• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Allahabad High Court quashes detention of man booked under NSA

Latest News

Back

Allahabad High Court quashes detention of man booked under NSA

Courtesy/By: Shruti Saha  |  08 Sep 2021     Views:251

The Allahabad High Court has quashed detention of one, Mohd. Faiyyaz Mansuri was booked under the National Security Act, 1980 for an alleged Facebook post on Babri Masjid (Mohd. Faiyyaz Mansuri v. Union of India).

A Division Bench comprising Justices Ramesh Sinha and Saroj Yadav opined that Mansuri's detention under NSA was justified but the delay by the government in disposing of his representation was not, and quashed the detention order on that ground. In its order passed on a Habeas Corpus plea, the Court emphasized that the Indian Constitution guarantees various freedoms and personal liberty to all persons, but the same should not be 'misused'.The order said that however, it should be kept in mind by one and all that the constitutional guarantee of such freedoms and liberty is not meant to be abused and misused so as to endanger and threaten the very foundation of the pattern of our free society in which the guaranteed democratic freedom and personal liberty is designed to grow and flourish. Posting provocative messages through his Facebook wall strikes at the root of the State’s authority and is directly connected to ‘public order, the court said.

The detenue had allegedly put up the post on Facebook. On August 5, 2020, a written report was filed by one Sagar Kapoor, that the detenue/petitioner had posted a provocative post with the intention of provoking the sentiments of Hindu society through his Facebook. One Samreen Bano made an indecent comment to that post and was supported by some other persons, it was alleged. On the basis of the said written report, a case was registered under Sections 153A, 292, 505 (2), 506, 509 of Indian Penal Code, and Section 67 of Information Technology Act, 2008. During the investigation, Section 292 and 509 were dropped and Section 295A was added.

Later, the applicant was sent to jail and subsequently, he was booked under National Security Act and detained. The counsel for the applicant/accused submitted that police had filed the charge-sheet against the detenue without verifying the facts or evidence as mandated under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act to connect a person with an information technology crime. He also argued that in the FIR, four persons were named as accused and the main person, Samreen Bano, who allegedly made abusive comments, has not been arrested to date.

It was also argued that delay and latches by the government in considering the petitioner’s representation has infringed fundamental rights of the detenue enshrined under Articles 21 and 22 (5) of the Constitution of India. On the other hand, the Additional Government Advocate (AGA) argued that the Act/offense committed by the detenue/petitioner violated the rights of other religions and is in the nature of insulting the religious sentiments of one community. The calculated tendency of this aggravated form of insult is clearly to disrupt public order, it was submitted. It was in the nature of insulting religion with the deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of one class, submitted the AGA. The Court held that the grounds on which the petitioner was 'detained by the authorities were justified.

"This Court, therefore, has no hesitation in holding that the instance of petitioner's activities enumerated in the grounds of detention, clearly show that his activities cover a wide field and fall within the contours of the concept of 'public order' Hence, there is no substance on the plea of the petitioner in this regard."However, on the issue of deciding the petitioner's representation, the Court took into account the argument of the petitioner and held government's affidavit did not contain a day-to-day explanation while dealing with the petitioner's representation between October 25, 2020, to November 11, 2020. Having regard to the nature of detention and rigor of the law, we are of the view that there was a disproportionate delay at the end of the Central Government. The Habeas Corpus plea was, therefore, allowed and the detention order under NSA was quashed.

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Shruti Saha  |  08 Sep 2021     Views:251

News Updates

Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:43
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:65
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:65
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:57
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:65
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:91
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:83
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:151
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:90
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:134
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:133
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:207
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:162
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:115
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:148
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:134
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:99
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:110
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:232
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:305
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:197
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:240
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:176
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:167
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:270
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:212
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:173
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:227
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:245
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:138
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:245
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:148
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:210
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:152
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:209
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:246
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:286
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:203
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:316
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:160
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:204
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:204
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:207
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:807
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:585
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:952
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:466
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:546
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:579
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:533
Supreme Court sends a notice about a petition for ...
09 Jan 2023     Views:770
The Meghalaya High Court's hold on the MoU definin...
08 Jan 2023     Views:781
Google's appeal of the ?1,337 crore fine from the ...
04 Jan 2023     Views:242
SC Issues Notice In A Batch Of Pleas Challenging T...
03 Jan 2023     Views:315
The Supreme Court rejects appeals against the 2016...
02 Jan 2023     Views:307
Chanda Kochhar and her husband Deepak Kochhar rema...
01 Jan 2023     Views:332
Gender Discrimination in intestate succession unde...
29 Dec 2022     Views:552
Section 300 CrPC BarTrial of a Person Not Only for...
29 Dec 2022     Views:423
Centre Informs Rajya Sabha That There Is No Propos...
28 Dec 2022     Views:314
Calcutta High Court: Depriving wife of her Stridha...
27 Dec 2022     Views:464
Sec 498A: An Apology should be tempered with genui...
24 Dec 2022     Views:292
Kerala High Court: Search engines like Google cann...
23 Dec 2022     Views:387
Rules of the Game Cannot be Changed After the Game...
23 Dec 2022     Views:1174
Bombay High Court: Social Media has become an impo...
21 Dec 2022     Views:438
Calcutta High Court Grants Bail to Murder Accused ...
19 Dec 2022     Views:376
Sec 438 CrPC: Anticipatory Bail Plea is Not Mainta...
19 Dec 2022     Views:546
Rights of secured creditors under SARFAESI, Recove...
18 Dec 2022     Views:298
Can a man accuse his wife of domestic violence? De...
17 Dec 2022     Views:576
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BAIL PROVISIONS UNDER THE IND...
15 Dec 2022     Views:582
Guardianship of an illegitimate minor granted to h...
14 Dec 2022     Views:280
Under the POCSO Act, rehabilitation of the victim ...
14 Dec 2022     Views:293
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BAIL PROVISIONS UNDER THE IND...
13 Dec 2022     Views:795
The current collegium system shouldn't be abandone...
10 Dec 2022     Views:337
Framing of a uniform marriage code applicable to a...
09 Dec 2022     Views:425
Telangana High Court: Appropriation of a Decree of...
07 Dec 2022     Views:283
Appointment Cannot Be Denied Merely Because The Ca...
06 Dec 2022     Views:486
FIR has been Lodged for Settling Monetary Dispute-...
06 Dec 2022     Views:341
Form 16 Issued By Employer Is Reliable Evidence To...
06 Dec 2022     Views:756
Bombay high court issued instructions in a PIL loo...
06 Dec 2022     Views:579
CA Cannot Be Prosecuted for ingenuine documents su...
05 Dec 2022     Views:486
Bombay High Court Slams Maharashtra's State Mental...
04 Dec 2022     Views:208
Ex-parte order passed by Delhi High Court for prot...
04 Dec 2022     Views:268
AFTER HAVING CONSENSUAL INTERCOURSE, DECLINING TO ...
30 Nov 2022     Views:463
Allahabad HC Rules That Marriage Certificate Issue...
29 Nov 2022     Views:496
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT ASKS BCI TO REPLY TO THE PLEA ...
28 Nov 2022     Views:219
Second and Successive Anticipatory Bail Applicatio...
26 Nov 2022     Views:304
Court Sentences Man To Six-Month Imprisonment For ...
26 Nov 2022     Views:217
Delhi High Court awards grande legal costs of Rs. ...
24 Nov 2022     Views:316
What Will Happen If Lawyers Go on Strike and Meet ...
23 Nov 2022     Views:277
KERALA HC HELD THAT HUSBAND IS LIABLE FOR SEX WITH...
23 Nov 2022     Views:1254
SC Refuses To Entertain Plea Seeking Two Child Pol...
22 Nov 2022     Views:248
DUE TO DISTRICT JUDGES' RELUCTANCE TO GRANT BAIL O...
21 Nov 2022     Views:210
Supreme Court seeks Union Government to answer a p...
21 Nov 2022     Views:287
SOCIETY'S OUTRAGE NOT GROUND TO SUPPRESS FREE SPEE...
20 Nov 2022     Views:255
Plea for guidelines on seizure of digital device...
19 Nov 2022     Views:286
MLA Poaching case...
19 Nov 2022     Views:213
Supreme Court stays Bombay High Court's observatio...
18 Nov 2022     Views:310
P&H HC SAYS, CHEQUE BOUNCE COMPLAINT FILED ON THE ...
16 Nov 2022     Views:247
J&K will always be part of India; Civil society gr...
15 Nov 2022     Views:251
POCSO not meant to criminalise consensual romantic...
14 Nov 2022     Views:299
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:90591
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:62927
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:62868
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:56762
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:50918
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

Allow Cookies!

By using our website, you agree to the use of cookies

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1127 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.