• Services For Users/Clients
      • Business Registrations
      • GST Registration (Person)
      • GST Registration (Company)
      • Importer Exporter Code
      • Trade License
      • FSSAI Registration
      • Udyog Aadhaar/MSME Registration
      • Shops & Establishments Registration
      • Partnership Firm Registration
      • Private Limited Company Registration
      • Producer Company Registration
      • Instant Legal Advise
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Email)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Analysis (By Email)
      • Contracts & Agreements
      • Business Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • Affidavits, Notary, Wills & POAs
      • Affidavit
      • Notary
      • Will
      • Codicil
      • General Power of Attorney
      • Special Power of Attorney
      • Attestation
      • Legal Research & Judgement Analysis
      • Judgments Search
      • Related Judgements Analysis
      • Laws/Reports/Acts Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Pleadings & Petitions Analysis
      • Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • High Courts & State Forums
      • Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Application Analysis
      • Exhibits Analysis
      • Evidence Analysis
  • Services For Lawyers
      • Online Office & Case Management
      • Assisted Online Case(s) & Calendar Management
      • Assisted Online Billing & Invoicing Assistance
      • Assistance in Recruiting Associates, Juniors, Staff
      • Assistance in Recruiting Interns
      • Translation, Transcription & Typing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • On-call Typing
      • Typing
      • Trial Preparation
      • Opening & Closing Statements
      • Pointers & Charts
      • Drafting & Document Management
      • Drafting Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Document Conversion (Jpeg to Word/PDF, PDF to Word etc)
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Drafting Wills/POAs/GPA/SPA/Affidavits
      • Legal Research
      • Judgment search
      • Laws, Acts & Reports Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Related Judgments Search
      • Pleadings & Petitions Drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - High Courts & State Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Applications & Affidavits drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder Proof Reading
      • Indexing & Table of contents
      • Preparing & Marking Exhibits
      • E Filing
  • +91 9632247247
  • Sign In/Sign Up
Menu
  • +Users/Clients Back

    • Get Fee Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Assistant
  • +Lawyers

    • Display Boards
    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Petitions & Pleadings Templates
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Secretary
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Legal News
  • ROJER MATHEW AND OTHERS V SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED AND OTHERS

Latest News

Back

ROJER MATHEW AND OTHERS V SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED AND OTHERS

Courtesy/By: Smaranika Sen  |  22 Nov 2020     Views:146

This case is one of the most important cases regarding the Finance Act which was passed in the year 2017. The main issue of these cases was to seek the validity or the Constitutionality of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017, and also the rules that we're framed in consonance had been concerned in the case.

The summary of the prayers that were made in these matters that aid the formulation of the core issues arising for adjudication was that the Madras Bar Association preferred a Civil writ petition; a writ of mandamus directing the Union of India to implement the directions of the honourable Supreme Court in the Union of India v R. Gandhi case. The prayer on being heard by a three-judge bench observed that this case presented substantial questions of Constitutional interpretation which is required to be heard by a Constitution bench. The Court also stated that the Union of India v R Gandhi also holds an important point regarding this case.

During the pendency of the above-stated writ petition, Rojer Mathew who is held to be the leading petitioner, in this case, filed a petition before the honourable High Court challenging the Constitutional validity of Section 13(5A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest also known as SARFAESI Act 2002. Section 13(5A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and enforcement of Securities Interest Act permitted secured creditors to participate in the auction of immovable property if it renewed unsold for want of reserve bid in an earlier bid. According to Rojer Mathew, this provision violated rights guaranteed under Article 300A and Article 14 of the Constitution of India. He also stated that it was in contravention of the Code Of Civil Procedure.

During the argument, the Court was brought into the notice that the appointment to the Debt Recovery Tribunals did not align with the Constitutional spirit of judicial independence.  However, the Rojer Mathew case was kept pending as the honourable High Court had to consider some broad issues immediately.

Another, Public Interest Litigation was filed by Kudrat Sadhu by challenging the vires of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017 by which the provisions of twenty-five different enactments were amended to effect sweeping changes to the requisite qualification, method of appointment, learns of office, salaries and allowances and various other terms and conditions of agencies of the members and presiding officers of different statutory Tribunals.

These cases reached the Honourable Supreme Court of India. These three main issues along with some other issues when was observed closely, it was stated that most of the individual cases were similar and overlapping. Hence for the sake of brevity, it is not necessary to refer to each submission separately. Broadly, it was observed that the petitioners had questioned the validity of Part XIV read with the 8th and the 9th Schedule of the Finance Act 2017, as being ex-facie unconstitutional, arbitrary, and offensive to the basic structure of the Constitution. The word only of Article 110 of the Constitution of India was emphasised which falls within the metes and bounds of Clause (a) to (g) and treated as a money bill because the foremost contention on behalf of petitioner In Part XIV could not be part to be money bill of the Finance Act 2017. The petitioner counsel also stated that the Tribunals are governed by Article 323A and Article 323B and laws enacted in this regard can't be claimed as a money bill.

The learned Attorney General passionately drew attention to the existence over forty tribunals, statutory commissions, and authority under the Government of India. They also stated that such inconsistency may happen due to the drafting error, and further stressed the need to normalize and harmonize the applicable rules which were attempted through the Finance Act 2017.

 Now the Court started analyzing the case. The questions that arose in the first instance that whether the Finance Act 2017 can be termed as a money bill under Article 110. The Court in this regard opined that the Indian Parliament is a bicameral legislature, and had to be both passed by Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha and must also receive Presidential ratification. However, the Court after much scrutiny thought it appropriate to refer it to a seven-judge bench.

In the next instance, the question which arose was whether Section 184 of the Finance Act, 2017 is unconstitutional on account of exercise delegation. The Court on examining of the Constitutional scheme, the statute which had created Tribunal and precedents stated that they do not think the power to prescribe qualifications, selection procedure and service conditions of member and other officeholders of Tribunals is to be a vest solely on. legislature. However, a mere possibility of abuse of delegated powers in absence of the evidence cannot be a ground to strike down the provision of Finance Act 2017.

 Another important issue was if Section 184 is valid, then whether the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities( Qualification, Experience  Condition And Service of Members Rule 2017 align with the Parent Act. In this regard, the bench observed that there lies some inconsistency within the Rules.

Finally, the Court gave the verdict. They struck down the Rules 2017 and also stated for framing a fresh set of Rules. They also referred it to a larger bench in this regard whether this can be passed as a money bill.

 

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Smaranika Sen  |  22 Nov 2020     Views:146

News Updates

Stay Order Issued Against GST Notice Served on Adv...
16 Jan 2021     Views:45
Karnataka Government directed to reconsider circul...
15 Jan 2021     Views:43
Karnataka District Courts to resume normal functio...
15 Jan 2021     Views:40
Constitutional Rights is at Stake: Kerala HC on De...
15 Jan 2021     Views:43
Same gender sexual harassment cases maintainable u...
15 Jan 2021     Views:57
The Delhi High Court issues notice in petition reg...
15 Jan 2021     Views:52
The state is not ready to deal with the demographi...
15 Jan 2021     Views:51
Mandatory investigation of all custodial deaths: N...
15 Jan 2021     Views:53
Accused should be subjected to blood test or breat...
15 Jan 2021     Views:56
Order Terminating Arbitration Proceedings Under Se...
15 Jan 2021     Views:68
Allahabad High Court tells UP government to come u...
15 Jan 2021     Views:71
Cannot Maintain Writ Petition Against Purely Priva...
14 Jan 2021     Views:47
Plea seeking live streaming of open court proceedi...
14 Jan 2021     Views:39
Calcutta High Court : Have the power to set aside ...
14 Jan 2021     Views:45
11 Benches of the Delhi High Court to resume physi...
14 Jan 2021     Views:39
The prudent citizen should abide by the order of t...
14 Jan 2021     Views:44
Parking facilities in malls liable to pay service ...
14 Jan 2021     Views:101
Madras High Court indicates close nexus between ri...
14 Jan 2021     Views:61
SEBI Boycotts Anchor Hemant Gahi, His Wife And His...
14 Jan 2021     Views:91
Supreme Court registers Suo moto case on “Remed...
14 Jan 2021     Views:239
Mandatory publication of notice inviting objection...
14 Jan 2021     Views:53
Directions issued towards timely service of notic...
13 Jan 2021     Views:48
Delhi HC allows termination of pregnancy after 20 ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:41
Andhra Pradesh High Court Suspends Schedule For Lo...
13 Jan 2021     Views:48
Delhi High Court Upholds The Constitutionality Of...
13 Jan 2021     Views:44
Progress in Sonu Sood's Plea Against BMC Notice: B...
13 Jan 2021     Views:44
Supreme Court Dismisses The Plea Against The High ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:49
Central Government notifies establishment of Natio...
13 Jan 2021     Views:71
Criminal liability of non-political executives can...
13 Jan 2021     Views:49
Rs. 20,000 Costs Imposed on Defendant who Cited th...
13 Jan 2021     Views:49
Notice issued to centre by Karnataka HC on plea ch...
13 Jan 2021     Views:167
Supreme Court refuses to entertain special leave p...
13 Jan 2021     Views:57
Sexual harassment on digital platform constitutes ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:59
SC refuses to set aside conviction, life term of 7...
13 Jan 2021     Views:46
SC directs demolition of a hotel-cum-restaurant in...
12 Jan 2021     Views:56
Delhi HC quashes GST order to attach bank account ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:42
CBDT declines extension of due dates for filing re...
12 Jan 2021     Views:46
Calcutta High Court imposes cost on defendant for ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:45
The Counter Affidavit Filed In The Supreme Court B...
12 Jan 2021     Views:50
Allahabad High Court to Decide on Plea for Relaxat...
12 Jan 2021     Views:42
Stay on Kerala HC’s order of setting aside the a...
12 Jan 2021     Views:42
High Court arrest should be the last option and sh...
12 Jan 2021     Views:70
Delhi HC issues notice on plea seeking child marri...
12 Jan 2021     Views:54
India proposes a Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolutio...
12 Jan 2021     Views:76
NCLT allows Josco to reduce share capital structur...
12 Jan 2021     Views:55
Kerala High Court Unhappy With DOC's Enquiry Into ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:65
Supreme Court acquits accused on death row, deems ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:68
Non-payment of Stamp duty on commercial contract d...
12 Jan 2021     Views:73
Supreme Court to stay on implementation of Farm la...
12 Jan 2021     Views:53
Karkardooma Court denies bail to woman accused of ...
12 Jan 2021     Views:51
Right to have access to drinking water cannot be d...
12 Jan 2021     Views:124
Ordinance for Religious Conversions Passed by Madh...
11 Jan 2021     Views:61
Death row of Balwant Singh Rajoana will be decided...
11 Jan 2021     Views:54
There Should Be No Criminal Contempt - Justice Mad...
11 Jan 2021     Views:57
Supreme Court examines whether it is necessary to ...
11 Jan 2021     Views:54
Force Majeure Clause Allowed to Suspend Payments M...
11 Jan 2021     Views:60
Scope for Interpretation of Covid-19 Duty Insuranc...
11 Jan 2021     Views:55
Exercising PT Order to keep prisoners in detention...
11 Jan 2021     Views:61
Plea in Delhi HC seeking directions for exempting ...
11 Jan 2021     Views:124
The Madhya Pradesh Freedom of Religion Ordinance, ...
11 Jan 2021     Views:65
Sonu Sood Moves Bombay High Court Against BMC Noti...
10 Jan 2021     Views:67
Blocking of Public High Ways and Roads Caused by F...
10 Jan 2021     Views:47
Victims Of 1975 Emergency Move Supreme Court Seeki...
10 Jan 2021     Views:79
Trials delayed endlessly due to deliberate absence...
10 Jan 2021     Views:66
Review petitions against the Aadhar Project to be ...
10 Jan 2021     Views:64
Gujarat HC directs CBDT to take decision to extend...
10 Jan 2021     Views:70
Madras High Court permits conduct of Kanuparivetta...
10 Jan 2021     Views:90
Review petition filed in the Supreme Court against...
10 Jan 2021     Views:61
All the subordinate courts shall start functionin...
10 Jan 2021     Views:63
Arrest Only the Last Resort: Allahabad High Court...
10 Jan 2021     Views:91
A Division Bench of Justices K Vinod Chandran and ...
10 Jan 2021     Views:54
Patna High Court suspends Chief Judicial Magistrat...
10 Jan 2021     Views:106
Karnataka High Court strikes down rules of KMMCR a...
10 Jan 2021     Views:59
Bar Council of Delhi increases enrolment fee effec...
10 Jan 2021     Views:67
Tamil Nadu Government Withdraws January 4 GO: Iss...
09 Jan 2021     Views:57
Ebrahim Kunju Gets Bail from Kerala High Court in ...
09 Jan 2021     Views:55
Have not issued guidelines directing people to wea...
09 Jan 2021     Views:55
Bombay High Court shows concern over difficulty to...
09 Jan 2021     Views:63
Calcutta High Court to allow home imprisonment of ...
09 Jan 2021     Views:55
Amicable Settlement can be a factor for reducing t...
09 Jan 2021     Views:54
Bail Granted After Injuries Were Caused by Jail Au...
09 Jan 2021     Views:55
Arrest Only When it is Imperative: Allahabad High ...
09 Jan 2021     Views:63
Calcutta HC urges the WB government to restrain fr...
09 Jan 2021     Views:54
Annexing proof of Citizenship in RTI application ...
09 Jan 2021     Views:49
Restore Criminal Case Against CM BS Yediyurappa: K...
09 Jan 2021     Views:66
application u/s 340 for 'forged files' lodged aga...
09 Jan 2021     Views:74
Delhi HC Issues Notices on Plea for Action Against...
09 Jan 2021     Views:60
Snapdeal not liable for the actions of seller: Kar...
09 Jan 2021     Views:81
Appeal challenging CBI court's verdict acquitting ...
08 Jan 2021     Views:51
Allahabad HC Provides Protection To Another Inter-...
08 Jan 2021     Views:55
Calcutta HC rules the 2014 and 2018 Amendments to ...
08 Jan 2021     Views:70
Central government gets last opportunity from Delh...
08 Jan 2021     Views:51
Madras High Court directs Centre to indicate respo...
08 Jan 2021     Views:51
Constitutionality of A Provision Can Be Challenged...
08 Jan 2021     Views:52
Only forceful conversion prohibited, no mention of...
08 Jan 2021     Views:56
BLIND ALL INDIA BAR EXAM CANDIDATE: ‘BCI CREATIN...
08 Jan 2021     Views:73
Bombay High Court: Invoking of Section 482 must t...
08 Jan 2021     Views:67
Gogoi's Bail Denied Yet Again...
08 Jan 2021     Views:68
Case Filed in District Court of Delhi Against IQ O...
08 Jan 2021     Views:136
Full Occupancy in Cinemas: Madras HC Delays Hearin...
08 Jan 2021     Views:68
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Misusing Religion for Electoral Gains: PIL in SC for Action against Parties, Candidates
    On 31 May 2018    Views:11962
  • Bci Directs To Supply Of The Details Of Every Practising Advocate As Per The Format Required By The E-committee Of The Supreme Court Of India.
    On 01 Aug 2020    Views:11201
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:10375
  • Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt
    On 22 Jul 2020    Views:9922
  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:7756
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile
  • Demo My Legal Assistant
  • Demo My Legal Secretary

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Campus Ambassadors
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1122 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.