• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambaram In INX Media Scam Case

Latest Articles

Back

Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambaram In INX Media Scam Case

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  23 Aug 2019     Views:1985

 

                                           It is really astonishing to learn that the former Finance Minister of India who is also an eminent and senior Supreme Court lawyer – P Chidambaram has been refused anticipatory bail by the Delhi High Court just recently in INX Media Scam Case pertaining to corruption and money laundering! What is even more astonishing is that this has happened notwithstanding that P Chidambaram was represented by a battery of senior and eminent lawyers led by stalwarts like Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi! What is most astonishing is that Justice Sunil Gaur who authored the latest judgment delivered by the Delhi High Court in the case titled P Chidambaram Vs Central Bureau Of Investigation in Bail Appln. 1316/2018 & Cri. M.A. 10976/2018 And Bail Appln. 1713/2018 & Cri. M.(B) 1163/2018 in P Chidambaram Vs Directorate Of Enforcement, Delhi has minced just no words to observe that this was a “classic case of money laundering”. He also said point blank that facts of the case reveal that the petitioner is the king pin or the key conspirator.

                                     To start with, it is first and foremost observed in para 1 of this latest judgment by Delhi High Court that, “In the above captioned first application [Bail Appln. 1316/2018], petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in FIR No. RC 220-2017-E-0011, under Section 120B read with Section 420 of IPC and Sections 8 and 13(2) r/w Section 13(1)(d) of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (henceforth referred to as the ‘PC Act’), whereas in the above captioned second application [Bail Appln. 1713/2018], petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in ECIR/07/HIU/2017, registered under the provisions of The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (henceforth referred to as the ‘PMLA’).” Para 2 then states that, “With the consent of learned counsel representing both the sides, these applications have been heard together and are being disposed of by the common order.”

                              To recapitulate, it is then brought out in para 3 that, “It is the case of petitioner that M/s INX Media Pvt. Ltd. Sought approval for FDI in a proposed TV channel upto 46.216 percent of the issued equity capital. The policy allowed investment upto 74 percent of equity. Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) Unit examined the proposal, found it to be in order and submitted the case to the Finance Minister. FIPB consisted of six secretaries to the Government of India and was chaired by the Secretary, Economic Affairs. FIPB unanimously recommended the proposal and placed it before the Finance Minister for his approval, along with several other proposals. In May 2007, the Finance Minister (i.e. the petitioner herein) granted his approval in the normal course of official business.”

                                           While elaborating further, para 4 then brings out that, “According to learned senior counsel for petitioner ten years later, based on alleged ‘oral source of information’, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) recorded an FIR on 15th May, 2017 against four companies, Karti P. Chidambaram (i.e. petitioner’s son), unknown officers/officials of the Ministry of Finance and other unknown persons under Section 120B r/w Section 420 of IPC and Section 8 and Section 13(1)(d) r/w Section 13(2) of the PC Act. The petitioner was not named as an accused or suspect; there is no allegation against the petitioner in the body of the FIR. The allegation in the FIR was that M/s INX Media Pvt. Ltd. had made down-stream investment without obtaining prior approval of the FIPB and in order to regularize that investment, had approached the petitioner’s son and made a payment of Rs 10 Lakh to another company allegedly associated with petitioner’s son. It is submitted that petitioner learnt that it is the case of the said company that it had received the said payment towards consultancy work and further, the petitioner’s son was never a shareholder or Director of the said company. It is further submitted by petitioner’s counsel that ECIR/67/HIU/2017 is baseless, politically motivated and an act of vendetta against petitioner and his son, because petitioner is a vocal critic and opponent of the present Central Government both inside Parliament and outside. It is also submitted that petitioner is a sitting member of Rajya Sabha.”

                           Moving on, para 5 then further elaborates that, “According to learned senior counsel for petitioner based on ECIR/07/HIU/2017, registered by the CBI, Enforcement Directorate (ED) recorded an ECIR, which ED has maintained is an internal record. It is submitted by learned senior counsel for petitioner that copy of the said ECIR has not been given to petitioner. However, petitioner understands and states that ECIR is virtually the same as an FIR.”

                                     What’s more, para 6 then illustrates further the petitioner’s contention that, “It is a matter of record that while entertaining both these bail applications, interim protection was granted to petitioner subject to joining investigation and that petitioner had joined the investigation. According to senior counsel for petitioner, respondent-CBI has sought sanction to prosecute petitioner in January 2019, which means that draft charge-sheet has been put up before the authorities concerned to obtain sanction to prosecute petitioner. So, it is submitted that investigation by CBI is complete and there is no ground for ED to oppose the bail or to seek petitioner’s custody. It is urged that since petitioner is cooperating in investigation, therefore, there is no ground to deny bail to petitioner.”

                              Going ahead, it is then further brought out in para 7 that, “Learned senior counsel for petitioner vehemently argued that there is no averment or allegation in the FIR that the petitioner accepted or agreed to accept any gratification as a motive or reward for inducing any public servant and hence, prima facie the accusation under Section 8 of PC Act does not apply to the case of petitioner. It is further submitted that since offence under Section 8 of PC Act is not made out, therefore, the ED cannot lodge money laundering case against petitioner. Learned senior counsel for petitioner vehemently submits that offences under Sections 420/120B IPC and under the PC Act were not Scheduled Offences under the PMLA and so petitioner cannot be prosecuted under the provisions of PMLA. It is pointed out by learned senior counsel for petitioner that minimum threshold for ED to acquire jurisdiction at the relevant time was Rs 30 Lakh and in the instant case, there is no averment of any payment apart from Rs. 10 Lakh approximately, which was allegedly paid by M/s INX Media Pvt. Ltd. to M/s Advantage Strategic Consulting Pvt. Ltd., with which petitioner is not concerned whatsoever in any manner. The precise argument of learned senior counsel for petitioner is that if any of the offences are applied qua petitioner, it would amount to giving retrospective application to the provisions of the PMLA which would be violative of petitioner’s fundamental rights enshrined under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India, 1950. To submit so, reliance is placed upon decision in Arun Kumar Mishra Vs. Directorate of Enforcement 2015 SCC OnLine Del 8658.”

                                       Furthermore, para 8 states that, “It was pointed out by learned senior counsel for petitioner that in the case of co-accused Karti Chidambaram, this Court had stayed the arrest of petitioner in proceedings under the PMLA and so petitioner is also entitled to similar relief. Learned senior counsel for petitioner submits that there are no allegations of petitioner tampering with the evidence and nothing is to be recovered from petitioner and that co-accused of petitioner are already on anticipatory bail or statutory bail and thus, petitioner deserves to be granted pre-arrest bail, as his antecedents are impeccable.”

                               Not stopping here, it is then enunciated in para 9 that, “It was also pointed out that petitioner is a sitting member of Rajya Sabha and there are no chances of his fleeing from justice. According to learned senior counsel for petitioner, offence of money laundering is a non-cognizable offence and investigation of ED is in violation of petitioner’s fundamental rights. It is further submitted by learned senior counsel for petitioner that amendment made in the year 2018 in the PMLA does not restore Sub-Clause II of Section 45(1) of PMLA. So, it is submitted that petitioner deserves the concession of pre-arrest bail. In support of above submissions, reliance is placed upon Supreme Court’s decisions in Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal 2014 (14) SCC 295; Arun Kumar Mishra Vs. Directorate of Enforcement 2015 SCC OnLine Del 8658; Bhadresh Bipinbhai Sheth Vs. State of Gujarat and another (2016) 1 SCC 152; Nikesh Tarachand Shah Vs. Union of India and another (2018) 11 SCC 1 and decisions of High Court of Andhra Pradesh in W.P. 17525/2014 titled as Tech Mahindra Limited Vs. Directorate of Enforcement: CRLRC No. 3222/2016 titled as Ashok Kumar Jain Vs. Asst. Director, Hyderabad; W.P. No. 37487/2012 titled as M/S Satyam Computer Services Ltd. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement and decision of High Court of Mumbai in Bail Appl. No. 286/2018 titled as Sameer M Bhujbal Vs. Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Ors. and decision of High Court of Madhya Pradesh in M.Cr.C.No. 34201/2018, titled as Vinod Bhandari Vs. Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement.”      

                             On the contrary, we then see that it is envisaged in para 10 that, “On behalf of respondents, it is submitted that Section 19 of PMLA empowers the ED to arrest petitioner on the basis of material collected so far and respondents have reason to believe that petitioner is guilty of offences of money laundering, cheating etc. and some of the proceeds of crime have been already identified and have been attached vide provision of attachment order of 10th October, 2018 and that petitioner’s custodial interrogation is necessary in order to trace out further proceeds of the crime. According to respondents, petitioner’s son Karti Chidambaram is involved in INX Media case which is being currently investigated by CBI and ED and that petitioner’s son has committed offences under the IPC and PMLA at the behest of petitioner. According to learned Attorney General of India, material on record manifestly indicates that petitioner was personally involved in the act of money laundering and he is also found to be a beneficiary of the Proceeds of Crime and to unearth the money trail, custodial interrogation of petitioner is essential. Learned Attorney General of India has sought to rely upon the diary of proceedings of investigation in a sealed cover to the Court for perusal while seeking to maintain confidentiality in respect of these case diaries. Highlighting the non-cooperation in investigation by petitioner, learned Attorney General of India had vehemently submitted that in the absence of custodial interrogation of petitioner, investigation in this case cannot be taken to its logical conclusion and in view of nature of gravity of offence, custodial investigation of petitioner be granted. It is submitted that petitioner is giving evasive replies and is not cooperating in the investigation while he is under the protective umbrella of interim orders.”

                           While taking the respondents submission further, it is then also added in para 11 that, “Reliance is placed upon decision in CBI Vs. Anil Sharma (1997) 7 SCC 187 to justify custodial interrogation of petitioner by pointing out that interrogation conducted under the protection order of the Court has proved to be a mere ritual in the instant case. It is also submitted that petitioner cannot claim parity with co-accused Karti Chidambaram, as the said co-accused had committed the offence in question at the behest of petitioner. In support of their case, respondents rely upon decisions in State of Gujarat Vs. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal & Anr. (1987) 2 SCC 364; Prahlad Singh Bhati Vs. NCT, Delhi & Anr. (2001) 4 SCC 280; Ram Pratap Yadav Vs. Mitra Sen Yadav and Anr. (2003) 1 SCC 15; Kalyan Chandra Sarkar Vs. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr. (2004) 7 SCC 528; Amvari Begum Vs. Sher Mohammad & Anr. (2005) 7 SCC 326; Prasanta Kumar Sarkar Vs. Ashis Chatterjee & Anr. (2010) 14 SCC 496; Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy Vs. CBI (2013) 7 SCC 439; Gautam Kundu Vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2015) 16 SCC 1; Sunil Dahiya Vs. State 2016 SCC OnLine Del 5566; Suresh Tiwari Vs. State of Maharashtra 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 2602; Chhagan Chandrakant Bhujbal Vs. Union of India 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 9938; State of Bihar & Anr. Vs. Amit Kumar @ Bachcha Rai (2017) 13 SCC 751 and Rohit Tandon Vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2018) 11 SCC 46.”   

                                 For the sake of brevity, let us see what para 12 mainly states. It is held that, “After having heard both the sides at length and on perusal of the FIR of this case, short reply of respondent-CBI, material on record and the decisions cited, I find that from the material collected by the Investigating Agency, it prima facie appears that Rs 3 Crores approximately has come into the account of M/s Advantage Strategic Consulting Pvt. Ltd. (ASCPL) and other concerns during the tenure of the petitioner as the Finance Minister.”

                                         More significantly, para 21 then minces no words in sending most seriously the following unmistakable message to one and all that, “This Court is conscious of the fact that personal liberty of a citizen is sacrosanct, but no one is above the law. Law makers cannot be allowed to turn into law breakers with impunity, particularly in cases of this magnitude. What is so far to be seen is the tip of the iceberg. Pre-arrest is not meant for high profile economic offenders. Time has come to recommend to the Parliament to suitably amend the Law to restrict the provisions of pre-arrest bail and make it inapplicable to economic offenders of high profile cases like the instant one. It is need of the hour. The law must come down upon economic offenders with a heavy hand. It is often seen that when economic offenders are on pre-arrest bail, then the investigation conducted is at a superficial level, like in the instant case. This not only weakens mega scam cases but it actually stiffs the prosecution. This Court cannot permit the prosecution in this sensitive case to end up in smoke like it has happened in some other high profile cases. Tendering of charge-sheet after obtaining sanction for prosecution of petitioner cannot dilute the gravity of the offence in question. Both the sides have cited legal precedents but the facts of instant case prima facie reveal that petitioner is the king pin i.e. the key conspirator in this case. Law enforcing agencies cannot be made ineffective by putting legal obstacles of offences in question being Scheduled or not Scheduled, as these legal pleas are sub-judice before Supreme Court and cannot persuade this Court to grant pre-arrest bail, as the gravity of offence committed by petitioner is quite evident from case diaries etc. produced by the Investigating Agencies. The gravity of offence committed by petitioner demands denial of pre-arrest bail to him.”

                                     No doubt, it also cannot be lost on us that it is then pointed out in para 22 that, “Economic offences constitute a class part and need to be visited with a different approach in matters of bail. Taking note of huge magnitude of conspiracy angle cua petitioner, it would be premature to jump to a conclusion that provisions of PMLA would not apply to the instant case, as it cannot be said that the amount involved is below Rs 30 Lakhs. Rather, money laundering involved in the INX Media Scam and Aircel Maxis deal scandal is of Rs 3,500 Crores.”     

                          Be it noted, it is then disclosed in para 23 that, “Supreme Court in YS Jagan Mohan Reddy (Supra) while dealing with a money laundering case, has reiterated as under:-

         “Economic offences constitute a class apart and need to be visited with a different approach in the matter of bail. The economic offences having deep-rooted conspiracies and involving huge loss of public funds need to be viewed seriously and considered as grave offences affecting the economy of the country as a whole and thereby posing serious threat to the financial health of the country.””

                             Do note, it is then further stated in para 24 that, “The pertinent observations made by Supreme Court in Gautam Kundu Vs. Directorate of Enforcement (Prevention of Money-Laundering Act (2015) 16 SCC 1, which apply to the instant case, are as under:-

          “32. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. At this stage we refrained ourselves from deciding the questions tried to be raised at this stage since it is nothing but a bail application. We cannot forget that this case is relating to “money-laundering” which we feel is a serious threat to the national economy and national interest. We cannot brush aside the fact that the schemes have been prepared in a calculative manner with a deliberative design and motive of personal gain regardless of the consequence to the members of the society.””

                                   More crucially, it is then underscored in para 25 that, “Applying the afore-noted dictum to the instant case, this Court finds that not naming of petitioner in FIR, is inconsequential, as petitioner has been projected to be the main accused on whose dictates the offence of this magnitude could be committed. Petitioner cannot claim parity with co-accused who are on bail. It cannot be forgotten that petitioner was the Finance Minister at the relevant time and he had given FDI clearances to INX Media Group for receiving overseas funds to the tune of Rs 305 Crores. The alleged irregularities committed by petitioner makes out a case for refusing pre-arrest bail to petitioner. Simply because petitioner is a sitting member of Parliament would not justify grant of pre-arrest bail to petitioner in this sensitive case. Offenders must be exposed, no matter what their status is. Petitioner is member of legal fraternity too. But this by itself does not and cannot justify concession of pre-arrest bail to him. Discretion to grant or deny pre-arrest bail cannot be exercised de hors the gravity of offence. It would be preposterous to say that prosecution of petitioner is baseless, politically motivated and act of vendetta as on the basis of material collected so far, it can be safely said that prima facie case is made out against petitioner, thereby, justifying denial of pre-arrest bail to him. The magnitude of this case dissuades this Court to grant pre-arrest bail to petitioner.” 

                                      To be sure, it is then held in para 26 that, “The pertinent observations of the Supreme Court in CBI Vs. Anil Sharma (Supra) which aptly apply to the instant case, are as follows:-

        “6. We find force in the submission of the CBI that custodial interrogation is qualitatively more elicitation oriented than questioning a suspect who is well ensconced with a favourable order under Section 438 of the Code. In a case like this effective interrogation of a suspected person is of tremendous advantage in disinterring many useful informations and also materials which would have been concealed. Success in such interrogation would elude if the suspected person knows that he is well protected and insulated by a pre-arrest bail order during the time he is interrogated. Very often interrogation in such a condition would reduce to a mere ritual. The argument that the custodial interrogation is fraught with the danger of the person being subjected to third-degree methods need not be countenanced for such an argument can be advanced by all accused in all criminal cases. The Court has to presume that responsible police officers would conduct themselves in a responsible manner and that those entrusted with the task of disinterring offence would not conduct themselves as offenders.””

                                      Needless to say, it is then pointed out in para 27 that, “Supreme Court in Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy (Supra), while dealing with multiple investigations involving multiple conspirators has reiterated that the approach to be followed while dealing with bail plea in cases involving criminal conspiracy to commit economic offences of huge magnitude relating to public money ought to be strict as fraudulent transactions affect the economic system to the detriment of the country. It was pertinently observed that economic crimes of such mammoth scale are craftily planned and executed. Thus, grant of bail in cases like instant one will send a wrong message to the society.”

                                         Suffice it to say, it is then held in para 28 that, “In the instant case, in view of the enormous material placed on record in respect of distinguished entities, various transactions etc, this Court unhesitatingly opines that bail plea of petitioner is not acceptable. Recently, Supreme Court in Rohit Tandon Vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2018) 11 SCC 46 while dealing with the bail plea in a money laundering case has again reiterated that white collar crimes/economic offenders have deep rooted conspiracies involving huge amount of public funds and this should be viewed seriously and such offences ought to be considered as grave offences. Pertinently, the bail plea in the case of Rohit Tandon (Supra) was repelled by the Supreme Court while observing that duty of the Court at the bail stage is not to weigh the evidence meticulously but to arrive at a finding on the broad probabilities of the case.”

                               Most importantly, it is then held clearly, convincingly and categorically in para 29 that, “This is a classic case of money laundering. The twin factors which have weighed to deny pre-arrest bail to petitioner are: (i) Gravity of offence and (ii) evasive replies given by petitioner to the questions put to him while he was under protective cover extended to him by this Court. The parameters governing pre-arrest bail and regular bail are altogether different. I have pondered over this matter for long and after weighing the pros and cons, I am of the considered view that the gravity of the offence committed in the instant case amply justifies denial of pre-arrest bail to petitioner. Grant of pre-arrest bail in a serious matter like instant one to an accused simply on the ground that investigation is complete and charge sheet has been filed, would defeat the ends of justice. In bail matters, gravity of the offence is of utmost consideration which weighs with the Court in granting or refusing pre-arrest bail or regular bail. The facts of this case persuades me to decline pre-arrest bail to petitioner while refraining to comment on the merits of the case.”

                                    Before parting, it is then finally held in para 30 that, “Upon considering the case set up against petitioner in its entirety, this Court is of prima facie opinion that it is not a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail to petitioner. Consequentially, both these applications are accordingly disposed of while observing that anything stated herein shall not be taken as an expression on merits at trial.”

                                    In conclusion, it may well be said that it is a big setback for P Chidambaram as Delhi High Court has not just declined his bail plea but also has not hesitated in bluntly saying that facts of the case prima facie reveal that the petitioner is the king pin or the key conspirator. It is because of this adverse order that CBI proceeded ahead to arrest him from his house. Not just this, even the Special CBI Court after hearing both the sides gave the custody of P Chidambaram to CBI for four days till August 26. But P Chidambaram who has also appealed in the Supreme Court is still hoping to get some respite from it. Let’s wait and see what happens finally! But one thing is for sure: P Chidambaram who is a former Finance Minister as also former Home Minister has handled many important portfolios in the UPA regime is facing troubled waters which he has never faced before but he is also determined to not give up so easily! Many top and eminent lawyers of the Supreme Court like Kapil Sibal, Abhishek Manu Singhvi and others are defending him with full gusto and he himself is a senior lawyer of Supreme Court and certainly he won’t allow his legal acumen to not be fully utilized in his own case! This is certainly the toughest challenge of his  high-profile life that he has faced till now!


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  23 Aug 2019     Views:1985

Articles Updates

Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:1341
Post-Merger Vision: HDFC Bank to Prioritize Profit...
01 Aug 2024     Views:1190
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:1395
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:1280
The Mandal Verdict: Indra Sawhney and Its Lasting ...
22 Jul 2024     Views:1973
Supreme Court Emphasizes Direct and a Specific Ple...
22 Jul 2024     Views:1292
Bail and Punishment Provisions of NDPS matters...
05 Apr 2023     Views:4739
The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:5581
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:5845
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:5946
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:6002
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:10495
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:5466
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:5714
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:5895
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:5962
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:3254
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:2860
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:2454
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:5360
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:21794
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:8594
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:4948
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:4525
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:9247
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:4285
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:4091
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:5181
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:3926
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2184
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2999
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2545
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2233
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:56772
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2129
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2271
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2440
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2421
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:6734
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1901
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1912
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1996
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:32005
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6730
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:3515
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6280
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:11128
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3704
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3065
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:7876
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:55263
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:2206
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1776
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:2060
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:2233
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:2018
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:3742
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:1520
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:6734
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2142
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2490
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:2144
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:3745
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:12812
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:2049
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:2134
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:3652
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:4975
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:2740
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:11081
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:1843
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:6683
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2662
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2695
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:3024
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:26490
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:5356
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2063
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:33943
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:2052
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:7170
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:2081
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:4142
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2059
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2991
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:20238
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1944
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1909
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1557
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2215
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2598
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2226
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1789
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1740
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1656
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1736
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:7440
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2096
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1941
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1657
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2044
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2182
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1827
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1653
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1732
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2165
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:2036
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1753
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1885
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:9343
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:2140
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1851
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1840
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1829
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:10477
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1942
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1754
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1786
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:2000
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:3734
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1706
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1714
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2055
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2831
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:2129
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2269
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2408
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1824
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:3123
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1939
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2478
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1764
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2018
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2043
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2016
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1867
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1760
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2879
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:6553
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:4295
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2235
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2464
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:2510
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:2400
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:2493
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:3019
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2428
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2369
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:3016
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2546
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:5528
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:6272
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2591
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2698
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:2312
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:2612
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:3165
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:35908
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:4519
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:2260
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:2279
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:2370
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:3002
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1976
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:2045
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:2352
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:3523
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:2620
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:4470
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2409
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:2687
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:2113
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:1886
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:2043
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:1947
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:1723
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:1822
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:2684
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:1755
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:1999
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:1752
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1985
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1647
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:5127
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:5331
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:2811
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:1842
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:1950
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:5392
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:4968
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2679
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2624
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2539
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1956
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1826
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:2359
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1880
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2179
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2058
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1951
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1974
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1783
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1883
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1900
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1857
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1985
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1823
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:2073
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1865
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1807
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:1776
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2495
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1936
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1872
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1857
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2271
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2179
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1451
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:3335
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:2128
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:2045
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1581
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1890
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:2084
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1998
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:2079
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:2021
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:2265
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1832
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1864
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:2025
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1843
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1807
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1742
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2400
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2167
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:2391
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1665
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1772
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1834
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:6106
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:2666
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:1839
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:1864
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:2121
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:1819
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:1836
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:1737
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:2101
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:2286
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:1758
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:1883
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:1652
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:2350
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:1448
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:1897
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:2758
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:3094
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:3095
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:3225
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1719
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1997
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:5456
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:3099
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:2239
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:2571
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:6055
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:1983
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:9410
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:1596
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:2057
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:1778
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:3533
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:1622
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:1702
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:3857
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4727
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:8757
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:7159
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:2134
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1906
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2475
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2637
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2460
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2486
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1766
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2234
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2673
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3456
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3194
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3483
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1648
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1967
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3602
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:2901
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:3559
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2792
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2781
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:3126
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:2121
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:2500
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2549
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:3141
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2072
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1953
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1825
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:7086
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1962
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:2156
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:12358
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:4195
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:1921
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2661
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2608
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2998
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:3349
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2198
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:2735
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:2353
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:2639
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2779
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2814
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2686
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:4964
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1939
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2029
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1904
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1836
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:3530
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2297
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:3078
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2866
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:4154
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3189
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2074
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3187
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2330
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2067
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2608
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2458
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:2772
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:3579
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:4542
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2577
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2101
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:2181
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:2137
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:2290
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:2632
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:3479
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2193
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2681
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2443
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:2127
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2292
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2296
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2422
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:2473
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:2455
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:2760
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2723
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2253
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:2382
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2202
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3583
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3544
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3417
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2689
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2033
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1974
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2538
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2508
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2254
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:4877
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3704
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2985
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2560
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1970
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1852
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2038
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1867
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:3053
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2460
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2848
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:3495
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2586
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2602
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:2166
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:1893
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2079
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3906
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1910
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3339
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1837
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2202
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2110
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2278
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2460
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2292
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:1983
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:2125
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1912
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1848
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1986
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:2506
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:2015
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1921
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:3361
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1911
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2152
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1892
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1918
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2498
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2019
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2009
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:2071
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:2633
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:2456
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:2094
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1840
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1912
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:2378
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:2598
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:1870
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1851
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1953
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2884
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1794
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2914
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1979
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2202
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2720
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1872
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2167

Most Read Articles

  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:56772
  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:55263
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:35908
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:33943
  • VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER
    On 20 Apr 2020    Views:32005
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims
Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.