• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Ground Of ‘Concurrent Findings’: SC

Latest Articles

Back

Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Ground Of ‘Concurrent Findings’: SC

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  18 Aug 2019     Views:1907

It would be imperative to mention right at the outset that the Supreme Court has just recently on August 14, 2019 in State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs Shiv Dayal & Anr. in Civil Appeal No. 7363 of 2000 With Civil Appeal No. 7364 of 2000 And Civil Appeal No. 7365 of 2000 has laid down in no uncertain terms that a High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable. It must be pointed out that in this case, the Rajasthan High Court Bench at Jaipur dismissed a second appeal filed by the State on the ground that since two Courts have decreed the suit, resulting in passing of the decree against the State, there arises no substantial question of law in the appeals. But the Supreme Court differed with this approach!

                                To start with, this latest, landmark and laudable judgment authored by Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre for himself and Justice R Subhash Reddy sets the ball rolling by first and foremost pointing out in para 1 wherein it is pointed out that, “These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 23.03.1999 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur in S.B. Civil Second Appeal Nos. 83, 84 and 85 of 1999 whereby the High Court dismissed the second appeals filed by the appellants herein.”

                               Briefly stated, para 2 then points out that, “A few facts need mention hereinbelow for the disposal of these appeals, which involve a short point.” Para 3 then discloses that, “The appellants are the defendants and respondent No. 1 is the plaintiff in the civil suit out of which these appeals arise.” Para 4 further discloses that, “The appellant No. 1 is the State of Rajasthan and respondent No. 1 claims to be the mining lessee in relation to the suit land under the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act (hereinafter referred to as “MMRD Act”).”

                                      Truth be told, it is then unravelled in para 5 that, “The respondent No. 1 filed a civil suit against the appellant – State and its authorities and claimed therein a relief of grant of permanent injunction restraining the State and its authorities from interfering in carrying out the mining operations on the suit land by respondent No. 1.” Para 6 then further elaborates saying that, “Respondent No. 1 claimed this relief inter alia on the averments that the suit land was not the part of any protected Forest area as claimed by the State authorities but it was a part of the Revenue area. It was averred that since the suit land did not fall in the protected forest area, the respondent No. 1 (plaintiff) had a right to carry out mining operation on the suit land without any interference of the State and its authorities.”  

                                  Be it noted, para 7 then clearly states that, “The State contested the suit by denying the averments made in the plaint. The Trial Court frmaed issues. Parties led their evidence. By Judgment and decree dated 10.05.1998, the Trial Court decreed in favour of the plaintiff in the suit and granted an injunction against the State and its authorities in relation to the suit land, as prayed in the plaint.”

                             As a consequence, we then find palpably what is stated in para 8 that, “The State felt aggrieved and filed first appeal before the District Judge. By Judgment dated 03.09.1998, the first Appellate Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment/decree of the Trial Court giving rise to filing of the second appeals by the State in the High Court.”     

                                   What follows next is elaborated in para 9 which reveals that, “By impugned order, the High Court dismissed the second appeals holding that the appeals did not involve any substantial question of law. It is against this order, the State felt aggrieved and has filed the present appeals by way of special leave before this Court.”

                         Shortly put, it is then asked in para 10 that, “So, the short question, which arises for consideration in these appeals, is whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the State’s second appeals on the ground that these appeals did not involve any substantial question of law.”

                            Do note, para 12 then illustrates stating that, “Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we are constrained to allow the appeals, set aside the impugned order and remand the case to the High Court for deciding the second appeals afresh on merits in accordance with law.”   

                      While elaborating further, it is then observed in para 13 that, “In our opinion, the need to remand the case to the High Court has arisen because we find that the second appeals did involve several substantial questions of law for being answered on merits in accordance with law. The High Court was, therefore, not right in so holding.”

                                 Going forward, it is then stipulated in para 14 that, “Indeed, we find that the High Court dismissed the second appeals essentially on the ground that since the two Courts have decreed the suit, no substantial question of law arises in the appeals. In other words, the High Court was mostly swayed away with the consideration that since two Courts have decreed the suit, resulting in passing of the decree against the State, there arises no substantial question of law in the appeals. It is clear from the last paragraph of the impugned order, which reads as under:

         “Under these circumstances, when both the Ld. Courts have arrived at the conclusion that the disputed area is outside the forest area. Therefore, the principles laid down in T.N. GODAWARAN vs. U.O.I. (above-quoted) cannot be enforced in this appeal.”

                                                 (Emphasis supplied).” 

                                       What’s more, it is then made amply clear in para 15 that, “We do not agree with the aforementioned reasoning and the conclusion arrived at by the High Court.” Also, the Apex Court then seeks to make it clear in para 16 that, “It is not the principle of law that where the High Court finds that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), such finding becomes unassailable in the second appeal.”

                                       Not stopping here, it is then further clarified in para 17 that, “True it is as has been laid down by this Court in several decisions that “concurrent finding of fact” is usually binding on the High Court while hearing the second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code). However, this rule of law is subject to certain well known exceptions mentioned infra.”

                                       Needless to say, para 18 then holds that, “It is a trite law that in order to record any finding on the facts, the Trial Court is required to appreciate the entire evidence (oral and documentary) in the light of the pleadings of the parties.” In a similar vein, para 19 too holds that, “Similarly, it is also a trite law that the Appellate Court also has the jurisdiction to appreciate the evidence de novo while hearing the first appeal and either affirm the finding of the Trial Court or reverse it.”

                                 Moving on, para 20 then says, “If the Appellate Court affirms the finding, it is called “concurrent finding of fact” whereas if the finding is reversed, it is called “reversing finding”. These expressions are well known in the legal parlance.”

                                  It would be pertinent to mention here that the Apex Court then observes in para 21 that, “When any concurrent finding of fact is assailed in second appeal, the appellant is entitled to point out that it is bad in law because it was recorded de hors the pleadings or it was based on no evidence or it was based on misreading of material documentary evidence or it was recorded against any provision of law and lastly, the decision is one which no Judge acting judicially could reasonably have reached. (see observation made by learned Judge – Vivian Bose, J. – as his Lordship then was a Judge of the Nagpur High Court in Rajeshwar Vishwanath Mamidwar & Ors. vs. Dashrath Narayan Chilwelkar & Ors., AIR 1943 Nagpur 117 – Para 43).”

                                 Frankly speaking, it is then made clear in para 22 that, “In our opinion, if any one or more ground, as mentioned above, is made out in an appropriate case on the basis of the pleading and evidence, such ground will constitute substantial question of law within the meaning of Section 100 of the Code.”

                            To put things in perspective, it is then held in para 23 that, “Coming to the facts of the case, we are of the view that the following are the questions which do arise for consideration in the suit/appeal for proper adjudication of the rights of the parties to the suit and are in the nature of substantial questions within the meaning of Section 100 of the Code.”

                               To be sure, let us now discuss them turn by turn. To begin with, para 24 while laying the groundwork points out that, “First, whether the suit land was a part of a protected Forest area, i.e., Forest land and, if so, whether the parties satisfied all the statutory provisions of the Forest Laws enacted by the Center and the State?” Para 25 then further states that, “Second, whether the suit land was a part of a Revenue land and, if so, whether the parties to the suit satisfied all the statutory provisions of the State Revenue Laws.”

                                     Furthermore, para 26 then envisages that, “Third, whether a mining lease of the suit land could be granted by the State to the plaintiff for carrying out the mining operation in accordance with the provisions of the MMRD Act and, if so, whether it satisfied all the statutory provisions of the MMRD Act read with relevant Forest and Revenue Laws.” Para 27 then says that, “Fourth, whether a suit is hit by any provision of Forest Laws or MMRD Act or/and Revenue Laws expressly or by implication.”

                                            Now turning to the last question, it is then postulated in para 28 that, “Lastly, whether the plaintiff on facts/evidence has proved that the suit land is a part of Revenue land and, therefore, it does not fall in the protected forest area and, if so, whether any prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss is made out for grant of permanent injunction in plaintiff’s favour?”

                      To put it succinctly, it is then held by the Apex Court in para 29 that, “In our opinion, all the five questions enumerated above did arise in the suit. As a matter of fact, the suit could not have been tried properly without deciding these questions in the light of the pleadings, evidence and the applicable laws mentioned above.”

                                  Suffice it to say, it is then very rightly held in para 30 that, “In our view, the High Court, therefore should have admitted the second appeal by framing appropriate substantial question(s) of law arising in the case and answered them on their respective merits rather than to dismiss the appeals without considering any of the aforementioned questions.”

                                  As a corollary, it is then aptly said in para 31 that, “It is for this reason, we are of the view that the interference in the impugned order is called for to enable the High Court to decide the controversy in its proper perspective.”

                                       In a nutshell, it is then held in para 32 that, “In the light of the foregoing discussion, the appeals succeed and are accordingly allowed. The impugned order is set aside. The case is remanded to the High Court for deciding the second appeals afresh on merits after framing appropriate substantial questions of law(s) arising in the case.”

                                 Interestingly enough, it is then clarified in para 33 that, “Needless to say, the High Court will frame proper questions keeping in view the pleadings/evidence and the findings of two Courts in the context of relevant provisions of the specific Forest Acts (Centre and State), MMRD Act and State Revenue Laws.” It is also then clarified further in para 34 that, “We, however, make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case having formed an opinion to remand the case to the High Court for deciding afresh.”

                                More significantly, the Apex Court then makes it clear in para 35 that, “It was, however, brought to our notice that during pendency of the appeals Shiv Dayal-plaintiff/respondent No. 1 in civil suit has expired. We, however, find that his wife – Smt. Kasturi Devi is already on record in two connected appeals/civil suits; Second, all the three suits/appeals, i.e., the one filed by Shiv Dayal and two filed by his wife Kasturi Devi were clubbed together for their analogues disposal; Third, when one legal representative of the deceased is already on record, the appeal would not abate; and lastly, when the remand of the case is directed, consequential steps to bring remaining legal representative of the deceased on record, if there are, can always be taken before the High Court in pending appeals. It is for these four reasons, we are of the view that the appeals filed against Shiv Dayal have not abated.”

                                         It cannot be lost on us that para 36 then makes it clear that, “The parties are, however, granted liberty to make necessary amendments in the cause title of the second appeals after remand of the case to the High Court by deleting the name of Shiv Dayal and substitute in his place the name of his wife-Kasturi Devi and his other legal representatives, if there are, before hearing of the second appeals.” Lastly, it is then held in para 37 that, “We request the High Court to expedite the hearing of the appeals preferably within 6 months.”

                           All said and done, this latest, landmark and laudable judgment leaves no one in doubt that second appeal is not to be dismissed merely on the ground of concurrent findings of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit). All the courts must always keep this in mind while deciding on such cases! This would be certainly the right approach also! This would save them also from getting a rap on the knuckles by the top court!

                                  While disagreeing with the Rajasthan High Court Bench at Jaipur for dismissing the second appeal filed by the appellant on the ground of concurrent findings, the Apex Court set aside the Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench order and remanded the matter to consider it afresh. Very rightly so! There can be no denying it! 


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  18 Aug 2019     Views:1907

Articles Updates

Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:1421
Post-Merger Vision: HDFC Bank to Prioritize Profit...
01 Aug 2024     Views:1270
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:1468
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:1355
The Mandal Verdict: Indra Sawhney and Its Lasting ...
22 Jul 2024     Views:2092
Supreme Court Emphasizes Direct and a Specific Ple...
22 Jul 2024     Views:1381
Bail and Punishment Provisions of NDPS matters...
05 Apr 2023     Views:4815
The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:5662
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:5923
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:6017
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:6082
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:10581
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:5544
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:5808
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:5898
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:6051
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:3332
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:2936
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:2534
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:5436
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:21883
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:8659
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:5020
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:4605
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:9321
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:4359
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:4163
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:5250
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:3992
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2265
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:3083
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2628
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2298
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:56864
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2196
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2348
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2515
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2493
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:6801
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1984
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1991
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2067
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:32116
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6809
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:3588
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6356
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:11212
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3778
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3145
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:7892
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:55347
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:2278
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1847
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:2147
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:2307
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:2095
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:3818
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:1523
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:6812
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2220
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2569
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:2216
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:3816
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:12880
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:2127
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:2207
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:3719
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:5063
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:2820
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:11155
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:1911
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:6757
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2724
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2774
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:3083
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:26564
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:5433
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2140
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:34028
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:2127
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:7291
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:2152
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:4210
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2129
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2996
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:20308
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2017
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1985
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1557
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2295
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2689
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2301
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1862
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1803
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1738
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1811
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:7521
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2176
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2016
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1733
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2106
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2268
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1913
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1719
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1802
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2247
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:2106
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1826
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1947
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:9421
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:2210
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1919
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1922
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1892
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:10558
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:2030
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1819
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1880
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:2063
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:3827
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1785
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1791
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2138
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2901
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:2210
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2347
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2490
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1893
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:3195
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2012
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2553
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1837
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2094
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2110
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2101
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1937
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1827
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2885
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:6631
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:4383
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2311
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2537
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:2582
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:2481
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:2591
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:3091
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2507
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2441
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:3085
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2625
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:5607
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:6345
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2667
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2771
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:2398
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:2681
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:3236
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:35991
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:4587
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:2344
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:2352
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:2444
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:3092
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:2054
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:2130
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:2436
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:3528
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:2688
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:4558
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2486
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:2749
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:2198
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:1888
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:2121
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:2041
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:1793
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:1899
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:2750
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:1818
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:2085
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:1825
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:2057
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1727
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:5201
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:5426
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:2893
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:1907
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:2010
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:5459
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:5052
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2776
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2699
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2608
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2030
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1913
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:2430
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1959
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2184
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2138
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2022
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2038
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1854
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1961
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1972
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1936
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:2055
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1884
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:2152
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1949
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1880
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:1847
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2581
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2011
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1941
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1924
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2343
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2260
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1452
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:3408
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:2205
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:2112
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1584
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1960
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:2152
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:2071
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:2157
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:2094
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:2349
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1909
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1868
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:2103
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1849
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1886
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1823
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2470
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2254
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:2470
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1667
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1855
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1906
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:6179
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:2745
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:1911
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:1945
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:2204
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:1898
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:1922
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:1817
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:2173
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:2363
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:1833
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:1962
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:1736
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:2443
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:1450
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:1971
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:2828
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:3159
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:3166
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:3316
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1791
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:2068
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:5547
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:3183
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:2314
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:2652
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:6138
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:2056
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:9487
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:1599
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:2138
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:1856
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:3610
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:1625
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:1783
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:3918
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4808
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:8849
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:7241
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:2202
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1968
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2546
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2721
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2463
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2489
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1842
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2313
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2673
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3535
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3267
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3550
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1651
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2026
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3681
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:2973
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:3644
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2873
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2782
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:3193
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:2123
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:2587
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2626
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:3215
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2144
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:2031
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1905
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:7174
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:2039
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:2235
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:12445
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:4270
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:1999
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2665
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2688
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:3078
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:3349
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2282
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:2800
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:2426
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:2725
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2849
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2871
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2772
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:5053
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2003
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2098
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1983
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1895
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:3605
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2369
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:3151
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2928
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:4231
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3282
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2155
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3254
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2404
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2148
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2676
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2532
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:2858
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:3673
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:4624
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2578
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2181
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:2253
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:2203
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:2364
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:2702
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:3570
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2270
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2766
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2514
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:2206
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2371
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2372
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2493
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:2544
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:2529
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:2832
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2799
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2338
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:2472
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2276
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3664
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3626
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3493
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2770
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2107
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2064
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2614
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2576
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2336
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:4881
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3773
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3060
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2622
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2049
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1921
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2119
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1953
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:3122
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2538
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2930
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:3584
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2667
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2679
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:2237
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:1955
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2166
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3996
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1989
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3417
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1913
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2278
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2189
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2345
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2536
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2354
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:2046
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:2205
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1979
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1934
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:2070
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:2582
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:2076
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1992
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:3443
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1982
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2222
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1966
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1985
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2575
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2096
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2095
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:2143
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:2703
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:2529
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:2168
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1918
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1988
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:2461
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:2662
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:1954
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1854
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2037
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2973
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1797
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2984
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2053
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2204
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2794
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1876
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2235

Most Read Articles

  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:56864
  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:55347
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:35991
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:34028
  • VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER
    On 20 Apr 2020    Views:32116
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims
Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.