• Services For Users/Clients
      • Business Registrations
      • GST Registration (Person)
      • GST Registration (Company)
      • Importer Exporter Code
      • Trade License
      • FSSAI Registration
      • Udyog Aadhaar/MSME Registration
      • Shops & Establishments Registration
      • Partnership Firm Registration
      • Private Limited Company Registration
      • Producer Company Registration
      • Instant Legal Advise
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Email)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Analysis (By Email)
      • Contracts & Agreements
      • Business Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • Affidavits, Notary, Wills & POAs
      • Affidavit
      • Notary
      • Will
      • Codicil
      • General Power of Attorney
      • Special Power of Attorney
      • Attestation
      • Legal Research & Judgement Analysis
      • Judgments Search
      • Related Judgements Analysis
      • Laws/Reports/Acts Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Pleadings & Petitions Analysis
      • Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • High Courts & State Forums
      • Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Application Analysis
      • Exhibits Analysis
      • Evidence Analysis
  • Services For Lawyers
      • Online Office & Case Management
      • Assisted Online Case(s) & Calendar Management
      • Assisted Online Billing & Invoicing Assistance
      • Assistance in Recruiting Associates, Juniors, Staff
      • Assistance in Recruiting Interns
      • Translation, Transcription & Typing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • On-call Typing
      • Typing
      • Trial Preparation
      • Opening & Closing Statements
      • Pointers & Charts
      • Drafting & Document Management
      • Drafting Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Document Conversion (Jpeg to Word/PDF, PDF to Word etc)
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Drafting Wills/POAs/GPA/SPA/Affidavits
      • Legal Research
      • Judgment search
      • Laws, Acts & Reports Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Related Judgments Search
      • Pleadings & Petitions Drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - High Courts & State Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Applications & Affidavits drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder Proof Reading
      • Indexing & Table of contents
      • Preparing & Marking Exhibits
      • E Filing
  • +91 9632247247
  • Sign In/Sign Up
Menu
  • +Users/Clients Back

    • Get Fee Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Assistant
  • +Lawyers

    • Display Boards
    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Petitions & Pleadings Templates
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Secretary
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Legal News
  • Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra

Latest News

Back

Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra

Courtesy/By: Surya J N  |  29 Nov 2020     Views:148

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Initially, the case emerged when the State Government of Maharashtra amended the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The state added Sections 33A and 33B which prohibited any kinds of dancing in restaurants, bars, and hotels with an exception under Section 33B; where the dance performance was only permitted in hotels, theatres, clubs rated above three stars. The Bombay High Court ruled this section arbitrary and unconstitutional and thus the amendment was struck down.

The State again in 2014 introduced another amendment in the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, eliminating Section 33B but instead adding Section 33A which banned dancing in hotels. A writ petition was filed by the Indian Hotel & Restaurant Association challenging the constitutional validity of the amended act. The State also filed a counter-affidavit opposing the writ petition. In the said case, the Supreme Court of India stayed the operation of the provision and upheld the judgment of Bombay High Court highlighting that no dance performance is possible inclusive of any kind of obscenity.

The State with strict implications to ban the dance bars, introduced legislation in 2016 imposing various restrictions on restaurants and bar dancers. It also incorporated the word “obscenity” in dance shows and prohibited it. The Preamble of the act signifies that the act prohibits obscene dance performances and it also was enacted to protect the women working in such conditions from exploitation and to improve their work condition Section 3 of the act defined terms like "obscenity", “bar room" “dancer”. It imposes strict restrictions on the part of the restaurants to obtain a license and duty to comply with the rules.

Section 8 of the Act prescribed penal provisions for non-compliance with the Act. It also imposed a fine of up to 10 lakhs and imprisonment of 5 years. Certain offenses were also prescribed as even cognizable and non-bailable. The provision of the act puts forward restriction on throwing or showering of money or any materials that had a monetary value attached to it.

 

ISSUES:

The major issue surrounding the act was to check the constitutional validity of it and its provisions that are said to regulate and protect the bar dancers from exploitation.

1. It pertains to the definition of "obscene dance" defined under Section 2(8)(i) of the Act.

2. Whether Section 6(4) of the Act violative of Article 19(1) of the Constitution?

3. Whether the penal provisions under Section 8(2) are discriminatory of Article 14 of the constitution?

4. Whether Section 8(4) of the said act arbitrary of Article 14 of the Constitution?

5. Whether Rule 3 of the Act is constitutionally legal?

 

ARGUMENTS BY THE PARTIES:

 

PETITIONER-

Section 6(4) of the Act IS violative of articles 14 and 19 (1) of the Constitution. The purpose behind this provision was to make sure that there would not be a license for a place, both for dance bars and discotheque or orchestra. The petitioner also argued that there was no rationale behind such a provision based on intelligible differentia. It was argued that the dance that amounts to obscenity is already an offense under Section 294 of the Indian Penal Code and is punishable with imprisonment which may extend up to three months. It was further said that such a provision (section 6(4) of the Act) was arbitrary and violative of Article 14, there was a clear conflict between the central law (i.e. the IPC) and the State Act (the impugned Act). Therefore, the section of the amended act needs to be struck down. It was brought before the bench that the prohibition under section 8(4) was only for the dancers and not singers or waitresses working in the same dance bars or hotels. the point of argument was that giving such things to a dancer only amounts to tipping her on an appreciation of her performance which was the same thing as appreciating a singer for her performance or a waitress for her service and there was absolutely nothing wrong about it and such an act cannot be made an offense. It was, therefore, grossly arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Indian constitution.

 

RESPONDENT-

Section 2(8) of the Act which defines ‘obscene dance’ was well defended by arguing that the expression ‘prurient interest’ has a definite meaning in the dictionary and this expression finds presence in Section 292 of the IPC as well which makes obscenity an offense. Section 8(1) makes the Act of using the place in contravention of Section 3 an offense. In the same manner, it was argued that  Section 8(2) is a separate offense prescribed in the law that is under the Maharashtra Act which is different and distinct from Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). In respect of Section 8(4), the defendant submitted that it’s a matter of cultural ethos of the society as a whole. It was further said that such a provision of showering money on the dancer is a method of inducement which has to be checked. According to the defendants, Section 354A of IPC which is a moral code of the society and the State is only attempting to preserve this moral code of conduct by bringing in such an amendment.

 

CONCLUSION:

The Judgment pronounced is really a boon to women and various institutions from being unemployed. The judgment took a modern view deviating from the age-old concepts of morality and prejudges of the past. The judgment clearly defines and interprets the act saying that the provisions that are in violation of the Constitution and are unjust to the dance women and institutions are invariably struck down. Certain regulatory provisions have been upheld to protect women from exploitation.


Document:


Courtesy/By: Surya J N  |  29 Nov 2020     Views:148

News Updates

Gujarat High Court Allows A Woman To Take Bar Exam...
24 Jan 2021     Views:49
Close surveillance of rowdy sheeter at their resid...
23 Jan 2021     Views:42
The Supreme Courts Orders The Family Court At UP T...
23 Jan 2021     Views:41
Supreme Court holds lack of enquiry is not valid g...
23 Jan 2021     Views:53
Jharkhand High Court Sets Up Fact-Finding Committe...
23 Jan 2021     Views:44
Karnataka High Court rejects plea containing priva...
23 Jan 2021     Views:49
Partho Dasgupta Shifted From Hospital To Taloja Ce...
23 Jan 2021     Views:53
J&K High Court refuses to direct bank to release e...
23 Jan 2021     Views:53
Defamation suits must be tried expeditiously: Karn...
23 Jan 2021     Views:53
White-Collar Offences are More Serious Than Murder...
22 Jan 2021     Views:56
Kerala High Court Dismisses The Habeas Corpus File...
22 Jan 2021     Views:45
Madras HC: Demolish all unauthorized construction ...
22 Jan 2021     Views:51
Delhi High Court Reissue Physical Hearing Directiv...
22 Jan 2021     Views:45
Thane Sessions Court grants bail to 89 accused in ...
22 Jan 2021     Views:53
Facebook does not have a role in curbing the hate ...
22 Jan 2021     Views:50
State Cannot Squeeze Citizens of Money Erroneously...
22 Jan 2021     Views:80
Court exercising bail jurisdiction not expected to...
22 Jan 2021     Views:55
Jharkhand administration and the media receive dir...
22 Jan 2021     Views:67
Gujarat High Court orders immediate release of arr...
21 Jan 2021     Views:50
Perjury proceedings can be instituted upon complai...
21 Jan 2021     Views:53
No Unnecessary Adjournments Should be Allowed: All...
21 Jan 2021     Views:58
Bombay High Court rejects appeal by Sonu Sood seek...
21 Jan 2021     Views:56
A Judge Should Not Make Mistakes Due to Haste: All...
21 Jan 2021     Views:60
Review petitions challenging Aadhaar verdict dismi...
21 Jan 2021     Views:55
Supreme Court Issues Notice In The Petition Filed ...
20 Jan 2021     Views:50
Allahabad High Court Seeks Response Of UP Govt & N...
20 Jan 2021     Views:54
Father-son relation does not confer fundamental ri...
20 Jan 2021     Views:50
Karnataka High Court Issues New SOP: Advocates to ...
20 Jan 2021     Views:64
The Petition Challenging The Appointment Of 8 Peop...
20 Jan 2021     Views:38
Relief under Probation of Offenders Act is not exc...
20 Jan 2021     Views:62
Bombay HC Rejects Republic TV's Contention ...
20 Jan 2021     Views:61
Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes FIR in Connectio...
20 Jan 2021     Views:66
Applicability of Notification on Increased IBC Thr...
19 Jan 2021     Views:78
Supreme court grants bail to former employee in Ma...
19 Jan 2021     Views:40
Hindu Sena chief files complaint in Patiala House ...
19 Jan 2021     Views:43
Petition to Squash Complaint Under Sec.482 Of CRPC...
19 Jan 2021     Views:84
Promotion on the basis of Educational Qualificatio...
19 Jan 2021     Views:79
SCBA asks Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad to gran...
19 Jan 2021     Views:62
Interim Protection Granted To Man Who Called CM Yo...
19 Jan 2021     Views:79
Allahabad High Court quashes non-compoundable case...
18 Jan 2021     Views:69
The High court of Tripura refused to entertain the...
18 Jan 2021     Views:66
Supreme Court holds compensation can only be provi...
18 Jan 2021     Views:73
Read Supreme Court Judgements on Anticipatory Bail...
18 Jan 2021     Views:68
Delhi HC issues notice on petition challenging Ins...
18 Jan 2021     Views:59
Petition before the Supreme Court challenges All-I...
18 Jan 2021     Views:99
Person unable to find a surety can take benefit of...
18 Jan 2021     Views:65
Delhi High Court Stays Mohit Saraf's Termination F...
18 Jan 2021     Views:67
If The Parties Agrees To Admit To Talaq Without An...
18 Jan 2021     Views:49
Patients cannot be deprived of treatment due to ex...
18 Jan 2021     Views:76
Seventeen Sub Judges Appointed as District Judges ...
18 Jan 2021     Views:59
State of Gujarat liable to pay Rs.25,000 for its i...
17 Jan 2021     Views:56
A Person Can Be Discharged on Bail Under Sec. 445 ...
17 Jan 2021     Views:98
MP High Court Adjourns Hearing In Comedian Munawar...
17 Jan 2021     Views:63
Notice Issued By Delhi High Court To The Center In...
17 Jan 2021     Views:57
Calcutta High Court Issues Contempt Notice To The ...
17 Jan 2021     Views:183
Delhi High Court Allows Reopening of Spas, Wellnes...
17 Jan 2021     Views:51
WhatsApp messages to hold evidentiary value only u...
17 Jan 2021     Views:80
FIR Registered Against Over 10 People For Compromi...
17 Jan 2021     Views:73
Delhi HC hikes amount of compensation to parents o...
17 Jan 2021     Views:78
Committee Constituted By Calcutta High Court To En...
16 Jan 2021     Views:38
Advance paid to property owner by real-estate deve...
16 Jan 2021     Views:39
Karnataka High Court Directs Govt To Reconsider Ci...
16 Jan 2021     Views:42
High Court of Punjab and Haryana Orders for Allowi...
16 Jan 2021     Views:41
Karnataka High Court seeks information regarding ...
16 Jan 2021     Views:49
Kerala HC orders the state to consider the grievan...
16 Jan 2021     Views:39
BSES-RPL liable for damages not on basis of proof ...
16 Jan 2021     Views:86
Reconsider decision to physical hearing: Letter to...
16 Jan 2021     Views:68
Disclosure of interest in the information sought u...
16 Jan 2021     Views:93
Stay Order Issued Against GST Notice Served on Adv...
16 Jan 2021     Views:88
Karnataka Government directed to reconsider circul...
15 Jan 2021     Views:70
Writ jurisdiction cannot be utilized by a litigant...
15 Jan 2021     Views:40
Delhi HC issues notice on a plea on non-implementa...
15 Jan 2021     Views:38
Whether an arbitrator appointed by a person who is...
15 Jan 2021     Views:53
Karnataka District Courts to resume normal functio...
15 Jan 2021     Views:69
Constitutional Rights is at Stake: Kerala HC on De...
15 Jan 2021     Views:62
Same gender sexual harassment cases maintainable u...
15 Jan 2021     Views:96
The Delhi High Court issues notice in petition reg...
15 Jan 2021     Views:73
The state is not ready to deal with the demographi...
15 Jan 2021     Views:77
Mandatory investigation of all custodial deaths: N...
15 Jan 2021     Views:78
Accused should be subjected to blood test or breat...
15 Jan 2021     Views:83
Order Terminating Arbitration Proceedings Under Se...
15 Jan 2021     Views:96
Allahabad High Court tells UP government to come u...
15 Jan 2021     Views:103
Cannot Maintain Writ Petition Against Purely Priva...
14 Jan 2021     Views:71
Plea seeking live streaming of open court proceedi...
14 Jan 2021     Views:47
Calcutta High Court : Have the power to set aside ...
14 Jan 2021     Views:76
11 Benches of the Delhi High Court to resume physi...
14 Jan 2021     Views:56
The prudent citizen should abide by the order of t...
14 Jan 2021     Views:57
Parking facilities in malls liable to pay service ...
14 Jan 2021     Views:125
Madras High Court indicates close nexus between ri...
14 Jan 2021     Views:76
SEBI Boycotts Anchor Hemant Gahi, His Wife And His...
14 Jan 2021     Views:176
Supreme Court registers Suo moto case on “Remed...
14 Jan 2021     Views:258
Mandatory publication of notice inviting objection...
14 Jan 2021     Views:68
Directions issued towards timely service of notic...
13 Jan 2021     Views:58
Delhi HC allows termination of pregnancy after 20 ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:53
Andhra Pradesh High Court Suspends Schedule For Lo...
13 Jan 2021     Views:64
Delhi High Court Upholds The Constitutionality Of...
13 Jan 2021     Views:62
Progress in Sonu Sood's Plea Against BMC Notice: B...
13 Jan 2021     Views:54
Supreme Court Dismisses The Plea Against The High ...
13 Jan 2021     Views:65
Central Government notifies establishment of Natio...
13 Jan 2021     Views:85
Criminal liability of non-political executives can...
13 Jan 2021     Views:59
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Misusing Religion for Electoral Gains: PIL in SC for Action against Parties, Candidates
    On 31 May 2018    Views:11973
  • Bci Directs To Supply Of The Details Of Every Practising Advocate As Per The Format Required By The E-committee Of The Supreme Court Of India.
    On 01 Aug 2020    Views:11252
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:10885
  • Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt
    On 22 Jul 2020    Views:10342
  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:7768
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile
  • Demo My Legal Assistant
  • Demo My Legal Secretary

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Campus Ambassadors
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1122 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.