• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • UNION OF INDIA VS EX. NO. 3192684 W. SEP. VIRENDER KUMAR

Latest News

Back

UNION OF INDIA VS EX. NO. 3192684 W. SEP. VIRENDER KUMAR

Courtesy/By: Sowbhagya Shetty  |  25 Nov 2020     Views:401

The case of Union of India vs Ex. No. 3192684 W.Sep. Virender Kumar dealt with non-compliance with Rule 180 of Army Rules Act, 1954 being a ground for ordering a retrial. Rule 180 of the Army Rules Act,1954 states that procedure when the character of a person subject to the Act is involved.

 

Brief Facts of the Case:

In the present case, Virender Kumar (respondent) killed a fellow soldier Havildar Harpal, accidentally and sustained gunshot injuries himself. The General Court Martial convicted the Respondent under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Havildar Harpal and for attempting to commit suicide. Virender Kumar was sentenced to imprisonment for life and was to be dismissed from service. Aggrieved, the respondent challenged the stated decision to the Armed Forces Tribunal for non-compliance with Rule 180 of the Army Rules, 1954. Though several grounds were taken before the Tribunal to challenge the order of the General Court Martial, the principal claim of the Respondent was non-compliance with Rule 180 of the Army Rules 1954. The Tribunal decided the petition by referring to the contention relating to Rule 180. The Tribunal stated that Rule 180 provides that a person against whom an inquiry is conducted to be present throughout the inquiry. As without doubt, the Respondent was refused permission to be present when statements of witnesses were being recorded before the Court of Inquiry, the Tribunal inferred that the entire trial against the Respondent is revoked. The Tribunal set aside the order of the Court Martial and repealed the matter for a new trial from the stage of Court of Inquiry in the exercise of its power under Section 16 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. Section 16 of the Armed Forces Tribunal deals with re-trial.

 

Judgment and Observations:

When the matter reached before the Supreme Court, the Appellant had argued that as the Respondent was allowed to cross-examine witnesses as provided in Rule 22 and during the Court Martial proceedings which he did not appropriate, there is no failure on part of the law. It was further submitted that the Court of Inquiry is only for the collection of evidence and any violation of the procedure prescribed under Rule 180 does not vitiate the proceedings of the Court Martial. The respondent, on the other hand, contended that the collection of evidence by the Court of Inquiry is a critical stage during which the accused is entitled to be provided with an opportunity as observed in Rule 180. Violation of the procedure prescribed in Rule 180 would render the entire proceedings void. The Apex Court observed that the only point considered by the Tribunal is Rule 180 and the effect of non-compliance of the said Rule. The Supreme Court in Major G.S. Sodhi v. Union of India (1991) 2 SCC 382 rejected the challenge to the Court Martial proceedings while dismissing the Writ Petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution. In Union of India & Ors. v. Major A. Hussain (IC-14827) (1998) 1 SCC 537, this Court while setting aside the judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh upheld the order of conviction of the respondent by the Court Martial.

Based on these judgments, the Apex court deduced the following: (a) The proceedings of a Court of Inquiry are like a fact-finding inquiry conducted at a stage prior to the investigation; (b) The accused is entitled to full opportunity as provided in Rule 180; (c) As a final order of conviction is based on a trial by the Court Martial, irregularities at the earlier stages cannot be grounds for setting aside the order passed by the Court Martial; (d) If the accused raises a ground of non-compliance with Rule 180 during the framing of charge or during the recording of summary of the evidence, the authorities have to amend the defect as the assent of the procedure prescribed in Rule 180 is essential.

The Supreme Court held that: Though there is non-compliance of Rule 180 of the Army Rules, in this case as the Respondent was not present during the recording of the statements of witnesses, it is clear from the record that the Respondent did not bring it to notice either at the stage of framing of the charge, recording summary of evidence or during the Court Martial proceedings. After a final order was passed by the Court Martial based on a full-fledged trial, it is not open to the Respondent to raise the ground of non-compliance of Rule 180 during the Court of Inquiry proceedings. The Tribunal is competent to direct re-trial only in case of evidence made available to the Tribunal was not produced before the Court Martial and if it appears to the Tribunal that the interests of justice require a retrial. The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to order re-trial on any other ground except that mentioned in Section 16(2). Non-compliance with Rule 180 cannot be a basis for ordering a re-trial. The Supreme Court also held that the Tribunal could only order a re-trial of a Court Martial proceeding. Therefore, the Tribunal ought not to have remanded the matter back for a de novo inquiry from the stage of Court of Inquiry on the ground of infringement of Rule 180 of the Army Rules.

 

The order passed by the Tribunal commanding a de novo inquiry from the stage of Court of Inquiry was set aside and the appeal was accordingly allowed.

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Sowbhagya Shetty  |  25 Nov 2020     Views:401

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:5986
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5408
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5388
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5181
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5203
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4850
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5238
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5228
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5346
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5530
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5237
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5212
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5163
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5282
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5240
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5565
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5392
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6229
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5355
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5699
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5601
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5791
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5642
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5757
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5544
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:8928
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7474
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7515
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7312
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8267
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7613
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6153
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:6928
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6190
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6197
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6443
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6145
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6125
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6173
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6139
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6495
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:5996
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6024
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6469
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6666
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6243
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6679
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8652
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6677
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6340
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:11983
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6059
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6912
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6489
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6191
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6423
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6064
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6513
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6186
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6632
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6846
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7073
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:10964
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6283
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6148
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7275
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:5995
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6009
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7586
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6535
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6087
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6131
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6076
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8178
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6356
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:5998
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5850
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:6937
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5874
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6289
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6129
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5814
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5812
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:5971
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8404
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7012
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6095
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5808
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6016
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5580
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5801
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5633
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6231
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6351
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6079
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6557
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5861
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:5997
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6585
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6324
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96308
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73880
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71295
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70432
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59795
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.