• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says Health Of Teeming Millions Will Have To Take Precedence Over Greed Of A Few Auto Makers

Latest Articles

Back

SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says Health Of Teeming Millions Will Have To Take Precedence Over Greed Of A Few Auto Makers

Courtesy/By: SANJEEV SIROHI  |  01 Nov 2018     Views:1736

It has to be stated right at the outset that in a landmark and laudable judgment titled MC Mehta v Union of India & Ors (In Re: Recommendation Nos. 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 of Report Nos. 71 and 78 submitted by EPCA) in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13029 of 1985 authored by Justice Deepak Gupta for a three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice Gupta himself, Justice Madan B Lokur and Justice S Abdul Nazeer while holding clearly and convincingly that Bharat Stage IV-compliant vehicles should not be permitted to be sold in India after 31.03.2020 has commendably and categorically observed that health of the teeming millions of this country will have to take precedence over the greed of a few automobile manufacturers. It was rightly held that, “Even a day’s delay in enforcing BS-VI norms is going to harm the health of the people.” It is bound to have far reaching and significant consequences which shall directly impact each and every citizen of India!

                           To begin with, para 1 of this landmark judgment sets the ball rolling by first and foremost pointing out that, “The seminal issue to be decided is whether Bharat Stage IV (for short BS-IV) compliant vehicles should be permitted to be sold in India after 31.03.2020.” Para 2 then points out that, “In an earlier judgment dated 13.04.2017, we have given detailed reasons for the order dated 29.03.2017 whereby this Court had directed that on and from 01.04.2017, vehicles which are not BS-IV compliant, shall not be sold by any manufacturer or dealer or motor vehicle company whether such vehicle is a two wheeler, three wheeler, four wheeler or commercial vehicle etc. We had also by the said order prohibited registration of non-BS-IV vehicles from 01.04.2017 except if such vehicles were sold on or before 31.03.2017. Since in the judgment dated 13.04.2017, we have set out in detail the history leading to implementation of the Bharat stage compliant fuels, it is not necessary to repeat the same here. However, a short recap of the same would be apposite to understand the issues in hand.”

                                       To recapitulate, it is then pointed out in para 3 that, “In 2003, the Government of India announced the National Auto Policy based on the recommendations of the Mashelkar Committee constituted in 2001. BS-IV compliant vehicles were made compulsory for four wheelers in different parts of the country on different dates starting from 01.04.2005, from which date registration of only BS-IV compliant vehicles were permitted in the metropolises of Delhi, Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Mumbai, Pune and Kolkata. Thereafter, it was made compulsory to have BS-IV compliant vehicles in some other cities from 01.04.2010. More cities were added on 21.05.2010 and on 14.07.2015. Finally, by amendment dated 19.08.2015 it was mandated that BS-IV norms would come into force throughout the country w.e.f. 01.04.2017.”

                                        Going forward, it is then pointed in para 4 that, “As far as two and three wheelers are concerned, they were made subject to BS-III norms on and with effect from 01.04.2010 by insertion of sub-rule 16 in Rule 115 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 hereinafter referred to as ‘the Rules’. With effect from 04.07.2014, it was mandated that on and from 01.04.2016 all two wheeler vehicles will comply with BS-IV emission norms and all existing models will shift to BS-IV emission norms from 01.04.2017. Similarly, Rule 17 was inserted in Rule 115 of the Rules on 12.06.2015 in respect of three wheelers wherein BS-IV standard would be applicable to new models on or after 01.04.2016. Resultantly, only those vehicles which were BS-IV compliant would be sold after 01.04.2017.”

                                         Not stopping here, para 5 then envisages that, “An issue was raised by the manufacturers of motor vehicles that they should be given reasonable and sufficient time for sale of stocks of those vehicles which are not BS-IV compliant vehicles but manufactured up to 31.03.2017. This Court did not accept the submission of the manufacturers and issued the direction referred to hereinabove. It would be interesting to note that though some of the manufacturers of two wheelers and three wheelers took a stand before this Court that great technological changes are required to make the vehicles BS-IV compliant, one of the largest manufacturers of two wheelers and three wheelers in India i.e. Bajaj Auto, filed an application in this Court praying that it was already manufacturing BS-IV compliant vehicles not complying to BS-IV norms should not be registered after 2017.”

                                        Needless to say, it is then pointed out in para 6 that, “The issue before us is somewhat similar. Mr. Ranjit Kumar, learned senior counsel and Mr. Sandeep Narain, learned counsel appearing for the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (for short ‘SIAM’) have submitted that though they are not averse to manufacturing BS-VI compliant vehicles, they should be given some time to sell the stocks of non BS-VI compliant vehicles manufactured upto 31.03.2020. In this regard, they have made reference to the notification dated 20.02.2018 whereby sub-rule 21 has been inserted in Rule 115 of the Rules, which reads as follows:

     “In the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, in rule 115 after sub-rule (20), the following sub-rule shall be inserted namely:-

       “(21) New motor vehicles conforming to Emission Standard Bharat Stage-IV, manufactured before the 1st April 2020 shall not be registered after the 30th June, 2020:

        Provided that the new motor vehicles of categories M and N conforming to Emission Standard Bharat Stage-IV manufactured before the 1st April, 2020 and sold in the form of drive away chassis, shall not be registered after the 30th September, 2020.”

                                         To be sure, para 7 then says “It is submitted that the Government of India while balancing the need for a cleaner environment with the practical difficulties faced by the manufacturers has given a three months’ window to the automobile manufacturers to dispose of the vehicles conforming to BS-IV norms. In respect of certain categories of commercial vehicles in which only a chassis is sold and a body has to be built thereupon, the period of registration has been extended up to 30.09.2020.”

                               As things stand, para 8 then goes on to elaborate saying that, “It has been contended on behalf of SIAM that in Europe the normal practice is that about one year’s time is given to the manufacturers of vehicles when a higher quality of fuel is introduced and the fuel is introduced much earlier and thereafter an outer limit is fixed for sale of compliant vehicles. According to SIAM, BS-VI fuel will be available in the entire country only with effect from 01.04.2020. Therefore, it is not feasible for the manufacturers to switch over to BS-VI compliant vehicles overnight. They have to be given some reasonable time for sale of the accumulated stocks of non-BS-VI (i.e. BS-IV) compliant vehicles. It is further submitted that six to nine months’ time is required to shift the assembly line to make BS-VI compliant vehicles and if the request of the manufacturers is not accepted, they will have to start manufacturing BS-VI compliant vehicles well before 31.03.2020 and at least three to six months prior to the said date. It has also been contended that earlier BS-VI fuel was to be introduced with effect from 01.04.2024, which was pre-poned to 01.04.2023 and it was then pre-poned to 01.04.2021 and finally the date was advanced to 01.04.2020. It was decided to leapfrog from BS-IV fuel to BS-VI fuel without shifting to BS-V fuel. According to SIAM, this is creating a lot of difficulties for the manufacturers.”

                                       It is then brought out in para 9 that, “Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, learned senior counsel appearing for one of the manufacturers, submits that his clients are already manufacturing vehicles which are both BS-IV and BS-VI fuel compliant and they are on the road already. Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, learned Additional Solicitor General submits that keeping in view the difficulties faced by the manufacturers and balancing the need to have a cleaner environment, three months period given to the manufacturers is reasonable. He also urges that the Rules have not been challenged by any party and, therefore, this Court should not go into the validity of the Rules.”    

                                    Delving deeper, para 10 then brings out that, “On the other hand, Ms. Aparajita Singh, learned amicus curiae, has made a passionate plea that no non-BS-VI compliant vehicle should be permitted to be sold in the entire country after 01.04.2020. She has drawn our attention to the Report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee (for short ‘the Committee’) dated 07.08.2018. This Report mainly deals with National Capital Region (NCR) of Delhi but there are some references to the entire country. Some of the observations made by the Committee need to be considered and taken note of. The Committee in Para 5.15 notes that the problem of air pollution is affecting all human beings and any leniency on the part of the Government in tackling it will have a cascading effect on the health of the citizens. These observations have been made with specific reference to vehicular pollution and the need to ensure compliance of BS-VI norms with effect from 01.04.2020. There can be no two views that air pollution is hazardous to health. We may, also take note of certain observations of the Report of the Committee which show that one out of three children in Delhi suffers from respiratory problems. This is almost twice as high as compared to the city of Kolkata or rural areas. We may note that the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) database of more than 4,300 cities showed Indian cities of Gwalior, Allahabad, Raipur, Delhi, Ludhiana, Khanna, Varanasi and Patna as being among the most polluted in the world. (“World’s Most Polluted Cities”, World Economic Forum, 03.05.2018) Our attention has been drawn to various other documents which clearly show the deleterious effects of pollution on health. The hazards of pollution and its ill effect on the health of the citizens especially children are not limited to the city of Delhi or the NCR of Delhi but affects all the citizens of the country.”

                               Elaborating further on the efforts made, it is then explained in para 11 that, “The Union Government has spent about Rs 30,000 crores to manufacture BS-IV compliant fuel. We have been informed that another Rs 30,000/- crores of the taxpayers’ money have been expended by the Union to ensure that the fuel available in the country is BS-VI compliant. It is heartening to note that the Union, being concerned with the health of the citizens and also taking note of the urgent need for a clean environment, has taken steps to manufacture cleaner fuel. This fuel has already been made available in the National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi from 01.04.2018 and we have been informed that barring a few places, it shall be available in the entire NCR from 01.04.2019. It will probably be available in many parts of the country prior to 01.04.2020 and the entire country will shift to BS-VI fuel from 01.04.2020. Obviously, the manufacture of clean fuel is being done in a phased manner because all the refineries cannot simultaneously start manufacturing clean fuel. It is not as if on 01.04.2020 just by waving a magic wand the entire country will change to BS-VI compliant norms. If all the refineries and manufacturers by taking note of the requirement to bring in BS-VI fuel, have introduced such fuel from 2018 and are introducing it in a phased manner in the entire country by 31.03.2020, we see no reason why manufacturers of automobiles, two wheelers, three wheelers etc. cannot also do so.”

                    While punching holes in the lame arguments forwarded by SIAM, para 12 then notes that, “We may note that whereas in this Court SIAM has been canvassing that the shift to BS-VI compliant vehicles is a long drawn out process requiring huge changes in technology, the very same manufacturers are selling and exporting BS-VI compliant vehicles to Europe and other countries. With regard to two wheelers it has been specifically urged that the technological changes are immense. To counter this argument the learned amicus curiae has drawn our attention to a Press Release issued by M/s. Hero MotoCorp., which is one of the largest motor manufacturers of two wheelers in the country. In this Press Release issued in July 2017 it has been stated that M/s. Hero MotoCorp. has begun developing BS-VI compliant models and it aims to introduce such products much before the timeline of 2020. The company has also stated that it will manufacture only BS-VI fuel compliant vehicles well before the date stipulated by the authorities. If one manufacturer can do this, we see no reason why other manufacturers of two wheelers cannot do so.” Very rightly so! It is most shameful to note that SIAM cites hundred lame excuses for not shifting to BS-VI compliant vehicles in India while simultaneously and most shamelessly selling and exporting BS-VI compliant vehicles to Europe and other countries! Even the Apex Court has noted this with utmost dismay! The Apex Court also rightly cites that when M/s Hero MotoCorp. has already started developing BS-VI compliant models then why can’t others do?   

                                    As it turned out, it is then observed in para 13 that, “With regard to trucks and buses, from a news item published in the Financial Express dated 06.07.2018, it is apparent that Eicher is already manufacturing trucks and buses which are not only BS-VI compliant but BS-VI CNG compliant. Another manufacturer of heavy vehicles i.e. Ashok Leyland had, in August 2018 through its subsidiary Optare obtained an order to manufacture the world’s first electric double decker buses. The technology needed to manufacture such electric buses is much more advanced and difficult as compared to the technological changes required to manufacture petrol and diesel vehicles which are BS-VI compliant. Similarly, TVS Motors on 07.08.2018 has issued a press note that it will be manufacturing BS-VI compliant vehicles much ahead of the deadline of 2020. Many members of SIAM in the Auto Expo held in February, 2018 have exhibited vehicles which are technologically much more advanced than BS-VI compliant vehicles. These manufacturers have not only asserted that they can manufacture electric vehicles but also asserted that they are developing hydrogen cell fuel vehicles along with hybrid, electric and CNG vehicles.”

                                         It is then clarified in para 14 that, “We have mentioned these facts only to highlight that some of the manufacturers are not willing to comply with the 31.03.2020 deadline not because they do not have the technology but because the use of technology will lead to increase in the cost of the vehicles which may lead to reduction in sales of the vehicles and ultimately their profit.” It is then rightly underscored in this same para that, “There can be no compromise with the health of the citizens and if one has to choose between health and wealth, keeping in view the expanded scope of Article 21 of the Constitution, health of the teeming millions of this country will have to take precedence over the greed of a few automobile manufacturers. The automobile manufacturers must behave responsibly. We expected that keeping in view our earlier order, they would have themselves volunteered to be BS-VI compliant by 31.03.2020. Unfortunately, this has not been the case with some of the manufacturers and they want to stretch on the timeline by a few days or months for no other reason but to make a little more money.”

                   Interestingly enough, it is then pointed out in para 15 that, “When we compare BS-VI fuel with BS-IV fuel, there is a massive improvement in environmental terms. Once BS-VI emission norms are enforced, there will be a 68% improvement in PM2.5. This is not a small change. It is a vast improvement and the faster it is brought, the better it is. The amicus curiae has strenuously urged that, at least, in the NCR of Delhi, the BS-VI norms be applied for sale of vehicles from 01.04.2020. We feel that it may not be practical to introduce BS-VI compliant vehicles region-wise or city-wise. In our view, the BS-IV experiment in this regard was not very successful. BS-VI compliant vehicles are going to be more expensive than BS-IV compliant vehicles. People have a tendency to buy cheaper vehicle(s) even from a neighbouring city. We also strongly feel that the problem of pollution is not limited to the NCR of Delhi but it is a problem which has engulfed the entire country especially the major cities. India has the dubious distinction of having 15 out of the 20 most polluted cities in the world. The pollution in Gwalior, Raipur and Allahabad is worse than Delhi. The situation is alarming and critical. It brooks no delay.”

                               Simply put, para 16 then enumerates various landmark delivered by the Apex Court from time to time. It stipulates that, “It is an established principle of law that the right to life, as envisaged under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the right to a decent environment (Shantistar Builders v Narayan Khimalal Totame AIR 1990 SC 630; (1990) 1 SCC 520). It includes within its ambit the right of a citizen to live in a clean environment (Bhavani River-Sakthi Sugars Ltd., In re, (1998) 2 SCC 601). With regard to vehicular traffic, this Court has issued a number of directions to ensure a clean environment and reduce pollution (M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, (1998) 6 SCC 60, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, (1998) 6 SCC 63, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Matter regarding emission standard for vehicles), (1999) 6 SCC 12, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, (2002) 10 SCC 191, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, 2017 SCC Online SC 394). It has been held that the right to clean environment is a fundamental right (N.D. Jayal v. Union of India, (2004) 9 SCC 362). The right to live in an environment free from smoke and pollution follows from the “quality” of life which is an inherent part of Article 21 of the Constitution. The right to live with human dignity becomes illusory in the absence of a healthy environment (Shantistar Builders vs Narayan Khimalal Gotame & Ors. Etc. AIR 1990 SC 630, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (2004) 12 SCC 118, State of M.P. v Kedia Leather & Liquor Ltd., (2003) 7 SCC 389). The right to life not only means leading a life with dignity but includes within its ambit the right to lead a healthy, robust life in a clean atmosphere free from pollution. Obviously, such rights are not absolute and have to co-exist with sustainable development. Therefore, if there is a conflict between health and wealth, obviously, health will have to be given precedence. When we are concerned with the health of not one citizen but the entire citizenry including the future citizens of the country, the larger public interest has to outweigh the much smaller pecuniary interest of the industry. In this case the automobile industry, especially when the entire wherewithal to introduce the cleaner technology exists.”

                                 In hindsight, it is then observed in para 17 that, “It is therefore necessary to ensure that BS-VI compliance is uniform throughout the country so that even those areas of the country which fortunately have not suffered the ills of extreme pollution are safe in the future. The sale of automobiles and other vehicles is rising exponentially and the number of vehicles on the road is increasing day by day. Therefore, even a day’s delay in enforcing BS-VI norms is going to harm the health of the people. We are dealing here with a situation where children and unborn children suffer from pollution and issues of intergenerational equity are involved. Do we as a society or as manufacturers of automobiles have a right to manufacture more polluting vehicles when we have the technology to manufacture less polluting vehicles? The answer is obviously a big NO. If we were to factor only economics even then it makes no economic sense to have more polluting vehicles on the roads. The effect of pollution on the environment and health is so huge that it cannot be compensated in the marginal extra profits that the manufacturers might make. The amount spent on countering the ills of pollution such as polluted air, damaged lungs and the cost of healthcare far outweigh the profits earned.”

                                     Truth be told, para 18 then observes that, “It was urged on behalf of the manufacturers that there are multiple sources of pollution and vehicles only contribute to 2% of the pollution. We are not in agreement with this submission because the Report of the Committee to which we have adverted hereinabove states that contribution of vehicles to ambient PM2.5 concentration during winter season is 25% and in the summer season it contributes 9%. Even if we were to accept the figures submitted by SIAM, we are of the view that no step is too small when it comes to fighting pollution. Small steps to reduce pollution when taken together will lead to large scale reduction in pollution which will result in much cleaner air, which eventually will result in a cleaner and better environment, healthier citizens and most importantly a healthier generation to come.” We all must adhere to what the Supreme Court has said! Ultimately, it is we and the coming generation who will gain the most if we abide by the landmark judgment delivered in this case!

                                    It cannot be lost on us what the Apex Court has said in para 19 of this landmark judgment. It is held that, “In view of the fact that these proceedings have been pending in court for a long time and also in view of the fact that it is because of orders of this Court that BS-IV and now BS-VI norms have been introduced from the dates which were not even thought of by the Government, we feel that we have to take suo moto  notice of the Rules. At the outset, we may notice that sub-rule 21 of Rule 115 is very vague. It does not talk of sale of vehicles. It only mentions registration of vehicles and permits registration of vehicles conforming to BS-VI norms up to 30.06.2020 and in case of categories M&N, up to 30.09.2020. This rule, in our view, is violative of Article 21 of the Constitution in as much as it extends time for registration of vehicles beyond 31.03.2020 and must be accordingly read down. Any extension of time in introducing the new norms which is not absolutely necessary adversely impacts the health of the citizens and is, therefore, violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. This Rule goes against the spirit of all the orders passed earlier by this Court. In the month of March, 2017 we were dealing with a situation when BS-VI norms were to be made effective throughout the country with effect from 01.04.2020 and this Court had directed that non-BS-IV compliant vehicles shall not be registered on or after 01.04.2017. The situation in the present case is totally different. 31.03.2020 is almost 1½ years away. There is sufficient time for the manufacturers to change over to the new system and, therefore, we see no reason why they should be given a window of three or six months for sale of accumulated vehicles. Every vehicle sold after the cut-off date of 01.04.2020 is bound to cause more pollution and, therefore, the manufacturers, in our considered view, cannot be permitted to sell any non-BS-VI compliant vehicle on or after 01.04.2020. On the one hand, the Government has been pro-active in spending huge amounts of money to move to the BS-VI technology, but on the other hand, the automobile industry is coming up with a variety of untenable excuses just to delay the introduction of BS-VI compliant vehicles by a few months. We, in our judgment dated 13.04.2017, had clearly held “when the health of millions of our countrymen is involved, notification relating to commercial activities ought not to be interpreted in a literal manner.” We have to give a purposive interpretation to notifications specially those dealing with public health issues and even more so, when health not only of the citizens at present but also the citizens in the future is involved. There is more than sufficient time for the manufacturers to manufacture BS-VI compliant vehicles. They already have the technology to do so. The automobile industry must show the will, responsibility and urgency in this regard.”

                                 Having said this, it must be noted now what para 20 says. It states that, “The Government has developed a policy of phasing out polluting vehicles and discouraging the manufacturers of polluting vehicles. This has been done in a gradual manner. Europe introduced Euro-IV fuel in the year 2009 and Euro-VI standards in 2015. We are already many years behind them. We cannot afford to fall back further even by a single day. The need of the hour is to move to a cleaner fuel as early as possible.”

                                          Finally and far more importantly, para 21 which is the concluding para concludes by saying that, “Therefore, in exercise of the power vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution, we read down sub-rule 21 of Rule 115 and direct that sub-rule 21 of Rule 115 shall be interpreted and understood to read that no motor vehicle conforming to the emission standard Bharat Stage-IV shall be sold or registered in the entire country with effect from 01.04.2020.”

                                         All said and done, it is a landmark and laudable judgment which must be earnestly implemented in letter and spirit. We all are directly and deeply impacted by the impact of increasing pollution. We are already behind European and other countries as has been noted by Apex Court also. So, it brooks no more delay! The Apex Court stands fully justified in setting a deadline on sale of BS-IV vehicles and it also very rightly observed that health of teeming millions will have to take precedence over greed of a few auto makers! 


Courtesy/By: SANJEEV SIROHI  |  01 Nov 2018     Views:1736

Articles Updates

Bail and Punishment Provisions of NDPS matters...
05 Apr 2023     Views:319
The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:1423
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:1090
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:1178
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:1575
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:3837
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:1256
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:1640
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:1708
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:1813
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:1323
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:1446
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:956
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:3439
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:19239
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:6656
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:3054
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:2968
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:7217
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:2735
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:2707
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:3274
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2337
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1057
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1581
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1178
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:965
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:44326
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:854
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1023
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1195
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1179
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:3735
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:813
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:758
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:799
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:20204
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:5310
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:2229
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:4456
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:9501
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2235
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:1818
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:6007
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:51820
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:786
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:730
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:759
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:912
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:866
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:2412
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:735
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:5027
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:979
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1217
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:932
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:2200
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:11071
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:917
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:999
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:2022
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:3164
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:1564
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:8706
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:834
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:5103
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1486
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1395
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1718
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:24280
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2536
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:882
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:28663
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:932
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:4295
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:963
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:2724
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:812
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1534
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:16637
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:691
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:764
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:761
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:769
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1370
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1079
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:705
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:678
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:658
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:647
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:5094
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:748
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:755
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:638
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:800
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1042
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:684
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:628
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:709
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:897
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:880
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:632
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:723
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:6218
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:751
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:785
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:707
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:648
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:5493
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:749
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:671
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:721
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:824
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1737
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:624
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:719
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:793
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1273
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:769
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:933
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:947
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:698
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1419
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:723
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1221
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:752
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:678
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:817
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:979
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:745
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:686
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1422
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:4128
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:3038
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1081
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1288
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:1247
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:1138
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:1311
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:1783
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:1241
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:1164
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1694
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1289
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:3954
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:4617
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1333
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1366
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:1136
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:1393
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:1927
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:31800
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:2815
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:1027
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:1089
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:1001
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1389
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:882
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:821
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:1077
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:2164
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:1439
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2770
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:1190
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:1522
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:896
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:992
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:949
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:754
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:689
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:768
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:1501
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:728
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:779
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:669
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:896
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:643
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:3385
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:3392
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:1228
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:853
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:945
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:3388
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:3233
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:1405
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1329
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1310
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:980
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:800
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:781
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:763
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1021
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:934
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:808
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:850
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:693
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:839
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:779
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:716
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:781
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:711
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:986
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:736
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:766
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:681
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:992
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:790
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:812
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:738
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:808
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1019
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:773
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2151
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:922
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:847
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:749
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:795
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:926
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:858
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:852
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:644
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1030
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:750
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:977
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:827
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1030
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:753
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:751
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1246
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:888
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1088
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:797
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:758
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:737
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:4875
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:1237
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:718
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:733
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:849
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:638
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:779
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:734
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1091
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1311
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:716
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:766
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:646
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:1115
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:641
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:868
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:1380
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1635
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1507
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1738
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:697
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:785
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:2352
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:1741
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:1043
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:1441
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:4442
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:772
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:6807
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:781
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:928
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:787
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:2002
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:759
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:762
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:2355
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:2932
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4088
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4639
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:974
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:838
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1435
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1462
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1531
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1435
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:819
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1110
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1754
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2052
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1860
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2145
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:930
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:883
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1970
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:1633
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:2332
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1536
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1707
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1924
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:1212
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:1383
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1464
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1943
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1009
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:823
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:774
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:4174
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:830
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:941
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:10092
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:2438
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:846
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1664
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1473
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1735
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2221
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1048
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:1285
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:1261
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:1287
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1602
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1606
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1442
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1405
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:863
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:775
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:853
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:776
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1598
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1074
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1792
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1736
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2919
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2048
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1025
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1674
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1228
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1018
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1330
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1451
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:1616
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:2038
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:3241
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1790
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1059
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1166
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1109
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1223
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:1491
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:2275
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1081
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1670
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1285
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:1029
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1130
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1122
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1269
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:1311
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:1166
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:1596
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1502
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1168
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:1064
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1134
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2300
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2033
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2387
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1596
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:966
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:901
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1125
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:999
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1143
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3439
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2205
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1779
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1469
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:888
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:807
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:880
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:905
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:1891
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1332
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1737
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:2103
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1468
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1608
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:1066
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:906
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:903
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2427
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:878
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1809
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:831
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:921
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:944
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1024
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1128
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1147
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:903
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:946
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:816
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:805
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:876
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:1142
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:881
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:848
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1991
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:888
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:861
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:812
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:816
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1364
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:900
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:897
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:799
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:1206
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:1105
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:885
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:812
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:842
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:1157
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:1388
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:849
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:999
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:871
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1575
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1020
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1557
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:930
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1207
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1384
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1035
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:899

Most Read Articles

  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:51820
  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:44326
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:31800
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:28663
  • How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Liability?
    On 09 Apr 2020    Views:24280
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

Allow Cookies!

By using our website, you agree to the use of cookies

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1127 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.