• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But Bailable Offence

Latest Articles

Back

Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But Bailable Offence

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  12 Aug 2019     Views:1512

“It is a happy moment for not just me but for Muslim society as a whole. We have been freed of an evil custom. Generations of women have suffered due to instant triple talaq. They have been thrown out of their house overnight and made to go through hell.”

-        Shayara Bano who litigated in Apex Court to outlaw it and got it done.

 

                                        It is a Himalayan blunder that while Hindus were banned from marrying more than one women or men but Muslims were not similarly banned which cannot be justified under any circumstances. Jawaharlal Nehru only thought about welfare and prosperity of Hindus but not of Muslims. The population of Hindus thus got contained due to which they have gained immensely but Muslims suffered terribly  as their population swelled as they were permitted to marry upto 4 wives in case of Sunnis and no limit among Shias by virtue of Muta marriage and a large chunk of the population is compelled to live in dire straits!

                                 Similarly Nehru took no other initiative to end other bad practices prevalent among Muslims like triple talaq and nikah halala by which if a husband pronounces triple talaq and he wants to marry her again then the women first has to undergo marriage with some other men then take divorce from him and then marry her former husband! Nothing on earth can be more terrible than this which makes a complete mockery of the dignity and esteem of women in the society! But why blame Nehru alone? No PM till recently ever took any initiative in this regard! Yes, late former PM Rajiv Gandhi wanted to take initiatives with his Union Minister Arif Mohammad Khan advising him but he buckled under pressure from fundamentalists and politicians supporting them within his party who were more in number!  

                           What a crowning irony that now when PM Narendra Modi has taken this great initiative, he is being criticized and castigated by members of the same grand old Congress party! Former Finance Minister and senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said that the triple talaq bill aimed at banning the practice of instant divorce among Muslims, “exposed those who consider themselves liberals”. He wrote in his tweet that, “A ‘liberal’ should ordinarily be hostile to the idea of discrimination and injustice perpetuated by an oral divorce. In this case, not one spoke in favour of the Bill which is ending the injustice. They raised weak arguments so that the fundamentalists amongst the Muslims are kept happy.”   

                                     Without mincing any words, the former Union Law Minister Arun Jaitley rightly said that, “Let us assume the reverse of the present situation. What if such a provision existed in Hindu law? Liberals, leftists, women organizations and perhaps even the judiciary would have been shocked with such a provision and would have attempted either for a repeal of the law or it being declared unconstitutional. These people stand exposed because what they have attempted to raise farcical objections.” He also rightly pointed out that, “While the Constitution has the right to practice and propagate one’s religion as well as an individual’s fundamental rights in the same chapter, there is a need to do a rethink on provisions of personal law which violate fundamental rights.” He then goes on to make a distinction between the rights and rituals in any religion. He wrote that, “Rituals cannot be decided by the law. They remain squarely within the right to practice one’s religion. However, fundamental rights belong to all. One section of the society cannot be denied these rights. What affects the right of a citizen – in this case the Muslim wife, cannot be determined by religion.”

                                    Needless to say, “Triple talaq”, as it’s known, allows a husband to divorce his wife by repeating the word “talaq” (divorce) three times in any form, including email or text message. It has been mostly always misused by men and it is the women who had to bear the maximum brunt because of it. Opposition especially Congress is attributing political motives to Centre ‘s bold moves to ban it and criminalise it even though it is bailable. While rebutting all such charges, Amit Shah who is Union Home Minister rightly points out that, “We need to understand that women who fought a long battle against triple talaq didn’t have any political motive. They were normal women who showed extreme courage to fight against injustices they were subjected to. They were determined to put an end to this practice and finally won the battle in the country’s highest court. By legislating a triple talaq our government has given a statutory backing to their battle. After all, lawmakers and political parties are duty bound to give voice and right direction to such fights. Opposition’s argument questioning the need for law applicable only to Muslim society is also baseless. Independent India has seen enactment of laws aimed at reforming entrenched practices in other communities. Hindu Marriage Act, Christian Marriage Act, and laws to ban child marriage and dowry are examples of such interventions. Those engaging in opportunistic, narrow political arguments refuse to acknowledge these. Those who question making triple talaq a criminal offence conveniently ignore that several other practices related to Hindu society are considered criminal offence and attract severe punishment.” Why no brouhaha is made for them similarly? This leaves us in no doubt that all opposition is because of vote bank politics!

                                To put things in perspective, it is most heartening to note that “The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2019” better known as the Triple Talaq Bill finally got President Ram Nath Kovind’s assent on August 1, 2019. Hence it has now become a law which shall be binding on Muslims. This is no less than a boon for Muslim women who earlier were subjected to the mercy of the whims and fancies of her husband who could dump her whenever he wanted!

                                 As it turned out, it must be mentioned here that with this assent of President, this historic Bill has replaced the triple talaq ordinance promulgated in February 2019. It was on July 25 that Lok Sabha passed this historic Bill with 303 votes in favour and 82 against. It was on July 30, 2019 that in the 245-member Upper House that is Rajya Sabha voted in favour of the Bill and 84 opposed it while 62 members stayed away by either walking out or abstaining or being absent!

                                 Let me say this on record: It is because of this 62 members of Rajya Sabha who either walked out in the name of formal protest or abstained from voting or remained absent that this historic Bill could see the light of  the day! Centre did not have enough members in Rajya Sabha to ensure that it get passed even though it had comfortable majority in Lok Sabha. But these 62 members decided to lend their support indirectly by not voting against the Bill by either remaining absent or staging a walk out or abstained from voting! All Muslim women must remain grateful to these 62 MPs also apart from Centre! There can be no denying or disputing it!   

                                               It is most heartening to note that the triple talaq bill has been finally outlawed! But its passage has been far from smooth. The ruling dispensation that is NDA led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad showed a steely resolve, firm determination and grit to make sure that women get their basic rights and those men who insult them by resorting to triple talaq are not able to escape the long arms of the law! It took three attempts to make sure that ultimately it becomes a law! Head of IMC (Ittehad Millat Council) – Maulana Tauqeer Raza Khan said that instead of opposing Triple Talaq Bill we should look at it from the viewpoint of a sister and daughter and it will protect them totally from harassment. He also rightly said this work should have been done by us but we didn’t do so Allah made Prime M inister Narendra Modi to do this! He rightly pointed out that, “In Islam triple talaq is criminalized since 1400 years and it was Khalifa-e-Waqt Hazrat Umar Farooq who had done this! The punishment is not as much as the Bani-e-Islam had expressed anger! Even Prophet Mohammad had expressed his anger at it”! Very rightly said!


                               Kudos to the Centre for taking such a historic initiative! It left no stone unturned to make sure that more and more members from different parties support this historic triple talaq bill to ensure that women don’t keep on suffering endlessly in silence as has been happening since past 72 years! Jawaharlal Nehru had the guts to usher in reforms in Hindu law and Hindu Marriage Act 1955 was passed and he very rightly ensured that Hindus who both male and female could marry as many as they want earlier were restricted to just one and if they violated they could be punished for a term of seven years for which Hindus must always be grateful to him and should salute him as it is because of this that the population has been controlled to a very large extent. But he did not do anything to ensure that polygamy is similarly banned among Muslims also which would have benefited them also and their population could have been brought under control! However, now PM Narendra Modi has done to Muslims what Jawaharlal Nehru could never do to ensure that Muslim women benefits by making sure that triple talaq bill gets passed in Parliament and finally becomes a law.

                                       As things stand, this Triple Talaq Bill has been a bone of contention and a point of friction between the Narendra Modi led NDA government and the Opposition since December 2017, when the government first tabled this historic legislation in the Lok Sabha. The Bill followed a Supreme Court judgment famously known as Shayara Bano case and titled as Shayara Bano Vs Union of India & Ors. It was in this landmark case that the Supreme Court in a 3:2 majority verdict struck down the age-old regressive and abominable practice under which a Muslim man could divorce his wife by uttering the word “talaq” thrice in one sitting and declared it as void and illegal.

                                          Be it noted, minutes after the vote, Prime Minister Narendra Modi tweeted that by abolishing triple talaq, “Parliament corrects a historical wrong done to Muslim women.” As many as eight Congress members were absent during the vote in Rajya Sabha. Janata Dal (U) and the AIADMK walked out. Also absent were high profile Opposition leaders like the NCP’s Sharad Pawar and Praful Patel thus lending their indirect support to this historic Bill!

                                      It must be pointed out here that as many as 22 Muslim countries including Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh – or their provinces have abolished triple talaq either explicitly or implicitly. The list includes Turkey and Cyprus, which have adopted secular family laws; Tunisia and Algeria and the Malaysian state of Sarawak, which do not recognize a divorce pronounced outside a court of law; and Iran, where triple talaq doesn’t have validity under its Shia law. Instant talaq is also banned in Algeria, Jordon, Egypt, Iraq, Brunei, the UAE, Indonesia, Libya, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Morocco and Kuwait.

                               It was way back in 1961 that Pakistan had abolished triple talaq. It also deserves mention that Sri Lanka’s Marriage and Divorce (Muslim) Act, 1951, as amended up to 2006, doesn’t recognize instant divorce. This is because the law requires a husband wishing to divorce his wife to give notice of his intention to a Qazi (Islamic Judge) who should attempt reconciliation between the couples over the next 30 days. It is only then after all this that the husband can give talaq to his wife and that too in the presence of the Qazi and two witnesses. But what we see in India is that triple talaq is given from telephone or even email which is most reprehensible as it degrades and demolishes the unique identity of women and subjects her to the whims and fancies of men alone! Describing the practice of triple talaq as “barbaric and inhuman”, Ravi Shankar Prasad rightly pointed out that nearly 22 countries have regulated triple talaq but gender justice was given a complete go-by in a secular country like India because of blatant vote bank politics.  

                                            It cannot be lost on us that Ravi Shankar Prasad who is Union Law Minister while hailing the passage of the Triple Talaq Bill pointed out emphatically that, “Finally, Parliament has passed the Triple Talaq Bill after three attempts. The kind of jubilation it has caused across the country, barring conservative elements, indicates how it is a proud moment for India. Our country is transforming and the women of India feel empowered. Triple talaq has never been sanctioned in Islamic scriptures. During the debate in Parliament, I quoted a very authoritative book on Islamic laws from an eminent jurist, Amir Ali, wherein Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) has been quoted as disapproving of it in the strongest possible terms, and, forcing one of his disciples who had given triple talaq to his wife to accept her again. Despite disapproval from the highest quarters in Islam, and the fact that many Muslim countries following sharia laws also chose to reform it one way or another – including making it penal in many cases – it took more than 70 years in India to not only delegitimise this curse, but also provide for penal consequences. Regrettably, this shows the hold the communal and conservative elements continue to exercise over the country’s polity.”

                                        What’s more, Ravi Shankar Prasad further points out with full zeal that, “Today, I need to salute great women like Shayara Bano and Ishrat Jehan and many others who went to the Supreme Court in 2013 challenging this pernicious practice. When the NDA government came to power in 2014, the Prime Minister boldly directed me to stand firmly with these women and support their cause.” He also lamented that, “After the Supreme Court judgment set aside triple talaq, many of us had thought that now this practice will come to an end. However, it continued unabated, even on the flimsiest of  grounds. I had shared before Parliament, a large number of cases that we could gather from the media and other reports, where it was revealed how helpless women (75 percent of the victims are poor) were driven out by uttering “talaq-talaq-talaq”, irrevocably annulling the marriage.”

                                       Let me say this on record: What a complete mockery does this make of women! Should it be allowed to permit under any circumstances? Certainly not. If it was not made a penal offence then certainly it would not serve as a adequate deterrent. The worst sufferers in such case would have been none other than women herself!

                               It also cannot be lost on us that many opposition parties have opposed this historic Bill on the ground that it criminalizes the triple talaq and this will break marriages more quickly. What they very conveniently forget is that even Hindus earlier could marry as many as they wanted both men and women but it was outlawed and they were made liable to be punished under Section 494 of IPC for imprisonment which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine! Then why so much of brouhaha for a three year bailable jail term for Muslims now?   

                                         It is a no brainer that to prevent this and taking on board such valid concerns, Ravi Shankar Prasad points out rightly that, “When we framed the law we took on board some of the legitimate concerns, namely: The FIR must be filed by the victim/wife or her relations, by blood or marriage, to prevent abuse, and, it must be compoundable. The provision of bail was specifically added, but after hearing the wife. Besides, there are provisions for subsistence allowance and custody of minor to the wife. It was a very simple and straight legal framework, and yet, the Congress took a very negative stand that it should not be made penal at all. Therefore, while formally opposing triple talaq Bill, the Congress was insisting upon a law whereby this curse could go unabated for want of any deterrence.” Very rightly said! How can this be permitted?

                                           It would be fair to ask: if the law was not made penal, would it have served its desired purpose of protecting Muslim women from being subjected to arbitrary divorces? It goes without saying that certainly not. It would have been toothless and the offence against women would have continued unabated as rightly pointed out by the Law Minister!   

                                          Most importantly, noted Islamic scholar and former Union Minister in late PM Rajiv Gandhi’s Cabinet – Arif Mohammad Khan very rightly sums up by saying that, “This is a very positive step taken by the Government. It has performed its constitutional duty. It was an obligation of the government to ensure that the Supreme Court (SC) judgment is followed in letter and spirit. Unless some penal provision is incorporated or it is made a punishable offence, the law is not respected. The malpractice of triple talaq has its roots in history. In India, the Supreme Court held triple talaq unlawful on two counts. One, it is arbitrary. Second, it is part of the religious law. The aprties defending this malpractice also admitted in their affidavit that it is ‘Haram’ (prohibited), and it is ‘bidat’ (innovative practice), which is not part of the original scheme. They said it is sinful but legally permissible – bad in religion but good in law. On it, the SC judgement said that this is unimaginable that something in a religious law can be ‘bad in religion and good in law’. If something is bad in religion then it must be bad in religious law also.”

                             While lambasting the Opposition leaders for criticizing it, Arif Mohammad Khan minced no words in saying that, “If the parties like the Congress and AIMIM feel that an act which is “Haram” and sinful is part of the Muslim identity, then I can only feel sorry about it and I would say it is highly insulting to every Muslim.” He also condemned those who say it is an attack on the Muslim identity saying that, “I find this language and these assertions absolutely insulting for the Muslims, because the triple talaq, according to the defenders of the practice also, is prohibited and sinful.

                                    About Nikah Halala, Arif Mohammad Khan said that, “I think Halala is a related issue. Once triple talaq comes to an end, Halala will die its natural death.” About polygamy, he said that, “Though I am not a practicing lawyer, I argued in the SC against triple talaq. And, I intend to do the same, when the polygamy issue is taken up. Based on my studies of the Quran, I am convinced that polygamy is as untenable as triple talaq and has very weak ground. The Quran clearly directs to ‘marry those among you who are single’. When the scripture is saying, ‘marry one who is single’, then why should she marry a man who already has a wife? I am very sure that it will also be outlawed. I am of the opinion that why should the government wait for the SC. The Legislature should initiate the process.”

                                   It must be pointed out that Zakia Soman who is co-founder of Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan has also hailed the outlawing of triple talaq by observing that, “The passage of the Triple Talaq Bill is a welcome development. Although this has been long overdue and Muslim women have been steadfastly demanding it for many years now, this is a historic step forward in the movement for gender justice by ordinary women.”

                        To conclude, in the 21st century why should women not have the same rights as men? Why should women suffer at the hands of men as he likes, whenever he likes, wherever he like and how he likes without any hindrance whatsoever? Why when polygamy was banned among Hindus in 1955 has it not been banned among Muslims 54 years later in 2019? It is for Centre to answer! Hindus have gained as the population has come under control but Muslims still are suffering because of it not being outlawed. It must take the great initiative in this direction also as rightly pointed out by Arif Mohammad Khan! Let’s hope so!


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  12 Aug 2019     Views:1512

Articles Updates

Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:588
Post-Merger Vision: HDFC Bank to Prioritize Profit...
01 Aug 2024     Views:689
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:874
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:786
The Mandal Verdict: Indra Sawhney and Its Lasting ...
22 Jul 2024     Views:970
Supreme Court Emphasizes Direct and a Specific Ple...
22 Jul 2024     Views:815
Bail and Punishment Provisions of NDPS matters...
05 Apr 2023     Views:4223
The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:5063
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:5290
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:5362
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:5516
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:9909
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:4973
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:5272
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:5684
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:5514
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:2827
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:2460
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:2028
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:4925
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:21299
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:8156
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:4543
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:4078
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:8768
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:3880
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:3698
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:4736
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:3506
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1837
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2620
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2176
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1836
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:56022
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1751
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1891
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2087
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2036
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:6270
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1532
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1551
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1635
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:30770
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6312
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:3149
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:5892
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:10712
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3328
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2706
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:7697
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:54724
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1825
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1432
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1714
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1818
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1658
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:3392
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:1426
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:6297
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1808
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2084
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:1782
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:3372
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:12371
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1690
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1786
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:3237
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:4519
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:2363
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:10644
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:1498
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:6288
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2293
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2311
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2634
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:26011
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:4748
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1696
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:33297
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:1695
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:6490
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:1726
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:3759
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1629
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2840
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:19397
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1574
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1563
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1474
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1841
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2217
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1884
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1421
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1376
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1316
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1390
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:6962
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1738
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1586
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1325
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1610
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1825
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1469
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1326
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1383
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1756
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1671
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1376
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1520
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:8917
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1798
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1506
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1485
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1479
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:9823
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1541
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1432
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1403
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:1603
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:3251
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1325
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1360
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1713
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2402
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:1769
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:1911
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2051
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1483
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2696
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1585
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2114
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1425
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1660
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1673
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1671
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1523
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1401
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2664
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:6113
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:3914
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1879
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2107
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:2137
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:2053
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:2128
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:2639
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2048
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2003
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2631
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2204
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:5057
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:5824
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2224
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2321
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:1958
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:2273
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:2789
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:35347
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:4097
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:1897
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:1917
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:1974
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:2552
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1660
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:1683
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:1987
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:3369
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:2236
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:4010
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2052
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:2313
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:1746
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:1770
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:1699
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:1578
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:1367
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:1484
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:2345
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:1409
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:1644
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:1386
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1596
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1324
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:4693
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:4879
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:2411
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:1495
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:1587
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:4950
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:4563
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2316
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2264
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2184
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1627
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1475
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:2005
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1508
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2062
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1697
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1606
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1600
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1440
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1530
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1535
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1512
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1622
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1465
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1707
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1494
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1475
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:1415
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2135
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1565
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1492
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1512
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1910
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1825
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1365
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2966
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1770
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1675
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1492
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1541
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1727
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1645
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1703
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1663
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1899
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1476
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1690
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:1675
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1753
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1467
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1385
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2037
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1784
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:2033
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1579
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1429
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1465
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:5724
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:2271
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:1488
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:1529
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:1720
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:1445
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:1473
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:1397
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1760
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1922
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:1424
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:1518
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:1295
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:1992
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:1363
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:1553
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:2392
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2695
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2694
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2824
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1332
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1645
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:4829
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:2694
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:1852
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:2188
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:5685
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:1626
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:8908
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips�...
20 May 2019     Views:1500
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:1712
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:1426
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:3172
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:1512
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:1365
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:3490
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4288
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:6802
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:6520
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1772
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1562
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2109
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2277
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2358
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2398
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1411
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1854
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2562
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3077
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2823
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3117
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1558
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1621
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3170
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:2481
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:3182
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2423
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2661
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2749
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:2024
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:2149
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2189
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2812
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1705
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1579
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1477
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:6625
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1614
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1782
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:12013
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:3723
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:1562
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2554
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2244
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2650
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:3215
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1813
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:2370
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:1973
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:2269
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2390
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2450
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2307
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:4276
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1572
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1694
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1548
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1479
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:3067
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1918
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2676
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2499
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3791
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2833
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1717
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2746
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1954
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1726
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2229
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2105
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:2414
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:3199
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:4122
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2484
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1758
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1825
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1765
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1913
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:2224
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:3080
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1835
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving �...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2318
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2080
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:1779
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1916
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1923
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2082
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:2134
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:2086
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:2406
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2363
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1874
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:1965
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1834
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3205
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3202
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3043
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2315
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1656
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1609
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2149
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2114
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1900
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:4681
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3303
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2624
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2224
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1624
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1512
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1676
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1499
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:2669
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2073
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2510
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:3100
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2195
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2280
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:1808
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:1554
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1717
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3489
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1542
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2962
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1491
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1835
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1732
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1892
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2081
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1913
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:1626
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:1750
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1543
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1504
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1620
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:2089
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1659
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1572
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:2951
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1546
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1810
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1549
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1579
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2117
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1645
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1687
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:1695
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:2204
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:2051
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:1745
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1511
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1539
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:2008
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:2186
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:1509
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1781
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1602
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2531
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1720
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2513
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1621
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2113
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2351
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1785
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1810
Prev1...2345678...9Next

Most Read Articles

  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:56022
  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:54724
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:35347
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:33297
  • VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER
    On 20 Apr 2020    Views:30770
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.