• Services For Clients
      • Business Registrations

      • GST Registration (Person)
      • GST Registration (Company)
      • Importer Exporter Code
      • Trade License
      • FSSAI Registration
      • Udyog Aadhaar/MSME Registration
      • Shops & Establishments Registration
      • Partnership Firm Registration
      • Private Limited Company Registration
      • Producer Company Registration
      • Online Court Case Management System

      • Assisted Online Case(s) & Calendar Management
      • Property Services

      • Rental/Agreement
      • Property Legal Opinion (Verbal)
      • Property Legal Opinion (Written)
      • Sale Agreement
      • Sale Deed
      • Instant Legal Advise

      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Instant Legal Research Advisory (By Email)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Video Meet - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Case Analysis (By Phone - 30 Mins)
      • Case Status & Analysis (By Email)
      • Contracts & Agreements

      • Business Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • Affidavits, Notary, Wills & POAs

      • Affidavit
      • Notary
      • Will
      • Codicil
      • General Power of Attorney
      • Special Power of Attorney
      • Attestation
      • Revoke/cancel Power of Attorney
      • Legal Research & Judgement Analysis

      • Judgments Search
      • Related Judgements Analysis
      • Laws/Reports/Acts Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Intellectual Property Rights

      • Trade Mark Registration
      • Copyright Registration
      • Court Certified Copies

      • Order/Judgement Copy District/Trial Court
      • Entire Case Copy District/Trial Court
      • Other Documents/Copies District/Trial Court
      • Order/Judgement Copy High Court
      • Entire Case Copy High Court
      • Other Documents/Copies High Court
      • Order/Judgement Copy Supreme Court
      • Entire Case Copy Supreme Court
      • Other Documents/Copies Supreme Court
  • Services For Lawyers
      • Pleadings & Petitions Drafting

      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Trial Courts & Dist Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - High Courts & State Forums
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder drafting - Supreme Court & National Forums
      • Applications & Affidavits drafting
      • Petition/Plaint/Objections/Rejoinder Proof Reading
      • Indexing & Table of contents
      • Preparing & Marking Exhibits
      • E Filing
      • Online Office & Case Management

      • Assisted Online Case(s) & Calendar Management
      • Assisted Online Billing & Invoicing Assistance
      • Assistance in Recruiting Associates, Juniors, Staff
      • Assistance in Recruiting Interns
      • Translation, Transcription & Typing

      • Legal Translation/Transcription
      • On-call Typing
      • Typing
      • Trial Preparation

      • Opening & Closing Statements
      • Pointers & Charts
      • Drafting & Document Management

      • Drafting Contracts & Agreements
      • Vetting Contracts & Agreements
      • Document Conversion (Jpeg to Word/PDF, PDF to Word etc)
      • Content Paraphrasing
      • Drafting Wills/POAs/GPA/SPA/Affidavits
      • Legal Research

      • Judgment search
      • Laws, Acts & Reports Search
      • Judgment Summary
      • Related Judgments Search
  • +91 9632247247
  • Sign In/Sign Up
Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Assistant
  • +Lawyers

    • Display Boards
    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Petitions & Pleadings Templates
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
    • Get A Dedicated Legal Secretary
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses In Criminal Trial

Latest Articles

Back

SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses In Criminal Trial

Courtesy/By: SANJEEV SIROHI  |  26 Nov 2018     Views:742

It has to be said right at the outset that while setting aside a Kerala High Court order, the Bench of Apex Court comprising of Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre and Justice Indu Malhotra in a landmark judgment titled State of Kerala v Rasheed in Criminal Appeal No. 1321 of 2018 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 4652 of 2018 delivered on October 30, 2018 and authored by Justice Indu Malhotra observed that while deciding an application to defer cross examination under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. a balance must be struck between the rights of the accused, and the prerogative of the prosecution to lead evidence. The Apex Court in this landmark judgment also listed out ‘practical guidelines’ which needs to be followed by the trial courts in the conduct of a criminal trial, ‘as far as possible’. The Bench was considering an application against the Kerala High Court order that had set aside a trial court order which had refused to defer cross examination of some witnesses.

                                         To say the least, while allowing the petition of the accused, the Kerala high Court had directed that the cross-examination of some witnesses be adjourned till after the examination-in-chief of a particular witness. On Kerala State’s appeal, the Apex Court Bench observed that High Court gave no reasons for reversal of the Trial Court order refusing to defer cross examination and that the order was too cryptic. The Bench also listed the factors which must be considered while deciding an application under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C.

                                     To begin with, para 1 first and foremost points out that, “The present Criminal Appeal arises out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 4652 of 2018 wherein the impugned Order dated January 9, 2018 passed by the High Court of Kerala in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 171 of 2018 has been challenged.” To recapitulate, para 2 then points out that, “The relevant facts for deciding the present Criminal Appeal, are briefly set out below:

2.1 A First Information Report under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“Cr.P.C.”) was registered at the instance of CW 1-Narayanan. According to the Original Statement provided by him to the Police, Krishnaprasad, who was the occupant of a flat in the building where CW 1-Narayanan was serving as a security guard, had called for an ambulance. Krishnaprasad, along with others, then carried an unconscious person out of the bathroom of the flat to the ambulance. The unconscious person was later identified to be Satheesan, who was declared dead on being taken to the hospital. CW 1-Narayanan then made a statement that Krishnaprasad had been staying in the flat for two months, and was a companion of the Respondent-Accused No. 2 Rasheed. It was alleged that the flat had been taken on rent by the Respondent-Accused No. 2.

2.2 On May 24, 2016, the Police filed a Charge-Sheet under Section 173 of the Cr.P.C. before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court II, Thrissur against 8 persons, including the Respondent-Accused No. 2, for the alleged commission of offences under Sections 302, 343, 212, 201, 202, 118 and 109 read with Sections 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. It was alleged that the deceased Satheesan had disclosed information to his girlfriend, CW 5-Ajitha, regarding the activities which had been taking place inside the rented flat, and about the illicit relationship between the Respondent-Accused No. 2 and Accused No. 3-Saswathy. On learning about this, the Accused persons had allegedly detained Satheesan, tortured him and killed him with criminal intention.

2.3 Charges were framed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thrissur CWs 1 to 5 were summoned as Prosecution Witnesses on December 16, 2017.

        On the same day, after the examination-in-chief of CW 1-Narayanan was conducted, an Application under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. was filed by the Counsel for the Respondent-Accused No. 2 seeking adjournment of the cross-examination of CW 1-Narayanan, as also of CWs 2 to 5, to a date after the examination-in-chief of CWs 2 to 5 was completed. It was stated in the said Application, that the case of the Respondent-Accused No. 2 would be adversely affected if the Application was not allowed, since the defence strategy adopted by the Respondent-Accused No. 2 would be revealed to the Prosecution.

2.4 The Application under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. was opposed by the Prosecution which filed a Reply, wherein it was stated that CWs 1 to 5 were not deposing with respect to the same subject matter. It was further stated that the deferral of the cross-examination would adversely affect the Prosecution evidence.

2.5 The Additional Sessions Judge vide Order dated December 20, 2017 dismissed the Application field on behalf of the Respondent-Accused No. 2.

       The Additional Sessions Judge held that Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. confers a discretion on the Trial Judge to defer the cross-examination of any witness until any other witness or witnesses have been examined. Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. does not confer a right on the accused to seek deferral in a wholesale way on the ground that the defence of the accused would become known to the Prosecution. The deferral of cross-examination, in the present case, would run counter to the general provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

      The Additional Sessions Judge held that the deferral of cross examination in this case could give rise to the possibility of loss of memory on the part of the witness, who had already been examined-in-chief, which would adversely affect the case of the Prosecution.

       The Additional Sessions Judge also observed that no specific reason for deferring the cross-examination had been pleaded on behalf of the Respondent-Accused No. 2, apart from a general averment that the defence would be disclosed to the Prosecution.

        The Additional Sessions Judge was of the view that the Respondent-Accused No. 2 and Accused No. 7 are “highly influential political leaders”, and the possibility of the threats to witnesses after their examination-in-chief, could not be ruled out. Furthermore, it was observed that CWs 1 to 5 would be deposing on different facts and aspects of the case.

        The Additional Sessions Judge keeping in view the provisions of Sections 231(2) and 309 of the Cr.P.C. held that deferral of cross-examination is not an ordinary practice in a criminal trial, and dismissed the Application filed on behalf of the Respondent-Accused No. 2.

2.6 Aggrieved by the Order dated December 20, 2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, the Respondent-Accused No. 2 filed Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 171 of 2018 under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. before the High Court of Kerala.

     The High Court reversed the Order of the Additional Sessions Judge by a short unreasoned cryptic Order dated January 1, 2018, and allowed Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 171 of 2018. It was directed that the cross-examination of CWs 1 to 4 be adjourned till after the examination-in-chief of CW 5.

2.7 Aggrieved by the Order dated January 1, 2018 passed by the High Court, the State of Kerala has field the present Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 4652 of 2018 before this Court.”

                                       Going forward, it is then pointed in para 3 that, “The legal issue which arises for consideration in the present Criminal Appeal is whether the exercise of discretion under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. by the Additional Sessions Judge was valid and legally sustainable.” It is then pointed in para 4 that, “The statutory framework governing the order of production and examination of witnesses is contained inter alia in Sections 135 and 138 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. A conjoint reading of Sections 135 and 138 would indicate that the usual practice in any trial, be it civil or criminal, is for the examination-in-chief of a witness to be carried out first; followed by his cross-examination (if so desired by the adverse party), and then re-examination (if so desired by the party calling the witness).”

                                                  Simply put, para 5 then goes on to state that, “Section 231 of the Cr.P.C. indicates that the Judge is given the discretion to defer cross-examination of a witness, until any other witness or witnesses have been examined.

   Section 231 is set out hereinbelow:

   “231. Evidence for prosecution. – (1) On the date so fixed, the Judge shall proceed to take all such evidence as may be produced in support of the prosecution.

(2) The Judge may, in his discretion permit the cross-examination of any witness to be deferred until any other witness or witnesses have been examined or recall any witness for further cross-examination.”

                                                           (Emphasis supplied)

The phraseology of Section 231(2) mirrors Section 242(3) [“242. Evidence for prosecution. – … (3) On the date so fixed, the Magistrate shall proceed to take all such evidence as may be produced in support of the prosecution:

               Provided that the Magistrate may permit the cross-examination of any witness to be deferred until any other witness or witnesses have been examined or recall any witness for further cross-examination.”] of the Cr.P.C. which provides for a similar discretion to a Magistrate in the trial of a Warrant Case under Chapter XIX of the Cr.P.C.”

                                     It would be imperative to mention here that para 6 then goes on to reveal that, “Section 242(3) is analogous to Section 251A(7) of the repealed Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 and is identically worded. Section 251A was inserted vide the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1955 (Act No. 26 of 1955) in the erstwhile Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.

              The Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1955 suggests inter alia that changes were introduced to simplify the procedure in warrant cases, to ensure speedy disposal of criminal judicial business, to minimise inconvenience caused to witness, and to ensure that adjournments are not allowed without the examination of witnesses present in court, except for an unavoidable cause.

   The Karnataka High Court in Shamoon Ahmed Sayed & Anr. v. Intelligence Officer 2009 CriLJ 1215: ILR 2008 Karnataka 4378, delivered by Shantanagoudar, J. (as he then was), had observed that Section 231(2) as well as Section 242(3) of the Cr.P.C. must be interpreted in light of the legislative intent behind the enactment of Section 251A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.”

                               More importantly, it is then revealed in para 7 that, “What follows from the discussion is that the norm in any criminal trial is for the examination-in-chief of witnesses to be carried out first, followed by cross-examination, and re-examination if required, in accordance with Section 138 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

       Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C., however, confers a discretion on the Judge to defer the cross-examination of any witness or witnesses have been examined, or recall any witness for further cross-examination, in appropriate cases. Judicial discretion has to be exercised in consonance with the statutory framework and context while being aware of reasonably foreseeable consequences. [ A Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. V. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 565 had elucidated upon the nature and manner of exercise of judicial discretion in paragraph 21. The relevant extract has been reproduced hereunder:

      “…Every kind of judicial discretion, whatever may be the nature of the matter in regard to which it is required to be exercised, has to be used with due care and caution. In fact, an awareness of the context in which the discretion is required to be exercised and of the reasonably foreseeable consequences of its use, is the hallmark of a prudent exercise of judicial discretion.”]

                                                            (Emphasis supplied)

The party seeking deferral under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. must give sufficient reasons to invoke the exercise of discretion by the Judge, and deferral cannot be asserted as a matter of right.

     Several High Courts have held that the discretion under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. should be exercised only in “”exceptional circumstances” (Sisir Debnath v. State of West Bengal & Anr. [C.R.R. No. 2533 of 2017; decided on August 2, 2017 by the High Court of Calcutta (Appellate Side)]; Shamoon Ahmed Sayed & Anr. v. Intelligence Officer, 2009 CriLJ 1215: ILR 2008 Karnataka 4378), or when “a very strong case” (Amit Kumar Shaw & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Anr. [C.R.R. No. 3846 of 2009; decided on June 23, 2010 by the High Court of Calcutta (Appellate Side)]) has been made out. However, while it is for the parties to decide the order of production and examination of witnesses in accordance with the statutory scheme, a Judge has the latitude to exercise discretion under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. if sufficient reasons are made out for deviating from the norm.”

                                  To be sure, para 8 then points out that, “The circumstances in which the High Courts have approved the exercise of discretion to defer cross-examination, so as to avoid prejudice due to disclosure of strategy are:

·      Where witnesses were related to each other, and were supposed to depose on the same subject-matter and facts (SriShankar v. State by Hebbagodi Police Station, [Cri. P. No. 8774 of 2017; decided on December 7, 2017 by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru]; Masiur Rahman Molla @ Mongla & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal & Ors. [C.R.R. No. 2411 of 2016; decided on August 10, 2016 by the High Court of Calcutta (Appellate Side)]; Jayakar v. The State by Frazer Town Police, ILR 1996 KARNATAKA 2783: 1996(3) KarLJ 747);

·      Where witnesses were supposed to depose about the same set of facts (R. Selvan v State [Crl.R.C. (MD) No. 744 of 2016; decided on January 24, 2017 by High Court of Madras, at Madurai): 2017(2) Crimes 509(Mad.)).

However, the circumstances in which deferral has been refused are:

·      where the ground for deferral was the mere existence of a relationship between the witnesses (Sisir Debnath v. State of West Bengal & Anr. [C.R.R. No. 2533 of 2017; decided on August 2, 2017 by the High Court of Calcutta (Appellate Side)]);

·      where specific reasons were not given in support of the claim that prejudice would be caused since the defence strategy would be disclosed (Pradeep Kumar Kolhe v. State of Madhya Pradesh [M.C.R.C. No. 20240 of 2018; decided on July 11, 2018 by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, at Indore]; State of Maharashtra v Raja Ram Appana Mane & Ors. [Criminal Writ Petition No. 578 of 2016 and Criminal Application No. 2485 of 2016; decided on January 23, 2017 by the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad]; Amit Kumar Shaw & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Anr [C.R.R. No. 3846 of 2009; decided on June 23, 2010 by the High Court of Calcutta (Appellate Side)]; Md. Sanjay & Anr. v. The State of West Bengal, 2000 CriLJ 608: 2001 (1) RCR (Criminal) 431);

·      where no prejudice would have been caused (The High Court in Calcutta in Lalu Alam v. State of West Bengal [Cr. Revision No. 385 of 1996; decided on June 12, 2002 by the High Court of Calcutta (Appellate Side)] : 2002 (3) CHN 301 had noted:

     “…So, the plea, taken by the petitioner in this case that if Miss Banerjee is cross-examined before the examination-in-chief of the other named witnesses on the same point, the prosecution will certainly have an opportunity to fill up a lacuna, cannot be accepted as a general rule as in a criminal trial the accused has an additional advantage inasmuch as the copies of earlier statement of the prosecution witnesses, recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. are supplied well in advance so that he can not only know to his advantage what each prosecution witness is expected to tell while in the witness box but has also the advantage of cross-examining each and every witness with reference to their earlier statement made by them during the investigation…In a situation like this, hardly it can be accepted that if the cross-examination of Ms. Bannerjee is allowed to be proceeded with before examination of the other witnesses in this case, the present petitioner would be highly prejudicial and prosecution will have the opportunity in filling up the lacuna in this case.”

                                  (Emphasis supplied)

The High Court of Karnataka in Shamoon Ahmed Sayed & Anr. v. Intelligence Officer, 2009 CriLJ 1215 : ILR 2008 Karnataka 4378 had noted that no prejudice be caused since:

       “…In most of the criminal cases, there may be more than one eye witness and definitely will be more than one mahazar witness. Many cases depend upon the official witness only who may have to depose about the similar facts. Thus the defence may choose to file application invoking Section 231(2) or under Section 242(3) of Cr.P.C. on the ground of alleged prejudice to be caused in every matter. But the same cannot be allowed by the Court. As aforementioned, the defence of the accused will not be prejudiced at all as the examination-in-chief of the witnesses generally will proceed based on either the statement recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C. or based on mahazar, etc.”)

                                                         (Emphasis supplied)

                           It cannot be lost on us what has been enunciated in para 9. It clearly and categorically lays down that, “The Delhi High Court, in Vijay Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), W.P. (Crl.) No. 1350 of 2017 and Crl. M.A. No. 7450 of 2017; decided on July 3, 2017 by the High Court of Delhi : 2017 CriLJ 3875, laid down useful directions for the conduct of criminal trials. The directions are commendable, and relevant excerpts are reproduced herein below:

     “42…(vi). Since the expectation of law is that the trial, once it commences, would continue from day-to-day till it is concluded, it is desirable that, keeping in mind the possible time required for recording of evidence (particularly of the prosecution), a detailed schedule of the dates of hearing on which evidence would be recorded is drawn up immediately after charge is framed – this, taking into account not only the calendar of the court but also the time required by the prosecution to muster and secure the presence of its witnesses as well as the convenience of the defence counsel. Once such a schedule has been drawn up, all sides would be duty bound to adhere it scrupulously.

(vii) While drawing up the schedule of dates for recording of the evidence for the prosecution, as indicated above, the presiding judge would take advice from the prosecution as to the order in which it would like to examine its witnesses, clubbing witnesses pertaining to the same facts or events together, for the same set of dates.

(viii) If the defence intends to invoke the jurisdiction of the criminal court to exercise the discretion for deferment of cross-examination of particular witness(es) in terms of Section 231(2) so that the order in which the witnesses are to be called can be appropriately determined, facilitating short deferment for cross-examination (when necessary) so that the recording of evidence continues, from day-to-day, unhindered avoiding prolonged adjournments as are often seen to be misused to unduly influence or intimidate the witnesses.

(ix) It is the bounden duty of the presiding judge of the criminal court to take appropriate measures, if the situation so demands, to insulate the witnesses from undue influence or intimidatory tactics or harassment. If the court has permitted deferment in terms of Section 231(2) or 242(3) Cr.PC. for cross-examination of a particular witness, it would not mean that such cross-examination is to be indefinitely postponed or scheduled for too distant a date. The court shall ensure that the deferred cross-examination is carried out in the on-going schedule immediately after the witness whose examination ahead of such exercise has been prayed for.”

                                 Of course, it is then made clear in para 10 in no uncertain terms that, “There cannot be a straitjacket formula providing for the grounds on which judicial discretion under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. can be exercised. The exercise of discretion has to take place on a case-to-case basis. The guiding principle for a Judge under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. is to ascertain whether prejudice would be caused to the party seeking deferral, if the application is dismissed.”

                            Now turning to para 11, it envisages that, “While deciding an Application under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C., a balance must be struck between the rights of the accused, and the prerogative of the prosecution to lead evidence.

      The following factors must be kept in consideration:

·      possibility of undue influence on witness(es);

·      possibility of threats to witness(es);

·      possibility that non-deferral would enable subsequent witnesses giving evidence on similar facts to tailor their testimony to circumvent the defence strategy;

·      possibility of loss of memory of the witness(es) whose examination-in-chief has been completed;

·      occurrence of delay in the trial, and the non-availability of witnesses, if deferral is allowed, in view of Section 309(1) of the Cr.P.C. [ “309. Power to postpone or adjourn proceedings. – (1) In every inquiry or trial the proceedings shall be continued from day-to-day until all the witnesses in attendance have been examined, unless the Court finds the adjournment of the same beyond the following day to be necessary for reasons to be recorded…” See also Vinod Kumar v State of Punjab, (2015) 3 SCC 220; and Lt Col. SJ. Chaudhary v. State (Delhi Administration), (1984) 1 SCC 722]

These factors are illustrative for guiding the exercise of discretion by a Judge under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C.”

                            It is of utmost significance to note here that para 12 then minces no words in making it absolutely clear that, “The following practice guidelines should be followed by trial courts in the conduct of a criminal trial, as far as possible:

i. a detailed case-calendar must be prepared at the commencement of the trial after framing of charges;

ii. the case-calendar must specify the dates on which the examination-in-chief and cross-examination (if required) of witnesses is to be conducted;

iii. the case-calendar must keep in view the proposed order of production of witnesses by parties, expected time required for examination of witnesses, availability of witnesses at the relevant time, and convenience of both the prosecution as well as the defence, as far as possible;

iv. testimony of witnesses deposing on the same subject-matter must be proximately scheduled;

v. the request for deferral under Section 231(2) of the Cr.P.C. must be preferably made before the preparation of the case-calendar;

vi. the grant for request of deferral must be premised on sufficient reasons justifying the deferral of cross-examination of each witness, or set of witnesses;

vii. while granting a request for deferral of cross-examination of any witness, the trial courts must specify a proximate date for the cross-examination of that witness, after the examination-in-chief of such witness(es) as has been prayed for;

viii. the case-calendar, prepared in accordance with the above guidelines, must be followed strictly, unless departure from the same becomes absolutely necessary;

ix. in cases where trial courts have granted a request for deferral, necessary steps must be taken to safeguard witnesses from being subjected to undue influence, harassment or intimidation.  

                              While setting aside the impugned order of the High Court, it is then held in para 13 that, “In the present case, a bald assertion was made by the Counsel for the Respondent-Accused No. 2 that the defence of the Respondent-Accused No. 2 would be prejudiced if the cross-examination of CWs 1 to 5 is not deferred until after the examination-in-chief of CWs 2 to 5.

      The impugned Order is liable to be set aside since the High Court has given no reasons for reversal of the Order of the Additional Sessions Judge, particularly in light of the possibility of undue influence and intimidation of witness(es) since the Respondent-Accused No. 2 and Accused No. 7 are “highly influential political leaders”.

                               In the ultimate analysis, para 14 then concludes by observing that, “In view of the aforesaid discussion, the present Criminal Appeal is allowed, and the impugned Order dated January 9, 2018 passed by the High Court of Kerala in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 171 of 2018 is set aside. The Order dated December 20, 2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge dismissing the Application filed on behalf of the Respondent-Accused No. 2 stands restored. The observations made hereinabove will, however, have no bearing on the merits of the case during the course of trial.

         Ordered accordingly.”


                              All said and done, it is beyond an iota of doubt that the guidelines laid down by the Apex Court in this landmark case must be followed by all trial courts as well as High Courts. There can be no denying or disputing it! This will certainly bring about uniformity in trial procedures and ensure that witnesses are not made to suffer senselessly and are protected from being intimidated, harassed or unduly influenced in any manner! No doubt, witnesses are the eyes and ears of justice and they must be given full protection and their interest must be given paramount importance so that they can depose in court without any fear because this alone will ensure that justice ultimately triumphs in the end and the perpetrators of crime are sent where they should be sent that is in jail!    



Courtesy/By: SANJEEV SIROHI  |  26 Nov 2018     Views:742

Articles Updates

The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:96
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:66
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:67
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:364
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:473
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:256
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:493
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:434
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:619
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:474
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:876
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:580
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:2883
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:16420
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:5199
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:2491
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:2422
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:6026
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:2222
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:2275
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:2481
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1824
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:826
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1296
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:804
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:690
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:28239
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:608
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:760
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:980
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:866
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2274
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:582
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:555
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:578
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:11715
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:4783
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:1932
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:3374
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:8493
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:1502
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:1517
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:5269
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:45272
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:555
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:530
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:565
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:657
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:638
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:2104
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:546
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:3709
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:666
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:897
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:596
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:1741
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:9137
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:666
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:608
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:1390
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:1926
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:1312
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:6596
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:618
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:2431
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1050
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1146
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1344
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:21639
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1176
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:617
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:18075
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:710
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:2980
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:701
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:2019
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:600
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:983
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:11313
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:500
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:540
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:560
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:559
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:999
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:799
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:534
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:497
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:467
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:466
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:3846
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:558
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:545
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:460
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:601
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:692
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:484
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:447
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:477
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:653
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:659
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:463
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:503
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:4276
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:494
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:548
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:534
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:460
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:2778
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:541
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:491
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:533
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:629
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1147
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:459
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:538
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:568
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:890
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:409
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:655
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:748
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:521
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:880
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:525
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:985
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:519
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:489
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:614
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:761
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:556
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:496
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:838
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2864
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:2364
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:808
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1045
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:965
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:807
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:983
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:1400
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:961
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:882
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1361
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:984
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:3119
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:3075
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1054
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1037
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:898
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:1144
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:1447
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:23380
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:2141
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:785
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:860
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:777
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:952
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:676
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:601
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:805
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:1439
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:1086
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2170
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:901
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:926
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:668
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:688
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:717
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:523
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:510
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:575
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:831
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:521
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:534
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:506
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:673
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:479
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:2775
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:2656
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:846
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:653
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:713
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2676
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2616
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:1127
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1087
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1057
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:726
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:554
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:586
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:562
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:801
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:679
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:617
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:632
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:507
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:589
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:578
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:521
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:550
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:529
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:747
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:545
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:544
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:502
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:795
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:592
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:626
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:536
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:628
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:812
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:588
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1758
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:666
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:635
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:542
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:568
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:711
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:632
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:645
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:476
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:769
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:560
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:718
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:620
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:808
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:564
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:540
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:902
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:655
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:819
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:593
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:572
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:508
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:4329
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:930
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:531
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:520
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:600
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:450
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:441
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:546
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:913
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1119
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:551
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:580
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:479
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:836
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:447
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:656
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:902
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1186
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1046
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1287
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:519
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:546
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:1483
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:1317
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:807
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:1119
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:3452
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:565
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:5049
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:571
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:521
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:569
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:1748
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:560
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:555
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:1984
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:2396
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:3060
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:3498
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:767
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:638
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1168
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1091
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1193
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1061
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:613
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:886
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1321
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1476
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1331
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1726
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:631
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:662
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1539
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:1245
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:1921
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1150
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1328
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1552
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:892
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:1058
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1165
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1425
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:734
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:631
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:591
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:2137
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:633
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:716
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:7511
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:1838
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:662
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1326
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1134
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1414
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1727
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:834
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:914
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:969
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:990
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1215
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1272
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1170
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1000
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:675
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:597
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:638
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:598
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:742
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:871
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1467
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1306
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2456
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1654
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:788
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1361
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:951
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:606
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1054
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:605
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:1317
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:1725
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:2638
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1450
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:860
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:936
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:931
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:976
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:1112
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:1678
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:888
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1370
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1056
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:804
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:863
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:898
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1019
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:912
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:911
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:1079
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1167
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:938
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:758
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:891
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1892
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1726
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1924
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1359
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:773
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:739
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:898
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:817
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:900
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2789
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1492
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1435
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1191
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:676
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:637
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:643
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:716
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:1037
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1090
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1269
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:1553
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1244
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1407
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:835
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:712
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:717
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1921
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:688
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1058
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:664
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:704
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:759
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:834
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:845
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:733
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:724
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:715
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:638
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:649
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:719
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:883
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:680
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:663
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1389
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:722
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:600
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:641
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:653
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1178
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:714
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:706
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:632
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:928
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:825
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:714
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:645
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:674
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:908
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:1230
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:674
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:748
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:689
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1279
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:840
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1245
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:755
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1000
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:821
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:815
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:701

Most Read Articles

  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:45272
  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:28239
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:23380
  • How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Liability?
    On 09 Apr 2020    Views:21639
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:18075
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile
  • Demo My Legal Assistant
  • Demo My Legal Secretary

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Campus Ambassadors
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1122 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.