• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • ROJER MATHEW AND OTHERS V SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED AND OTHERS

Latest News

Back

ROJER MATHEW AND OTHERS V SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED AND OTHERS

Courtesy/By: Smaranika Sen  |  22 Nov 2020     Views:2268

This case is one of the most important cases regarding the Finance Act which was passed in the year 2017. The main issue of these cases was to seek the validity or the Constitutionality of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017, and also the rules that we're framed in consonance had been concerned in the case.

The summary of the prayers that were made in these matters that aid the formulation of the core issues arising for adjudication was that the Madras Bar Association preferred a Civil writ petition; a writ of mandamus directing the Union of India to implement the directions of the honourable Supreme Court in the Union of India v R. Gandhi case. The prayer on being heard by a three-judge bench observed that this case presented substantial questions of Constitutional interpretation which is required to be heard by a Constitution bench. The Court also stated that the Union of India v R Gandhi also holds an important point regarding this case.

During the pendency of the above-stated writ petition, Rojer Mathew who is held to be the leading petitioner, in this case, filed a petition before the honourable High Court challenging the Constitutional validity of Section 13(5A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest also known as SARFAESI Act 2002. Section 13(5A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and enforcement of Securities Interest Act permitted secured creditors to participate in the auction of immovable property if it renewed unsold for want of reserve bid in an earlier bid. According to Rojer Mathew, this provision violated rights guaranteed under Article 300A and Article 14 of the Constitution of India. He also stated that it was in contravention of the Code Of Civil Procedure.

During the argument, the Court was brought into the notice that the appointment to the Debt Recovery Tribunals did not align with the Constitutional spirit of judicial independence.  However, the Rojer Mathew case was kept pending as the honourable High Court had to consider some broad issues immediately.

Another, Public Interest Litigation was filed by Kudrat Sadhu by challenging the vires of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017 by which the provisions of twenty-five different enactments were amended to effect sweeping changes to the requisite qualification, method of appointment, learns of office, salaries and allowances and various other terms and conditions of agencies of the members and presiding officers of different statutory Tribunals.

These cases reached the Honourable Supreme Court of India. These three main issues along with some other issues when was observed closely, it was stated that most of the individual cases were similar and overlapping. Hence for the sake of brevity, it is not necessary to refer to each submission separately. Broadly, it was observed that the petitioners had questioned the validity of Part XIV read with the 8th and the 9th Schedule of the Finance Act 2017, as being ex-facie unconstitutional, arbitrary, and offensive to the basic structure of the Constitution. The word only of Article 110 of the Constitution of India was emphasised which falls within the metes and bounds of Clause (a) to (g) and treated as a money bill because the foremost contention on behalf of petitioner In Part XIV could not be part to be money bill of the Finance Act 2017. The petitioner counsel also stated that the Tribunals are governed by Article 323A and Article 323B and laws enacted in this regard can't be claimed as a money bill.

The learned Attorney General passionately drew attention to the existence over forty tribunals, statutory commissions, and authority under the Government of India. They also stated that such inconsistency may happen due to the drafting error, and further stressed the need to normalize and harmonize the applicable rules which were attempted through the Finance Act 2017.

 Now the Court started analyzing the case. The questions that arose in the first instance that whether the Finance Act 2017 can be termed as a money bill under Article 110. The Court in this regard opined that the Indian Parliament is a bicameral legislature, and had to be both passed by Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha and must also receive Presidential ratification. However, the Court after much scrutiny thought it appropriate to refer it to a seven-judge bench.

In the next instance, the question which arose was whether Section 184 of the Finance Act, 2017 is unconstitutional on account of exercise delegation. The Court on examining of the Constitutional scheme, the statute which had created Tribunal and precedents stated that they do not think the power to prescribe qualifications, selection procedure and service conditions of member and other officeholders of Tribunals is to be a vest solely on. legislature. However, a mere possibility of abuse of delegated powers in absence of the evidence cannot be a ground to strike down the provision of Finance Act 2017.

 Another important issue was if Section 184 is valid, then whether the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities( Qualification, Experience  Condition And Service of Members Rule 2017 align with the Parent Act. In this regard, the bench observed that there lies some inconsistency within the Rules.

Finally, the Court gave the verdict. They struck down the Rules 2017 and also stated for framing a fresh set of Rules. They also referred it to a larger bench in this regard whether this can be passed as a money bill.

 

 


Document:


Courtesy/By: Smaranika Sen  |  22 Nov 2020     Views:2268

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:5994
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5418
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5397
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5189
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5213
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:4861
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5245
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5235
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5353
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5538
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5244
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5219
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5171
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5289
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5247
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5572
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5400
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6238
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5364
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5707
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5608
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5799
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5650
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5764
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5551
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:8936
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7481
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7522
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7319
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8275
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7620
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6161
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:6935
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6199
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6205
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6451
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6153
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6133
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6181
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6147
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6505
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6003
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6031
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6477
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6674
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6250
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6687
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8659
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6685
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6347
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:11990
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6068
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:6920
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6496
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6198
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6431
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6071
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6521
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6194
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6640
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:6853
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7080
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:10971
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6290
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6156
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7283
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6003
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6017
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7594
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6542
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6094
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6138
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6084
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8185
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6364
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6006
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:5857
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:6945
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:5881
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6296
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6136
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5821
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5819
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:5979
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8411
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7020
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6102
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5815
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6023
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5588
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5808
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5640
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6238
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6358
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6086
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6564
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:5868
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6006
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6593
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6332
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96317
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:73888
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71303
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70439
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:59802
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.