• Services For Users/Clients
      • Business Registrations
      • GST Registration (Person)
      • GST Registration (Company)
      • Importer Exporter Code
      • Trade License
      • FSSAI Registration
      • Udyog Aadhaar/MSME Registration
      • Shops & Establishments Registration
      • Partnership Firm Registration
      • Private Limited Company Registration
      • Producer Company Registration
      • Instant Legal Advise
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Email)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Analysis (By Email)
      • Contracts & Agreements
      • Business Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • Affidavits, Notary, Wills & POAs
      • Affidavit
      • Notary
      • Will
      • Codicil
      • General Power of Attorney
      • Special Power of Attorney
      • Attestation
      • Legal Research & Judgement Analysis
      • Judgments Search
      • Related Judgements Analysis
      • Laws/Reports/Acts Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Pleadings & Petitions Analysis
      • Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • High Courts & State Forums
      • Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Application Analysis
      • Exhibits Analysis
      • Evidence Analysis
  • Services For Lawyers
      • Online Office & Case Management
      • Assisted Online Case(s) & Calendar Management
      • Assisted Online Billing & Invoicing Assistance
      • Assistance in Recruiting Associates, Juniors, Staff
      • Assistance in Recruiting Interns
      • Translation, Transcription & Typing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • On-call Typing
      • Typing
      • Trial Preparation
      • Opening & Closing Statements
      • Pointers & Charts
      • Drafting & Document Management
      • Drafting Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Document Conversion (Jpeg to Word/PDF, PDF to Word etc)
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Drafting Wills/POAs/GPA/SPA/Affidavits
      • Legal Research
      • Judgment search
      • Laws, Acts & Reports Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Related Judgments Search
      • Pleadings & Petitions Drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - High Courts & State Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Applications & Affidavits drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder Proof Reading
      • Indexing & Table of contents
      • Preparing & Marking Exhibits
      • E Filing
  • +91 9632247247
  • Sign In/Sign Up
Menu
  • +Users/Clients Back

    • Get Fee Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Assistant
  • +Lawyers

    • Display Boards
    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Petitions & Pleadings Templates
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Secretary
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Emergency medical assistance: Pt. Parmanand Katara v. Union of India & Ors.

Latest News

Back

Emergency medical assistance: Pt. Parmanand Katara v. Union of India & Ors.

Courtesy/By: Ashwin Satheesh  |  20 Nov 2020     Views:480

Citation: (1989) 4 SCC 286

Date of judgement: 08 September 1989

 

Introduction

Right to health forms an indispensable part of the fundamental Right to life under Article 21. The obligation of fulfilling this right passes over to medical practitioners in cases of accidents and emergencies as a victim’s life rests in the skill and treatment given to him.  Nonetheless, victims of accidents are denied treatment and redirected to other hospitals due to mental apprehensions against medico-legal cases.

A Medico-legal case (MLC) involves an injury or ailment whereby affixing of liability by a law enforcement agency is necessary owing to the circumstances. [1] Such cases involve legal implications due to the nature and cause for such injury and require additional work by practitioners under the name of formalities. Victims have thus been denied treatment due to the fear of being pegged for providing evidence, being questioned by the police, presenting themselves before a Court, and getting cross-examined.

 

Facts:

An article was published in the Hindustan Times in 1988 which expressed that a motorist involved in an accident succumbed to his injuries on grounds of denial of treatment by the nearest hospital. The victim in that matter was denied admission on medico-legal grounds and was redirected to another.

The petitioner, a human rights activist, came across the contents of this article and thus filed a writ petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The petition sought the issuance of a direction to the Union of India to ensure instantaneous medical aid to those injured. He subsequently sought a procedural criminal law to avoid deaths caused by negligence in such matters and compensations for the same. Thus, the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, the Indian Medical Council & the Indian Medical Association were impleaded as respondents to the matter.

 

Submissions by the parties:

Contrary to the general trend in petitions with two opposing parties, the respondents’ contentions were on the same lines as petitioners with more input towards the legal aspect and measures incorporated by them. The hindrance in this process was contented to be caused by statutory needs to fulfill legal formalities in the presence of a police officer before administering treatment. The Medical Council, one of the respondents, raised 2 relevant clauses of the Code of Medical Ethics, 1970 that imposed a duty upon doctors to render their services.

Clause 10 stated that a physician was not bound to treat every sick person. However, in cases of emergency, it would be an obligation on a medical practitioner to be ready to respond and render service. Clause 13 of the Code expressed that the freedom to choose whom to serve would be available in cases except for emergencies. It also held that a practitioner ought not to withdraw himself from treating someone and barred willful commission of negligence.

The aforementioned clauses conveyed the duty imposed on medical practitioners to serve and treat those injured to their best without recusing themselves from performing their duty. A close reading of Clause 13 also connotes that it strictly barred willful negligence to establish the same degree of care and skill while dealing with emergencies. It was evident that the Medical Council by itself had expectations from practitioners.

Legislations such as the Indian Penal Code, CrPC, or the Motor Vehicles Act did not restrict from providing treatment before completing formalities. The life of a person is indubitably more valuable than medical formalities and to ensure the same, amendments would have to be effectuated to be able to give immediate medical care and relief. The respondents also suggested an amendment to the Indian Evidence Act to consider a doctor’s diary as evidence for accident cases to avoid the hassles of going to court.

Despite showing that these legislations did not bar practitioners from rendering aid, the ground reality of cases had cast several doubts and fears into the minds of these practitioners who wished to steer clear from litigation.

 

Judgement:

The learned judges recognized that the matter could not be kept at bay as it was of severe importance. The rationale behind having medical formalities for such cases was to keep the evidence intact. However, the inherent issues in the procedure resulted in delays. The Court also acknowledged that the general public was afraid of assisting those injured due to the fear of being asked to present evidence as a witness and produce themselves before courts.

In 1986, a Committee under the Chairmanship of the Director-General of Health Services even came about with directions to ensure immediate assistance. The directions imposed responsibility on the Duty Constable to report to the Police Station. The direction expressly stated that the treatment of an individual would happen immediately regardless of the completion of formalities. To conclude, all government hospitals and medical institutes were mandated to provide emergency medical aid regardless of them being medico-legal or not.

Justice Ranganath Misra held that the submissions by the parties made it evident that both the Centre and States had taken the matter seriously but were unable to clear the air of confusion around it. He upheld the view that it was the duty of a medical practitioner to treat either an innocent person or a criminal liable for punishment. Such treatment would be to preserve the life of that innocent person or to ensure that the guilty would be punished.

Protection of life was held to be a sacred duty of the State under Article 21. Nonetheless, the right had an overarching effect that would make it mandatory for each doctor, whether from a private or governmental hospital, to extend his services with expertise to preserve life. It was hence decided that this obligation was paramount and any law or procedure that hindered it would have to step away.

To ensure that the order would be complied with, the learned judge ordered the reporting of the decision in all journals reporting for the Supreme Court while also adding publicity through Doordarshan and All India Radio. A copy of the order was directed to be forwarded to every High Court and Sessions judge within the country while also forwarding it to State Governments and affiliated medical colleges to ensure that there would be no more confusion.

Justice Oza concurred with the verdict penned by Justice Misra but added on to the practical state of affairs. He held that relevant directions, Code of Ethics, and legislative clarity were in place even before the occurrence of the accident that resulted in this petition. The issue was recognized to be the failure to communicate well-intended high-level decisions to the common man.

The learned judge opined that there were no impediments caused by the legislative framework that barred a practitioner from giving treatment. He also added that this duty of saving lives rested with the public and police as well and that apprehensions about the same had to be cleared for all.

In order to alleviate the rooted fear of being called to courts, the learned judge ordered the taking of practitioners to police stations to be confined to exceptional cases. It was also added that courts had to disperse matters expeditiously and not utilize too much time of practitioners if they were summoned for cross-examination or to produce evidence. In conclusion, medical practitioners were direct to provide services to their best and if they felt that their assistance wouldn’t suffice, they were to ensure that the patient was directed to an expert as soon as possible.

 

Conclusion:

The Division Bench of the Hon’ble Apex Court upheld that right to life was paramount and would override medical and legal formalities in case of emergency aid. The Code of 1970 was later revised into the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations in 2002 which entails similar clauses concerning obligations of doctors. The scope of the right to health has been expanding ever since with decisions such as that in Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal, (1996) 4 SCC 37 and State v. Sanjeev Nanda, (2012) 8 SCC 450 debunking the confusion surrounding emergency medical aid. Helping individuals in need of immediate medical assistance is the duty of the public as well as medical practitioners and law enforcement agencies. No law will come in the way to hinder a person’s right to receive medical assistance under Article 21 and no practitioner is to be subject to harassment in the name of formalities.

 

[1] Medicolegal Issues : Guidelines To Medical Officers, National Health Systems Resource Centre, http://qi.nhsrcindia.org/sites/default/files/medico_legal.pdf.

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Ashwin Satheesh  |  20 Nov 2020     Views:480

News Updates

Jharkhand administration and the media receive dir...
22 Jan 2021     Views:39
Gujarat High Court orders immediate release of arr...
21 Jan 2021     Views:34
Perjury proceedings can be instituted upon complai...
21 Jan 2021     Views:34
No Unnecessary Adjournments Should be Allowed: All...
21 Jan 2021     Views:47
Bombay High Court rejects appeal by Sonu Sood seek...
21 Jan 2021     Views:46
A Judge Should Not Make Mistakes Due to Haste: All...
21 Jan 2021     Views:50
Review petitions challenging Aadhaar verdict dismi...
21 Jan 2021     Views:49
Supreme Court Issues Notice In The Petition Filed ...
20 Jan 2021     Views:43
Allahabad High Court Seeks Response Of UP Govt & N...
20 Jan 2021     Views:49
Father-son relation does not confer fundamental ri...
20 Jan 2021     Views:41
Karnataka High Court Issues New SOP: Advocates to ...
20 Jan 2021     Views:50
Relief under Probation of Offenders Act is not exc...
20 Jan 2021     Views:58
Bombay HC Rejects Republic TV's Contention ...
20 Jan 2021     Views:55
Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes FIR in Connectio...
20 Jan 2021     Views:63
Applicability of Notification on Increased IBC Thr...
19 Jan 2021     Views:71
Hindu Sena chief files complaint in Patiala House ...
19 Jan 2021     Views:38
Petition to Squash Complaint Under Sec.482 Of CRPC...
19 Jan 2021     Views:77
Promotion on the basis of Educational Qualificatio...
19 Jan 2021     Views:73
SCBA asks Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad to gran...
19 Jan 2021     Views:56
Interim Protection Granted To Man Who Called CM Yo...
19 Jan 2021     Views:75
Allahabad High Court quashes non-compoundable case...
18 Jan 2021     Views:65
The High court of Tripura refused to entertain the...
18 Jan 2021     Views:56
Supreme Court holds compensation can only be provi...
18 Jan 2021     Views:69
Read Supreme Court Judgements on Anticipatory Bail...
18 Jan 2021     Views:62
Delhi HC issues notice on petition challenging Ins...
18 Jan 2021     Views:56
Petition before the Supreme Court challenges All-I...
18 Jan 2021     Views:90
Person unable to find a surety can take benefit of...
18 Jan 2021     Views:61
Delhi High Court Stays Mohit Saraf's Termination F...
18 Jan 2021     Views:65
If The Parties Agrees To Admit To Talaq Without An...
18 Jan 2021     Views:47
Patients cannot be deprived of treatment due to ex...
18 Jan 2021     Views:73
Seventeen Sub Judges Appointed as District Judges ...
18 Jan 2021     Views:54
State of Gujarat liable to pay Rs.25,000 for its i...
17 Jan 2021     Views:52
A Person Can Be Discharged on Bail Under Sec. 445 ...
17 Jan 2021     Views:85
MP High Court Adjourns Hearing In Comedian Munawar...
17 Jan 2021     Views:57
Notice Issued By Delhi High Court To The Center In...
17 Jan 2021     Views:53
Calcutta High Court Issues Contempt Notice To The ...
17 Jan 2021     Views:177
Delhi High Court Allows Reopening of Spas, Wellnes...
17 Jan 2021     Views:44
WhatsApp messages to hold evidentiary value only u...
17 Jan 2021     Views:73
FIR Registered Against Over 10 People For Compromi...
17 Jan 2021     Views:67
Delhi HC hikes amount of compensation to parents o...
17 Jan 2021     Views:67
Committee Constituted By Calcutta High Court To En...
16 Jan 2021     Views:36
Advance paid to property owner by real-estate deve...
16 Jan 2021     Views:38
Karnataka High Court Directs Govt To Reconsider Ci...
16 Jan 2021     Views:38
High Court of Punjab and Haryana Orders for Allowi...
16 Jan 2021     Views:38
Karnataka High Court seeks information regarding ...
16 Jan 2021     Views:46
Kerala HC orders the state to consider the grievan...
16 Jan 2021     Views:39
BSES-RPL liable for damages not on basis of proof ...
16 Jan 2021     Views:79
Reconsider decision to physical hearing: Letter to...
16 Jan 2021     Views:66
Disclosure of interest in the information sought u...
16 Jan 2021     Views:89
Stay Order Issued Against GST Notice Served on Adv...
16 Jan 2021     Views:83
Karnataka Government directed to reconsider circul...
15 Jan 2021     Views:67
Writ jurisdiction cannot be utilized by a litigant...
15 Jan 2021     Views:39
Delhi HC issues notice on a plea on non-implementa...
15 Jan 2021     Views:36
Whether an arbitrator appointed by a person who is...
15 Jan 2021     Views:48
Karnataka District Courts to resume normal functio...
15 Jan 2021     Views:56
Constitutional Rights is at Stake: Kerala HC on De...
15 Jan 2021     Views:60
Same gender sexual harassment cases maintainable u...
15 Jan 2021     Views:89
The Delhi High Court issues notice in petition reg...
15 Jan 2021     Views:71
The state is not ready to deal with the demographi...
15 Jan 2021     Views:71
Mandatory investigation of all custodial deaths: N...
15 Jan 2021     Views:71
Accused should be subjected to blood test or breat...
15 Jan 2021     Views:79
Order Terminating Arbitration Proceedings Under Se...
15 Jan 2021     Views:90
Allahabad High Court tells UP government to come u...
15 Jan 2021     Views:101
Cannot Maintain Writ Petition Against Purely Priva...
14 Jan 2021     Views:68
Plea seeking live streaming of open court proceedi...
14 Jan 2021     Views:44
Calcutta High Court : Have the power to set aside ...
14 Jan 2021     Views:71
11 Benches of the Delhi High Court to resume physi...
14 Jan 2021     Views:53
The prudent citizen should abide by the order of t...
14 Jan 2021     Views:50
Parking facilities in malls liable to pay service ...
14 Jan 2021     Views:122
Madras High Court indicates close nexus between ri...
14 Jan 2021     Views:72
SEBI Boycotts Anchor Hemant Gahi, His Wife And His...
14 Jan 2021     Views:166
Supreme Court registers Suo moto case on “Remed...
14 Jan 2021     Views:255
Mandatory publication of notice inviting objection...
14 Jan 2021     Views:66
Directions issued towards timely service of notic...
13 Jan 2021     Views:57
Delhi HC allows termination of pregnancy after 20 ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:49
Andhra Pradesh High Court Suspends Schedule For Lo...
13 Jan 2021     Views:62
Delhi High Court Upholds The Constitutionality Of...
13 Jan 2021     Views:60
Progress in Sonu Sood's Plea Against BMC Notice: B...
13 Jan 2021     Views:52
Supreme Court Dismisses The Plea Against The High ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:64
Central Government notifies establishment of Natio...
13 Jan 2021     Views:83
Criminal liability of non-political executives can...
13 Jan 2021     Views:56
Rs. 20,000 Costs Imposed on Defendant who Cited th...
13 Jan 2021     Views:60
Notice issued to centre by Karnataka HC on plea ch...
13 Jan 2021     Views:179
Supreme Court refuses to entertain special leave p...
13 Jan 2021     Views:67
Sexual harassment on digital platform constitutes ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:71
SC refuses to set aside conviction, life term of 7...
13 Jan 2021     Views:53
SC directs demolition of a hotel-cum-restaurant in...
12 Jan 2021     Views:59
Delhi HC quashes GST order to attach bank account ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:52
CBDT declines extension of due dates for filing re...
12 Jan 2021     Views:57
Calcutta High Court imposes cost on defendant for ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:57
The Counter Affidavit Filed In The Supreme Court B...
12 Jan 2021     Views:57
Allahabad High Court to Decide on Plea for Relaxat...
12 Jan 2021     Views:60
Stay on Kerala HC’s order of setting aside the a...
12 Jan 2021     Views:52
High Court arrest should be the last option and sh...
12 Jan 2021     Views:78
Delhi HC issues notice on plea seeking child marri...
12 Jan 2021     Views:58
India proposes a Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolutio...
12 Jan 2021     Views:88
NCLT allows Josco to reduce share capital structur...
12 Jan 2021     Views:68
Kerala High Court Unhappy With DOC's Enquiry Into ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:69
Supreme Court acquits accused on death row, deems ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:71
Non-payment of Stamp duty on commercial contract d...
12 Jan 2021     Views:85
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Misusing Religion for Electoral Gains: PIL in SC for Action against Parties, Candidates
    On 31 May 2018    Views:11967
  • Bci Directs To Supply Of The Details Of Every Practising Advocate As Per The Format Required By The E-committee Of The Supreme Court Of India.
    On 01 Aug 2020    Views:11239
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:10675
  • Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt
    On 22 Jul 2020    Views:10231
  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:7766
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile
  • Demo My Legal Assistant
  • Demo My Legal Secretary

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Campus Ambassadors
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1122 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.