• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • Surat Citizens Council Trust v. State of Gujarat: Judgement Analysis

Latest News

Back

Surat Citizens Council Trust v. State of Gujarat: Judgement Analysis

Courtesy/By: Ashwin Satheesh  |  27 Oct 2020     Views:473

R/WP (PIL) No. 156 of 2018

Date of Judgement: 11/09/2018

Court: High Court of Gujarat

Coram: R. Subhash Reddy, Vipul M. Pancholi.

 

Background:

The petitioner is a Trust registered under the Bombay Trusts Act, 1950, comprising of members from the city of Surat in Gujarat. Surat Citizens Council Trust was constituted as a separate body under the Southern Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry on the 27th of March, 1990 to combat public utility service-based issues. [1]

Tapi, one of Gujarat’s largest rivers, flows through the city of Surat and its water is used for drinking, irrigation as well as for industrial purposes. However, the use of the river as a body for immersion of idols for multiple festivals has raised various environmental and health concerns. The idols were predominantly made of Plaster of Paris and contained of 92% toxic elements in addition to chemical dyes and paints. The level of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) were said to have drastically increased after festivals that involved immersions.

The present matter seeks action on part of the respondent authority to implement the Central Pollution Control Board’s (CPCB) guidelines on Idol immersion, 2010 during Ganesh Chaturthi. Through this petition, they requested the court to order the Surat Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as SMC) to strictly implement the 2010 guidelines and construct more than 45 artificial ponds made of earthen bunds for immersion. They also requested the court to issue directions to the Corporation to ban the immersion of idols into Tapi during other festivals such as Durga Puja, Janmashtami, Moharam etc.

The claims of inaction on part of the respondents was nevertheless refuted, as SMC strongly contended that it had already created 13 artificial ponds within various zones of the city. They also added that they were going to add 2 more ponds in order to meet the demands of the population. The petitioners had argued that the respondents had done nothing to ban the immersion of idols into Tapi but it was eventually proved that they had in fact effectuated the ban and the same was printed in the Times of India. SMC further advanced their commitment in the matter by producing a letter sent to the Secretary of the Urban Development Department of Gandhinagar.

 

Letter to Urban Development & Urban Housing Development, Gandhinagar:

The letter was sent on the 10/09/2018, one day before the procedure and 3 days before the festival and indicated the steps taken by SMC in avoiding and abating pollution. It contained that they had appealed to the citizens to use eco-friendly Ganeshas that were not painted using any toxic dyes or chemicals. All idols up to a height of 5 feet were appealed to be immersed in the artificial ponds. The remains of the immersion were also said to be segregated and disposed of the day after the festival and added the proposal to avail the services of Essar Company on humanitarian grounds to assist in the disposal. The letter further added that they had proposed to create 19 ponds for immersion in 2018 that could hold up to 72,100 idols and stated that the Corporation had lent infrastructural aid in addition to supply of water to the ponds.

 

Central Pollution Control Board Guidelines on Idol Immersion, 2010:

The CPCB Guidelines came into being in July, 2010 and stated that idols ought to have been made out of natural materials as provided in holy scriptures. The guidelines discouraged the painting of idols and added that if painted, to be strictly based off water-soluble and non-toxic dyes. Guideline 2(iii) directs the removal of all worship and decorative material prior to immersion in addition to segregation of those materials prior to disposal.

Guideline 2(v) provides that Idol Immersion Points (IIP) have to be barricaded and that artificial ponds may be placed with synthetic liner on the bottom. Local bodies are expected to identify an adequate number of IIP spots and release the water into free-flowing sources after checking for their colour and turbidity.

Immersions in lakes and ponds may be done only in a corner with the aid of synthetic liners. It also adds that lime is to be mixed with the water after removing the remains and the local authorities have to undertake desludging. Immersions in rivers are permitted only in temporary ponds with earthen bunds along the river bank and the remains from the same are to be disposed within 48 hours.

 

Analysis:

The CPCB Guidelines, 2010 came into being as a result of an order dated 10/02/2009 to constitute a committee to frame guidelines on the topic of idol immersion. [2] This was not the first time that the petitioner had requested the Gujarat High Court to direct the SMC to implement them. It was previously raised in Surat Citizen’s Council Trust v. State of Gujarat (2014) a few weeks prior to the festival of Ganesh Chaturthi. SMC rebutted with a stance similar to the one in the present matter by constantly emphasising that they were taking all measures to enforce the directions issued by various courts. It was also contended that the construction of about 8 to 10 artificial ponds would be done exactly a day before the festival. The petitioner requested the learned single judge bench to direct the completion well in advance as immersions would take place prior to the final days of the festival as well. Nevertheless, the court was of the opinion that those directions were sufficient and no further action was warranted by the matter. Another PIL seeking modifications of the CPCB Guidelines to make them more comprehensive was disposed on 11/11/2014 by the Gujarat High Court in light of the subject matter being one to be taken up before the National Green Tribunal.

The learned judges went through the letter by the SMC and were satisfied by the efforts on part of the respondents. However, the letter’s contents were not directive per se and merely stated that an appeal was made to the citizens. Moreover, the CPCB Guidelines under guideline 2.2(i) despite being directive, suggest the creation of artificial ponds a month prior to the date of the festival. It also adds that all concerned authorities and the public are to be made aware about the zones and locations for immersions. Despite the same, the order banning immersions in Tapi was circulated only through a single newspaper. The petitions in 2014, multiple idol immersions in Tapi in 2017 and the matter being raised yet again in 2018 provide sufficient knowledge as to the inaction on part of the respondent authority and the need to make the Guidelines mandatory and more stringent.

The Hon’ble 2 judge bench of the High Court considered the submissions from both the sides and acknowledged the binding value of orders by the National Green Tribunal on the implementation of the Guidelines of 2010. The Court referred to the ban on immersion in Tapi that was communicated through the Times of India as well as the letter made out on 10/9/2018 and were satisfied by the steps taken by the SMC in this regard. Furthermore, upon hearing the steps taken by the respondent authority, the petitioner requested the Court to dispose of the matter which was accepted.

Conclusion:

The court ordered the respondent to oversee that the ban on immersion was not only for the festival of Ganesh Chaturthi but also all other festivals. The ban on immersing in river Tapi was asked to be given widespread publication through newspapers having wide circulation in Surat. Thus curing the infirmity in the communication of the ban. The Municipal Corporation was further directed to undertake public awareness programmes through print and electronic media while also spreading awareness to manufacturers of Plaster of Paris based idols.

In 2017, more than 60000 idols were installed in Surat and most of them were immersed in Tapi despite the guidelines of 2010 in existence. Greater number of immersions in rivers may be attributed to the lack of awareness about these artificial ponds or the difficulty in using them. The petitioners had previously raised the issue of inaction in 2014 but failed to yield desired results. Needless to say, the court secured the implementation of the Guidelines of 2010 through its extensive order that demanded additional intervention by the respondent. This judgement of the Gujarat High Court plays a crucial role in setting down a precedent for saving India’s rivers that get polluted due to idol immersions during festivals.

In 2020, the CPCB brought about reformed guidelines on the 12th of May that banned idols made of Plaster of Paris and the use of decorations made of single-use plastics and thermocol. Idol makers are also to register with the local civic bodies and obtain licenses from the respective authority.

 

[1] Surat Citizen Council Trust, https://www.sgcci.in/pages/surat-citizen-council-trust/ .

[2] Andhashraddha Nirmulan Samity & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors., 2011 2 BOM CR 514.


Document:


Courtesy/By: Ashwin Satheesh  |  27 Oct 2020     Views:473

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:5855
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5284
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5265
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5054
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5077
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4727
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5116
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5108
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5223
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5407
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5113
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5089
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5040
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5158
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5118
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5440
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5270
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6100
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5233
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5574
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5478
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5666
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5520
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5637
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5422
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:8800
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7351
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7395
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7192
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8145
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7489
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6030
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:6806
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6070
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6075
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6323
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6023
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6003
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6053
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6017
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6373
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:5876
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:5902
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6348
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6543
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6121
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6556
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8519
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6557
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6219
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:11860
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:5941
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6789
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6368
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6067
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6301
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:5945
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6395
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6066
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6513
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6724
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:6949
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:10840
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6163
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6027
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7156
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:5875
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:5889
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7464
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6411
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:5969
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6011
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:5954
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8059
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6232
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:5877
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5730
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:6814
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5753
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6166
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6008
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5693
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5694
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:5849
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8283
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:6891
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:5975
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5690
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:5893
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5461
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5680
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5513
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6108
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6231
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:5957
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6437
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5740
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:5878
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6462
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6202
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96190
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73753
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71173
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70311
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59670
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.