• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • Delhi High Court Issues India’s First ‘Dynamic’ Website Blocking Injunction for Copyright Infringement.

Latest News

Back

Delhi High Court Issues India’s First ‘Dynamic’ Website Blocking Injunction for Copyright Infringement.

Courtesy/By: Sakshi Garg  |  15 Apr 2019     Views:782

The Delhi High Court through its judgement in UTV v 1337x.to, delivered on April 10, has made a significant contribution to this jurisprudence in India, particularly by crafting a new remedy of a ‘dynamic injunction’, whereby rights-holders do not need to go through the ‘cumbersome’ process of a judicial order in order to issue blocking orders to ISPs. Instead, as per this ruling, the plaintiffs have been allowed to approach the Joint Registrar of the Delhi High Court (an administrative position), to extend an injunction order already granted against a website, against a similar ‘mirror/redirect/alphanumeric’ website which contains the same content as the original website.

Mr. Justice Manmohan’s order is important for its detailed consideration of the issues involved in issuing website blocking injunctions, (at least compared to similar blocking injunctions we have seen in the past) as well as for the unique final remedy crafted to secure copyright holders’ interests in the form of a dynamic injunction.

While dealing extensively with the issue of online piracy, the Delhi High Court has held that it has the inherent power to issue a ‘dynamic injunction’ to contain mirror websites of an injuncted rogue website.

Rogue websites are those that primarily and predominantly share infringing/pirated content or illegal work. These websites either themselves allow streaming of content or provide a searchable database with links to third-party ‘Flagrantly Infringing Online Locations’. Mirror websites or ‘Hydra-Headed’ websites are the ones that multiply and resurface as alphanumeric or mirror websites on being blocked.

Background of the case was that the plaintiffs, including UTV Software Communications Ltd., are companies engaged in ‘creating content, producing and distributing cinematographic films around the world including in India’. The defendants are, inter alia, thirty identified websites, along with John Doe defendants, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, the Department of Telecom and various ISPs.

The plaintiffs contend that the defendant websites host and provide access to their copyrighted works, in a manner which infringes their rights under the Indian Copyright Act. The plaintiffs provided access to a sample of such infringing content as evidence that the websites were primarily engaging in online piracy.

The principal defendants (the websites) did not respond to the summons, presumably since they are hosted outside of India. However, as the issues were deemed to be questions of law ‘of general public importance’, the Court appointed an amicus curiae, Mr. Hemant Singh, to assist the court with its determination on the questions of law

 

The Court stated that although the Indian law does not provide for a ‘dynamic injunction’, the same can be issued to meet the ends of justice and to address the menace of piracy. 

Consequently, a plaintiff can file an affidavit confirming that the newly impleaded website is a “mirror/redirect/alphanumeric website” with sufficient supporting evidence, along with an Order I Rule 10 application for impleadment, to the Joint Registrar.

On being satisfied that the website is a mirror of an injuncted rogue website(s), the Joint Registrar shall issue directions to Internet Service Providers to disable access to them.While adjudicating the issue, the Court also laid down an illustrative list of factors to determine, qualitatively, if any website is a rogue website.

These factors are:

  1. Whether the primary purpose of the website is to commit or facilitate copyright infringement the flagrancy of the infringement, or the flagrancy of the facilitation of the infringement;
  2. Whether the detail of the registrant is masked and no personal or traceable detail is available either of the Registrant or of the user.
  3. Whether there is silence or inaction by such website after receipt of takedown notices pertaining to copyright infringement;
  4. Whether the online location makes available or contains directories, indexes or categories of the means to infringe or facilitate infringement of copyright;
  5. Whether the owner or operator of the online location demonstrates a disregard for copyright generally;
  6. Whether access to the online location has been disabled by orders from any court of another country or territory on the ground of or related to copyright infringement;
  7. Whether the website contains guides or instructions to circumvent measures, or any order of any court, that disables access to the website on the ground of or related to copyright infringement;
  8. The volume of traffic at or frequency of access to the website;
  9. Any other relevant matter.

The Court has clarified that the test does not apply to intermediaries governed by the Information Technology  Act, which have statutory immunity and function in a wholly different manner.

Further, the Court also opined that website blocking in the case of rogue websites, like the defendant-websites, strikes a balance between preserving the benefits of a free and open Internet and efforts to stop crimes such as digital piracy. The Court also rejected the school of thought that an infringer of copyright on the internet should be treated differently from an infringer in the physical world, in the name of facilitating free consumer choice.

In view of the fact that the majority of the viewers accessing, viewing and downloading infringing content are youngsters who do not have knowledge that the content is pirated/infringing, the Court has issued directions to the Central Government as well.

The Court has directed the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology and the Department of Telecommunication to explore the possibility of framing a policy under which a warning is issued to the viewers of the infringing content. The warning could be issued in the form of e-mails, pop-ups, or other modes, cautioning the viewers to cease viewing/downloading the infringing material, the Court said. In the event the warning is not heeded to and the viewers/subscribers continue to view, access or download the infringing/pirated content, then a fine could be levied on the viewers/subscribers, it added.

In the present suit, the Court passed a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendant-websites from hosting, streaming, reproducing, distributing, making available to the public and/or communicating to the public, any cinematograph work/content/programme/show in relation to which plaintiffs have copyright. 


Courtesy/By: Sakshi Garg  |  15 Apr 2019     Views:782

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:6190
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5605
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5584
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5380
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5403
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:5055
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5418
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5410
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5531
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5713
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5423
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5388
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5340
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5464
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5414
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5747
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5573
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6419
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5537
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5882
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5781
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5968
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5821
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5932
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5724
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:9123
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7656
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7695
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7486
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8459
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7794
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6327
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:7113
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6372
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6377
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6631
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6323
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6305
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6352
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6323
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6677
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6171
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6203
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6649
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6851
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6425
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6861
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8855
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6856
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6522
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:12186
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6236
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:7098
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6668
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6378
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6608
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6242
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6695
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6362
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6807
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:7028
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7261
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:11144
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6458
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6326
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7464
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6173
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6184
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7770
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6714
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6261
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6304
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6254
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8355
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6538
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6173
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:6026
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:7116
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:6050
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6470
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6306
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5991
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5982
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:6148
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8587
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7195
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6265
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5979
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6193
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5750
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5976
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5803
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6407
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6528
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6254
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6728
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:6036
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6175
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6767
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6504
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96487
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:74070
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71483
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70622
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59991
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.