• +91 9632247247
  • Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliament Unlawful And Void

Latest Articles

Back

UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliament Unlawful And Void

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  29 Sep 2019     Views:826

In a hard hitting, hair raising and historic judgment titled R (on the application of Miller) (Appellant) v The Prime Minister (Respondent) Cherry and others (Respondents) v Advocate General for Scotland (Appellant) (Scotland) in [2019] UK SC 41 on appeals from [2019] EWHC 2381 (QB) and [2019] CSIH 49, Lady Hale who presided the 11 Judge Bench read out on 24 September, 2019 the landmark judgment by which United Kingdom Supreme Court has unanimously declared the prorogation of UK Parliament by Boris Johnson to be unlawful and void. Very rarely do we see in UK the judiciary stepping in as directly as we notice here! In this leading case the UK Supreme Court felt it imperative to step in and declare the prorogation of Parliament by PM Boris Johnson to be unlawful and void!

                                  Without mincing any words, it was held clearly, categorically and convincingly that, “A decision will be unlawful if it frustrates the ability of the Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions.” This momentous judgment has grabbed the eyeballs cutting across boundary lines all across the world. We thus see that the Supreme Court unanimously allows Mrs Miller appeal and dismisses the Advocate General for Scotland’s appeal.

                                     To start with, the 11-Judge Bench comprising of President Lady Hale and Deputy President Lord Reed while giving the judgment of the Court for themselves along with Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hodge, Lady Black, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden, Lord Kitchin and Lord Sales first and foremost set the ball rolling by first and foremost pointing out in para 1 that, “It is important to emphasise that the issue in these appeals is not when and on what terms the United Kingdom is to leave the European Union. The issue is whether the advice given by the Prime Minister to Her Majesty the Queen on 27th or 28th August 2019 that Parliament should be prorogued from a date between 9th and 12th September until 14th October was lawful. It arises in circumstances which have never arisen before and are unlikely ever to arise again. It is a “one off”. But our law is used to rising to such challenges and supplies us with the legal tools to enable us to reason to a solution.”

                  What is prorogation

                                    On this subject, it would be pertinent to discuss what paras 2 to 6 says on this score. To begin with, para 2 states that, “Parliamentary sittings are normally divided into sessions, usually lasting for about a year, but sometimes less and sometimes, as with the current session, much longer Prorogation of Parliament brings the current session to an end. The next session begins, usually a short time later, with the Queen’s Speech. While Parliament is prorogued, neither House can meet, debate and pass legislation. Neither House can debate Government policy. Nor may members of either House ask written or oral questions of Ministers. They may not meet and take evidence in committees. In general, Bills which have not yet completed all their stages are lost and will have to start again from scratch in the next session of Parliament. In certain circumstances, individual Bills may be “carried over” into the next session and pick up where they left off. The Government remains in office and can exercise its powers to make delegated legislation and bring it into force. It may also exercise all the other powers which the law permits. It cannot procure the passing of Acts of Parliament or obtain Parliamentary approval for further spending.”

                                        Following next, what we then see in  para 3 is this: “Parliament does not decide when it should be prorogued. This is a prerogative power exercised by the Crown on the advice of the Privy Council. In practice, as noted in the House of Commons Library Briefing Paper (No 8589, 11th June 2019), “this process has been a formality in the UK for more than a century: the Government of the day advises the Crown to prorogue and that request is acquiesced to”. In theory the monarch could attend Parliament and make the proclamation proroguing it in person, but the last monarch to do this was Queen Victoria in 1854. Under current practice, a proclamation is made by Order in Council a few days before the actual prorogation, specifying a range of days within which Parliament may be prorogued and the date on which the prorogation would end. The Lord Chancellor prepares a commission under the great seal instructing the Commissioners accordingly. On the day chosen for the prorogation, the Commissioners enter the House of Lords; the House of Commons is summoned; the command of the monarch appointing the Commission is read; and Parliament is formally prorogued.”

                                    Going forward, it is then pointed out in para 4 that, “Prorogation must be distinguished from the dissolution of Parliament. The dissolution of Parliament brings the current Parliament to an end. Members of the House of Commons cease to be Members of Parliament. A general election is then held to elect a new House of Commons. The Government remains in office but there are conventional constraints on what it can do during that period. These days, dissolution is usually preceded by a short period of prorogation.”

                              Furthermore, para 5 then enumerates that, “Dissolution used also to be a prerogative power of the Crown but is now governed by the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011. This provides for general elections to be held every five years and for an earlier election to be held in only two circumstances either the House of Commons votes, by a majority of at least two thirds of the number of seats (including vacant seats) in the House, to hold an early election; or the House of Commons votes that it has no confidence in Her Majesty’s Government and no-one is able to form a Government in which the House does have confidence within 14 days. Parliament is dissolved 25 days before polling day and cannot otherwise be dissolved. The Act expressly provides that it does not affect Her Majesty’s power to prorogue Parliament (section 6(1)).”   

                                          Moving on, it is then enunciated in para 6 that, “Prorogation must also be distinguished from the House adjourning or going into recess. This is decided, not by the Crown acting on the advice of the Prime Minister, but by each House passing a motion to that effect. The Houses might go into recess at different times from one another. In the House of Commons, the motion is moved by the Prime Minister. In the House of Lords, it is moved by the Lord Speaker. During a recess, the House does not sit but Parliamentary business can otherwise continue as usual. Committees may meet, written Parliamentary questions can be asked and must be answered.”

         The run-up to this prorogation

                                              Time now to give a brief background. It is firstly pointed out in para 7 that, “As everyone knows, a referendum was held (pursuant to the European Union Referendum Act 2015) on 23rd June 2016. The majority of those voting voted to leave the European Union. Technically, the result was not legally binding. But the Government had pledged to honour the result and it has since been treated as politically and democratically binding. Successive Governments and Parliament have acted on that basis. Immediately after the referendum, Mr David Cameron resigned as Prime Minister. Mrs Theresa May was chosen as leader of the Conservative party and took his place.”  

                                         What follows next in para 8 is this: “The machinery for leaving the European Union is contained in article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. This provides that any member state may decide to withdraw from the Union “in accordance with its own constitutional requirements”. That member state is to notify the European Council of its intention. The Union must then negotiate and conclude an agreement with that member state, “setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union”. The European Union treaties will cease to apply to that state when the withdrawal agreement comes into force or, failing that, two years after the notification unless the European Council in agreement with the member state, unanimously decides to extend this period.”

                                    Going ahead, it is then brought out in para 9 that, “On 2nd October 2016, Mrs May announced her intention to give notice under article 50 before the end of March 2017. Mrs Gina Miller and others challenged her power to do so without the authority of an Act of Parliament. That challenge succeeded: R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5; [2018] AC 61. Parliament responded by passing the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017, which received royal assent on 16th March 2017 and authorised the Prime Minister to give the notification. Mrs May did so on 29th March 2017.”

                                                Of course, it is then further brought out in para 10 that, “The Parliament was dissolved on 3rd May 2017 and a general election was held on 8th June 2017. The result was that Mrs May no longer had an overall majority in the House of Commons, but she was able to form a Government because of a “confidence and supply” agreement with the Democratic Unionist Party of Northern Ireland. Negotiations for a withdrawal agreement with the European Council proceeded.”

                                  While explaining further, it is then illustrated in para 11 that, “Meanwhile, Parliament proceeded with some of the legislative steps needed to prepare United Kingdom law for leaving the Union. The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 came into force on 26th June 2018. In brief, it defined “exit day” as 29th March 2019 but this could be extended by statutory instrument (section 20). From that day, it repealed the European Communities Act 1972, the Act which had provided for our entry into what became the European Union, but it preserved much of the existing EU law as the law of the United Kingdom with provision for exceptions and modifications to be made by delegated legislation. Crucially, section 13 requires Parliamentary approval of any withdrawal agreement reached by the Government. In summary it provides that a withdrawal agreement may only be ratified if (a) a Minister of the Crown has laid before Parliament a statement that political agreement has been reached, a copy of the negotiated withdrawal agreement and a copy of the framework for the future relationship; (b) the House of Commons has approved the withdrawal agreement and future framework; (c) the House of Lords has, in effect, taken note of them both, and (d) an Act of Parliament has been passed which contains provision for the implementation of the withdrawal agreement.”

                              Interestingly enough, para 12 then brings out that, “A withdrawal agreement, setting out terms for a “smooth and orderly exit from the European Union” and a political declaration, setting out a framework for the future relationship, to be negotiated by the end of 2020, were concluded on 25th November 2018. However, the agreement was rejected three times by the House of Commons, on 15th January 2019 (by 432 to 202 votes), on 12th March 2019 (by 391 to 242 votes) and on 29th March 2019 (by 344 to 286 votes).”

                                              To be sure, it is then pointed out in para 13 that, “On 20th March 2019 the Prime Minister had asked the European Council to extend the notification period. This was granted only until 12th April 2019. However, on 8th April 2019, the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019 was passed. This required a Minister of the Crown to move a motion, that day or the next, that the House of Commons agrees to the Prime Minister seeking an extension to a specified date and, if the motion was passed, required the Prime Minister to seek that extension. Pursuant to that Act, the Prime Minister sought an extension, which on 10th April 2019 was granted until 31st October 2019. The regulation changing the “exit day” was made the next day (European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (Exit Day) (Amendment No 2) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/859)). Thus the current position, under both article 50 of the Treaty on European Union and the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 is that the United Kingdom will leave the Union on 31st October 2019 whether or not there is a withdrawal agreement (but this is now subject to the European Union (Withdrawal) (No 2) Act 2019, see para 22 below).”

                             To put things in perspective, it is then pointed out in para 14 that, “Mrs May resigned as leader of the Conservative party on 7th June 2019 and stood down as Prime Minister on 24th July after the Conservative party had chosen Mr Boris Johnson as its leader. Mr Johnson has on many occasions made it clear that he believes that the European Council will only agree to changes in the withdrawal agreement if they think that there is a genuine risk that the United Kingdom will leave without any such agreement. He appointed Mr Michael Gove Cabinet Office Minister with a view to preparing for a “no deal” exit. Yet it was also clear that a majority of the House of Commons would not support withdrawal without an agreement.”

                 This prorogation

                                    What is then unfolded in para 15 is this: “On 28th August 2019, Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg, Lord President of the (Privy) Council and Leader of the House of Commons, Baroness Evans of Bowes Park, Leader of the House of Lords, and Mr Mark Spencer, Chief Whip, attended a meeting of the Privy Council held by the Queen at Balmoral Castle. An Order in Council was made ordering that “the Parliament be prorogued on a day no earlier than Monday the 9th day of September and no later than Thursday the 12th day of September 2019 to Monday the 14th day of October 2019” and that the Lord Chancellor “do cause a Commission to be prepared and issued in the usual manner for proroguing the Parliament accordingly”. We know that in approving the prorogation, Her Majesty was acting on the advice of the Prime Minister. We do not know what conversation passed between them when he gave her that advice. We do not know what conversation, if any, passed between the assembled Privy Counsellors before or after the meeting. We do not know what the Queen was told and cannot draw any conclusions about it.”     

                                            As it turned out, it is then clarified in para 16 that, “We do not know the contents of three documents leading up to that advice, annexed to a witness statement from Jonathan Jones, Treasury Solicitor and Head of the Government Legal Department. His evidence is that his department had made clear to all relevant departments, including the Prime Minister’s Office, the requirement to make thorough searches for and to produce all information relevant to Mrs Miller’s claim.”

                                         More consequentially, it is then revealed in para 17 that, “The first document is a Memorandum dated 15th August 2019 from Nikki da Costa, Director of Legislative Affairs in the Prime Minister’s Office, to the Prime Minister and copied to seven other people, including Sir Mark Sedwill, Cabinet Secretary, and Dominic Cummings, Special Adviser. The key points made in the Memorandum are:

  • This had been the longest session since records began. Because of this, they were at the very end of the legislative programme of the previous administration. Commons and Lords business managers were asking for new Bills to ensure that Parliament was using its time gainfully. But if new Bills were introduced, the session would have to continue for another four to six months, or the Bills would fall at the end of the session.
  • Choosing when to end the session – ie prorogue – was a balance between “wash up” – completing the Bills which were close to Royal Assent – and “not wasting time that could be used for new measures in a fresh session”. There were very few Bills suitable for “wash-up”, so this pointed to bringing the session to a close in September. Asking for prorogation to commence within the period 9thto 12th September was recommended.
  • To start the new session with a Queen’s Speech would be achievable in the week beginning 14thOctober but any earlier “is extremely pressured”.
  • Politically, it was essential that Parliament was sitting before and after the EU Council meeting (which is scheduled for 17th-18thOctober). If the Queen’s Speech were on 14th October, the usual six-day debate would culminate in key votes on 21st and 22nd October. Parliament would have the opportunity to debate the Government’s overall approach to Brexit in the run up to the EU Council and then vote on it once the outcome of the Council was known.               
  • It must be recognised that “prorogation on its own and separate of a Queen’s Speech, has been portrayed as a potential tool to prevent MPs intervening prior to the UK’s departure from the EU on 31stOctober”. The dates proposed sought to provide reassurance by ensuring that Parliament would sit for three weeks before exit and that a maximum of seven days were lost apart from the time usually set aside for the conference recess.
  • The usual length of a prorogation was under ten days, though there had been longer ones. The present proposal would mean that Parliament stood prorogued for up to 34 calendar days but, given the conference recess, the number of sitting days would be far less than that.
  • The Prime Minister ticked “Yes” to the recommendation that his PPS Approach the Palace with a request for prorogation to begin within the period Monday 9thSeptember to Thursday 12th September and for a Queen’s Speech on Monday 14th October.”          

                                                           What’s more, para 18 then reveals that, “The second document is the Prime Minister’s handwritten comments on the Memorandum, dated 16th August. They read:

“(1) The whole September session is a rigmarole introduced [words redacted] t [sic] show the public that MPs were earning their crust.

(2) So I don’t see anything especially shocking about their prorogation.

(3) As Nikki nots [sic], it is OVER THE CONFERENCE SEASON so that the sitting days lost are actually very few.””

                                                Still further, para 19 then further reveals that, “The third document is another Memorandum from Nikki da Costa, dated 23rd August, again to the Prime Minister and copied to five people, including Sir Mark Sedwill and Dominic Cummings. This sets out the proposed arrangements, including a telephone call between the Prime Minister and Her Majesty at 6.00 pm on Tuesday 27th August, formally to advise prorogation, the Privy Council meeting the next day, a cabinet meeting by conference call after that, and a press notice after the Draft remarks for the Cabinet meeting and a draft letter to MPs (approved by the Chief Whip) were annexed.”

                                         To put it succinctly, the Bench then holds in para 20 that, “We also have the Minutes of the Cabinet meeting held by conference call at 10.05 am on Wednesday 28th August, after the advice had been given. The Prime Minister explained that it was important that they were “brought up to speed” on the decisions which had been taken. It was also “important to emphasise that this decision to prorogue Parliament for a Queen’s Speech was not driven by Brexit considerations; it was about pursuing an exciting and dynamic legislative programme to take forward the Government’s agenda”. He also explained that the timetable did not conflict with the statutory responsibilities under the Northern Ireland (Executive Formation etc) Act 2019 (as it happens, the timetable for Parliamentary sittings laid down in section 3 of that Act requires that Parliament sit on 9th September and, on one interpretation, no later than 14th October). He acknowledged that the new timetable would impact on the sitting days available to pass the Northern Ireland Budget Bill and “potentially put at risk the ability to pass the necessary legislation relating to decision-making powers in a no-deal scenario”. In discussion at the Cabinet meeting, among the points made was that “any messaging should emphasise that the plan for a Queen’s Speech was not intended to reduce parliamentary scrutiny or minimise Parliament’s opportunity to make clear its views on Brexit… Any suggestion that the Government was using this as a tactic to frustrate Parliament should be rebutted.” In conclusion, the Prime Minister said that “there were no plans for an early General Election. This would not be right for the British people; they had faced an awful lot of electoral events in recent years”.”      

                                                 Truth be told, the Bench then notes in para 21 that, “That same day, the Prime Minister sent a letter to all MPs updating them on the Government’s plans for its business in Parliament, stressing his intention to “bring forward a new bold and ambitious domestic legislative agenda for the renewal of our country after Brexit”.”

                                           As things stood, para 22 then illustrates that, “On 3rd September Parliament returned from its summer recess. The House of Commons passed a motion that MPs should take control of the order paper – in other words decide for themselves what business they would transact. On 4th September what became the European Union (Withdrawal) (No 2) Act 2019 passed all its stages in the House of Commons. On 6th September the House of Lords suspended its usual rules so that the Bill could be passed. It received Royal Assent on Monday 9th September. The import of the Act is to require the Prime Minister on 19th October to seek, by a letter in the form scheduled to the Act, an extension of three months from the European Council, unless by then Parliament has either approved a withdrawal agreement or approved leaving without one.”

                                More significantly, it is then enjoined in para 25 that, “Meanwhile, as soon as the prorogation was announced, Mrs Gina Miller launched proceedings in the High Court in England and Wales, seeking a declaration that the Prime Minister’s advice to her Majesty was unlawful. Those proceedings were heard by a Divisional Court (Lord Burnett of Maldon, Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Sir Terence Etherton, Master of the Rolls and Dame Victoria Sharp, President of the Queen’s Bench Division) on 5th September and their judgment was delivered on 11th September: [2019] EWHC 2381 (QB). They dismissed the claim on the ground that the issue was not justiciable. They granted a “leap-frog” certificate so that the case could come directly to this court.”

                                            Without mincing any words, the eleven Judges of the highest court in the United Kingdom have in an extraordinary unanimous judgment has struck down as unlawful a recommendation by Prime Minister Boris Johnson to Queen Elizabeth to suspend Parliament for five weeks ahead of Britain’s scheduled October 31 exit from the Europena Union. The Justices, sitting on the largest permissible Bench of the 12-Judge Supreme Court gave presiding officers of both Houses of Parliament the freedom to reconvene the Houses immediately.

                                      While pronouncing the landmark decision, the Supreme Court President Brenda Hale said that, “The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification.” She added that, “Parliament has not been prorogued. This is the unanimous judgment of all 11 Justices. It is for Parliament and in particular, the Speaker and the [House of] Lords to decide what to do next.”

                                                     Be it noted, the Supreme Court ruled explicitly on “whether the advice given by the Prime Minister to Her Majesty the Queen on 27 or 28 August that Parliament should be prorogued from a date between 9 and 12 September until 14 October, was lawful and the legal consequences if it was not”. It said the PM’s action was unlawful and the prorogation of Parliament was “void and of no effect”. It also made clear that the question was ‘justiciable’.

                                              As we see, the summary said that, “The court has already concluded that the Prime Minister’s advice to Her Majesty was unlawful, void and of no effect. This means that the order in council to which it led was also unlawful, void and of no effect and should be quashed. This means that when the royal commissioners walked into the House of Lords it was as if they walked in with a blank sheet of paper. The prorogation was also void and of no effect. Parliament has not been prorogued.”

                                       It was also clarified by the Supreme Court that, “As Parliament is not prorogued, it is for Parliament to decide what to do next. Also, because it is not prorogued, it need not be recalled; and it has not voted to adjourn or go into recess.” The Court thus laid down that, “Unless there is some Parliamentary rule to the contrary of which we are unaware, the Speaker of the House of Commons and the Lord Speaker can take immediate steps to enable each House to meet as soon as possible to decide upon a way forward.”

                                        It must be mentioned here that eminent Constitutional expert Upendra Baxi who is Professor of Law, University of Warwick and former Vice Chancellor of Universities of South Gujarat and Delhi remarked rightly that, “This was truly a Kesavananda Bharati moment for the British court. But unlike the full Indian court, there was no riot of concurring and dissenting opinions. Of course, no judicial decision is beyond scially responsible critique. But in asking Parliament to finally decide the terms and conditions of Brexit, the British court has valuably upheld the principles of democratic accountability of a sovereign Parliament.”

                                           No doubt, this is a major setback for British PM Boris Johnson. He himself said that he strongly disagreed with the ruling but he would respect it and of course Parliament will come back. The Supreme Court in its summary also made it clear that this was not a normal prorogation. It said that, “The prolonged suspension of Parliamentary democracy took place in quite exceptional circumstances; the fundamental change which was due to take place in the Constitution of the United Kingdom on 31 October.” It also made it clear that, “Parliament…has a right to voice in how that change comes about. The effect upon the fundamentals of our democracy was extreme.” On the government’s argument that the courts had no business jumping in because the decision to prorogue Parliament lay in the territory of political judgment, not legal standards, the Supreme Court strongly reaffirmed that it was firmly of the opinion that the question of the lawfulness of the Prime Minister’s advice to Her Majesty is justiciable. The official summary of the judgment also sought to make it clear that, “Courts have exercised a supervisory jurisdiction over the lawfulness of acts of the Government for centuries”. Very rightly so! The British PM and his party have no option but to abide by it as the Supreme Court President Lady Hale had minced no words to say that the effect of the suspension on the fundamentals of democracy was extreme! There can be no denying or disputing it! We thus see that the Advocate General’s appeal in the case of Cherry is dismissed and Mrs Miller’s appeal is allowed. Needless to say, this landmark and extremely laudable judgment is a big rebuke to UK PM Boris Johnson and plunges Brexit into further turmoil!


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  29 Sep 2019     Views:826

Articles Updates

The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:835
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:626
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:677
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:1028
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:2504
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:801
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:1172
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:1107
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:1196
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:992
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:1230
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:827
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:3257
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:18511
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:5900
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:2836
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:2769
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:6804
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:2560
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:2551
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:2976
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2103
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:971
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1485
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1073
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:872
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:39213
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:767
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:934
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1124
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1078
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:3213
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:738
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:685
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:731
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:16684
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:5158
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:2142
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:4003
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:9285
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2076
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:1681
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:5777
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:49847
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:705
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:654
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:697
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:841
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:795
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:2310
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:664
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:4698
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:897
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1121
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:865
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:2075
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:10414
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:838
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:750
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:1838
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:2788
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:1472
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:8069
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:747
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:4176
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1221
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1328
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1609
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:23702
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2083
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:769
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:25064
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:853
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:3874
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:892
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:2508
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:743
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1358
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:15189
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:614
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:689
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:679
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:688
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1223
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:981
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:647
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:622
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:590
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:582
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:4559
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:684
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:692
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:571
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:734
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:853
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:609
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:568
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:602
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:825
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:775
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:577
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:650
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:5379
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:656
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:710
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:654
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:582
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:4636
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:691
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:605
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:653
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:755
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1545
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:568
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:663
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:705
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1158
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:534
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:815
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:879
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:635
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1196
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:651
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1133
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:667
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:612
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:749
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:899
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:674
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:627
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1150
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:3719
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:2892
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:997
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1196
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:1156
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:1004
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:1190
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:1645
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:1151
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:1088
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1591
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1183
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:3703
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:3601
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1250
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1248
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:1047
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:1303
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:1765
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:29420
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:2610
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:950
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:1017
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:926
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1251
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:806
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:749
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:980
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:1925
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:1329
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2531
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:1101
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:1076
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:826
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:892
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:861
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:661
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:628
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:700
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:1007
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:663
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:694
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:602
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:822
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:580
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:3167
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:3116
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:1098
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:786
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:866
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:3133
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2997
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:1313
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1239
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1223
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:905
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:668
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:711
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:693
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:954
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:843
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:741
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:778
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:617
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:729
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:704
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:648
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:678
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:656
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:911
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:671
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:671
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:621
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:937
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:702
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:755
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:674
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:746
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:956
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:710
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2018
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:808
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:776
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:672
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:715
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:851
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:772
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:780
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:580
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:945
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:688
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:871
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:753
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:959
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:686
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:669
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1058
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:813
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1004
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:722
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:695
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:671
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:4776
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:1149
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:658
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:654
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:783
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:576
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:563
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:667
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1025
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1242
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:659
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:707
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:587
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:1015
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:572
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:802
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:1240
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1465
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1347
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1559
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:644
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:680
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:1975
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:1608
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:963
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:1314
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:4120
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:707
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:6186
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:711
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:651
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:712
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:1923
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:692
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:687
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:2237
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:2746
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:3660
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4256
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:904
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:772
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1353
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1336
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1423
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1337
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:754
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1044
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1652
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1933
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1758
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2020
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:794
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:815
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1800
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:1529
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:2227
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1425
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1596
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1820
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:1110
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:1279
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1381
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1748
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:875
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:750
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:712
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:3215
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:770
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:866
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:9377
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:2179
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:787
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1534
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1396
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1651
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2026
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:992
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:1049
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:1156
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:1205
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1448
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1510
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1372
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1267
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:798
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:717
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:775
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:717
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1281
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:993
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1677
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1616
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2779
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1953
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:948
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1577
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1132
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:745
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1247
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:732
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:1523
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:1946
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:3081
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1708
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:995
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1103
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1047
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1141
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:1300
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:1921
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1008
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1592
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1205
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:960
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1025
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1038
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1195
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:1141
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:1066
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:1388
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1387
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1102
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:970
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1062
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2174
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1969
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2156
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1534
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:896
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:841
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1036
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:941
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1064
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3092
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1793
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1666
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1373
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:805
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:747
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:770
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:838
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:1210
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1256
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1463
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:1843
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1397
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1516
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:991
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:839
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:841
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2238
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:805
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1508
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:767
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:844
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:875
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:958
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1021
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:809
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:843
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:883
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:751
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:750
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:823
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:1052
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:821
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:783
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1748
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:835
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:784
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:747
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:759
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1300
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:840
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:832
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:737
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:1107
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:1022
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:830
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:752
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:755
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:1071
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:1332
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:789
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:893
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:816
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1467
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:958
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1445
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:868
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1136
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:944
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:948
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:827

Most Read Articles

  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:49847
  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:39213
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:29420
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:25064
  • How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Liability?
    On 09 Apr 2020    Views:23702
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1127 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.