• +91 9632247247
  • Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability Of Complicity Of A Person Required: SC

Latest Articles

Back

Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability Of Complicity Of A Person Required: SC

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  04 Apr 2019     Views:4402

It would be imperative to mention right at the outset that in a significant pronouncement, the Supreme Court just recently on March 15, 2019 in Sugreev Kumar v. State of Punjab & Ors in Criminal Appeal No. 509 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 9687 of 2018  has unequivocally reiterated that to add a person as additional accused under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, stronger evidence is required than mere probability of complicity of that person. This notable and commendable judgment authored by Justice Dinesh Maheshwari for himself and Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre while setting aside an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court unambiguously observed that while invoking Section 319 CrPC should not proceed as if an infallible case is required to be shown by the prosecution in order to proceed against the proposed accused persons. Very rightly so!

                                         While leave is granted in para 1, we then see that para 2 brings out that, “In this appeal, the complainant-appellant has called in question the judgment and order dated 02.07.2018 in Criminal Revision Application No. 2626 of 2014 whereby, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, has upheld the order dated 24.07.2014 as passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fazilka in S.C. No. 9 of 14.01.2014 on an application filed under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (‘crPC’) seeking summoning of additional accused persons to stand the trial.”

                                    As things stand, para 2.1 then brings out that, “The sessions case aforesaid is pending trial for the offences under Sections 302, 307, 341, 34 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’) and Sections 25, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act. By the said order dated 24.07.2014 on the application under Section 319 CrPC, the Trial Court, while partly granting the prayer of the prosecution to summon one of the accused Sonu son of Jaipal to face the trial, has dismissed the prayer for summoning the other 7 persons namely, Krishan Dev, Vikash son of Krishan Dev, Rajan, Mukesh @ Jungli, Devinder @ Veeru, Surinder Mahal and Prithvi Raj.”

                                      In hindsight, it is then observed in para 3 that, “The background aspects, so far relevant for the present purpose, could be noticed, in brief, as follows:

3.1 The prosecution case is that on 29.08.2013, the appellant accompanied by his father, brother and other associates, proceeded to reclaim possession of their land from the erstwhile tenants in compliance with the directions issued by the Court of Assistant Collector Grade-1, than on reaching the site at about 3:30 p.m., they found that the concerned revenue officers were not present and while they were making their way back to the village in search of the revenue officers, 3-4 cars intercepted them and about 10-12 persons emerged from the said vehicles, some of them being the alleged tenants, who were armed with pistols, rifles, swords, dangs, sotas and 12 bore gun; and that after a heated exchange of words, the appellant, his family members and their associates were attacked by the accused which resulted in the demise of the appellant’s father and brother while the others sustained varying injuries with the appellant receiving three bullet injuries.

3.2 For the incident in question, FIR came to be filed against 11 persons for the offences under Sections 302, 307, 341, 148 and 149 IPC as also Sections 27, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act. However, after investigation, only 3 persons, namely, Vikram Gilla, Gurmit Singh and Sunil Kumar, were charge-sheeted.

3.3 In trial, the appellant was examined by the prosecution as PW-1, who asserted in relation to the incident in question, inter alia, as under:-

       “…… After alighting from the car Vikas raised Alarm that they be taught lesson for taking possession of their land. Then Vikram fired from his rifle on my father which hit him. Then my brother Sandeep alighted from the Jeep and Vikram with his rifle fired two shots at him which hit on the left side of his chest and waist. Krishan again raised Lalkara and instigated Sonu why are you standing and asked him to kill all sons of Hanuman. Then Sonu fired three shots from, his revolver out of which two fires on my chest near the heart and one near the left shoulder. Vikram again fired shot from his gun on my father which hit him on his waist. Then allthe accused started indiscriminating firing with their revolver, 12 bore gun and pistols and the fires hit with the vehicles. Mahi Ram, Budh Ram, my father and Sham Lal our servant. Thereafter we raised Raula of MAR DITTA MAR DITTA. Then accused tried to run away on their vehicles but Innova did not start and they left the Innova then along with 12 bore rifle and ran away from the spot in another vehicles….(sic)”

3.4 In his cross-examination, the appellant deposed that Krishan Dev, Vikas, Sonu, Rajan, Mukesh @ Jungli, Devinder @ Veeru, Surinder Mahal and Pirthi Raj were declared innocent after investigation by the police, but volunteered to state that they were wrongly declared innocent.

3.5 Pending further cross-examination of the appellant, an application under Section 319 CrPC was filed by the prosecution to summon the aforesaid 8 persons to face trial on the basis of the testimony of the appellant (PW-1), wherein, he had asserted that all of them were present at the crime scene; and had assaulted and injured the applicant, his family members and associates on exhortation by Krishan Dev which resulted in the demise of his father and brother. Hence, it was submitted that there was sufficient material on record to summon all the aforesaid persons to face the trial in this case.”

                                       To be sure, it is then pointed out in para 4 that, “In its impugned order dated 24.07.2014, the Trial Court referred to certain inconsistencies in the testimony of the appellant as compared to his statement under Section 161 CrPC and the FIR; and found no case for summoning 7 of the aforesaid persons but considered it just and proper to summon Sonu son of Jaipal, who had allegedly fired three shots from his firearm, which hit the appellant.”

                              As it turned out, it is then disclosed in para 5 that, “Against the order aforesaid, the appellant filed a criminal revision petition, being CRR No. 2626 of 2014, before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh which was dismissed by the impugned order dated 02.07.2018. It is mentioned in paragraph 4 of the order impugned that the learned counsel for the petitioner had confined the relief only qua the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, Krishan Dev and Vikas son of Krishan Dev. The High Court upheld the order of the Trial Court while observing as under:

           “11. In this case, statements of complainant and witnesses is same, which were recorded by the police during investigation. Learned trial Court has observed in its order that Vikas was attributed lalkara to the effect that complainant party be taught lesson for taking possession of the disputed land while Sugreev (PW) had admitted in his cross-examination that possession of the disputed land had not yet been taken by them. This shows that respondents, Krishna Dev and Vikas were arrayed as accused because of enmity between the parties and the police during investigation had collected the evidence which prove that both these respondents were far away from the place of occurrence.

         12. Hon’ble Apex Court in the case Brijendra Singh (supra) has observed that for summoning the additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. degree of satisfaction is much stricter. Power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is discretionary and extraordinary power which is to be exercised sparingly and only in those cases where circumstances of the case so warrants and strong and cogent evidence occurs against a person from the evidence led before the Court and not in a casual and cavalier manner. …….”

                                   As anticipated, para 6 then envisages that, “Assailing the order aforesaid, the learned counsel for the appellant has strenuously argued that the High Court as also the Trial Court have failed to consider the fact that respondent No. 2 Krishan Dev and respondent No. 3 Vikas are the main perpetrators of the crime; and had planned everything in advance for executing the crime and to escape from the law. Learned counsel would submit that the exhortation (lalkara) was a previously planned one as the possession of the land was to be handed over to the appellant and his family members; that the Innova car, which is registered in the name of respondent No. 2, was recovered from the scene of the crime; and that the report submitted by the police is based on the statement of witnesses at the instance of the respondents Nos. 2 and 3, where some of them are related to respondent No. 2 and while the others are his acquaintances. Learned counsel would submit that with the evidence available on record, a clear case for proceeding against the aforesaid persons alongwith the charge-sheeted accused is made out. Learned counsel for the appellant has referred to and relied upon the decisions in Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab : (2014) 3 SCC 92 and Brijendra Singh & Ors. V. State of Rajasthan : (2017) 7 SCC 706.”

                                      On the contrary, it is then brought out in para 7 that, “Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents have duly supported the orders impugned and have submitted that no case for interference is made out as the Court under Section 319 of CrPC are to be exercised sparingly and, in this case, the Trial Court and the High Court, after having thoroughly examined the record, found no substance in the application so moved. More specifically, learned counsel for respondent No. 6 has pointed out that before the High Court, the appellant had given up the challenge qua this respondent. Learned counsel would submit that the impugned order has been passed after due consideration of the material on record; that his name was neither reflected in the FIR nor in the statement under Section 161 CrPC; that after police investigation, nothing incriminating was found against him and even the Trial Court has found no cogent evidence against him.”

                                       Furthermore, para 8 then stipulates that, “During the course of submissions, it has been pointed out that since after passing of the orders impugned, further evidence of the prosecution was recorded in the trial and thereafter another application under Section 319 CrPC was moved for summoning of the aforesaid 7 persons but the same was also rejected by the Trial Court on 28.09.2018. It has also been submitted that practically, the entire prosecution evidence in the matter is over.”

                                       To put it succinctly, the Bench then held in para 9 that, “Having given anxious consideration to the rival submissions and having examined the record with reference to the law applicable, we are clearly of the view that the disposal of applications moved in this matter under Section 319 CrPC cannot be approved; and in the given set of facts and circumstances, it appears just and proper that the Trial Court should re-examine the entire matter with reference to the principles applicable to the case, in order to take a decision afresh as to whether the persons above-named or any of them deserve to be tried together with the other accused persons.”

                                 While encapsulating the purpose behind Section 319 of CrPC, the Bench then underscores in para 10 that, “It remains trite that the provisions contained in Section 319 CrPC are to achieve the objective that the real culprit should not get away unpunished. By virtue of these provisions, the Court is empowered to proceed against any person not shown as an accused, if it appears from evidence that such person has committed any offence for which, he could be tried together with the other accused persons. In Hardeep Singh (supra), the Constitution Bench of this Court has explained the purpose behind this provision, inter alia, in the following:

        “12. Section 319 Code of Criminal Procedure springs out of the doctrine judex damnatur cum nocens absolvitur (judge is condemned when guilty is acquitted) and this doctrine must be used as a beacon of light while explaining the ambit and the spirit underlying the enactment of Section 319 Code of Criminal Procedure.

          13. It is the duty of the court to do justice by punishing the real culprit. Where the investigation agency for any reason does not array one of the real culprits as an accused, the court is not powerless in calling the said accused to face trial. The question remains under what circumstances and at what stage should the court exercise its power as contemplated in Section 319 CrPC?  

***                     ***                      ***

              19. The court is the sole repository of justice and a duty is cast upon it to uphold the rule of law and, therefore, it will be inappropriate to deny the existence of such powers with the courts in our criminal justice system where it is not uncommon that the real accused, at times, get away by manipulating the investigating and/or the prosecuting agency. The desire to avoid trial is so strong that an accused makes efforts at times to get himself absolved even at the stage of investigation or inquiry even though he may be connected with the commission of the offence.”

                                     What’s more, it is then significantly laid down in para 11 that, “As regards the degree of satisfaction required for invoking the powers under Section 319 CrPC, the Constitution Bench has laid down the principles as follows:

        “95. At the time of taking cognizance, the court has to see whether a prima facie case is made out to proceed against the accused. Under Section 319 CrPC, though the test of prima facie case is the same, the degree of satisfaction that is required is much stricter. A two-Judge Bench of this Court in Vikas v. State of Rajasthan, held that on the objective satisfaction of the court a person may be “arrested” or “summoned”, as the circumstances of the case may require, if it appears from the evidence that any such person not being the accused has committed an offence for which such person could be tried together with the already arraigned accused persons.

***                 ***                ***

         105. Power under Section 319 CrPC is a discretionary and an extraordinary power. It is to be exercised sparingly and only in those cases where the circumstances of the case so warrant. It is not to be exercised because the Magistrate or the Sesssions Judge is of the opinion that some other person may also be guilty of committing that offence. Only where strong and cogent evidence occurs against a person from the evidence led before the court that such power should be exercised and not in a casual and cavalier manner.

         106. Thus, we hold that though only a prima facie case is to be established from the evidence led before the court, not necessarily tested on the anvil of cross-examination, it requires much stronger evidence than mere probability of his complicity. The test that has to be applied is one which is more than prima facie case as exercised at the time of framing of charge, but short of satisfaction to an extent that the evidence, if goes unrebutted, would lead to conviction in the absence of such satisfaction, the court should refrain from exercising power under Section 319 CrPC. InSection 319 CrPC the purpose of providing if “it appears from the evidence that any person not being the accused has committed any offence” is clear from the words “for which such person could be tried together with the accused.” The words used are not “for which such person could be convicted”. There is, therefore, no scope for the court acting under Section 319 CrPC to form any opinion as to the guilt of the accused”.”

                                     Simply put, is then noted in para 12 that, “Thus, the provisions contained in Section 319 CrPC sanction the summoning of any person on the basis of any relevant evidence as available on record. However, it being a discretionary power and an extraordinary one, is to be exercised sparingly and only when cogent evidence is available. The prima facie opinion which is to be formed for exercise of this power requires stronger evidence than mere probability of complicity of a person. The test to be applied is the one which is more than a prima facie case as examined at the time of framing charge but not of satisfaction to the extent that the evidence, if goes uncontroverted, would lead to the conviction of the accused.”

                                        It is a no-brainer that the Bench then held in para 13 that, “While applying the above-mentioned principles to the facts of the present case, we are of the view that the consideration of the application under Section 319 CrPC in the orders impugned had been as if the existence of a case beyond reasonable doubt was being examined against the proposed accused persons. In other words, the Trial Court and the High Court have proceeded as if an infallible case was required to be shown by the prosecution in order to proceed against the proposed accused persons. That had clearly been an erroneous approach towards the prayer for proceeding against a person with reference to the evidence available on record.”

                                      Be it noted, para 14 then states that, “The appellant (PW-1) has made the statement assigning specific roles to the proposed accused persons. At this stage of consideration of the application under Section 319 CrPC, of course, the Trial Court was to look at something more than a prima facie case but could not have gone to the extent of enquiring as to whether the matter would ultimately result in conviction of the proposed accused persons.” Para 15 then further states that, “The other application moved by the prosecution after leading of further evidence in the matter has been rejected by the Trial Court essentially with reference to the impugned orders dated 24.07.2014 and 02.07.2018, which are the subject matter of challenge in this appeal.”

                                     Suffice it to say, para 16 then sums up by saying that, “In the totality of the circumstances of this case, rather than dilating further on the evidence, suffice it would be to observe for the present purpose that the prayer of the prosecution for proceeding against other accused persons, having not been examined in the proper prospective and with due regard to the applicable principles, deserves to be restored for reconsideration of the Trial Court.”

                              Finally and perhaps most importantly, it is then held in the last para 17 that, “Accordingly, this appeal is allowed in part, to the extent and in the manner that the impugned orders are set aside and the applications made by the prosecution under Section 319 CrPC are restored for reconsideration of the Trial Court. In the interest of justice, it is made clear that we have not pronounced on the merits of the case either way and it would be expected of the Trial Court to reconsider the prayer of prosecution for proceeding against the proposed accused persons totally uninfluenced by any observation herein regarding facts of the case but with due regard to the evidence on record and to the law applicable.”

                          All said and done, it is a must read judgment which makes the position on Section 319 CrPC very clear. It specifies clearly and convincingly that a person can be added as an additional accused only when there is strong and cogent evidence and mere probability of complicity of that person is not enough to add him as accused. Thus now there is no unambiguity and no uncertainty left on this as to the test that has to be applied while considering an application to add a person as an additional accused for which the Apex Court Bench comprising of Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre have to be appreciated and applauded for delivering such a landmark and laudable judgment so elegantly!  


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  04 Apr 2019     Views:4402

Articles Updates

The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:1015
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:782
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:849
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:1220
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:2967
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:963
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:1336
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:1311
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:1476
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:1139
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:1372
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:882
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:3324
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:18769
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:6461
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:2927
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:2843
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:6958
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:2619
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:2605
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:3075
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2225
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1004
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1521
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1112
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:908
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:40924
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:799
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:972
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1153
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1113
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:3423
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:766
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:714
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:755
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:18211
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:5212
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:2168
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:4113
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:9355
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2127
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:1765
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:5844
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:50713
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:737
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:677
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:721
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:866
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:823
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:2353
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:689
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:4824
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:922
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1155
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:887
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:2108
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:10857
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:868
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:942
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:1904
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:2888
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:1504
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:8335
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:775
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:4430
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1436
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1352
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1647
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:23918
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2219
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:827
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:26832
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:884
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:4019
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:917
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:2574
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:770
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1421
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:15819
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:635
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:711
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:702
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:713
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1253
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1024
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:669
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:644
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:614
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:602
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:4722
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:707
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:713
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:593
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:760
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:997
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:640
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:593
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:659
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:850
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:828
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:597
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:671
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:5628
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:695
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:734
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:673
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:609
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:4974
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:709
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:629
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:679
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:777
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1598
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:586
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:680
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:734
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1202
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:712
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:843
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:901
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:659
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1278
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:675
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1157
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:709
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:638
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:771
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:925
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:698
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:646
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1240
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:3858
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:2949
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1020
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1230
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:1192
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:1059
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:1233
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:1687
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:1191
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:1118
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1625
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1224
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:3818
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:4430
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1289
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1302
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:1079
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:1338
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:1820
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:30297
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:2685
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:979
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:1045
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:953
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1297
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:830
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:774
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:1015
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:2020
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:1377
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2599
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:1129
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:1470
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:853
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:930
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:893
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:684
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:654
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:725
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:1441
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:687
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:719
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:619
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:851
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:599
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:3236
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:3215
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:1142
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:816
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:891
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:3226
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:3076
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:1348
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1274
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1250
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:931
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:760
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:737
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:716
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:976
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:881
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:768
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:800
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:640
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:788
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:732
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:678
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:731
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:675
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:934
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:691
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:726
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:642
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:957
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:738
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:782
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:694
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:770
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:978
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:729
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2058
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:868
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:800
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:699
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:742
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:876
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:797
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:810
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:603
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:973
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:712
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:918
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:780
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:984
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:712
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:699
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1212
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:842
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1040
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:745
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:714
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:692
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:4823
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:1183
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:676
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:686
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:808
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:595
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:745
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:692
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1053
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1267
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:681
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:729
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:609
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:1048
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:591
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:829
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:1288
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1522
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1402
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1619
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:665
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:754
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:2096
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:1647
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:991
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:1361
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:4232
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:724
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:6382
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:732
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:878
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:740
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:1953
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:711
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:718
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:2266
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:2805
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:3785
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4402
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:932
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:793
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1379
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1398
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1457
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1364
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:776
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1067
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1685
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1973
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1792
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2065
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:881
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:839
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1864
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:1562
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:2260
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1469
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1638
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1860
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:1138
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:1317
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1408
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1825
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:966
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:774
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:732
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:3516
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:796
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:896
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:9686
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:2264
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:814
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1591
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1427
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1678
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2117
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1009
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:1250
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:1201
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:1250
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1513
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1551
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1392
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1321
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:823
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:739
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:803
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:740
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1384
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1015
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1718
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1653
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2836
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1988
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:983
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1611
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1168
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:981
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1269
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1403
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:1557
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:1981
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:3142
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1740
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1018
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1125
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1068
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1174
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:1450
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:2221
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1031
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1622
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1227
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:982
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1057
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1067
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1218
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:1256
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:1092
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:1548
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1410
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1123
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:1003
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1083
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2208
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1992
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2338
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1555
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:918
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:861
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1060
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:961
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1093
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3227
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2118
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1718
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1421
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:827
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:765
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:836
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:861
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:1249
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1290
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1690
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:2023
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1423
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1575
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:1015
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:865
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:862
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2306
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:833
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1617
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:791
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:870
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:895
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:982
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1060
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1118
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:861
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:906
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:770
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:771
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:840
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:1079
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:841
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:811
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1796
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:852
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:806
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:766
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:778
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1323
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:862
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:857
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:757
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:1140
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:1048
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:848
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:775
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:804
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:1094
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:1352
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:809
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:916
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:836
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1501
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:981
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1476
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:886
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1158
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1330
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:981
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:845

Most Read Articles

  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:50713
  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:40924
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:30297
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:26832
  • How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Liability?
    On 09 Apr 2020    Views:23918
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1127 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.