• Services For Users/Clients
      • Business Registrations
      • GST Registration (Person)
      • GST Registration (Company)
      • Importer Exporter Code
      • Trade License
      • FSSAI Registration
      • Udyog Aadhaar/MSME Registration
      • Shops & Establishments Registration
      • Partnership Firm Registration
      • Private Limited Company Registration
      • Producer Company Registration
      • Instant Legal Advise
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Email)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Analysis (By Email)
      • Contracts & Agreements
      • Business Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • Affidavits, Notary, Wills & POAs
      • Affidavit
      • Notary
      • Will
      • Codicil
      • General Power of Attorney
      • Special Power of Attorney
      • Attestation
      • Legal Research & Judgement Analysis
      • Judgments Search
      • Related Judgements Analysis
      • Laws/Reports/Acts Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Pleadings & Petitions Analysis
      • Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • High Courts & State Forums
      • Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Application Analysis
      • Exhibits Analysis
      • Evidence Analysis
  • Services For Lawyers
      • Online Office & Case Management
      • Assisted Online Case(s) & Calendar Management
      • Assisted Online Billing & Invoicing Assistance
      • Assistance in Recruiting Associates, Juniors, Staff
      • Assistance in Recruiting Interns
      • Translation, Transcription & Typing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • On-call Typing
      • Typing
      • Trial Preparation
      • Opening & Closing Statements
      • Pointers & Charts
      • Drafting & Document Management
      • Drafting Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Document Conversion (Jpeg to Word/PDF, PDF to Word etc)
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Drafting Wills/POAs/GPA/SPA/Affidavits
      • Legal Research
      • Judgment search
      • Laws, Acts & Reports Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Related Judgments Search
      • Pleadings & Petitions Drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - High Courts & State Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Applications & Affidavits drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder Proof Reading
      • Indexing & Table of contents
      • Preparing & Marking Exhibits
      • E Filing
  • +91 9632247247
  • Sign In/Sign Up
Menu
  • +Users/Clients Back

    • Get Fee Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Assistant
  • +Lawyers

    • Display Boards
    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Petitions & Pleadings Templates
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Secretary
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Occupational Health and Safety Association v. Union of India & Ors. (2014)

Latest News

Back

Occupational Health and Safety Association v. Union of India & Ors. (2014)

Courtesy/By: Ashwin Satheesh  |  22 Nov 2020     Views:148

Citation: (2014) 3 SCC 547

Date of Judgement: 31/01/2014

 

Background:

The petitioner was a non-profit organization committed towards the health and safety of workers and represented about 130 Coal Fired Thermal Power Plants (CFTPP). The predominant concern was the lack of a system for occupational safety or safeguards from health hazards in such industries.

They invoked the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court through Article 32, seeking a direction of mandamus to frame guidelines for occupational safety and health regulations. They also sought the establishment of a Committee to monitor the working of thermal power plants, and maintain a check on the health and well-being of its workers while providing compensation.

 

Arguments advanced and adopted measures:

The petitioner submitted that there was various labour-related legislation in place such as the Factories Act, Employees’ State Insurance Act, Workmen’s Compensation Act etc. but their application with regard to workers’ safety was inconspicuous. A Report had been produced in 2007 that highlighted half of the workers in such industries to be suffering from lung function abnormalities, pneumoconiosis, asthma, human error and skin diseases to name a few.

  • Previous proceedings:

Based on this report, the Apex Court had earlier passed an interim order on 30/01/2008 along with certain suggestions.  The order included suggestions such as periodic medical checkups, free medical treatment, compensation for disease, ailment or accident etc. It additionally suggested the adoption of safe methods to dispose of hazardous wastes while calling upon the formation of a Committee of experts. The Committee was to comprise of individuals from the National Institute of Occupational Health, Ahmedabad, representatives from Trade Unions and Non-Governmental Organisations. Most of the suggestions relied on the recommendations of guidelines by the National Institute of Occupational Health (NIOH).

However, the respondents submitted that 7 out of 9 suggestions had already been satisfied by them as they had been broadly covered under various legislations. Moreover, the suggestions on safe methods for disposal and the establishment of a committee (hereinafter referred to as the 8th and 9th suggestion) would have to be examined by the Central Government to decide on its practicability.

  • NIOH Committee Report:

In 2011, a Committee established by the NIOH submitted the Environment, Health and Safety Issues in Coal Fired Thermal Power Plants in order to effectuate the suggestions. The petitioners contended that the respondents as well as the NIOH had misunderstood the scope of the 8th and 9th suggestion. It was contended that not enough weightage was being accorded to the issue of workers’ health and that the NIOH Committee had overlooked the aspects of timely medical check-ups and provision for compensation.

However, the respondents rebutted by stating that the Committee’s report was comprehensive and there were various laws already in place to protect these workers.

 

Judgement:

  • Right to safety & health of workers

The right to health and medical care of workmen has been viewed as a fundamental right since the decision of the Apex Court in Consumer Education & Research Centre and others v. Union of India & Ors., (1995) 3 SCC 42. The 3 Judge bench in that matter decided the right to come under Article 21 of the Constitution when read with Articles 39(e), 41, 43 & 48-A. The 1995 decision held that the compulsion of the workman to work in such a hazardous industry ought not to be misused to forsake one’s health and vigour.

It was held that an individual’s right to have and work in a clean environment that would lead to a healthy mind and body flowed from the wide ambit of Article 21. The Court recognized that workers worked in such hazardous and unhygienic conditions out of economic compulsion. The Division Bench stated that the right to live with dignity under Article 21 derived its life’s breath from Articles 39(e), 39(f), 41 & 42 (Directive Principles of State Policy).

Article 39(e) provides that a state shall strive to secure the health and strength of its workers while ensuring they did not perform unsuitable tasks out of economic compulsion. Article 41 deals with the securing of right to work and public assistance based on its economic capacity whereas Article 42 provides for just and humane conditions for workers. These Articles conferred individuals with the minimum requirements to live with dignity.

The Division Bench took into account that India was one of the largest coal-producing countries in the world with production meeting 54.3% of the nation’s energy requirement. Workers in industries such as CFTPPs were exposed to thermal discharges, dust, air and coal emissions. Such particles were plagued with the presence of coal dust besides silica, a carcinogenic substance. The State’s obligation to provide these minimum conditions would be paramount and when the industry itself was dangerous, that duty would become double-fold.

The respondents had already submitted that the prior suggestions had been incorporated through various laws. Thus, the issue before the Court was reduced to the implementation of the 8th and 9th suggestion. The Hon’ble judges then noted the relevant provisions of the NIOH Report, 2011 which was claimed to have included all necessary measures as sought by the petitioners.   

  • Scope of the NIOH Report:

The Report contained that materials such as asbestos and glass wool were hazardous to human health and advocated the use of PPE while handling the same. Industries were to have facilities for a robust occupational health safety system with trained manpower and infrastructure. Evaluation of workers’ occupational health status and periodic health check-ups would have to be carried out regularly. An annual workers’ awareness programme for a minimum of 8 hours per year was set out as a mandate.

NIOH had also considered the aspect of yearly radiology tests but later confined it to urgent and necessary cases due to the ill-effects of regular exposure. Moreover, maintenance of health records and a pre-placement medical examination was made compulsory. Thus, an occupier of a CFTPP would be responsible to ensure stringent compliance with the provisions of the Factories Act especially concerning health and safety.

The report also took into account the various forms of health hazards faced by workers due to the nature of work. The learned judges were satisfied with the understanding by NIOH but were concerned with the practical application and the extent to which it would be implemented. Many workers in CFTPPs suffer from diseases such as pneumoconiosis and chronic bronchitis.

  • Decision

The Division bench penned that CFTPPs were spread all over the country and it would not be practicable for the Supreme Court to examine whether the standards were being complied with at each such industry. The Court thus deemed it appropriate to assign these issues to High Courts in whose jurisdictions the plants were functioning, to examine them in-depth with the aid and assistance of the respective State Governments and CFTPPs. It would be the role of respective High Courts to examine whether there were effective health delivery mechanisms and periodic evaluation of workers’ health. 

The Court opined that the said report was not comprehensive as contended by the respondents and the issues with the same would have to be delved into by High Courts. In conclusion, The Division Bench ordered for a copy of the judgement to be forwarded to the Chief Justices of 18 High Courts to initiate suo moto proceedings in larger interests of workers.

 

The way ahead:

The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 received Presidential assent on 28/09/2020 that would replace 13 Central legislations including the Factories Act of 1948 and the Mines Act of 1952. Entry 4 of the First Schedule has included Coal and coal-related industries to be a class of hazardous industries. Section 6 imposes a responsibility on employers to comply with health and safety standards set out under Section 18 of the Code while assuring the safety and health of workers. Nonetheless, the competency of the Code to reform the present health and safety systems would boil down to its extent of implementation.


Document:


Courtesy/By: Ashwin Satheesh  |  22 Nov 2020     Views:148

News Updates

Gujarat High Court Allows A Woman To Take Bar Exam...
24 Jan 2021     Views:46
Close surveillance of rowdy sheeter at their resid...
23 Jan 2021     Views:42
The Supreme Courts Orders The Family Court At UP T...
23 Jan 2021     Views:38
Supreme Court holds lack of enquiry is not valid g...
23 Jan 2021     Views:53
Jharkhand High Court Sets Up Fact-Finding Committe...
23 Jan 2021     Views:44
Karnataka High Court rejects plea containing priva...
23 Jan 2021     Views:49
Partho Dasgupta Shifted From Hospital To Taloja Ce...
23 Jan 2021     Views:53
J&K High Court refuses to direct bank to release e...
23 Jan 2021     Views:53
Defamation suits must be tried expeditiously: Karn...
23 Jan 2021     Views:53
White-Collar Offences are More Serious Than Murder...
22 Jan 2021     Views:56
Kerala High Court Dismisses The Habeas Corpus File...
22 Jan 2021     Views:45
Madras HC: Demolish all unauthorized construction ...
22 Jan 2021     Views:51
Delhi High Court Reissue Physical Hearing Directiv...
22 Jan 2021     Views:45
Thane Sessions Court grants bail to 89 accused in ...
22 Jan 2021     Views:53
Facebook does not have a role in curbing the hate ...
22 Jan 2021     Views:50
State Cannot Squeeze Citizens of Money Erroneously...
22 Jan 2021     Views:80
Court exercising bail jurisdiction not expected to...
22 Jan 2021     Views:55
Jharkhand administration and the media receive dir...
22 Jan 2021     Views:67
Gujarat High Court orders immediate release of arr...
21 Jan 2021     Views:49
Perjury proceedings can be instituted upon complai...
21 Jan 2021     Views:53
No Unnecessary Adjournments Should be Allowed: All...
21 Jan 2021     Views:58
Bombay High Court rejects appeal by Sonu Sood seek...
21 Jan 2021     Views:56
A Judge Should Not Make Mistakes Due to Haste: All...
21 Jan 2021     Views:60
Review petitions challenging Aadhaar verdict dismi...
21 Jan 2021     Views:55
Supreme Court Issues Notice In The Petition Filed ...
20 Jan 2021     Views:50
Allahabad High Court Seeks Response Of UP Govt & N...
20 Jan 2021     Views:54
Father-son relation does not confer fundamental ri...
20 Jan 2021     Views:50
Karnataka High Court Issues New SOP: Advocates to ...
20 Jan 2021     Views:64
The Petition Challenging The Appointment Of 8 Peop...
20 Jan 2021     Views:38
Relief under Probation of Offenders Act is not exc...
20 Jan 2021     Views:62
Bombay HC Rejects Republic TV's Contention ...
20 Jan 2021     Views:61
Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes FIR in Connectio...
20 Jan 2021     Views:66
Applicability of Notification on Increased IBC Thr...
19 Jan 2021     Views:78
Supreme court grants bail to former employee in Ma...
19 Jan 2021     Views:40
Hindu Sena chief files complaint in Patiala House ...
19 Jan 2021     Views:43
Petition to Squash Complaint Under Sec.482 Of CRPC...
19 Jan 2021     Views:84
Promotion on the basis of Educational Qualificatio...
19 Jan 2021     Views:79
SCBA asks Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad to gran...
19 Jan 2021     Views:62
Interim Protection Granted To Man Who Called CM Yo...
19 Jan 2021     Views:79
Allahabad High Court quashes non-compoundable case...
18 Jan 2021     Views:69
The High court of Tripura refused to entertain the...
18 Jan 2021     Views:66
Supreme Court holds compensation can only be provi...
18 Jan 2021     Views:73
Read Supreme Court Judgements on Anticipatory Bail...
18 Jan 2021     Views:68
Delhi HC issues notice on petition challenging Ins...
18 Jan 2021     Views:59
Petition before the Supreme Court challenges All-I...
18 Jan 2021     Views:99
Person unable to find a surety can take benefit of...
18 Jan 2021     Views:65
Delhi High Court Stays Mohit Saraf's Termination F...
18 Jan 2021     Views:67
If The Parties Agrees To Admit To Talaq Without An...
18 Jan 2021     Views:49
Patients cannot be deprived of treatment due to ex...
18 Jan 2021     Views:76
Seventeen Sub Judges Appointed as District Judges ...
18 Jan 2021     Views:59
State of Gujarat liable to pay Rs.25,000 for its i...
17 Jan 2021     Views:56
A Person Can Be Discharged on Bail Under Sec. 445 ...
17 Jan 2021     Views:98
MP High Court Adjourns Hearing In Comedian Munawar...
17 Jan 2021     Views:63
Notice Issued By Delhi High Court To The Center In...
17 Jan 2021     Views:57
Calcutta High Court Issues Contempt Notice To The ...
17 Jan 2021     Views:183
Delhi High Court Allows Reopening of Spas, Wellnes...
17 Jan 2021     Views:51
WhatsApp messages to hold evidentiary value only u...
17 Jan 2021     Views:80
FIR Registered Against Over 10 People For Compromi...
17 Jan 2021     Views:73
Delhi HC hikes amount of compensation to parents o...
17 Jan 2021     Views:78
Committee Constituted By Calcutta High Court To En...
16 Jan 2021     Views:38
Advance paid to property owner by real-estate deve...
16 Jan 2021     Views:39
Karnataka High Court Directs Govt To Reconsider Ci...
16 Jan 2021     Views:42
High Court of Punjab and Haryana Orders for Allowi...
16 Jan 2021     Views:41
Karnataka High Court seeks information regarding ...
16 Jan 2021     Views:49
Kerala HC orders the state to consider the grievan...
16 Jan 2021     Views:39
BSES-RPL liable for damages not on basis of proof ...
16 Jan 2021     Views:86
Reconsider decision to physical hearing: Letter to...
16 Jan 2021     Views:68
Disclosure of interest in the information sought u...
16 Jan 2021     Views:93
Stay Order Issued Against GST Notice Served on Adv...
16 Jan 2021     Views:88
Karnataka Government directed to reconsider circul...
15 Jan 2021     Views:70
Writ jurisdiction cannot be utilized by a litigant...
15 Jan 2021     Views:40
Delhi HC issues notice on a plea on non-implementa...
15 Jan 2021     Views:38
Whether an arbitrator appointed by a person who is...
15 Jan 2021     Views:53
Karnataka District Courts to resume normal functio...
15 Jan 2021     Views:69
Constitutional Rights is at Stake: Kerala HC on De...
15 Jan 2021     Views:62
Same gender sexual harassment cases maintainable u...
15 Jan 2021     Views:96
The Delhi High Court issues notice in petition reg...
15 Jan 2021     Views:73
The state is not ready to deal with the demographi...
15 Jan 2021     Views:77
Mandatory investigation of all custodial deaths: N...
15 Jan 2021     Views:78
Accused should be subjected to blood test or breat...
15 Jan 2021     Views:83
Order Terminating Arbitration Proceedings Under Se...
15 Jan 2021     Views:96
Allahabad High Court tells UP government to come u...
15 Jan 2021     Views:103
Cannot Maintain Writ Petition Against Purely Priva...
14 Jan 2021     Views:71
Plea seeking live streaming of open court proceedi...
14 Jan 2021     Views:47
Calcutta High Court : Have the power to set aside ...
14 Jan 2021     Views:76
11 Benches of the Delhi High Court to resume physi...
14 Jan 2021     Views:56
The prudent citizen should abide by the order of t...
14 Jan 2021     Views:57
Parking facilities in malls liable to pay service ...
14 Jan 2021     Views:125
Madras High Court indicates close nexus between ri...
14 Jan 2021     Views:76
SEBI Boycotts Anchor Hemant Gahi, His Wife And His...
14 Jan 2021     Views:176
Supreme Court registers Suo moto case on “Remed...
14 Jan 2021     Views:258
Mandatory publication of notice inviting objection...
14 Jan 2021     Views:68
Directions issued towards timely service of notic...
13 Jan 2021     Views:58
Delhi HC allows termination of pregnancy after 20 ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:53
Andhra Pradesh High Court Suspends Schedule For Lo...
13 Jan 2021     Views:64
Delhi High Court Upholds The Constitutionality Of...
13 Jan 2021     Views:62
Progress in Sonu Sood's Plea Against BMC Notice: B...
13 Jan 2021     Views:54
Supreme Court Dismisses The Plea Against The High ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:65
Central Government notifies establishment of Natio...
13 Jan 2021     Views:85
Criminal liability of non-political executives can...
13 Jan 2021     Views:59
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Misusing Religion for Electoral Gains: PIL in SC for Action against Parties, Candidates
    On 31 May 2018    Views:11973
  • Bci Directs To Supply Of The Details Of Every Practising Advocate As Per The Format Required By The E-committee Of The Supreme Court Of India.
    On 01 Aug 2020    Views:11252
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:10882
  • Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt
    On 22 Jul 2020    Views:10341
  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:7768
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile
  • Demo My Legal Assistant
  • Demo My Legal Secretary

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Campus Ambassadors
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1122 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.