• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Legal News
  • P&H HC SAYS, CHEQUE BOUNCE COMPLAINT FILED ON THE 14TH DAY OF SENDING LEGAL NOTICE IS UNMAINTAINABLE

Latest News

Back

P&H HC SAYS, CHEQUE BOUNCE COMPLAINT FILED ON THE 14TH DAY OF SENDING LEGAL NOTICE IS UNMAINTAINABLE

Courtesy/By: Kriti Sood  |  16 Nov 2022     Views:301

In a recent judgment delivered by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, no court can take cognizance of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, unless a valid written complaint, fulfilling all the requirements, is filed by the complainant according to Section 142 of the aforementioned act. The single-judge bench of Justice Aman Chaudhary heard the appeal challenging the judgment passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class at Yamuna Nagar, vide which the complaint was dismissed.

The facts of the case at hand were that an agreement was entered into between the parties, i.e., The Haryana State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. (appellant) and M/s Hanuman Rice Mill and another (respondents). Accordingly, 47,322 quintals and 80 kgs of paddy were supplied for custom milling to the respondents. However, the consignment was found to be short of 6738 quintals and 2 kgs of paddy when it was lifted from the sheller, which cost the plaintiff/appellant a total loss of Rs.78,00,800/-. Subsequently, in the discharge of the existing part liability, the respondent issued a cheque for a sum of Rs.50 lakhs, drawn on the State Bank of India (Jagadhari branch). However, the same was dishonoured vide memo with the remarks “funds insufficient”. This was repeated, after which 15 days were given to the respondents via a postal legal notice to make the requisite payment. However, due to non-payment of the amount, the complaint was filed by the appellant wherein the respondents were summoned by the trial Court to face the trial. Lastly, even the High Court stated that the trial Court had rightly held the complaint to be unmaintainable, and premature, having been filed on 3.11.2010 i.e., the 14th day.

Mr Pawan Girdhar and Mr Manav Bajaj counsel for the appellant contended before the court that the view taken by the trial court of “premature filing of the complaint on the 14th day” was incorrect. They submitted that since the cognizance of the complaint had been taken on the same day itself, so it cannot be regarded as a premature complaint. Moreover, this approach adopted by the learned trial court while dismissing the complaint was a hyper-technical one. Contrarily, Mr Parminder Singh, the counsel for the respondent submitted that the factum of taking the cognizance on the same very day would not, ipso facto, make the complaint maintainable. Moreover, waiting for the 15 days to expire is an important condition mentioned under the provision of Section 138 of the Act.

Since the complainant was under a legal obligation to have waited for 15 days after sending a legal notice, the single-judge bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class needed no interference. Furthermore, the complainant failed to prove the ingredients of Section 138 of the NI Act. The court placed reliance on the judgment of Sarav Investment & Financial Consultancy Private Limited and another vs. Llyods, Register of Shipping, India Officer, Staff Provident Fund and another, (2007) 13 SCC 753, which held that nothing contained in the main provision of Section 138 shall apply unless the requirements prescribed therein are complied with.

Hence, the premature filing of the complaint was the only ground for dismissing the appeal. In the view of the court, since an important and major ingredient of the offence in question is not being fulfilled the complaint in hand deserves to be dismissed.

Refer to the following case for more details - The Haryana State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. v. M/s Hanuman Rice Mill and another (Case No.- CRA-AS-338-2022)


Document:


Courtesy/By: Kriti Sood  |  16 Nov 2022     Views:301

News Updates

Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:375
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:317
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:265
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:345
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:382
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:349
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:201
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:265
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:204
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:197
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:328
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:209
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:238
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:204
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:244
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:217
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:217
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:211
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:211
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:262
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:275
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:276
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:392
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:304
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:288
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:1464
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:256
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:374
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:232
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:258
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:286
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:247
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:331
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:258
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:321
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:402
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:616
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:999
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:241
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:297
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:499
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:193
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:268
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:858
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:526
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:450
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:427
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:350
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:264
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:457
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:361
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:279
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:503
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:328
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:228
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:383
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:270
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:276
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:237
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:737
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:745
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:382
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:283
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:437
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:228
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:301
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:294
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:382
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:889
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:696
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:1083
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:555
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:640
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:813
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:735
Supreme Court sends a notice about a petition for ...
09 Jan 2023     Views:872
The Meghalaya High Court's hold on the MoU definin...
08 Jan 2023     Views:866
Google's appeal of the ?1,337 crore fine from the ...
04 Jan 2023     Views:307
SC Issues Notice In A Batch Of Pleas Challenging T...
03 Jan 2023     Views:413
The Supreme Court rejects appeals against the 2016...
02 Jan 2023     Views:405
Chanda Kochhar and her husband Deepak Kochhar rema...
01 Jan 2023     Views:453
Gender Discrimination in intestate succession unde...
29 Dec 2022     Views:709
Section 300 CrPC BarTrial of a Person Not Only for...
29 Dec 2022     Views:593
Centre Informs Rajya Sabha That There Is No Propos...
28 Dec 2022     Views:412
Calcutta High Court: Depriving wife of her Stridha...
27 Dec 2022     Views:610
Sec 498A: An Apology should be tempered with genui...
24 Dec 2022     Views:388
Kerala High Court: Search engines like Google cann...
23 Dec 2022     Views:521
Rules of the Game Cannot be Changed After the Game...
23 Dec 2022     Views:2529
Bombay High Court: Social Media has become an impo...
21 Dec 2022     Views:538
Calcutta High Court Grants Bail to Murder Accused ...
19 Dec 2022     Views:486
Sec 438 CrPC: Anticipatory Bail Plea is Not Mainta...
19 Dec 2022     Views:804
Rights of secured creditors under SARFAESI, Recove...
18 Dec 2022     Views:394
Can a man accuse his wife of domestic violence? De...
17 Dec 2022     Views:744
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BAIL PROVISIONS UNDER THE IND...
15 Dec 2022     Views:818
Guardianship of an illegitimate minor granted to h...
14 Dec 2022     Views:383
Under the POCSO Act, rehabilitation of the victim ...
14 Dec 2022     Views:390
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF BAIL PROVISIONS UNDER THE IND...
13 Dec 2022     Views:1178
The current collegium system shouldn't be abandone...
10 Dec 2022     Views:428
Framing of a uniform marriage code applicable to a...
09 Dec 2022     Views:598
Telangana High Court: Appropriation of a Decree of...
07 Dec 2022     Views:410
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:90760
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:64122
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:63751
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:61538
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:51749
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

Allow Cookies!

By using our website, you agree to the use of cookies

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1127 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.