• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • The Constitutional Court While Exercising Their Powers Of Judicial Review Would Not Assume The Role Of An Appellate Authority: SC

Latest News

Back

The Constitutional Court While Exercising Their Powers Of Judicial Review Would Not Assume The Role Of An Appellate Authority: SC

Courtesy/By: Shaily Garg  |  12 Sep 2020     Views:1078

A civil appeal was filed by the Appellant ‘Mr. Pravin Kumar’ in the case of Pravin Kumar v. Union of India, where he plea for quashing disciplinary proceedings and setting aside an order dated 5th May 2009, passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Bombay on charges of corruption and extra-constitutional conduct while he was employed as a paramilitary officer. The Appellant joined Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) as a sub-inspector and after completing the requisite training in Hyderabad was allocated to the Mumbai office and posted at the local unit of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL) in March 1996 . Later in 1997, after deputed to perform shift duty, he was deployed in the Crime and Intelligence Wing, where he was specifically entrusted with conducting surprise searches of personnel and taking strict action against anyone indulging in corruption.

One day, it was found that Constable Ram Avtar Sharma was carrying high denomination notes in his pocket near the BPCL compound. A total sum of ?10,780/- was recovered from him in the form of 100 notes of ?100/- and the rest in smaller denominations. An explanation was given by Constable Sharma that an amount of ? 9,000/- had been handed over to him by dog handler Constable KK Sharma as a personal loan after making his false entry at the GD gate. However, it was discovered throughout the investigation that the entry of personal loan was false and there had been made numerous phone calls between the Appellant and Constable KK Sharma, where the Constable was pressurized by the Appellant to alternate his loan theory by giving a false statement and deposit the impounded sum of money in his account.

Therefore, an FIR was registered by the Authorities with the regional Anti-Corruption Branch of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) acting as a Respondent, under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Additionally, an enquiry was made by an Assistant Commandant PB Patil under Rule 34 of CISF Rules, 1969.

The charge-sheet contained three charges against the appellant, ‘Mr. Pravin Kumar’ which are: Gross misconduct and indiscipline by ordering a false GD entry to the Constable Ram Avtar Sharma; Acting as an extra-constitutional authority by issuing unlawful orders to Constable KK Sharma and giving a false statement to substantiate fake GD entry; and illegally collecting bribe from contractors of BPCL through his subordinates, hence, charges of corruption framed against him.

It was shown in the Investigation and Enquiry report which was submitted by an enquiry officer containing written statements and depositions of six witnesses, an amount of ?10,780/- was seized from the Constable Ram Avtar Sharma and he failed to explain the source of this suspicious amount and his later explanation related to this amount given as a loan by other Constable KK Sharma was negated that he was threatened by the appellant to give a false statement. Also, it was examined that Constable Ram Avtar Singh has received a bundle of notes totaling Rs. 10,000/- from the contractor of BPCL for the job of lifting garbage/waste.

It was contended by counsel on behalf of the Appellant that as this appeal being the last resort, the court must see again into the witnesses and documents. It was submitted by the Appellant that the main witness had repudiated his statement and there was no corroboration between witnesses and documents. Also, the enquiry officer had acted as both the Judge and Prosecutor, this alleged to have vitiated the entirety of the proceedings. The charges which were leveled on him were fallacious as the sum recovered was nothing but a loan extended between two officials in a private capacity, and hence, there was the malicious intention of certain superior regarding duping the Appellant. Finally, an urge was made by the appellant to be lenient and give another 21 years of remaining service to him as the imposition of the severest punishment of dismissal from service was highly disproportionate.

However, it was contended by the counsel on behalf of the Respondent that “this is the case of the deliberate and planned manner of the falsifications and repeated threats were made to the subordinate officials, and the loan theory propounded by the appellant was shown as having been recurrently agitated and discarded by all the previous forums”.

 

Observations and Conclusion of the Court:

The Court is of the view that the appellant has raised some new grounds before this Court but such an exercise was in vain. The Court said that “The power of judicial review discharged by Constitutional Courts under Article 226 or 32, or when sitting in an appeal under Article 136, is distinct from the appellate power exercised by a departmental appellate authority”. The Constitutional Court while exercising their powers of judicial review would not assume the role of an appellate authority.

Where an appellate or reviewing Court/authority comes to an alternate conclusion, ordinarily the decision under appeal ought not to be disturbed in so far as it remains conceivable or is not discovered debilitated with backwardness. In the present case there is neither evidence, nor is it one where we can arrive at a different conclusion than the disciplinary authority, especially for the reasons stated hereunder. It was further observed by the Court that the appellant's contention that the punishment of dismissal was disproportionate to the allegation of corruption, is without merit. It is a settled legal proposition that the Disciplinary Authority has wide discretion in punishing proven delinquency, subject of course to principles of proportionality and fair play.[1]

Hence, it is concluded that the punishment of dismissal from service is far from disproportionate to the charges of corruption, fabrication, and intimidation which have unanimously been proven against the appellant. It was also held that the “appellants actions would most presumably have caused huge consequential losses to BPCL and lowered the reputation of the CISF amongst members of the public”. Hence, the appeal was dismissed.

 

 [1]BHEL v. M Mani, (2018) 1 SCC 285.

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Shaily Garg  |  12 Sep 2020     Views:1078

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:5994
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5419
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5399
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5190
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5214
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4861
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5245
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5236
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5353
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5538
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5244
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5219
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5171
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5289
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5247
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5573
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5400
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6238
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5364
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5707
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5608
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5799
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5650
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5764
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5552
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:8936
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7481
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7522
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7319
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8275
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7620
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6161
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:6936
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6199
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6205
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6451
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6153
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6133
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6181
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6147
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6505
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6003
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6031
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6477
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6674
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6250
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6687
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8659
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6685
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6347
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:11990
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6068
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6920
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6496
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6198
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6431
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6071
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6521
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6194
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6641
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6853
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7080
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:10971
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6291
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6156
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7283
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6004
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6017
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7595
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6544
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6094
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6140
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6084
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8185
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6365
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6006
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5857
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:6945
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5881
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6296
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6136
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5822
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5820
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:5979
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8411
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7020
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6102
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5815
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6023
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5589
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5808
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5640
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6239
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6358
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6086
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6564
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5868
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6007
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6593
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6332
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96317
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73889
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71303
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70439
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59803
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.