• +91 9632247247
  • Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The Accused U/s 313 CrPC; Non-Consideration Can Vitiate Conviction: SC

Latest Articles

Back

Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The Accused U/s 313 CrPC; Non-Consideration Can Vitiate Conviction: SC

Courtesy/By: SANJEEV SIROHI  |  26 Nov 2018     Views:803

It must be observed right at the outset that in a remarkable and landmark judgment delivered on October 31, 2018 in Reena Hazarika v State of Assam in Criminal Appeal No. 1330 of 2018 (arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 2440 of 2018) authored by Justice Navin Sinha for himself and Justice RF Nariman, the two Judge Bench of Apex Court observed quite clearly and convincingly that a solemn duty is cast on the court in the dispensation of justice to adequately consider the defence of the accused taken under Section 313 CrPC and to either accept or reject the same for reasons specified in writing. It was also held that, “Section 313, Cr.P.C. cannot be seen simply as a part of audi alteram partem, rather it confers a valuable right upon an accused to establish his innocence”. It also made it explicitly clear that if there has been no consideration at all of the defence taken by the accused under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the conviction can stand vitiated.   

                              In retrospect, it must be pointed out that a woman, who was convicted for the murder of her husband, had approached the Apex Court assailing concurrent verdicts of the trial court and the high court. In her 313 CrPC statement, she had stated that she was falsely implicated by one Manoj. She also said that she suspects some other persons are behind the murder of her husband.

                                   To put things in perspective, it is pointed out in para 2 that, “The appellant is the wife of the deceased convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default, imprisonment for one month.” It is then pointed in para 3 that, “The deceased resided along with the appellant and his minor daughter CW-1, Miss Puja Hazarika, aged about 9 years, in the tenanted premises belonging to PW-1 Manoj Kumar Deka, PW-2 Dipen Deka and PW-3 Bhrigumoni Deka, who are brothers. The appellant is stated to have assaulted the deceased in the intervening night of 10.05.2013/11.05.2013. PWs. 1, 2 and 3 are stated to have heard noises and on going there, found the deceased with head injury attributed to a fall, but that the deceased was otherwise alright. They were unable to take him to the hospital because of rains and the unavailability of an ambulance. According to the post-mortem report proved by PW-6, Dr. Ritu Raj Chaliha the deceased had the following injuries on his person:-

(i)                         Chop wound of size 11cm x 2cm x muscle deep present on left side of cheek 6 cm medial tragus and 1 cm above angle of mandible.

(ii)                      Chop wound of size 9cm x 2cm x muscle deep present back of occipital region.

(iii)                   Chop wound of size 4cm x 2cm x muscle deep present on left side of forearm.

(iv)                   Laceration of size (5 x 4) cm present over left wrist joint on posterior aspect.

(v)                      Chop wound of size (4 x 1) cm x muscle deep, present over temporal region on right side.

(vi)                   Chop wound of size (6 x 2) cm of muscle deep present over back of scapula.

(vii)                Fracture of temporal bone on both sides.

 All injuries were ante mortem and caused by moderately heavy sharp cutting weapon and homicidal in nature.

                                     Simply put, it is then pointed out in para 4 that, “The Trial Court and the High Court held that the present was a case of circumstantial evidence. The last seen theory establishes the presence of the appellant with the deceased at night. Her unnatural conduct because she was not crying, she was the assailant of the deceased.” It is then rightly elaborated upon in para 5 that, “Mr. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the courts below have erred in holding that the links in the chain of circumstances stood established leading to the only inescapable conclusion of the appellant being the assailant and no other hypothesis of innocence being possible. PW-6 has deposed that the injuries were caused by a moderately heavy sharp cutting weapon such as a dao, and that the fracture of the temporal bone may have been caused by a moderate heavy weapon. The recovery from the place of occurrence, as proved by PW-7 S.I. Nilomani Malakar, is of an ordinary knife used for cutting betel nut, one feet long with a bent sharp point. Chop injuries were not possible with the same. The alleged knife was not even shown to PW-6 for eliciting opinion if the injuries could have been caused by the same.”  

                                   Going forward, para 6 then states that, “Miss Diksha Rai, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appellant was last seen with the deceased in the room, confirmed by CW-1. The appellant has failed to offer any explanation of the circumstances as to how the death occurred at night. Her unnatural conduct in not even weeping was also noticed by PW-7. The knife used for assault , and blood soaked clothes of the deceased have also been recovered.”

                                Striking a note of caution, it is then observed in para 7 that, “We have considered the respective submissions, the orders of the courts below, as also the evidence available on record. Normally this court under Article 136 of the Constitution, would be reluctant in appeal to interfere with the concurrent findings of two courts by reappreciating the facts and evidence. But in an appropriate case, if this court finds that there has been erroneous consideration and appreciation of facts and evidence, leading to miscarriage of justice, this court is duty bound to ensure that ultimately justice prevails. It is a well established principle of criminal jurisprudence that several accused may go free, but an innocent person should not be punished. In Anant Chintaman Lagu v. State of Bombay, (1960) 2 SCR 460 this court observed as follows:-

“16. Ordinarily, it is not the practice of this Court to re-examine the findings of fact reached by the High Court particularly in a case where there is concurrence of opinion between the two Courts below. But the case against the appellant is entirely based on circumstantial evidence, and there is no direct evidence that he administered a poison, and no poison has, in fact been detected by the doctor, who performed the post-mortem examination, or by the Chemical Analyser. The inference of guilt having been drawn on an examination of a mass of evidence during which subsidiary findings were given by the two Courts below, we have felt it necessary, in view of the extraordinary nature of this case, to satisfy ourselves whether each conclusion on the separate aspects of the case, is supported by evidence and is just and proper. Ordinarily, this Court is not required to enter into an elaborate examination of the evidence, but we have departed from this rule in this particular case, in view of the variety of arguments that were addressed to us and the evidence of conduct which the appellant has sought to explain away on hypotheses suggesting innocence. These arguments, as we have stated in brief, covered both the factual as well as the medical aspects of the case, and have necessitated a close examination of the evidence once again, so that we may be in a position to say what are the facts found, on which our decision is rested”.”  

                                  While reiterating that benefit of doubt must be given to the accused, it is then stated in para 8 that, “The essentials of circumstantial evidence stand well established by precedents and we do not consider it necessary to reiterate the same and burden the order unnecessarily. Suffice it to observe that in a case of circumstantial evidence the prosecution is required to establish the continuity in the links of the chain of circumstances, so as to lead to the only and inescapable conclusion of the accused being the assailant, inconsistent or incompatible with the possibility of any other hypothesis compatible with the innocence of the accused. Mere invocation of the last seen theory, sans the facts and evidence in a case, will not suffice to shift the onus upon the accused under Section 106 of the Evidence Act, 1872 unless the prosecution first establishes a prima facie case. If the links in the chain of circumstances itself are not complete, and the prosecution is unable to establish a prima facie case, leaving open the possibility that the occurrence may have taken place in some other manner, the onus will not shift to the accused, and the benefit of doubt will have to be given.”

                                 Needless to say, para 9 then brings out that, “Before proceeding with the discussion further, we deem it proper to notice that the appellant did not have the benefit of a lawyer of her choice, both before the trial court and the High Court, naturally because of some handicap. She had to be provided legal assistance by the Legal Services Authority. This is not to make any comment or observation on the nature of the defence made available with the appellant but only to notice her handicap in establishing her innocence.”

                                        As it turned out, para 10 then observes that, “Pw-1 deposed that he was told by the deceased at about 11:00 p.m. on 10.05.2013 that he had suffered a head injury because of a fall, and that the witness did not provide any first aid to the deceased though he along with his brother PW-2, did try to call an ambulance at about 12:00 am. Additionally, that he did not see any other injuries on the deceased. On the contrary, CW-1 deposed that PW-1 had applied Dettol to the wounds of the deceased.” What follows next is para 11 which envisages that, “Contrary to the statement of PW-1, his brother, PW-2 deposed that he was woken up at about 2-3 a.m. by the appellant who was crying and told him that her husband had suffered head injury. The deceased is then stated to have himself told the witness that the injury was not serious. The contradiction in the evidence of PW-1 and PW-2 is further compounded by the third brother PW-3, deposing that PW-2 informed him of the injury to the deceased at 12:00 am. All the three witnesses have deposed that the deceased was of heavy built, because of which they were unable to take him to the hospital on the motor-cycle, for the treatment. The post mortem however recites that the deceased was of average built. If the deceased had merely suffered a head injury by fall and was otherwise fit to talk to the witnesses, we see no reason why he could not have been taken to the hospital on a motorcycle. While PW-3 states that the deceased was wearing clothes, the post-mortem report shows that the deceased was brought in an underwear only. The clothes of the deceased were found near the well in a gunny bag. But PW-7 did not consider it necessary to have the blood group examined by the FSL, which in our opinion in the facts of the case is a major lapse.”  

                       While pooh-poohing the serious charges levelled against the appellant, it is then observed in para 12 that, “The post-mortem report makes it evident that the chop wounds could not have been caused by the small knife alleged to have been recovered. Fracture of the temporal bone with the knife was an impossibility. PW-6 in the deposition ruled out that the injury could be caused by a fall. The post mortem did not find any alcohol in the body of the deceased. The witness also opined that injury no. 4 could have been caused while the deceased may have attempted to save himself from assault. The multiple injuries could certainly not have been caused by one person and tells an entirely different story by itself that the assailants may have been more than one. The chop injuries were possible by a modertae and heavy weapon like a dao. In our opinion also, if the deceased was of average built, it is difficult to accept, according to normal prudence and human behaviour and capacity, that the appellant being a woman, could have made such severe and repeated assault on the deceased, who was her husband, with a small knife, without any resistance and suffered no injury herself.”

                                     Punching further into the holes of the prosecution version, it is then observed in para 13 that, “PW-7 claimed to have found a knife with the smell of Dettol. Even if the knife had been wiped to erase traces of blood the wooden handle could have revealed much if it had been sent to the FSL. The witness again offers no explanation why he did not do so. No bottle of Dettol has been recovered. There is absolutely no evidence that the deceased would often assault the appellant and the minor child in a drunken condition. The fact that PW-7 did not notice tears in the eyes of the appellant, deemed an unnatural conduct by the courts below, cannot be sufficient to draw an adverse inference of guilt against the appellant. The appellant being in a helpless situation may have been stunned into a shock of disbelief by the death of her husband. It is not uncommon human behaviour that on the death of a near relative, or upon witnessing a murderous assault, a person goes into complete silence and stupor showing no reaction or sensibility. We also find it difficult to believe and rely upon the evidence of CW-1 primarily because of her minority. If the deceased had been assaulted by the appellant in the room at night, it would certainly have led to noise and shouts and the witness could not have possibly slept throughout without waking up.”

                                    It also cannot be lost on us that the very basis of the prosecution case against the appellant stands eroded when we go through para 14. It is pointed out in para 14 that, “PW-1 deposed that he informed the police the next morning at about 8:00 a.m. But PW-7 has deposed that information was given to the police station by PW-1 at about 12:00 p.m. on 11.05.2013 and the General Diary entry no. 452 made in the police station at 12.20 p.m., and the F.I.R. registered at 7:45 p.m. These are suspicious circumstances which leaves enough time for planning after thinking for the manner in which allegations were to be made for deflecting that the occurrence took place in a manner other than what may have happened actually.”

                         To be sure, it is then brought out in para 15 that, “In the background of the aforesaid discussion regarding the nature of evidence and the manner of its appreciation, we deem it proper to set out the English translation in the paper book of defence taken by the appellant under Section 313 Cr.P.C. as follows:-

“Ans: On the date of occurrence at about 8-8:30 while I have returend from my work at Satgaon, I saw that my husband was lying in the room with bleeding injury. On my cry, Manoj Deka and his brothers come there with drink in the hand of one brother. Thereafter I saw Manoj Deka was putting Dettol on the wound of my husband. I also rang to 108 ambulance. When, I wanted to call police Manoj Deka, snatched the phone from me. On my crying neighbouring peoples arrived there. I tred to take my husband to medical but due to non co-operation by Manoj Deka and others, I failed to take him to Medical. On that night at about 9.30 my husband expired and Manoj Deka and other neighbours were sitting. Subsequently, Manoj Deka has falsely implicated me. I have the suspicion that my husband was physically assaulted earlier at some place by Mintu Nath, Dipak Das and Jeetu Deka while taking liquor and brought my husband on injured condition and laid in the room. I also saw the lock of my room in broken condition, when I arrived here. I have not killed my husband. I am innocent.”

In this same para, it is then pointed out that, “PW-2 has acknowledged in his evidence that he would have drinks with the deceased. According to the post-mortem report, the stomach of the deceased was found empty, suggesting that the assault had taken place earlier in the evening contrary to the evidence of PWs. 1, 2 and 3 suggesting the assault in the late hours of the night by which time the deceased would undoubtedly have had his dinner.”

                      While underscoring the rights conferred by Section 313 of the Cr.P.C on the accused, para 16 then points out that, “Section 313, Cr.P.C. cannot be seen simply as a part of audi alteram partem. It confers a valuable right upon an accused to establish his innocence and can well be considered beyond a statutory right as a constitutional right to a fair trial under Article 21 of the Constitution, even if it is not to be considered as a piece of substantive evidence, not being on oath under Section 313(2), Cr.P.C. The importance of this right has been considered time and again by this court, but it yet remains to be applied in practice as we shall see presently in the discussion to follow. If the accused takes a defence after the prosecution evidence is closed, under Section 313(1)(b) Cr.P.C. the Court is duty bound under Section 313(4) Cr.P.C. to consider the same. The mere use of the word ‘may’ cannot be held to confer a discretionary power on the court to consider or not to consider such defence, since it constitutes a valubale right of an accused for access to justice, and the likelihood of the prejudice that may be caused thereby.Whether the defence is acceptable or not and whether it is compatible or incompatible with the evidence available is an entirely different matter. If there has been no consideration at all of the defence taken under Section 313 Cr.P.C., in the given facts of a case, the conviction may well stand vitiated. To our mind, a solemn duty is cast on the court in dispensation of justice to adequately consider the defence of the accused taken under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and to either accept or reject the same for reasons specified in writing.”  

                        It is then lamented in para 17 that, “Unfortunately neither Trial Court nor the High Court considered it necessary to take notice of much less discuss or observe with regard to the aforesaid defence by the appellant under Section 313 Cr. P.C. to either accept or reject it. The defence taken cannot be said to be irrelevant, illogical or fanciful in the entirety of the facts and the nature of other evidence available as discussed hereinbefore. The complete non-consideration thereof has clearly caused prejudice to the appellant. Unlike the prosecution, the accused is not required to establish the defence beyond all reasonable doubt. The accused has only to raise doubts on a preponderance of probability as observed in Hate Singh Bhagat Singh vs State of Madhya Bharat AIR 1953 SC 468. A similar view is expressed in M. Abbas vs. State of Kerala, (2001) 10 SCC 103 as follows:-

“10….On the other hand, the explanation given by the appellant both during the cross-examination of prosecution witnesses and in his own statement recorded under Section 313 CrPC is quite plausible. Where an accused sets up a defence or offers an explanation, it is well settled that he is not required to prove his defence beyond a reasonable doubt but only by preponderance of probabilities….”

                           While allowing the appeal in para 19, it is then finally and perhaps most importantly held in para 18 that, “The entirety of the discussion, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of evidence available coupled with the manner of its consideration, leaves us satisfied that the links in the chain of circumstances in a case of circumstantial evidence, cannot be said to have been established leading to the inescapable conclusion that the appellant was the assailant of the deceased, incompatible with any possibility of innocence of the appellant. The possibility that the occurrence may have taken place in some other manner cannot be completely ruled out. The appellant is therefore held entitled to acquittal on the benefit of doubt. We accordingly order the acquittal and release of the appellant from custody forthwith, unless wanted in any other case.” Rightly said!


Courtesy/By: SANJEEV SIROHI  |  26 Nov 2018     Views:803

Articles Updates

The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:1015
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:782
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:849
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:1220
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:2967
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:963
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:1336
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:1311
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:1476
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:1139
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:1372
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:882
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:3323
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:18769
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:6461
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:2927
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:2843
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:6958
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:2619
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:2605
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:3075
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2225
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1004
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1521
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1112
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:908
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:40922
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:799
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:972
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1153
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1113
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:3423
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:766
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:714
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:755
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:18208
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:5212
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:2168
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:4113
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:9355
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2127
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:1765
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:5844
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:50712
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:737
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:677
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:721
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:866
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:823
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:2353
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:688
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:4824
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:922
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1155
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:887
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:2108
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:10856
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:868
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:942
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:1904
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:2888
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:1504
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:8335
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:775
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:4429
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1436
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1352
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1647
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:23917
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2219
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:827
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:26832
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:884
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:4018
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:917
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:2573
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:770
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1421
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:15817
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:635
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:711
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:702
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:713
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1253
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1024
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:669
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:644
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:614
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:602
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:4721
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:707
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:713
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:593
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:760
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:997
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:640
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:593
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:659
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:850
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:828
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:597
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:671
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:5628
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:695
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:734
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:673
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:609
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:4974
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:709
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:629
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:679
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:777
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1598
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:586
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:680
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:734
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1202
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:712
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:843
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:901
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:659
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1278
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:675
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1157
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:709
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:638
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:771
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:925
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:698
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:646
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1240
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:3858
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:2949
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1020
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1230
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:1192
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:1059
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:1233
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:1687
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:1191
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:1117
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1625
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1224
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:3818
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:4430
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1288
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1302
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:1079
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:1338
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:1819
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:30296
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:2685
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:979
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:1045
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:953
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1297
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:830
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:774
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:1015
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:2020
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:1377
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2599
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:1129
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:1470
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:853
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:930
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:893
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:684
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:654
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:725
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:1441
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:687
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:719
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:619
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:851
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:599
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:3236
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:3214
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:1142
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:816
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:891
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:3226
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:3076
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:1348
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1274
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1250
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:931
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:760
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:737
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:716
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:976
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:881
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:768
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:800
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:640
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:788
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:732
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:678
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:731
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:675
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:934
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:691
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:726
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:642
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:957
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:738
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:782
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:694
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:770
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:978
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:729
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2058
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:868
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:800
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:699
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:742
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:876
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:797
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:810
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:603
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:973
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:712
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:918
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:779
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:984
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:712
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:699
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1212
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:842
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1040
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:745
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:714
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:692
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:4823
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:1183
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:676
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:686
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:808
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:595
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:744
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:692
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1053
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1267
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:681
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:729
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:609
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:1047
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:590
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:829
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:1288
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1522
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1402
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1619
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:665
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:754
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:2096
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:1647
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:991
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:1361
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:4231
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:724
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:6381
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:732
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:878
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:740
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:1953
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:711
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:718
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:2266
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:2805
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:3785
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4400
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:932
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:793
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1379
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1398
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1456
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1364
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:776
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1067
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1685
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1973
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1792
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2065
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:881
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:839
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1864
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:1562
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:2260
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1469
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1638
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1860
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:1138
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:1317
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1408
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1825
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:966
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:774
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:732
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:3516
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:796
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:896
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:9681
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:2264
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:814
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1591
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1427
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1678
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2117
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1009
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:1250
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:1201
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:1250
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1513
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1551
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1392
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1321
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:823
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:739
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:803
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:740
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1384
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1015
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1718
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1652
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2836
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1988
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:983
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1610
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1168
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:981
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1269
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1403
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:1557
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:1981
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:3142
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1740
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1017
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1125
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1068
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1174
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:1450
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:2221
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1030
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1622
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1227
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:982
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1057
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1067
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1218
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:1256
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:1092
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:1548
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1410
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1123
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:1003
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1083
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2208
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1992
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2338
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1555
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:918
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:861
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1060
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:961
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1093
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3227
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2118
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1718
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1421
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:827
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:765
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:836
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:861
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:1249
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1290
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1690
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:2023
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1422
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1575
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:1015
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:865
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:862
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2306
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:833
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1617
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:791
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:870
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:895
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:982
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1060
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1118
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:861
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:906
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:770
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:771
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:840
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:1079
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:841
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:811
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1796
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:852
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:806
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:766
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:778
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1323
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:862
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:857
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:757
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:1140
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:1048
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:847
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:775
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:804
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:1094
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:1352
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:809
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:916
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:836
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1501
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:981
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1476
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:886
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1158
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1330
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:981
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:845

Most Read Articles

  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:50712
  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:40922
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:30296
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:26832
  • How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Liability?
    On 09 Apr 2020    Views:23917
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1127 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.