Emphasizing that the Hindi news channel 'Aaj Tak' made some interesting, humorous, and indifferent statements to the Indian army and exposed corruption through the death of film actor Sushant Singh Rajput, filmmaker Nissh Navalakha made the claim before the Broadcasting Department demanded its suspension.
The complaint states that during the India-China negotiations, media manager Sweta Singh and his colleague Rohit Sardana made the same remarks against the Indian army.
"This is a military duty. You cannot blame the government for that."
"that the Chinese entry into the Indian Ocean is not only flawed but also the military as it crosses the border is not the responsibility of the government".
".. This is not a situation where you ask questions after something has happened. There are a few questions to be answered here. Firstly, when the People's Liberation Army enters the Indian state and our troops lie, then it is in the Military. existing troops ”.
As per the complaint filed by Advocates Rajesh G Inamdar and Amit Pai, the above broadcaster "attacks India's sovereignty and truth, security, public order, respect or morality and is completely inconsistent with freedom of the press."
The complaint states that the anchor specifications, which are not experts in the field, could affect the character of the Armed Forces and the formation of strategic alliances.
"In an ever-changing environment, as radio is reaching more people, this is a way of trying to spread a negative image of Indian soldiers, and directly violate the Civil Code," the complaint said.
"The station and the pins despise every Indian veteran serving the country, the Martyrs, their families and all the citizens of this nation for their apathy, defamation, disrespect, disrespect, disrespect, corruption, suspicion and contempt.
The complaint also alleges that the arrest of the station in the death of Sushant Singh Rajput had not been heard. It is said that shortly after the news of her death, the channel gave the nickname "How did you hit the wicker" and published photos of her body. A reporter at the station also attacked members of Sushant's distraught family with ridiculous questions, the complaint said.
It is also alleged that Aaj Tak made some tweets and the fake photos were known to be real and made the final tweets.
In this background, the complaint is:
"That the broadcast clearly shows that the Aaj Tak channel openly promotes sensitivity, fake news, the anti-defamatory attitude of the Indian army, against good taste and good behavior, is shameful, deliberate, false and removes the truth and compromises the integrity of the country which clearly violates section 5 of the Act Telecommunications Cables Act, 1995 ("Cable Law"), Rule 6 (a), (c), (d), (e), (h), (i), of the Cable Television Laws Codes, 1994 (Rules), the Code of Ethics and Broadcasting (the "Code") and the Procedures for the Media Broadcasting Principles (the "Regulation").
The complainant reminds that the provisions under the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act of 1995, 1994 The Laws and Guidelines on Telecommunications Policy Installation, give the government the power to suspend/revoke licensing companies.
"In such cases, the Department is requested to recognize the violation of the program code and suspend/cancel the reduced license granted to Aaj Tak and impose a maximum fine", the complainant, who has produced nine films including the national films' Shala ',' Fandry 'and' Anumati ', requested.
86540
103860
630
114
59824