• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch Is Laudable

Latest Articles

Back

NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch Is Laudable

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  20 Aug 2018     Views:2504

 Let me start by first and foremost pointing out that the consolidated draft National Register of Citizens (NRC) which is a database of Indian citizens in Assam and is being prepared under the Supreme Court’s watch, is a critical step in resolving one of Assam’s longstanding and most complicated problem of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh. No politics should be done over it. No credit should be taken by any political party for it and it must be kept completely out of the dirty theatric politics over it because if this is not done then it will become completely embroiled in it and nothing substantial will ever take place actually which will be our nation’s biggest misfortune!

                                              To be sure, the list which was made public on July 30 has left out the names of over 4 million (40,07,707 to be precise) of the state’s 32.9 million residents. But those left out should not panic. Applicants left out of the NRC may be given a personal hearing under a fresh Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) being devised by the Home Ministry. The Registrar-General of India (RGI) and the Home Ministry are exploring several options to provide adequate opportunity to 40 lakh of the 3.9 crore applicants whose names were not included in the final NRC draft published on July 30.

                                                Be it noted, RGI Sailesh told media that the SOP would ensure that filing claims and objections was a fair and credible process. He said that, “There may be many applicants who may not understand the process and the required documentation. So we have to see that every person has the right information and the assistance required.” An official said that the circle officers or block development officers would be asked to give personal hearings to applicants even after they had exhausted the option of filing “claims and objections”.

                                   While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, let me inform here that on July 31, a Supreme Court Bench had ordered the government to frame in consultation with State NRC Coordinator Prateek Hajela, a “fair” SOP to deal with the claims and objections of those who did not find their names in the draft NRC. RGI Sailesh revealed that, “The SOP will also go into the aspects of disposal of claims and objections so that reasonable time and adequate opportunity are given to applicants. The rules say that any person can make an objection against an inclusion and any person whose name is not there can file a claim.” Every precaution is being taken to ensure that no bona fide citizen is left out! Still one just fails to comprehend that why some leaders are trying to give it a political twist and are warning of nation getting immersed in “civil war” and “bloodbath” if any action is taken on illegal immigrants! This is what is most deplorable, degrading and dangerous which cannot be justiified under any circumstances!

                                            For my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence, it must be also informed here that in a most matured and balanced stand the RGI Sailesh when asked by media if it would be appropriate to call the 40 lakh applicants “infiltrators”, as they were being referred to by some political leaders stated unambiguously that, “We don’t have any nomenclature for them. We have the list of eligible people for inclusion in NRC and the total [number of] applicants in NRC. For us they are applicants.” The Home Ministry too commendably had earlier told the Assam government that no action should be initiated by the administration or the police based on the draft NRC. The RGI has been asked to use all means of communication, including websites, toll-free numbers and SMS, to provide information to the public about the draft NRC.

                           Truth be told, while it is not yet clear who will decide the fate of the 4 million applicants who have been left out and have not made it to the final draft of the NRC, the issue of illegal immigrants in Assam has been historically determined by two tribunals. The first is the Foreigners Tribunal (FT) which was set up by the Assam government in 1964 to identify the legal status of suspected foreigners in Assam. There are 100 FTs in Assam as on date. The second is the Illegal Migrants Determination Tribunal, or IM (DT), established in 1985, with special provisions for Assam. It only considered the cases of those who had allegedly entered India after March 25, 1971 and crucially these placed the onus of proving citizenship on the accuser rather than the accused. The IM(DT) Act was subsequently struck down by the Supreme Court as being unconstitutional in 2005.

                                           As it turned out, high pendency has severely plagued the working of the two tribunals, according to data from a 2012 white paper issued by the Assam government. Between 1985 and 2012, about 221,000 cases were referred to the two tribunals. During this period, they disposed of only about 97,000 cases. In these, they declared about 55,000 individuals as foreigners, leading to the deportation of 2,442 individuals. Between the two tribunals, the IM (DT) courts have been seen to be far less efficient and also less likely in declaring a person a foreigner. However, they were more likely to effect deportations. The high pendency in the two tribunals has been attributed to the lack of judicial supervision, long vacancies of members and inadequate staff. And now, in Assam, there are 4 million cases to be heard. What all has been disclosed here was effectively highlighted by Arjun Srinivas who is a recipient of the Mint-Hindustan Times-HowIndiaLives Data Fellowship 2018 in Hindustan Times newspaper dated August 9, 2018.

                                                     Going forward, Zia Haq in this same newspaper and same date further goes on to point out elaborately that, “The list made public on July 30 has left out the names of over 4 million (40,07,707 to be precise) of the state’s 32.9 million residents. Assam has witnessed large-scale migrations from Bangladesh, with which it shares a 267.5-km border. Natives want illegal migrants to be deported. The terms of citizenship in Assam were written into an agreement, the so-called Assam Accord which was signed on August 15, 1985 by the then Rajiv Gandhi-led Congress government with the All Assam Students Union (AASU). It was the culmination of a six-year agitation led by the student body against illegal settlers. According to the pact, anybody who can prove that they or their families were in Assam prior to the midnight of March 24, 1971 would be deemed a citizen. The NRC was not a part of the Assam Accord. It was suggested by the previous Congress government on May 2, 2005 during tripartite talks involving the state government and the AASU in which former PM Manmohan Singh was present. In June 2010, the Tarun Gogoi-led Congress government of Assam started a pilot project in two districts – Barpeta and Chaigaon – to vet citizenship and update the citizens’ registry, first compiled manually in 1951, the year of India’s first census. The names of many native Assamese like Dhrubojyoti Sharma of Rangia, a central committee member of the Asom Gana Parishad are missing. The aim of publishing the citizens register, a list of all Indian citizens in Assam, on the directions of the apex court is to identify genuine residents. A correct NRC will be a milestone. Residents need two sets of documentation to prove citizenship. The first is to furnish documents in “List A”. This refers to any government-certified document from before 1971, such as names in a similar 1951 citizens register, or a school certificate, birth certificate, land records etc. This is the so-called “legacy data”. Then, they are required to submit documents mentioned under “List B”. Purpose of documents under List B need to clearly link up with those in List A, proving ancestry.”    

                                                Having said this, let us now discuss some pertinent questions on this very vexed issue as also on citizenship in India which is grabbing the eyeballs of not just the people of India but extending all across the globe! This will certainly enable more clarity on this vexed issue which is being unnecessarily politicised by few politicians for serving their own vested political interests. Rahul Tripathi has brilliantly dwelt on the same in The Indian Express dated August 3, 2018. They are as follows: -

                     How is citizenship determined in India?    

                           Indian citizenship can be acquired by birth, descent, registration and naturalisation. A person domiciled in India as on November 26, 1949 – the date when the Constituent Assembly adopted the Constitution – autmoatically became a citizen if he or either of his parents was born in India, or if he had been in India for at least five years until that date.

                       For those born in India after the Constitution came into effect, the Citizenship Act, 1955, grants citizenship by birth based on birth dates. Anyone born between January 26, 1950 and July 1, 1987 is a citizen by birth; a person between July 1, 1987 and December 3, 2004 is a citizen by birth if either of his parents is a citizen of India at the time; those born on or after December 3, 2004 is a citizen by birth if both parents are citizens of India at the time, or if one parent is a citizen and the other is not an illegal migrant – defined as a foreigner who entered India without valid documents, or stayed beyond the allowed period.

                               Citizenship by registration can be acquired by persons of Indian origin who have lived in India for 7 years before applying, persons of Indian origin who live in any country outside undivided India, persons marrried to a citizen of India and who have lived in India for 7 years before the application. Any minor child can be registered as a citizen if the government is satisfied that there are special circumstances.

          Is it possible for a foreigner with no connection to India(marriage, descent etc) to become a citizen of India?

                                    This is citizenship by naturalisation. Any foreigner, provided he is not an illegal immigrant, can acquire citizenship, provided he has stayed in India for 12 consecutive months preceding the date of application, and for 11 years out of the preceding 14 years.

            Is citizenship permanent?

                        Under Section 9(1) of the 1955 Act, a person ceases to be a citizen if he or she voluntarily acquires the citizenship of another country or renounces Indian citizenship. India does not allow dual citizenship. Under Section 10, anyone who has become a citizen of India by naturalisation or by registration due to marriage to an Indian citizen can be deprived of the citizenship by the Home Ministry for certain reasons.

         How is Assam different? Why a separate National Register of Citizens?

               This is because of a history of migration. During British rule, Assam was merged with Bengal Presidency for administrative purpose. From 1826 to 1947, the British continuously brought migrant workers to Assam for cheap labor in tea plantations. Two major waves of migration came after British rule – first after Partition, from East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), and then in the aftermath of the liberation of Bangladesh in 1971. This eventually led to an agitation during 1979-85, led by the All Assam Students Union. It culminated in the 1985 Assam Accord signed with the Rajiv Gandhi government, under which illegal migrants were to be identified and deported. Clause 6A was inserted in the Citizenship Act with special provisions for Assam.

        What are those provisions?

                 These take into account two cutoff dates – January 1, 1966 and March 25, 1971. Anyone who was a resident of Assam before the first date is a citizen. Migrants who entered on any day between these two dates, and remained there, would need to register with a Foreigners Tribunal. For 10 years, they would have all rights of a citizen except the right to vote which would be granted at the end of 10 years. Finally, migrants who entered Assam on or after March 25, 1971, are not eligible for citizenship.

           Is this not the cutoff date for NRC too?

                   Yes. For inclusion, applicants need to prove that they – or their parents, grandparents etc – were citizens before March 25, 1971. Those who could not prove this, as well as their offspring, have been excluded. Assam already has an NRC, prepared in 1951 with 80 lakh citizens, on the basis of that year’s Census. In 2003, the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules were amended for updating the NRC in order to identify genuine citizens.

        What was the mechanism for identifying migrants earlier?

                 When Indira Gandhi was Prime Minister, the government introduced the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunal) Act, applicable only to Assam. Against the Foreigners Act that was in force elsewhere, the IMDT Act was seen as ineffective as the burden of proof of someone being a foreigner was on the accuser and not on the state or the accused. In 2005, the Supreme Court struck down IMDT Act on a petition filed by Sarbananda Sonowal, then an AGP leader, now Assam Chief Minister and a BJP leader.

          Before the NRC update, Assam was witnessing protests over the Citizenship Amendment Bill. What was this about?

                In 2016, the Centre introduced amendments to the Citizenship Act to grant citizenship to religious minorities (mostly Hindus and including other non-Muslims) from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan who took shelter in India. The Bill relaxes norms for granting them citizenship by decreasing the residency requirement from 11 years to six years. In Assam, where the agitation was against migrants irrespective of religion, this has led to protests. The Bill is currently pending with a Joint Parliamentary Committee.

           Is there a similar situation for migrants in any other state?

                In Arunachal Pradesh, a demand for citizenship to Chakmas has been pending for decades. While the Centre is keen to grant them citizenship, it is being opposed by the state government. In Kashmir, West Pakistan refugees are allowed to vote in national elections but not in Assembly elections.

                                          It is heartening to note that amid an intensifying ugly political slugfest over Assam NRC, the Supreme Court on July 31 stated that the exercise for verifying the citizenship of residents of the state will be taken to its logical conclusion, even as it asked the Centre to frame a ‘fair and equitable’ standard operating procedure to adjudicate claims for Indian citizenship. A Bench of Supreme Court comprising Justices Ranjan Gogoi and RF Nariman made it plain that the exercise being conducted under the court’s aegis identifying alleged aliens residing in Assam will not stop, but nipped the fear of any immediate fallout for those who have not made it to the draft NRC by saying that no coercive steps will be taken against them. NRC coordinator Prateek Hajela told the Apex Court that, “Of the 40.07 lakh who don’t find their name in the list, applications of 37.59 lakh persons have been rejected and those of 2.48 lakh have been put on hold.”

                                          Truly speaking, Attorney General KK Venugopal said the ministry concerned would prepare a detailed SOP to receive and adjudicate claims and objections of those excluded from the NRC. Venugopal said that, “Given the magnitude of the human dimension of the problem, it would be appropriate if the SC assured the public against any coercive step on the basis of draft NRC.” The Bench said it gives no assurances but passes orders. The Bench said: “In this regard, the court would like to observe that what has been published being a draft NRC, it cannot be the basis for any action by any authority” thus allaying fears among members of the minority community that they could face immediate deportation proceedings.

                             Needless to add, the Bench also said: “Whatever be the modalities in the SOP, it has to be a fair procedure. Those who have been excluded from the draft NRC must get a fair opportunity. Whatever SOP you (the Centre) want to frame to govern this (claims and objections) must be a fair procedure.” Asked about a possible timeline, the AG said that it will depend on the total number of claims and objections received. However, Justices Gogoi and Nariman were firm to take to logical conclusion the long drawn exercise of preparation of draft NRC, credit of which largely goes to the Bench for its untiring monitoring of the process undertaken by a team of thousands of state government officers, led by IIT Delhi electronics graduate-turned IAS officer Hajela since 2013. The first draft NRC was published on December 31, 2017 when 1.9 crore of the 3.29 crore population of Assam was included in it.

                                         Simply put, the Bench asked the Centre to place the draft SOP for receiving and adjudicating claims and objections before the court on August 16 for vetting. Making clear its intention to finalise the draft NRC in due course, the Bench said: “We permit the concerned ministry of the Union government to frame modalities and place it before the court for dealing with claims and objections so as to enable publication of final NRC.” On August 16, the court said it would draw up the time schedule for this. Hajela told the court that the draft NRC would be on display at local registrar office from August 7 to permit public to verify their names. He also said that, “Those who have objections or claims against draft NRC, can file it with supporting documents before local registrar in 30 days from August 30 till September 28.”

                                       Interestingly enough, the Centre proposes to include Indian citizens who are not from Bangladesh and who moved to Assam from other parts of the country before or after March 24, 1971 in the National Register of Citizens (NRC) if their citizenship is proved beyond reasonable doubt. This is part of the SOP drawn up by the Centre to deal with claims and objections of those who have been left out of the draft NRC which is being prepared on the directions of the Apex Court. The government also suggested that the time for filing claims and objections regarding inclusion of names in the draft NRC be extended from the one month proposed initially to two months.

                                     It must be added here that the document pointed out that the Supreme Court in its July 21, 2015 order had said “…Indian citizens including their children and descendants, who may have moved to the State of Assam subsequent to 24th March, 1971 would be eligible for inclusion in the NRC on adducing satisfactory proof of residence in any part of the country (outside Assam) as on 24th March 1971.” The government, however said that in some cases, people have not been able to provide documents to prove their residence in any part of the country. For such people, it proposed to make provisions similar to Rule 4 of the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003 and Clause 3(3) of the Schedule.”

                                             Accordingly, government submitted that, “citizens of India who originate from other states in India and who do not have any origin in specified territory (Bangladesh) and have moved to State of Assam prior to 24th March 1971 or after will be included in the NRC if the citizenship of such persons is ascertained beyond reasonable doubt to the satisfaction of the authorities disposing of claims and objections. Cases of all such persons whether ordered for inclusion by the authority (disposing claims and objections), or for exclusion, will be examined first by the CRCR (Circle Registrar of Citizen Registration) and then by the DRCR (District Registrar of Citizen Registration). The final decision of inclusion or exclusion will be taken by the DRCR, who will issue a speaking order issued under his deal and signature” the SOP stated adding that “authorities examining the claim and the DRCR will exercise great caution to ensure that no illegal person’s name is included taking recourse to the above provisions.”

                                 Of course, the government also submitted that claims involving children of 14 years who have been left out from the draft NRC and whose parents have included in it “will be segregated and pre-claim verification undertaken by CRCR to ascertain the shortcomings in linkage documents or any inconsistencies thereof.” It said the DRCR concerned will ensure specific hearings for the composite family in respect of these children and oral and written evidences from parents will be available. This “special consideration” was needed, the government said, because adequate documentary evidence may not be available for children below age 14. “Claims where only married women are involved and have no linkage document other than Gaon Panchayat Secretary Certificate issued prior to August 2015 will be examined separately in accordance with the guidelines issued in its compliance to Hon’ble Supreme Court orders on the verification of Gaon Panchayat Secretary Certificate for married women,” it said.

                                      In essence, the Local Registrar of Citizen Registration (LRCR) will issue notices for hearing the objections raised to inclusion of any names including to the person against whom the objection raised. To “ensure fairness and objectivity”, the government said, “it is considered necessary that the officers who have decided the applications at the stage of draft NRC (LRCR) are not the decision-making authority at the stage of disposal of claims and objections”. Centre stated that the state had informed that it will be able to make available 1,500 to 2,500 Class I officers for this. The exact requirement will, however, depend on the number of claims and objections that are filed, the SOP said, adding that it was also proposed to appoint senior state government officers as observers to oversee the process of disposal of claims and objections.

                                As things stand, during the hearings, the state, in collaboration with UIDAI, will undertake biometric enrolment of applicants. Once the final NRC is published, those included in it will be given Aadhaar numbers. The SOP also provides a timeline for completing tasks. Accordingly, the period for receiving claims and objections will be from August 30 to October 28. The hearings will start from December 15 onward.  It may be recalled here that on July 31, a Bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and RF Nariman while allowing the government to draw up the SOP had said it would approve the same if the procedure adopted was fair, else it would correct it.

                                           It must be brought out here that the Registrar General of India (RGI) will not make public the reasons for excluding the names of 40 lakh people from the NRC, the final draft of which was just released. This will certainly give an opportunity to some to raise serious question marks over such secrecy especially those who are not at all happy with this historic move! The only exceptions to this are those who have been marked ‘doubtful’ voters by the Election Commission (voting rights of such people and their descendants already stand suspended) and those who have, at any point of time, been referred to Foreigners Tribunals and their descendants. These two categories of people, numbering 2.48 lakh already know that their names would not be included in the draft NRC until their names are cleared by the tribunals.

                                               It must also be brought out here that another 1.5 lakh people whose names were part of the draft published in December but have been excluded from the final draft, will be informed about the reason for their exclusion by a letter of information (LOI). These applicants were excluded for one of three reasons – either their names had been erroneously included, they were found to have submitted false claims or panchayat certificates submitted by them were found invalid. NRC State Coordinator Prateek Hajela submitted before the Supreme Court while seeking its permission which was subsequently granted that, “The LOI will have to be served to the rejected applicants within seven days from the date of publication of the complete draft. The LOI will explicitly state that the applicant has an opportunity to file a claim for inclusion in the NRC. The LOI will also inform the time schedule and place of submission for the claim.” The rest of the excluded persons will have to file a fresh application in a prescribed form with the local registrar of citizen’s registration between August 7 and September 28 to know the reason for exclusion. RGI Sailesh said that, “Each of the individuals will be given a letter citing the reason for exclusion.”

                                   All said and done, it is a herculean task to ensure that innocents are not harassed and illegal immigrants are not spared from being deported to their respective countries from where they entered illegally to India. Similarly all those who burn Indian flags and chant anti-Indian slogans must be deported from all across India! All political parties must refrain from indulging in petty politics as it concerns our national security and there can be no compromise on it! Rajnath Singh who is Union Home Minister very rightly cautioned parties against politicizing it. He said: “Whatever work is going on in the NRC, is happening under the supervision of the Supreme Court. To say that the government has done it, and it is inhuman and brutal…such allegations are baseless. It is not the right thing to say. Some people are unnecessarily trying to create an atmosphere of fear. I want to assure all that there is no need for any apprehension or fear. Some misinformation is also being spread.” Appealing to the House, Rajnath Singh again very rightly said that, “This is a very sensitive issue. Everyone should lend their support. I want to make it clear…you can express your anger…but let me tell you that the government is not doing anything…everything is being done under the supervision of Supreme Court.” Absolutely right! Rajnath also very rightly said that there is no question of any coercive action against anyone while stressing that NRC process is “being carried out with complete fairness and transparency”. He also made it clear that if anyone was not satisfied with the final draft of the NRC, that person would get an opportunity to file claims and objections as per provisions in the law and also approach the Foreigners Tribunal. He also clarified that, “Only after the disposal of claims and objections, will the final NRC be published.”

                                             On a concluding note, what is being done in Assam is truly laudable and should be emulated in all parts of India to ensure that illegal immigrants are first identified and then deported back to their native country! If this is not done, it is bound to have disastrous consequences on the unity and integrity of India. Also, all those who stay in India and repeatedly swear by Pakistan or any other foreign country must be first identified and then deported to the country of their choice without wasting anymore time because it goes without saying that, “You cannot be a Pakistani and an Indian at the same time because India and Pakistan are separate countries since 1947. You cannot claim fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution while believing in Pakistan and burning our flags and Constitution”. Same holds true for other countries as well. Those who burn Indian flags, Indian Constitution, insult national anthem and sing Pakistani anthem or anthem of any other country must migrate to their country of choice and if they don’t they must be deported at all cost and under all circumstances. Similarly those who stay in India and still attack army vehicles and slap our brave soldiers and throw their helmets in gutter must be deported without showing any leniency of any kind towards them irrespective of their religion, caste, creed or sex! Similarly if a person has no proof of citizenship but swears by India and demonstrates total loyalty for nation by doing exemplary acts of courage and promotes harmony must be rehabilitated in India at all cost and under all circumstances no matter what his/her religion, caste, creed, community or sex is!   


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  20 Aug 2018     Views:2504

Articles Updates

“SPPU Hosts National Seminar on 75 Years of the ...
16 Sep 2025     Views:152
Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:1553
Post-Merger Vision: HDFC Bank to Prioritize Profit...
01 Aug 2024     Views:1400
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:1602
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:1490
The Mandal Verdict: Indra Sawhney and Its Lasting ...
22 Jul 2024     Views:2287
Supreme Court Emphasizes Direct and a Specific Ple...
22 Jul 2024     Views:1523
Bail and Punishment Provisions of NDPS matters...
05 Apr 2023     Views:4959
The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:5791
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:6055
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:6148
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:6223
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:10723
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:5674
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:5949
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:5907
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:6196
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:3472
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:3080
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:2673
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:5560
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:22025
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:8792
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:5143
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:4726
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:9453
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:4486
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:4291
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:5384
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:4106
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2391
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:3211
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2769
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2432
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:56997
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2325
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2482
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2636
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2627
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:6934
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2112
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2118
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2205
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:32308
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6952
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:3723
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6478
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:11340
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3899
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3272
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:7899
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:55483
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:2417
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1977
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:2263
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:2437
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:2220
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:3959
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:1526
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:6944
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2344
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2705
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:2335
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:3939
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:13006
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:2239
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:2333
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:3851
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:5181
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:2955
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:11298
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:2051
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:6894
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2854
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2898
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:3228
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:26696
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:5578
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2275
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:34168
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:2253
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:7427
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:2270
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:4330
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2262
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:3002
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:20454
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2147
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2120
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1565
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2433
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2823
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2426
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1971
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1933
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1864
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1948
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:7650
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2310
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2148
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1855
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2234
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2405
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2035
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1852
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1943
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2373
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:2239
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1971
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:2079
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:9547
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:2342
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:2056
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:2058
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:2031
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:10688
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:2145
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1951
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:2017
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:2197
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:3965
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1921
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1932
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2257
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:3041
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:2343
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2469
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2634
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2022
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:3331
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2144
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2665
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1984
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2200
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2229
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2235
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2059
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1947
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2894
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:6770
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:4524
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2448
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2663
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:2710
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:2622
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:2716
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:3209
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2643
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2574
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:3241
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2767
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:5727
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:6482
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2799
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2900
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:2527
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:2810
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:3366
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:36152
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:4721
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:2488
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:2485
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:2578
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:3219
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:2192
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:2252
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:2563
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:3537
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:2812
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:4685
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2616
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:2880
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:2322
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:1893
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:2252
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:2178
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:1920
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:2034
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:2865
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:1951
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:2217
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:1955
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:2198
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1855
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:5331
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:5582
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:3018
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:2035
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:2134
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:5589
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:5190
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2909
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2843
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2742
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2163
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:2049
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:2563
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:2094
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2188
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2288
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2142
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2178
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1979
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:2093
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:2098
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:2063
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:2188
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:2026
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:2280
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:2073
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1999
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:1971
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2708
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2139
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2067
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2060
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2473
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2386
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1457
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:3534
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:2338
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:2258
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1589
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:2100
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:2286
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:2202
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:2299
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:2227
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:2482
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:2049
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1876
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:2240
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1851
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2027
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1953
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2620
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2370
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:2613
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1671
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1986
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:2041
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:6309
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:2894
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:2037
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:2084
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:2336
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:2038
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:2051
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:1948
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:2292
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:2507
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:1958
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:2086
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:1873
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:2581
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:1453
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:2107
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:2957
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:3299
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:3307
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:3433
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1923
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:2197
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:5694
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:3303
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:2444
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:2794
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:6263
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:2190
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:9615
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:1600
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:2269
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:1982
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:3753
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:1630
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:1914
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:4068
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4931
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:9002
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:7385
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:2342
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:2097
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2686
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2841
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2468
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2491
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1965
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2453
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2679
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3653
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3395
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3683
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1655
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2177
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3801
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:3113
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:3769
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2999
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2787
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:3321
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:2127
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:2718
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2775
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:3327
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2277
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:2166
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:2025
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:7290
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:2166
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:2361
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:12566
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:4397
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:2139
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2666
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2811
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:3204
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:3353
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2416
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:2932
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:2542
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:2857
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2984
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2999
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2891
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:5196
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2141
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2237
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2112
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2021
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:3719
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2504
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:3286
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:3058
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:4370
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3412
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2293
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3369
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2535
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2279
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2798
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2661
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:2987
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:3784
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:4757
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2582
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2313
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:2389
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:2327
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:2489
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:2831
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:3693
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2401
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2899
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2639
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:2337
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2509
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2504
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2628
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:2671
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:2658
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:2970
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2929
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2473
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:2599
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2409
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3794
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3767
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3624
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2909
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2248
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2208
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2736
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2706
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2466
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:4888
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3907
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3185
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2758
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2165
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2055
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2248
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2094
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:3254
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2682
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:3058
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:3718
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2791
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2809
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:2355
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:2086
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2291
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:4121
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2124
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3550
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2036
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2403
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2316
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2485
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2676
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2488
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:2176
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:2336
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:2116
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:2055
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:2210
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:2725
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:2211
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:2110
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:3574
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2124
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2354
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2096
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2119
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2711
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2219
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2232
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:2279
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:2844
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:2662
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:2298
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:2045
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:2100
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:2595
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:2799
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:2069
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1860
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2176
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:3094
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1801
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:3120
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2177
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2206
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2922
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1883
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2353

Most Read Articles

  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:56997
  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:55483
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:36152
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:34168
  • VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER
    On 20 Apr 2020    Views:32308
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims
Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.