• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPNDT Act, Complete Contents Of Form ‘F’ Mandatory

Latest Articles

Back

SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPNDT Act, Complete Contents Of Form ‘F’ Mandatory

Courtesy/By: Adv.Sanjeev Sirohi  |  20 May 2019     Views:2698

                                          To start with, the Supreme Court in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India (FOGSI) Vs. Union of India and others in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 129 of 2017 delivered on May 3, 2019 and authored by Justice Arun Mishra for himself and Justice Vineet Saran has clearly and convincingly upheld the Constitutional validity of Sections 23(1) and 23(2) of the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994. While dismissing a writ petition filed by FOGSI, the Bench of Apex Court unequivocally observed that dilution of the provisions of the Act or the Rules would only defeat the purpose of the Act to prevent female foeticide and regulate the right to life of the girl child under Article 21 of the Constitution to a mere formality. There can be no denying it!

                                     First and foremost, the ball is set rolling in para 1 wherein it is observed that, “The instant writ petition has been filed by the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Services of India (FOGSI) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Society’) highlighting the issues and problems affecting the practice of obstetricians and gynaecologists across the country under the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 23(1) and 23(2) of the Act and seeking direction in the nature of certiorari/mandamus for decriminalising anomalies in paperwork/record keeping/clerical errors in regard to the provisions of the Act for being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India. The Society is the apex body of obstetricians and gynaecologists of the country and is concerned for the welfare of its members.”  

                     Needless to say, it is then observed in para 2 that, “The case set up on behalf of the petitioner-Society is that the Act was enacted with the objective to prohibit pre-natal diagnostic techniques for determination of sex of the foetus leading to female foeticide. But unfortunately, its implementation is more in letter and less in spirit. The problem of sex determination and gender selection is a serious issue and is one of the biggest social problems faced by our society. Despite enactment of the Act and subsequent amendments, the Child Sex Ratio has not shown significant improvement, hence, putting sufficient concern and questions on the proper implementation of the Act. It is contended that equating clerical errors on the same footing with the actual offence of sex determination shows the inherent weakness in the language of the Act.”

                             Furthermore, it is then pointed out in para 3 that, “It is further contended that the Appropriate Authority appointed under the Act conducts inspections and raids in various districts and cities and even if there are mere anomalies in the paperwork, it seals the sonography machine and files a criminal case under the Act. As a result, doctors who do not conduct sex determination and gender selection are being targeted on the basis of aforesaid anomalies. The inherent infirmity in the Act as it stands currently in its present form amounting to treating unequals as equals. The Act has failed to distinguish between criminal offences and the anomalies in paperwork like incomplete ‘F’-Forms, clerical mistakes such as writing NA or incomplete address, no mentioning of the date, objectionable pictures of Radha Krishna in sonography room, incomplete filling of Form ‘F’, indication for sonography not written, faded notice board and not legible, striking out details in the Form ‘F’ etc., thereby charging the members of the petitioner-Society for heinous crime of female foeticide and sex determination and that too merely for unintentional mistakes in record keeping. The Act provides same punishment for the contravention of any provision of the Act, thus equating the anomalies in paperwork and the offence of sex determination and gender selection on the same pedestal. The sealing of machines directly deprives a woman in that vicinity of a critical medical aid and thereby putting the lives of the woman in danger. The unreasonable sealing of the sonography machine not only impacts the welfare of the women as such, but it also amounts to undue harassment and mental torture of the members of the petitioner-Society.”

                                Not stopping here, it is then mentioned in para 4 that, “It is further contended that the ambiguous wording of Section 23(1) of the Act has resulted in grave miscarriage of justice and the members of the petitioner-Society have faced grave hardships and have undergone criminal prosecution for act, which cannot be equated with the acts of sex determination.” Para 5 then states that, “It is averred that even the smallest anomaly in paperwork which is in fact an inadvertent and unintentional error has made the obstetricians and gynaecologists vulnerable to the prosecution by the Authorities all over the country.”

                                   To be sure, para 6 then stipulates that, “Section 23(2) of the Act empowers the State Medical Council to suspend the registration of any doctor indefinitely, who is reported by the Appropriate Authority for necessary action, during the pendency of trial. The petitioner-Society submitted that Section 23(2) of the Act is ultra vires the Constitution as it assumes the guilt of the alleged accused even before his/her conviction by a competent court and hence violates the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.”

                                          As things stood, para 7 then enunciates that, “It is contended that presumption of innocence is a cardinal principle of rule of law for which petitioner-Society has placed reliance on Article 14(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966, which states that everyone charged with a criminal offence shall have the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law. Article 14(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 reads thus:

       “Article 14

  1. ***
  2. Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall have the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law”.”    

                                            Going forward, para 8 then spells out that, “It is contended that the Act fails to distinguish between the cases of presence and absence of mens rea during the commission of minor clerical mistakes. Mens rea is not to be presumed at the time of taking cognizance and must be established as held by this Court in Arun Bhandari v. State of U.P., (2013) 2 SCC 801.” Para 9 then discloses that, “The petitioner-Society has further placed reliance on the decisions rendered by this Court in cases of penal statutes to give proper effect to the scheme of various interests involved by striking down/reading down/diluting the concerned penal provisions.”

                                                Moving on, para 10 then states that, “It is further contended that suspension of the medical licence at the stage of framing of charges is highly improper and harsh, which results in loss of livelihood of not only the members of the Society, but also his family as well as the dependents, who are deprived of financial security and well-being. The vague and ambiguous wordings of Section 23(1) renders Section 25 totally redundant.” Para 11 then points out: “It is further submitted that Form-F as it stands today does not serve the purpose for which it was made and there is no substantive evidence which proves that errors in Form-F have any direct nexus with the offence of sex selection and determination.”  

                                         On the contrary, para 12 then brings out that, “Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has refuted the claims of the petitioner-Society altogether. It is contended that the Act is a social welfare legislation with a social objective to prevent elimination of girls before birth and it is not a general law providing any general right to practice medicine. The specific choice of legislature cannot be called arbitrary and is in no way ultra vires or violative of the Constitution. The Act is a Central legislation; however, its implementation lies primarily with the States, who are required to enforce the law through the statutory bodies in the State, constituted under the Act. The Act empowers the Central Government to regulate the use of pre-natal diagnostic techniques. The proliferation of the technology is resulting in a catastrophe in the form of female foeticide leading to severe imbalance in child sex ratio and sex ratio at birth. The Centre is duty bound to intervene in such a case to uphold the welfare of the society, especially of the women and the children. The Act was enacted with a purpose to ban the use of sex selection techniques before or after conception; prevent the misuse of pre-natal diagnostic techniques for sex selection abortions and to regulate such techniques. It is mandatory to maintain proper record in respect of use of ultrasound machines under the Act. For effective implementation of the Act, a hierarchy of Appropriate Authority at State, District and Sub District level is created.”

                          Truth be told, the Bench makes it amply clear in para 79 that, “Considering the compelling general public interest and gender justice and declining sex ratio, we have no hesitation in upholding the validity of the provisions of Section 23(1) of the Act.

                        What’s more, it is then observed in para 81 that, “We find that Act intends not to jeopardize the female foetus. As such curtailment of the liberty in cause of such a violation cannot be said to be disproportionate.”

                              To put things in perspective, it is then held in para 83 that, “There can be a legislative provision for imposing burden of proof in reverse order relating to gender justice. In the light of prevalent violence against women and children, the Legislature has enacted various Acts, and amended existing statutes, reversing the traditional burden of proof. Some examples of reversed burden of proof in statutes include Sections 29 and 30 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act in which there is presumption regarding commission and abetment of certain offences under the Act, and presumption of mental state of the accused respectively. In Sections 113-A and 113-B of the Indian Evidence Act there is presumption regarding abetment of suicide and dowry death, and in Section 114-A of the Indian Evidence Act there is presumption of absence of consent of prosecutrix in offence of rape.”

                           Going one step forward, it is then pointed out in para 84 that, “These provisions are a clear indication of the seriousness with which crimes against women and children have been viewed by the Legislature. It is also evident from these provisions that due to the pervasive nature of these crimes, the Legislature has deemed it fit to employ a reversed burden of proof in these cases. The presumption in the proviso to Section 4(3) of the Act has to be viewed in this light.”

                                No wonder, it is then clarified in para 85 that, “The Act is a social welfare legislation, which was conceived in light of the skewed sex-ratio of India and to avoid the consequences of the same. A skewed sex-ratio is likely to lead to greater incidences of violence against women and increase in practices of trafficking, ‘bride-buying’ etc. The rigorous implementation of the Act is an edifice on which rests the task of saving the girl child.”

                                    As it turned out, para 86 then minces no words in holding that, “In view of the aforesaid discussion and in our opinion, no case is made out to hold that deficiency in maintaining the record mandated by Sections 5, 6 and the proviso to Section 4(3) cannot be diluted as the aforesaid provisions have been incorporated in various columns of the Form ‘F’ and as already held that it would not be a case of clerical mistake but absence of sine qua non for undertaking a diagnostic test/procedure. It cannot be said to be a case of clerical or technical lapse. Section 23(1) need not have provided for gradation of offence once offence is of non-maintenance of which itself intend to prevent female foeticide. It need not have graded offence any further difference is so blur it would not be possible to prevent crime. There need not have been any gradation of offence on the basis of actual determination of sex and non-maintenance of record as undertaking the test without the pre-requisites is totally prohibited under the Act. The non-maintenance of record is very foundation of offence. For first and second offences, gradation has been made which is quite reasonable.”  

                                   Be it noted, it is then held in para 87 that, “Provisions of Section 23(2) has also been attacked on the ground that suspension on framing the charges should not be on the basis of clerical mistake, inadvertent clerical lapses. As we found it is not what is suggested to be clerical or technical lapse nor it can be said to be inadvertent mistakes as existence of the particular medical condition is mandated by Sections 4 and 5 including the age etc. Thus, suspension on framing of charges cannot be said to be unwarranted. The same intends to prevent mischief. We are not going into the minutes what can be treated as a sample clerical mistake that has to be seen case wise and no categorization can be made of such mistakes, if any, but with respect to what is mandatory to be provided in the Form as per provisions of various sections has to be clearly mentioned, it cannot be kept vague, obscure or blank as it is necessary for undertaking requisite tests, investigations and procedures. There are internal safeguards in the Act under the provisions relating to appeal, the Supervisory Board as well as the Appropriate Authority, its Advisory Committee and we find that the provisions cannot be said to be suffering from any vice as framing of the charges would mean prima facie case has been found by the Court and in that case, suspension cannot be said to be unwarranted.”  

                                Of course, para 88 then goes on to add that, “It was also prayed that action should be taken under Section 20 after show cause notice and reasonable opportunity of being heard. There is already a provision in Section 20(1) to issue a show cause and in Section 20(2) contains the provision as to reasonable opportunity of being heard. Thus, we find no infirmity in the aforesaid provision.” Para 89 then states that, “There also the Appropriate Authority to consider each case on merits with the help of Advisory Body which has legal expert. The Advisory Committee consists of one legal expert which has to aid and advise the Appropriate Authority as provided in Sections 16 and 17(5)(6). Thus, the submission that legal advice should be taken before prosecution, in view of the provisions, has no legs to stand.”

                           More importantly, para 90 then illustrates that, “It was also contended that action of seizure of ultrasonography machine and sealing the premises cannot be said to be appropriate. The submission is too tenuous and liable to be rejected. Section 30 of the Act enumerates the power of search and seizure and Rules 11 and 12 of the Rules provide for the power of the Appropriate Authority to seal equipment, inspect premises and conduct search and seizure. It was pointed out by the Respondents that a “Standard Operational Procedure”, detailing the procedure for search and seizure has been developed by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Further, regular training of Appropriate Authorities is being carried out at both the National and State level. All the States have also been directed to develop online MIS for monitoring the implementation of the Act. It is settled proposition that when offence is found to be committed, there can be seizure and sealing of the premises and equipment during trial as no license can be given to go on committing the offence. Such provisions of seizure/sealing, pending trial are to be found invariably in various penal legislations. The impugned provisions contained in the Act constitute reasonable restrictions to carry on any profession which cannot be said to be violative of Right to Equality enshrined under Article 14 or right to practice any profession under Article 19(1)(g). Considering the Fundamental Duties under Article 51A(e) and considering that female foeticide is most inhumane act and results in reduction in sex ratio, such provisions cannot be said to be illegal and arbitrary in any manner besides there are various safeguards provided in the Act to prevent arbitrary actions as discussed above.”

                                     To put it succinctly, it is then held in para 91 that, “In light of the nature of offences which necessitated the enactment of the Act and the grave consequences that would ensue otherwise, suspension of registration under Section 23(2) of the Act serves as a deterrent. The individual cases cited by the petitioner-Society cannot be a ground for passing blanket directions, and the individuals have remedies under the law which they can avail. Moreover, the concept of double jeopardy would have no application here, as it provides that a person shall not be convicted of the same offence twice, which is demonstrably not the case here. Suspension is a step-in-aid to further the intendment of act. It cannot be said to be double punishment. In case an employee is convicted for an offence, he cannot continue in service which can be termed to be double jeopardy.”

                      Bluntly put, para 92 then minces no words in making it absolutely clear that, “Non maintenance of record is spring board for commission of offence of foeticide, not just a clerical error. In order to effectively implement the various provisions of the Act, the detailed forms in which records have to be maintained have been provided for by the Rules. These Rules are necessary for the implementation of the Act and improper maintenance of such record amounts to violation of provisions of Section 5 and 6 of the Act, by virtue of proviso to Section 4(3) of the Act. In addition, any breach of the provisions of the Act or its Rules would attract cancellation or suspension of registration of Genetic Counselling Centre, Genetic Laboratory or Genetic Clinic, by the Appropriate Authority as provided under Section 20 of the Act.”

                               It has to be borne in mind that it is then held in para 93 that, “There is no substance in the submission that provision of Section 4(3) be read down. By virtue of the proviso to Section 4(3), a person conducting ultrasonography on a pregnant woman, is required to keep complete record of the same in the prescribed manner and any deficiency or inaccuracy in the same amounts to contravention of Section 5 or Section 6 of the Act, unless the contrary is proved by the person conducting the said ultrasonography. The aforementioned proviso to Section 4(3) reflects the importance of records in such cases, as they are often the only source to ensure that an establishment is not engaged in sex-determination.”

                                     It would be pertinent to also take note of what para 94 says. It states that, “Section 23 of the Act, which provides for penalties of offences, acts in aid of the other Sections of the Act is quite reasonable. It provides for punishment for any medical geneticist, gynecologist, registered medical practitioner or a person who owns a Genetic Counselling Centre, a Genetic Clinic or a Genetic Laboratory, and renders his professional or technical services to or at said place, whether on honorarium basis or otherwise and contravenes any provisions of the Act, or the Rules under it.”

                                  As a consequence, it is then held in para 95 that, “Therefore, dilution of the provisions of the Act or the Rules would only defeat the purpose of the Act to prevent female foeticide and relegate the right to life of the girl child under Article 21 of the Constitution, to a mere formality.”

                            Finally and perhaps most importantly, it is then held in the last para 96 that, “In view of the above, no case is made out for striking down the proviso to Section 4(3), provisions of Sections 23(1), 23(2) or to read down Section 20 or 30 of the Act. Complete contents of Form ‘F’ are held to be mandatory. Thus, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.”

                                   In conclusion, it may well be said that the two Judge Bench of Apex Court comprising of Justice Arun Mishra and Justice Vineet Saran have in this landmark case refused to dilute the provisions of the PCPNDT Act, 1994, clearly held the complete contents of Form ‘F’ mandatory and also upheld the Constitutional validity of Section 23(1) and Section 23(2) of this Act. It has also send a point blank message that dilution of the provisions of the Act or the Rules would only serve to defeat the purpose of the Act to prevent female foeticide and relegate the right to life of the girl child under Article 21 of the Constitution to a mere formality!

                              Not just this, it has categorically said that giving preference to male child is against Constitutional duty to renounce practices derogatory to women’s dignity. It is also violative of Article 39A of the Constitution and against mandate of Article 51A(e) which casts a Constitutional duty on citizens to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women! We all must always bear this in mind and adhere in letter and spirit to what the Supreme Court has held so explicitly and elegantly in this landmark and laudable case if we really want our nation to progress and prosper! No nation can ever progress and prosper where female foeticide is allowed to go on rampantly with full impunity! Can we ever allow this? It is for us to decide for ourselves that what exactly do we want to do! No point in worshipping Devi or Goddess if we can’t respect women and girl child and are not ready to even allow her to come to being as an independent being!

 


Courtesy/By: Adv.Sanjeev Sirohi  |  20 May 2019     Views:2698

Articles Updates

Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:606
Post-Merger Vision: HDFC Bank to Prioritize Profit...
01 Aug 2024     Views:702
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:883
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:797
The Mandal Verdict: Indra Sawhney and Its Lasting ...
22 Jul 2024     Views:983
Supreme Court Emphasizes Direct and a Specific Ple...
22 Jul 2024     Views:824
Bail and Punishment Provisions of NDPS matters...
05 Apr 2023     Views:4231
The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:5073
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:5300
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:5372
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:5522
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:9924
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:4978
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:5278
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:5693
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:5519
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:2834
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:2467
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:2033
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:4932
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:21305
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:8163
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:4550
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:4084
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:8774
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:3888
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:3703
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:4745
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:3513
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1841
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2625
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2180
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1846
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:56071
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1756
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1895
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2091
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2041
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:6279
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1537
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1555
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1640
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:30827
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6318
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:3153
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:5898
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:10719
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3334
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2712
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:7704
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:54736
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1830
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1437
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1718
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1828
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1663
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:3397
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:1432
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:6303
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1812
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2092
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:1787
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:3378
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:12387
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1694
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1791
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:3243
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:4524
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:2368
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:10655
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:1503
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:6293
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2300
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2325
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2641
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:26037
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:4763
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1701
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:33322
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:1699
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:6509
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:1730
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:3764
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1643
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2846
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:19544
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1579
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1569
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1478
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1846
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2221
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1890
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1425
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1382
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1322
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1394
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:6975
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1743
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1592
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1329
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1618
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1829
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1474
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1332
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1389
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1761
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1676
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1381
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1524
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:8928
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1802
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1511
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1492
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1485
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:9835
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1548
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1436
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1407
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:1608
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:3261
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1329
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1365
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1717
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2410
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:1774
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:1918
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2056
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1487
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2703
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1589
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2119
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1429
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1664
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1677
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1676
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1528
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1405
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2674
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:6123
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:3918
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1886
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2114
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:2142
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:2057
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:2133
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:2644
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2053
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2007
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2636
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2208
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:5062
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:5834
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2228
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2326
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:1962
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:2277
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:2794
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:35357
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:4105
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:1902
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:1921
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:1979
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:2559
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1664
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:1688
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:1994
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:3378
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:2243
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:4017
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2058
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:2319
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:1751
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:1776
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:1704
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:1582
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:1371
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:1488
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:2349
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:1413
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:1649
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:1390
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1602
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1328
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:4700
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:4889
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:2420
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:1501
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:1593
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:4960
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:4573
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2322
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2269
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2189
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1631
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1480
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:2009
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1512
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2066
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1702
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1612
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1604
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1445
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1535
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1540
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1516
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1627
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1472
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1711
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1498
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1480
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:1419
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2139
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1570
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1497
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1518
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1916
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1832
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1371
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2970
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1774
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1679
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1496
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1545
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1734
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1649
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1710
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1670
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1903
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1481
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1695
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:1679
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1757
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1472
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1390
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2043
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1790
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:2038
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1584
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1433
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1469
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:5728
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:2280
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:1493
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:1534
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:1727
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:1451
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:1478
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:1401
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1764
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1927
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:1428
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:1522
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:1301
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:1996
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:1367
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:1557
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:2396
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2700
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2697
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2829
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1337
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1650
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:4850
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:2698
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:1858
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:2193
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:5692
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:1630
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:8920
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:1504
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:1718
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:1430
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:3176
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:1519
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:1369
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:3499
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4296
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:6813
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:6527
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1777
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1568
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2116
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2281
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2362
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2402
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1415
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1861
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2567
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3081
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2829
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3123
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1563
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1626
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3176
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:2487
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:3187
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2428
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2668
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2753
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:2028
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:2153
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2193
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2817
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1709
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1584
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1482
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:6630
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1619
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1786
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:12017
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:3727
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:1566
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2558
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2250
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2655
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:3220
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1829
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:2374
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:1979
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:2273
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2394
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2454
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2311
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:4340
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1578
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1698
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1551
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1483
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:3076
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1922
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2681
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2514
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3796
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2837
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1721
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2756
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1959
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1731
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2235
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2110
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:2419
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:3203
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:4128
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2489
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1761
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1829
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1770
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1920
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:2229
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:3084
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1840
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2325
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2085
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:1783
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1921
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1929
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2087
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:2138
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:2090
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:2410
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2368
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1878
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:1970
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1839
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3209
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3207
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3047
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2323
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1660
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1616
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2155
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2119
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1904
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:4689
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3312
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2631
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2228
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1628
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1516
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1680
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1503
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:2674
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2077
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2516
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:3105
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2199
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2284
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:1813
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:1560
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1721
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3493
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1546
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2966
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1495
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1842
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1737
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1901
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2086
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1917
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:1631
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:1755
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1548
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1508
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1627
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:2097
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1663
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1577
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:2959
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1551
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1815
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1553
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1583
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2121
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1649
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1692
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:1702
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:2211
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:2059
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:1750
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1516
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1543
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:2013
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:2190
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:1514
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1786
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1606
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2538
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1726
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2517
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1627
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2117
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2357
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1789
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1814

Most Read Articles

  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:56071
  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:54736
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:35357
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:33322
  • VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER
    On 20 Apr 2020    Views:30827
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.