• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Litigants Before Courts: Calcutta HC

Latest Articles

Back

Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Litigants Before Courts: Calcutta HC

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  09 Apr 2019     Views:3531

It has to be said first and foremost that in a noteworthy and significant judgment titled ‘In the goods of: Usha Kanta Das (Deceased) And Amiya Kanti Das & Anr. Vs. S.M. Sefalika Ash’ in G.A. No. 3659 of 2017 with far reaching consequences, the Calcutta High Court on February 21, 2019 has clearly and categorically held that only advocates enrolled under the Advocates Act are authorized to plead and argue on behalf of litigants before a court of law. Those who are not so enrolled cannot plead and argue on behalf of litigants before a court of law! Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya who authored this judgment minced no words in making it absolutely clear that, “Acting and appearing for another will not include a right to plead or argue before a court of law.”  

                                   To begin with, Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya of Calcutta High Court sets the ball rolling by first and foremost observing in para 1 that, “This is an application filed by one Radha Nath Nandy for leave to appear in person on behalf of the defendant/caveatrix.” We thus see here that it is Radha Nath Nandy who despite not being a lawyer had filed an application for leave in Calcutta High Court to appear in person to argue the case of the defendant/caveatrix.

                                  To recapitulate, it is then brought out in para 2 that, “The dispute relates to two Wills both allegedly executed by one Usha Kanta Das. The first Will was executed on 10th September, 1965 in which Amiya Kanti Das and Amar Nath Ash (now deceased) were made the joint executors. The testator (Usha Kant Das) then substituted the first Will with the last and final Will dated 3rd October, 1975, which was registered with the Registrar of Assurances, Calcutta. In the last Will dated 3rd October, 1975, the testator replaced the name of his son-in-law, Amar Nath Ash (now deceased) and included his wife Smt. Ushabari Devi (now deceased) as the joint executor along with his son Amiya Kanti Das, the plaintiff no. 1. It was specified in the last Will that in the event of the death of Ushabari, she shall be substituted by Jyotsna Das, the wife of Amiya Kanti Das for discharging the duty of an executor. After the death of Usha Kanta Das, the plaintiff, on coming to know of the existence of the Will dated 3rd October 1975, applied for grant of both Shefalika Ash and Prativa Nandy. Shefalika Ash (defendant) and Prativa Nandy are the daughters of the deceased, Usha Kanta Das. After a considerable delay of about 5 years thereafter, the plaintiffs came to know that Shefalika Ash had filed an affidavit in support of a caveat on 19th December, 2012. The application for grant of probate being P.L.A no. 53 of 2010 was thereafter converted into the present testamentary suit. Issues were framed in the suit and after examination of the plaintiffs’ first witness (Amiya Kanti Das), the claim of the plaintiffs was dismissed by a judgment dated 8th November, 2016. An appeal was preferred therefrom by the plaintiffs and by an order dated 26th April, 2017, the suit was remanded for adducing the evidence of Rabindralal Ghosh, the attesting witness to the Will, who the plaintiffs had intended to produce before the Trial Court. Both the plaintiffs and the caveatrix, namely, Shefalika Ash were represented by their advocates during these proceedings. The plaintiffs then applied for framing of additional issues before the learned Judge, who was hearing the suit. At this stage, Mr. Radha Nath Nandy (the applicant herein) expressed his intention to argue the matter on behalf of the defendant/caveatrix, Shefalika Ash. By an order dated 16th November, 2017, passed by the Hon’ble Justice Sahidullah Munshi, such liberty was denied on the ground that Order III Rules 1 and 2 of The Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) does not give any scope to a party to represent a litigant if the concerned party is not an advocate. Mr. Radha Nath Nandy, was however, given leave to file an appropriate application for this issue to be considered. Mr. Radha Nath Nandy thereafter filed two applications under Order III Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC and another application for rejection of the plaint.”

                             Furthermore, it is then brought out in para 3 that, “The issue in the instant application is whether Mr. Radha Nath Nandy has a right of audience before this court.”

                                Going forward, it is then pointed out in para 4 that, “Mr. Radha Nath Nandy appearing in person, submits that he is the constituted attorney of Shefalika Ash, the defendant/caveatrix and has been authorized to act and argue, including signing affidavits, applications, etc as a “recognized agent” under Chapter I of the Original Side Rules of this court. Mr. Nandy cites Chapter XII of the Original Side Rules in relation to indigent persons in pursuance of his right to argue. Mr. Nandy cites a host of orders passed by different High Courts (without placing them individually) on the point of rights conferred by a power of attorney and that a holder of a power of attorney can appear, plead and act on behalf of the party who has given the power of Attorney. Mr. Nandy urges that he is otherwise competent and entitled in law to appear, argue and plead on behalf of the caveatrix. He also relies on Order III Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC to contend that as a recognized agent he is authorized to appear and act on behalf of the caveatrix by reason of holding the power of attorney extended in his favour.”

                        On the contrary, it is then pointed out in para 5 that, “Ms. Sutapa Sanyal, learned Counsel appearing for the plaintiffs submits that Order III Rule 2 of the CPC to restrict the power of “recognized agents” to appearing and making applications and generally acting as a holder of a power of attorney on behalf of the person who has authorized the recognized agent. Counsel submits that Order III does not include the right of audience or examination of witnesses, which Mr. Nandy seeks to do in this case. Counsel relies on Ashwin Sambhuprasad Patel Vs. National Rayan Corporation Limited reported in AIR 1955 Bombay 262 and on P. Thayarammal Vs. Pitty Kuppuswamy Naidu reported in AIR 1937 Madras 937. She further relies on Section 8 of the Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 which provides for the following.

“8. Enrolment of advocates –

(1)         No person shall be entitled as of right to practise in any High Court, unless his name is entered in the roll of the advocates of the High Court maintained under this Act: Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to any attorney of the High Court.

(2)         The High Court shall prepare and maintain a roll of advocates of the High Court in which shall be entered the names of-

(a)          all persons who were, as advocates, akils or pleaders, entitled as of right to practice in the High Court immediately before the date on which this section comes into force in respect thereof; and

(b)         all other persons who have been admitted to be advocates of the High Court under this Act: Provided that such persons shall have paid in respect of enrolment the stamp duty, if any, chargeable under the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899), and a fee, payable to the Bar Council, which shall be ten rupees in the case of the persons referred to in clause (a) and in other cases such amount as may be prescribed…………..”

and on Section 29 of the Advocates Act, 1961, which is:

“29. Advocates to be the only recognized class of persons entitled to practice law.- Subject to the provisions of this Act and any rules made thereunder, there shall, as from the appointed day, be only one class of persons entitled to practice the profession of law, namely, advocates.”

Based on the above, it is submitted that the right of audience cannot be claimed as a matter of right and counsel relies on Pannalal Vs. Deoji Dhanji reported in (AIR 1955 Madhya Bharat 109) and Jivan Lal Vs. Ram Ratan reported in (AIR 1936 Oudh 261) to explain the scope of Order III Rule 1 of the CPC.”

                                   While pooh-poohing the specious grounds on which Mr Nandy sought to appear on behalf caveatrix, it is then elucidated in para 6 that, “On facts, it is submitted that the caveatrix, Shefailka Ash was earlier represented by advocate and there is no reason for Mr. Nandy to suddenly seek to appear on behalf of the caveatrix. She submits that this is a ploy to delay the suit as the executor and the attesting witnesses are both elderly persons suffering from various ailments.”

                                    It cannot be lost on us that it is then pointed out in para 7 that, “The decisions relied upon by learned counsel for the plaintiffs date back to 1937 to a Full Bench decision of P. Thayarammal Vs. Pitty Kuppuswamy Naidu reported in 46 LW 734, where one of the issues was whether an agent with a power of attorney has the right of audience in a court. The facts in that case involved a widow who had given a power of attorney to one Krishnarmmal who had filed a suit against the widow’s sister. The power of attorney authorized the holder (respondent in that case) to appear and plead in court in person on the plaintiff’s behalf and to engage advocates. On a subsequent date, one S. Iyengar appeared on behalf of Krishnarmmal on the basis of a Vakalat given by her. The respondent challenged the validity of Iyengar’s Vakalatnama and claimed that by reason of the authority given to him in the power of attorney, the respondent has the same right as a legal practitioner who has been given a Vakalatnama, particularly when the power of attorney authorized him to plead in the Court. The judgment delivered by Sir Own Beasley, C.J. upon considering Order III Rules 1 and 2 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), held that the said provisions do not give a recognized agent any right to plead on behalf of his principal either in the Appellate or Original Side of this court. The court further relied on Section 119 of the CPC which provides the following:

“119. Unauthorized persons not to address Court. Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to authorize any person on behalf of another to address the Court in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction, or to examine witnesses, except where the Court shall have in the exercise of the power conferred by its charter authorized him so to do, or to interfere with the power of the High Court to make rules concerning advocates, vakils and attorneys.”

The second issue considered by the court was whether a power of attorney holder stands in the same footing as that of an Advocate holding a Vakalatnama wherein upon examining Chapter I of the Original Side Rules, the court held that an agent under a power of attorney has no right of audience in a court of law. The next decision of Pannalal Vs. Deoji Dhanji reported in AIR 1955 Madhya Bharat 109 looked into the question whether a Mukhtyar (recognized agent) could be allowed to cross-examine a witness. Again upon considering Order III Rule 1 of the CPC, the court held that a recognized agent cannot claim a right of audience and further that the distinction drawn in AIR 1948 EP 61, between addressing a court and examining witnesses, was not supported by earlier decisions on the subject. The court held that the words used in Order III Rule 1, namely, “appearance”, “application” or “acting” does not include examination and cross-examination of witnesses which requires an audience before a court. In coming to the aforesaid conclusion, the court relied on Jiwan Lal Vs. Ram Ratan reported in AIR 1936 Oudh 261, which succinctly held that Order III Rule 1 of the CPC does not justify a recognized agent being allowed to argue and plead. The court noted that the word “plead” has not been used in Order III Rule 1 of the CPC and cautioned against unqualified persons assuming the role of pleaders.”   

                                 To put it succinctly, it is then held in para 8 that, “I have considered the submissions of counsel appearing for the plaintiffs and Mr. Radhanath Nandy who seeks to argue on behalf of the defendant caveatrix. The issue before this court is whether appearance, application or acting by a recognized agent of a party would include within such scope, the right to plead and argue before a court of law as defined in Rule 2 of Order III. In this case, Mr. Nandy is admittedly a power of attorney holder on behalf of the caveatrix and claims a right to argue the case of the caveatrix including examining witnesses in the proceedings on the basis of the authorization arising from the power of attorney. The scope of the rights given to a holder of a power of attorney/recognized agent would be classified from a look at some of the other provisions in the CPC and the Original Side Rules. The first of such would be Section 2(15) of the CPC which says that only a pleader would be entitled to appear and plead for another in court and which would include an advocate, a vakil and an attorney of a High Court. The next provision is Chapter I, Rules 1 and 5 of The Original Side Rules. Under Rule 1, “acting” has been defined to include filing application or pleadings, affidavits or any act “other than pleading” authorized by law to be done by a party or by a recognized agent or by an Advocate. Under Rule 1 (i) (b), a person qualifies as an “advocate” if covered within the meaning of The Advocates Act, 1961. Rule 5 provides, inter alia, that an advocate shall not be entitled to appear and plead before a court unless he has filed a Vakalatnama or is instructed by an advocate who has filed a Vakalatnama. The rights granted under Order III Rule 1 is further clarified by Sections 8 and 29 of the Advocates Act, 1961 which provide, inter alia, that no person shall be entitled as of right to practice in any High Court unless his name is entered in the Roll of advocates of the High Court (Section 8) and that there is only one class of persons entitled to practice of law namely “advocates” (Section 29). Section 119 further prohibits unauthorized persons from addressing court and mentions examination of witnesses in particular.”

                           Be it noted, it is then observed in para 9 that, “On a conjoint reading of the aforesaid provisions, three propositions emerge; first, Order III Rule 1 specifically excludes the expression “plead” from the purview of “appearing” or “acting”. The expression plead, on the other hand, arises from the definition of “Pleader” under Section 2 (15) of the CPC. Second, advocates, vakils and attorneys of a High Court have been specifically included in the class of those who are entitled to plead for another before a court. Third, “pleading” as an exclusive domain has been formalized under Chapter I Rule 1 (i) (a) of the Original Side Rules which has specifically excluded “pleading” from “acting”.Rule 6 lays down the procedure by which a party can be entitled to act and plead for another. From the decisions cited on behalf of the plaintiffs, it is evident that the courts have stressed on the distinction namely, that acting and appearing for another will not include a right to plead or argue before a court of law. The anomaly in AIR 1948 EP 61 was departed from in Pannalal and the court followed the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Harchand Ray Vs. B.N. Rly. Co. reported in AIR 1916 Cal 181 (1) (B), where a person holding a power of attorney was not allowed to argue as the court held that a recognised agent had no right of audience before a court. Pannnalal is important as the Mukhtyar (recognised agent) in that case had sought to examine witnesses which Mr. Nandy also seeks to do in the instant case.”

                                 It is then underscored in para 10 that, “It is clear from the decisions as well as the releant statutes and Rules, that a special class of persons, namely, Advocates enrolled under The Advocates Act, 1961, have been authorised to plead and argue before a court of law. It should further be noted that the “special reason” of permitting “any other person” under Rule 5 of chapter I of The Original Side Rules relate only to appearance and not pleading. This is in consonance with Rule 1 (i) (a) which specifically mentions arious acts which a person authorized or a recognized agent can do “other than pleading”.”

                    Now let us discuss the concluding paras. It is held in para 11 that, “In view of the above discussion, G.A. 3659 of 2019 filed by the defendant for permitting Mr. Radhanath Nandy to appear and act on behalf of the defendant/caveatrix under Order III Rule 2 of the CPC, is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.”

                        Lastly, it is then held in para 12 that, “G.A. 3700 of 2017 being an application for dismissal of the Testamentary Suit shall be placed before the appropriate Bench. Urgent Photostat, certified copy of this Judgment, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.”

                               All in all, this significant and latest judgment by Calcutta High Court has made it amply clear that only advocates can argue or plead on behalf of litigants before the court. It has to be accepted unless and until the Supreme Court overrules it. There can be no denying ort disputing it! 


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  09 Apr 2019     Views:3531

Articles Updates

Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:876
Post-Merger Vision: HDFC Bank to Prioritize Profit...
01 Aug 2024     Views:783
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:974
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:877
The Mandal Verdict: Indra Sawhney and Its Lasting ...
22 Jul 2024     Views:1098
Supreme Court Emphasizes Direct and a Specific Ple...
22 Jul 2024     Views:882
Bail and Punishment Provisions of NDPS matters...
05 Apr 2023     Views:4317
The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:5157
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:5410
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:5483
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:5618
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:10053
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:5057
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:5354
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:5775
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:5593
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:2883
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:2502
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:2086
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:4987
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:21390
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:8219
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:4592
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:4135
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:8841
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:3944
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:3734
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:4803
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:3557
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1869
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2657
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2209
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1882
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:56276
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1796
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1925
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2114
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2065
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:6350
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1566
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1578
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1667
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:31185
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6351
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:3183
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:5931
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:10762
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3368
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2737
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:7763
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:54834
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1859
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1456
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1738
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1884
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1688
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:3426
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:1455
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:6338
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1844
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2127
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:1814
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:3406
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:12432
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1720
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1822
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:3284
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:4585
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:2393
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:10703
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:1524
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:6324
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2324
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2357
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2673
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:26092
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:4847
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1726
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:33448
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:1728
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:6619
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:1752
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:3792
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1705
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2898
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:19824
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1605
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1593
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1501
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1876
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2274
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1913
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1453
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1404
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1341
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1414
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:7042
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1773
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1617
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1356
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1666
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1854
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1506
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1356
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1417
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1803
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1706
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1408
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1550
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:8982
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1837
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1542
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1513
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1521
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:9966
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1583
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1458
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1443
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:1643
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:3327
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1356
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1388
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1740
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2456
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:1797
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:1943
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2081
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1512
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2743
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1620
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2145
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1451
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1693
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1709
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1697
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1544
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1430
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2751
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:6174
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:3947
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1911
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2143
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:2178
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:2090
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:2158
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:2674
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2077
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2029
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2674
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2235
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:5122
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:5877
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2252
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2354
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:1988
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:2303
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:2826
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:35446
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:4156
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:1936
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:1947
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:2013
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:2600
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1693
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:1712
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:2028
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:3409
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:2272
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:4084
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2087
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:2353
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:1774
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:1809
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:1729
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:1605
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:1392
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:1510
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:2371
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:1442
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:1673
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:1419
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1636
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1353
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:4756
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:4950
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:2460
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:1519
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:1621
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:5012
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:4612
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2355
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2301
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2214
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1655
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1504
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:2037
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1536
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2105
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1734
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1644
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1632
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1468
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1569
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1568
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1533
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1665
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1507
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1744
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1517
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1503
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:1448
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2159
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1604
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1522
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1545
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1940
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1859
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1392
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2995
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1802
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1706
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1520
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1573
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1758
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1679
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1742
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1702
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1927
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1505
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1752
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:1710
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1782
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1493
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1410
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2067
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1814
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:2076
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1608
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1462
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1496
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:5762
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:2323
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:1519
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:1558
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:1775
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:1474
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:1503
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:1429
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1795
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1948
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:1445
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:1576
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:1332
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:2027
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:1391
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:1579
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:2424
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2750
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2736
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2870
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1367
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1675
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:4956
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:2743
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:1893
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:2229
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:5727
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:1664
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:8982
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:1528
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:1746
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:1457
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:3199
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:1550
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:1392
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:3531
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4346
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:7401
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:6629
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1803
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1589
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2140
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2308
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2396
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2426
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1440
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1892
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2608
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3133
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2865
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3160
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1589
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1655
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3234
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:2545
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:3222
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2463
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2709
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2785
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:2054
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:2174
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2222
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2843
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1741
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1614
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1505
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:6689
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1646
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1822
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:12045
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:3796
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:1588
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2591
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2279
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2681
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:3258
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1867
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:2393
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:2006
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:2302
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2433
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2488
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2347
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:4474
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1599
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1727
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1576
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1511
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:3143
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1971
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2735
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2546
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3819
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2863
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1747
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2808
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1988
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1763
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2295
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2133
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:2443
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:3235
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:4167
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2514
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1781
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1851
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1789
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1956
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:2278
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:3127
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1872
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2348
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2129
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:1803
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1953
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1952
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2112
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:2158
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:2121
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:2436
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2401
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1900
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:1994
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1865
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3239
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3232
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3084
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2353
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1692
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1641
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2194
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2170
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1933
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:4771
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3346
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2665
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2257
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1651
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1544
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1706
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1530
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:2706
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2127
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2548
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:3137
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2226
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2310
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:1836
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:1588
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1748
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3535
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1577
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2994
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1517
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1878
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1765
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1930
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2126
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1949
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:1660
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:1791
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1573
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1531
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1655
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:2128
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1684
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1606
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:2988
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1575
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1843
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1580
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1604
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2154
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1676
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1716
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:1735
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:2255
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:2100
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:1775
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1539
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1567
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:2050
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:2213
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:1543
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1810
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1638
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2568
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1749
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2561
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1656
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2143
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2389
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1814
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1842

Most Read Articles

  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:56276
  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:54834
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:35446
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:33448
  • VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER
    On 20 Apr 2020    Views:31185
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.