• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • News/Articles
  • Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra

Latest News

Back

Case Brief: Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (Ahar) & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra

Courtesy/By: Surya J N  |  29 Nov 2020     Views:557

FACTS OF THE CASE:

Initially, the case emerged when the State Government of Maharashtra amended the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The state added Sections 33A and 33B which prohibited any kinds of dancing in restaurants, bars, and hotels with an exception under Section 33B; where the dance performance was only permitted in hotels, theatres, clubs rated above three stars. The Bombay High Court ruled this section arbitrary and unconstitutional and thus the amendment was struck down.

The State again in 2014 introduced another amendment in the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, eliminating Section 33B but instead adding Section 33A which banned dancing in hotels. A writ petition was filed by the Indian Hotel & Restaurant Association challenging the constitutional validity of the amended act. The State also filed a counter-affidavit opposing the writ petition. In the said case, the Supreme Court of India stayed the operation of the provision and upheld the judgment of Bombay High Court highlighting that no dance performance is possible inclusive of any kind of obscenity.

The State with strict implications to ban the dance bars, introduced legislation in 2016 imposing various restrictions on restaurants and bar dancers. It also incorporated the word “obscenity” in dance shows and prohibited it. The Preamble of the act signifies that the act prohibits obscene dance performances and it also was enacted to protect the women working in such conditions from exploitation and to improve their work condition Section 3 of the act defined terms like "obscenity", “bar room" “dancer”. It imposes strict restrictions on the part of the restaurants to obtain a license and duty to comply with the rules.

Section 8 of the Act prescribed penal provisions for non-compliance with the Act. It also imposed a fine of up to 10 lakhs and imprisonment of 5 years. Certain offenses were also prescribed as even cognizable and non-bailable. The provision of the act puts forward restriction on throwing or showering of money or any materials that had a monetary value attached to it.

 

ISSUES:

The major issue surrounding the act was to check the constitutional validity of it and its provisions that are said to regulate and protect the bar dancers from exploitation.

1. It pertains to the definition of "obscene dance" defined under Section 2(8)(i) of the Act.

2. Whether Section 6(4) of the Act violative of Article 19(1) of the Constitution?

3. Whether the penal provisions under Section 8(2) are discriminatory of Article 14 of the constitution?

4. Whether Section 8(4) of the said act arbitrary of Article 14 of the Constitution?

5. Whether Rule 3 of the Act is constitutionally legal?

 

ARGUMENTS BY THE PARTIES:

 

PETITIONER-

Section 6(4) of the Act IS violative of articles 14 and 19 (1) of the Constitution. The purpose behind this provision was to make sure that there would not be a license for a place, both for dance bars and discotheque or orchestra. The petitioner also argued that there was no rationale behind such a provision based on intelligible differentia. It was argued that the dance that amounts to obscenity is already an offense under Section 294 of the Indian Penal Code and is punishable with imprisonment which may extend up to three months. It was further said that such a provision (section 6(4) of the Act) was arbitrary and violative of Article 14, there was a clear conflict between the central law (i.e. the IPC) and the State Act (the impugned Act). Therefore, the section of the amended act needs to be struck down. It was brought before the bench that the prohibition under section 8(4) was only for the dancers and not singers or waitresses working in the same dance bars or hotels. the point of argument was that giving such things to a dancer only amounts to tipping her on an appreciation of her performance which was the same thing as appreciating a singer for her performance or a waitress for her service and there was absolutely nothing wrong about it and such an act cannot be made an offense. It was, therefore, grossly arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Indian constitution.

 

RESPONDENT-

Section 2(8) of the Act which defines ‘obscene dance’ was well defended by arguing that the expression ‘prurient interest’ has a definite meaning in the dictionary and this expression finds presence in Section 292 of the IPC as well which makes obscenity an offense. Section 8(1) makes the Act of using the place in contravention of Section 3 an offense. In the same manner, it was argued that  Section 8(2) is a separate offense prescribed in the law that is under the Maharashtra Act which is different and distinct from Section 292 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). In respect of Section 8(4), the defendant submitted that it’s a matter of cultural ethos of the society as a whole. It was further said that such a provision of showering money on the dancer is a method of inducement which has to be checked. According to the defendants, Section 354A of IPC which is a moral code of the society and the State is only attempting to preserve this moral code of conduct by bringing in such an amendment.

 

CONCLUSION:

The Judgment pronounced is really a boon to women and various institutions from being unemployed. The judgment took a modern view deviating from the age-old concepts of morality and prejudges of the past. The judgment clearly defines and interprets the act saying that the provisions that are in violation of the Constitution and are unjust to the dance women and institutions are invariably struck down. Certain regulatory provisions have been upheld to protect women from exploitation.


Document:


Courtesy/By: Surya J N  |  29 Nov 2020     Views:557

News Updates

The Legal Framework of Bail Conditions in India: B...
25 Oct 2024     Views:6202
Changing an Arbitrator Mid-Proceeding: Legal Frame...
23 Oct 2024     Views:5614
IMF Retains India's FY25 GDP Growth Forecast at 7%...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5595
The Evolving Landscape of Russian Anti-Suit Injunc...
22 Oct 2024     Views:5393
Hyundai’s IPO vs Competitors: How the Auto Giant...
15 Oct 2024     Views:5415
The Validity of Arbitration Agreements Post Decree...
14 Oct 2024     Views:5064
SEBI Issues Checklist for AIFs, Their Managers, an...
08 Oct 2024     Views:5429
The Siemens v. Russian Railroads Case...
07 Oct 2024     Views:5421
Empowering Minds in Confinement: Bombay HC’s Lan...
03 Oct 2024     Views:5544
The Dynamics of Novation in Contract Law and Its I...
02 Oct 2024     Views:5727
SEBI Establishes Consistent Evaluation Standards f...
01 Oct 2024     Views:5437
Landmark Decision by Austrian Supreme Court on Arb...
30 Sep 2024     Views:5402
Key Considerations for Indian Commercial Claims...
25 Sep 2024     Views:5353
Boom or Bust: Africa’s Oil Giants Face Declining...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5478
The Growing Role of Arbitration in Intellectual Pr...
23 Sep 2024     Views:5434
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:5761
SEBI's Employee Grievances Prompt Formation of Wor...
19 Sep 2024     Views:5586
Environmental Law in India: Challenges and Opportu...
18 Sep 2024     Views:6432
Navigating the New Legal Landscape of Exclusive Ju...
16 Sep 2024     Views:5548
The Anatomy of Joint Venture Breakups in India (an...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5892
The Integration of ESG in India's M&A Landscape...
31 Jul 2024     Views:5793
Future of AI in Legal Systems and Conflict Resolut...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5979
World Health Assembly Revises International Health...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5831
Pokemon GO Fans Concerned Over Restrictive New Ter...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5942
Landmark Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitration Awa...
21 Jul 2024     Views:5734
Understanding the Process of Issuing Summons in In...
11 Jul 2023     Views:9135
Understanding the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)...
10 Jul 2023     Views:7667
Understanding the Mental Health Act in India: A St...
09 Jul 2023     Views:7705
Combating Manual Scavenging in India: A Call for S...
07 Jul 2023     Views:7495
Impleadment in Supreme Court of India: A Comprehen...
05 Jul 2023     Views:8477
Unraveling the Distinction: Culpable Homicide vs. ...
03 Jul 2023     Views:7804
Understanding the Difference between Money Bills a...
02 Jul 2023     Views:6336
Understanding the Civil Procedure Code in India: A...
01 Jul 2023     Views:7123
The Rights of Criminals in India: Upholding Justic...
30 Jun 2023     Views:6381
Exploring the Differences between the US and India...
29 Jun 2023     Views:6389
What to Do If the Police Refuse to Register Your F...
26 Jun 2023     Views:6642
Timeline of Environmental Protocols: A Global Effo...
25 Jun 2023     Views:6332
How to Deal with Cheque Bounce Cases in India...
24 Jun 2023     Views:6315
Pursuing a Lucrative Litigation Career in Indian L...
22 Jun 2023     Views:6362
Understanding the Emergency Provisions of India: S...
21 Jun 2023     Views:6334
Environment Legislation in India: A Comprehensive ...
20 Jun 2023     Views:6686
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
18 Jun 2023     Views:6179
Understanding the Emergency Powers of the Constitu...
17 Jun 2023     Views:6212
Timeline of Same-Sex Laws in India: A Journey Towa...
16 Jun 2023     Views:6659
Sir Creek Dispute and Legal Implications...
15 Jun 2023     Views:6860
Jurisprudence of NDPS Laws in India: A Comprehensi...
14 Jun 2023     Views:6434
Impleadment Proceedings: A Comprehensive Guide to ...
13 Jun 2023     Views:6871
Understanding Continuing Mandamus: A Powerful Judi...
12 Jun 2023     Views:8869
Res Judicata: The Doctrine of Finality in Legal Pr...
10 Jun 2023     Views:6866
Mastering the Art of Legal Drafting: A Comprehensi...
08 Jun 2023     Views:6530
Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CP...
07 Jun 2023     Views:12197
Understanding the Laws of War: Protecting Humanity...
03 Jun 2023     Views:6245
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC...
02 Jun 2023     Views:7108
The National Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDP...
01 Jun 2023     Views:6677
A Step-by-Step Guide: How to File an FIR in India...
31 May 2023     Views:6388
Zero FIR: An Effective Tool for Prompt Criminal Ju...
30 May 2023     Views:6617
Unveiling the Dissent of Judges in Judicial Judgme...
28 May 2023     Views:6252
Environmental Laws in India: Safeguarding Nature f...
25 May 2023     Views:6706
The Recusal of Supreme Court of India Judges from ...
24 May 2023     Views:6371
Understanding the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Cour...
23 May 2023     Views:6816
Article 142 of the Constitution of India: A Compre...
22 May 2023     Views:7040
Landmark Judgments in Arbitration Law in India: A...
21 May 2023     Views:7272
Landmark Cases on Anticipatory Bail in India: A Pa...
20 May 2023     Views:11155
Embracing the Future: How AI is Revolutionizing th...
18 May 2023     Views:6466
Understanding Narcotics Laws in India: A Comprehen...
17 May 2023     Views:6336
Understanding Indian Laws on Cross-Border Transact...
16 May 2023     Views:7473
ADR mechanism of legal adjudication in India...
15 May 2023     Views:6183
Validity of foreign arbitral award in India throug...
14 May 2023     Views:6193
Scope of Section 151 CPC...
13 May 2023     Views:7779
Detailed Overview on Section 482 of Crpc...
11 May 2023     Views:6723
Scope of Decree under CPC...
10 May 2023     Views:6269
Legal development of Arbitration Laws in India....
09 May 2023     Views:6313
Arbitration Laws in India...
07 May 2023     Views:6262
Impact of COVID-19 on Legal Industry...
06 May 2023     Views:8363
Chargesheet not having authority's valid sanction ...
02 May 2023     Views:6548
Same-Sex Marriage in India...
30 Apr 2023     Views:6182
National Commission for Women...
27 Apr 2023     Views:6036
Law making process of India....
26 Apr 2023     Views:7126
Bail Provisions in India...
25 Apr 2023     Views:6060
Life imprisonment in Criminal Law in India...
24 Apr 2023     Views:6479
Contempt of Court...
23 Apr 2023     Views:6314
The collegium system of Judiciary in India....
22 Apr 2023     Views:5999
Remarriage before Expiry of Limitation Period to f...
21 Apr 2023     Views:5991
Need for strict measure of NDPS laws in India....
20 Apr 2023     Views:6156
Nature of Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is Q...
19 Apr 2023     Views:8596
Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Plaint cannot be rejected m...
18 Apr 2023     Views:7203
Mediation: At the Dawn of Golden Age organized at ...
16 Apr 2023     Views:6272
Central Government's motto should be mediate, not ...
15 Apr 2023     Views:5986
Ambedkar Jayanti Celebrations...
14 Apr 2023     Views:6201
Supreme Court of India calls for Preventive Measur...
12 Apr 2023     Views:5757
Pursuing LL.M is not break in Law Practice, Rules ...
11 Apr 2023     Views:5984
Law should take into consideration realities of co...
10 Apr 2023     Views:5812
Delhi High Court said that peeping into public bat...
08 Apr 2023     Views:6418
Delhi High Court denies bails to AAP's Satyendra J...
06 Apr 2023     Views:6537
Supreme Court’s Triple Talaq Judgement Would App...
30 Jan 2023     Views:6262
Article 311(1) | An Order of Removal From Service ...
26 Jan 2023     Views:6737
Leaders shouldn't disrespect the President or Pri...
17 Jan 2023     Views:6044
New bench will hear Ashwini Upadhyay's Supreme Cou...
15 Jan 2023     Views:6183
Person Who Drove Rashly with the Knowledge that it...
12 Jan 2023     Views:6775
The rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act cannot b...
11 Jan 2023     Views:6512
FIND A LAWYER




FIND A LAW SCHOOL



Most Read News Articles

  • Sabrimala Verdict (28 sept 2018) - A End of Taboo.
    On 07 Oct 2020    Views:96495
  • Case Analysis: Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India
    On 11 Dec 2020    Views:74081
  • Case Analysis: THE BERUBARI UNION CASE
    On 14 Dec 2020    Views:71493
  • DOCTRINE OF ELECTION UNDER TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882
    On 08 Jul 2020    Views:70632
  • A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950 AIR 27, 1950 SCR 88)
    On 08 Nov 2020    Views:60003
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.