It was also pointed out that Singh was the president of the Save India Foundation and the co-­organiser of the event where “inflammatory” sloganeering took place and “hate speech” was delivered.

The Court recorded the prosecutor’s submission in the bail order, which stated that people belonging to various outfits had gathered in huge numbers and that seeing this opportunity, Singh with his associates “conspired to use the platform to create communal disharmony” and “give communal colours to their plants”.The court was told that they persuade the youth to propagate against a particular community, despite the sanction to gather refused by the competent authority.

The Court opined that prima facie, on the basis of the material on record and the prosecution’s submissions, there was active participation by Singh in his individual capacity and also as the main organiser of the event itself, which was conducted at Jantar Mantar in spite of the denial of permission by the Delhi Police and total disregard to Covid­19 protocol issued by the Government of India.

The Court found Singh to be an active main organiser of the event and an "influential personality." As such, the Judge also opined that there was a possibility of him interfering with the investigation and/or influencing the witnesses. The court concluded that it is a pre­mature stage to enlarge the applicant/accused Preet Singh on bail at this conjuncture,

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Aman Jaisawal  |  28 Aug 2021     Views:358

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:6165
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5582
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5561
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5358
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5381
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:5032
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5396
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5387
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5510
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5691
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5401
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5365
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5317
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5441
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5392
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5724
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5551
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6397
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5515
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5860
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5759
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5946
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5798
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5910
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5703
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:9099
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7634
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7673
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7464
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8433
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7771
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6306
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:7091
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6350
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6354
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6607
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6301
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6282
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6330
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6300
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6656
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6149
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6182
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6627
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6829
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6403
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6838
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8830
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6834
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6497
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:12160
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6214
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:7074
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6646
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6355
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6584
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6221
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6673
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6340
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6785
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:7004
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7233
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:11122
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6438
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6306
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7444
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6152
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6164
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7749
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6692
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6241
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6284
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6233
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8335
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6517
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6153
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:6006
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:7096
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:6030
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6449
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6286
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5971
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5962
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:6127
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8567
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7175
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6245
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5959
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6172
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5730
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5955
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5783
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6387
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6508
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6234
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6708
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:6016
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6155
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6745
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6484
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96467
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:74048
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71460
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70601
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59968
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.