• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must Bow Down To Compelling Public Interest: SC

Latest Articles

Back

Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must Bow Down To Compelling Public Interest: SC

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  05 Aug 2019     Views:1827

We all had either read or are fully well acquainted with the famous judgment titled Justice KS Puttaswamy (Retd) and Anr vs Union of India and others delivered on August 24, 2017 about two years back in which a 9-Judge Constitution Bench of Supreme Court including the then Chief Justice of India (CJI) JS Khehar had unanimously held that right to privacy is a fundamental right. The other Judges in this landmark and extremely laudable judgment praised all over were Justice J Chelameswar, Justice Sharad A Bobde, Justice RK Agrawal, Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman, Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre, Justice Dr DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice S Abdul Nazeer. It was applauded not just in India but all over the world for upholding that the right to privacy is fundamental right. Very rightly so!

                            However, it must be mentioned here that in a latest and noteworthy judgment titled Ritesh Sinha Vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr in Criminal Appeal No. 2003 of 2012 with Criminal Appeal No. 1318 of 2013, Criminal Appeal No. 1187 of 2019 [Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 9671 of 2017], Criminal Appeal No. 1188 of 2019 [Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 2225 of 2018] and Criminal Appeal No. 1190 of 2019 [Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 3272 of 2018], a three-Judge Bench of Supreme Court comprising of CJI Ranjan Gogoi along with Justice Deepak Gupta and Justice Sanjeev Khanna have on August 2, 2019 held unambiguously and unanimously that the fundamental right to privacy cannot be construed as absolute and must bow down to compelling public interest thus reaffirming what was laid down earlier also in Justice KS Puttaswamy (Retd) case as also in other cases. This it held while holding that a Judicial Magistrate can order a person to give a sample of his voice for the purpose of investigation of a crime. Very rightly so!  

                      To start with, this notable and laudable judgment authored by CJI Ranjan Gogoi for himself, Justice Deepak Gupta and Justice Sanjeev Khanna sets the ball rolling in para 1 by observing that, “Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos. 9671 of 2017, 1048 of 2018, 2225 of 2018 and 3272 of 2018.”

                               While dwelling on the facts of Criminal Appeal No. 2003 of 2012, Para 2 then illustrates stating that, “On 7th December, 2009 the In-charge of the Electronics Cell of Sadar Bazar Police Station located in the district of Saharanpur of the State of Uttar Pradesh lodged a First Information Report (“FIR” for short) alleging that one Dhoom Singh in association with the appellant – Ritesh Sinha, was engaged in collection of monies from different people on the promise of jobs in the Police. Dhoom Singh was arrested and one mobile phone was seized from him. The Investigating Authority wanted to verify whether the recorded conversation in the mobile phone was between Dhoom Singh and the appellant – Ritesh Sinha. They, therefore, needed the voice sample of the appellant and accordingly filed an application before the learned jurisdictional Chief Judicial Magistrate (“CJM” for short) praying for summoning the appellant to the Court for recording his voice sample.”

                                      What we then see unfolding in para 3 is this: “The learned CJM, Saharanpur by order dated 8th January, 2010 issued summons to the appellant to appear before the Investigating Officer and to give his voice sample. This order of the learned CJM was challenged before the High Court of Allahabad under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “Cr.P.C.”). The High Court having negative the challenge made by the appellant by its order dated 9th July, 2010, the present appeal has been filed.” Para 4 then also further states that, “The appeal was heard and disposed of by a split verdict of a two Judge Bench of this Court requiring the present reference.”

                                 Be it noted, it is then envisaged in para 5 that, “Two principal questions arose for determination of the appeal which have been set out in the order of Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai dated 7th December, 2012 in the following terms.

‘(1) Whether Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India, which protects a person accused of an offence from being compelled to be a witness against himself, extends to protecting such an accused from being compelled to give his voice sample during the course of investigation into an offence?

(2) Assuming that there is no violation of Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India, whether in the absence of any provision in the Code, can a Magistrate authorize the investigating agency to record the voice sample of the person accused of an offence?’”

                                As it turned out, para 6 then reveals that, “While the first question was answered in the negative by both the learned Judges (Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai and Justice Aftab Alam) following the ratio of the law laid down in State of Bombay vs Kathi Kalu Oghad, AIR 1961 SC 1808, difference of opinion has occurred insofar as second question is concerned.”

                              On the one hand, para 7 points out that, “Justice Desai took the view that voice sample can be included in the phrase “such other tests” appearing in Explanation (a) to Section 53 Cr.P.C. by applying the doctrine of ejusdem generis and, therefore, the Magistrate would have an implied power under Section 53 Cr.P.C. to pass an order permitting taking of voice sample in the aid of criminal investigation.”

                            On the contrary, para 8 then observes that, “On the other hand, Justice Aftab Alam took the view that compulsion on an accused to give his/her voice sample must be authorized on the basis of a law passed by the Legislature instead of a process of judicial interpretation. In this regard, the learned judge (Aftab Alam, J.) also took note of the amendments in Sections 53, 53A and 311-A of the Cr.P.C. by Act No. 25 of 2005 introduced with effect from 23rd June, 2006 which amendments did not bring, within the fold of the aforesaid provisions of the Cr.P.C., any power in the trial Court to compel an accused to give sample of his/her voice for the purpose of investigation of a criminal charge.” 

                               To put things in perspective, it is then explained in para 11 that, “Medical examination of an accused for the purposes of effective investigation of a criminal charge has received a wider meaning by the amendment to the Explanation to Section 53 Cr.P.C. made by Act No. 25 of 2005 with effect from 23rd June, 2006. Similarly, Section 53A has been inserted by the same Amending Act (No. 25 of 2005) to provide for examination of a person accused of rape. Likewise, by insertion of Section 311-A by the same Amending Act (No. 25 of 2005) a Magistrate has been empowered to order any person, including an accused person, to give specimen signatures or handwriting for the purposes of any investigation or proceeding under the Cr.P.C.”

                                To be sure, it is then clarified in para 12 that, “None of the said amendments specifically authorize or empower a Magistrate to direct an accused person or any other person to give his/her voice sample for the purposes of an inquiry or investigation under the Code. “Omission” of the Legislature to specifically so provide has led the learned Judge (Justice Aftab Alam) on the two judge Bench to doubt as to whether legislative wisdom was in favour of a specific exclusion or omission so as to make a judicial exercise through a process of interpretation impermissible.”

                                  More importantly, it is then envisaged in para 13 that, “The Law Commission of India in its 87th report dated 29th August, 1980, also had an occasion to deal with the question presently confronting the Court. The Law Commission examined the matter (almost four decades earlier) in the context of the working of the provisions of the Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920. The view taken was that a suitable legislation which could be in the form of an amendment to Section 5 of the Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 would be appropriate so as to specifically empower a Judicial Magistrate to compel an accused person to give a sample of his voice. The following extract from the 87th Report of the Law Commission dated 29th August, 1980 would be relevant.

“A voice print is a visual recording of voice. It mainly depends on the position of “formats”. These are concentrates of sound energy at a given frequency. It is stated that their position is the “frequency domain” is unique to each speaker. Voice prints resemble finger prints, in that each person has a distinctive voice with characteristic features dictated by vocal cavities and articulates.

                     Voice-print Identification seems to have a number of practical uses. In England, in November 1967, at the Winchester Magistrate’s Court, a man was accused of making malicious telephone calls. Voice-print Identification (spectrograph) was used and the accused was found guilty.” [Paragraphs 5, 27, 87th Report of the Law Commission of India]

                               ***         ***            ***

“Often it becomes desirable to have an accused person speak for the purposes of giving to the police an opportunity to hear his voice and try to identify it as that of the criminal offender. A comparison may even be desired between the voice of an accused person and the recorded voice of a criminal which has been obtained by, say, telephone tapping. To facilitate proof of the crime the police may like that the accused should be compelled to speak, and even that his voice as recorded may be converted into a “voice print”.

……………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………

             However, if the accused refuses to furnish such voice, there is no legal sanction for compelling him to do so, and the use of force for that purpose would be illegal.”

                               ***       ***        ***

“The scope of Section 5 needs to be expanded in another aspect. The general power of investigation given to the police under the Criminal Procedure Code may not imply the power to require the accused to furnish a specimen of his voice. Cases in which the voice of the accused was obtained for comparison with the voice of the criminal offender are known but the question whether the accused can be compelled to do so does not seem to have been debated so far in India.

              There is no specific statutory provision in India which expressly gives power to a police officer or a court to require an accused person to furnish a specimen of his voice.” [Paragraph 5, 26, 87th Report of the Law Commission of India].”    

                                     It cannot be missed out that para 14 then holds that, “Section 5 of the Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 coincidentally empowers the Magistrate to order/direct any person to allow his measurements or photographs to be taken for the purposes of any investigation or proceeding. It may be significant to note that the amendments in the Cr.P.C., noticed above, could very well have been a sequel to the recommendation of the Law Commission in its Report dated 29th August, 1980 though the said recommendation was in slightly narrower terms i.e. in the context of Section 5 of the Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920. In this regard, it may also be usefully noticed that though this Court in State of Uttar Pradesh vs Ram Babu Misra AIR 1980 SC 791 after holding that a Judicial Magistrate has no power to direct ac accused to give his specimen writing for the purposes of investigation had suggested to Parliament that a suitable legislation be made on the analogy of Section 5 of the Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 sp as to invest a Magistrate with the power to issue directions to any person including an accused person to give specimen signatures and writings. The consequential amendment, instead, came by way of insertion of Section 311-A in the Cr.P.C. by the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Act No. 25 of 2005) with effect from 23rd June, 2006.”

                                   As things stand, para 15 then points out that, “The legislative response in remaining silent or acting at a “slow” pace can always be explained by legislative concerns and considerations of care and caution. It is in the aforesaid context and in the admitted absence of any clear statutory provision that the question arising has to be answered which is primarily one of the extent to which by a process of judicial interpretation a clear gap in the statute should be filled up pending a formal legislative exercise. It is the aforesaid question that we shall now turn to.”  

                                    Needless to say, it is then made clear in para 16 that, “ “Procedure is the handmaid, not the mistress, of justice and cannot be permitted to thwart the fact-finding course in litigation”. [AIR 1975 SC 349 (Vatal Nagaraj vs R. Dayanand Sagar)]. We would like to proceed in the matter keeping the above view of this Court in the backdrop.”

                                   More to the point, it is then observed in para 18 that, “In the present case, the view that the law on the point should emanate from the Legislature and not from the Court, as expressed in the judgment of this Court from which the reference has emanated is founded on two main reasons, viz., (i) the compulsion to give voice sample does in some way involve an invasion of the rights of the individual and to bring it within the ambit of the existing law would require more than reasonable bending and stretching of the principles of interpretation and (ii) if the legislature even while making amendments in the Criminal Procedure Code (Act No. 25 of 2005), is oblivious and despite express reminders chooses not to include voice sample either in the newly introduced explanation to Section 53 or in Sections 53A and 311A of Cr.P.C., then it may even be contended that in the larger scheme of things the legislature is able to see something which perhaps the Court is missing.”

                                    It cannot be lost on us that it is then observed in para 19 that, “Insofar as the first reservation is concerned, the same would stand dispelled by one of the earlier pronouncements of this Court on the subject in State of Bombay vs. Kathi Kalu Oghad (supra), relevant extracts of which judgment has already been set out. The following views in the concurring opinion of Justice K.C. Das Gupta in State of Bombay vs Kathi Kalu Oghad (supra) would further strengthen the view of this Court to the contrary.

“(32) ………..It has to be noticed that Article 20(3) of our Constitution does not say that an accused person shall not be compelled to be a witness. It says that such a person shall not be compelled to be a witness against himself. The question that arises therefore is: Is an accused person furnishing evidence against himself, when he gives his specimen handwriting, or impressions of his fingers, palm or foot? The answer to this must, in our opinion, be in the negative.

(33) ………..the evidence of specimen handwriting or the impressions of the accused person’s fingers, palm or foot, will incriminate him, only if on comparison of these with certain other handwritings or certain other impressions, identity between the two sets is established. By themselves, these impressions or the handwritings do not incriminate the accused person, or even tend to do so. That is why it must be held that by giving these impressions or specimen handwriting, the accused person does not furnish evidence against himself. So, when an accused person is compelled to give a specimen handwriting or impressions of his finger, palm or foot, it may be said that he has been compelled to be a witness; it cannot however be said that he has been compelled to be a witness against himself.”

                                              [Emphasis is ours]”

                                   What’s more, it is then pointed out in para 20 that, “So far as the second basis for the view taken is concerned, we have already expressed an opinion that what may appear to be legislative inaction to fill in the gaps in the Statute could be on account of justified legislative concern and exercise of care and caution. However, when a yawning gap in the Statute, in the considered view of the Court, calls for temporary patchwork of filling up to make the Statute effective and workable and to sub-serve societal interests a process of judicial interpretation would become inevitable.”

                                   Truth be told, it is then rightly advised in para 21 that, “The exercise of jurisdiction by Constitutional Courts must be guided by contemporaneous realities/existing realities on the ground. Judicial power should not be allowed to be entrapped within inflexible parameters or guided by rigid principles. True, the judicial function is not to legislate but in a situation where the call of justice and that too of a large number who are not parties to the lis before the Court, demands expression of an opinion on a silent aspect of the Statute, such void must be filled up not only on the principle of ejusdem generis but on the principle of imminent necessity with a call to the Legislature to act promptly in the matter.”    

                                   Furthermore, it would be of immense significance to note here that it is then observed in para 24 that, “Would a judicial order compelling a person to give a sample of his voice violate the fundamental right to privacy under Article 20(3) of the Constitution, is the next question. The issue is interesting and debatable but not having been argued before us it will suffice to note that in view of the opinion rendered by this Court in Modern Dental College and Research Centre and others vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others (2016) 7 SCC 353, Gobind vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and another (1975) 2 SCC 148 and the Nine Judge’s Bench of this Court in K.S. Puttaswamy and another vs. Union of India and others (2017) 10 SCC 1 the fundamental right to privacy cannot be construed as absolute and but must bow down to compelling public interest. We refrain from any further discussion and consider it appropriate not to record any further observation on an issue not specifically raised before us.”

                          Finally and most importantly, it is then held in the last para 25 that, “In the light of the above discussions, we unhesitatingly take the view that until explicit provisions are engrafted in the Code of Criminal Procedure by Parliament, a Judicial Magistrate must be conceded the power to order a person to give a sample of his voice for the purpose of investigation of a crime. Such power has to be conferred on a Magistrate by a process of judicial interpretation and in exercise of jurisdiction vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. We order accordingly and consequently dispose the appeals in terms of the above.”

                                In essence, this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment very rightly takes the logical stand that though right to privacy is a fundamental right but it cannot be construed as absolute and must bow down to compelling public interest. Right to privacy cannot trample compelling public interest and has to step aside whenever it is in conflict with it! 


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  05 Aug 2019     Views:1827

Articles Updates

Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:953
Post-Merger Vision: HDFC Bank to Prioritize Profit...
01 Aug 2024     Views:839
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:1022
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:918
The Mandal Verdict: Indra Sawhney and Its Lasting ...
22 Jul 2024     Views:1202
Supreme Court Emphasizes Direct and a Specific Ple...
22 Jul 2024     Views:927
Bail and Punishment Provisions of NDPS matters...
05 Apr 2023     Views:4369
The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:5207
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:5470
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:5549
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:5680
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:10105
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:5104
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:5389
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:5812
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:5633
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:2920
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:2525
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:2124
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:5039
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:21445
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:8269
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:4633
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:4174
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:8902
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:3991
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:3775
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:4850
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:3598
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1892
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2684
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2230
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1903
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:56344
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1824
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1952
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2135
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2086
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:6401
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1588
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1599
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1689
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:31310
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6376
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:3204
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:5956
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:10793
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3389
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2766
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:7819
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:54885
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1886
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1473
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1756
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1911
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1710
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:3448
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:1476
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:6390
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1865
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2158
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:1837
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:3431
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:12465
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1742
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1849
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:3312
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:4626
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:2419
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:10742
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:1549
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:6343
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2343
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2386
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2695
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:26124
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:4898
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1751
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:33508
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:1747
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:6676
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:1775
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:3820
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1727
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2932
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:19857
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1628
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1614
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1519
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1897
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2295
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1934
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1480
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1426
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1358
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1428
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:7095
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1797
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1640
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1374
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1702
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1876
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1527
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1376
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1438
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1837
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1725
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1429
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1568
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:9016
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1863
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1562
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1537
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1545
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:10046
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1609
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1476
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1470
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:1666
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:3370
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1374
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1408
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1763
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2494
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:1817
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:1964
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2103
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1537
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2784
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1642
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2164
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1468
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1714
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1733
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1716
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1562
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1444
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2782
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:6210
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:3966
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1937
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2171
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:2208
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:2114
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:2184
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:2703
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2112
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2054
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2699
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2258
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:5151
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:5912
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2288
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2378
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:2014
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:2319
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:2851
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:35503
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:4185
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:1955
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:1968
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:2032
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:2632
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1714
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:1731
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:2049
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:3448
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:2297
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:4129
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2108
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:2387
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:1800
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:1836
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:1752
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:1625
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:1409
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:1534
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:2395
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:1461
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:1695
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:1442
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1671
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1371
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:4800
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:4985
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:2481
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:1534
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:1645
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:5057
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:4653
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2381
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2327
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2237
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1672
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1526
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:2060
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1555
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2139
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1757
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1668
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1658
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1482
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1587
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1591
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1553
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1694
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1526
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1771
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1535
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1521
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:1469
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2177
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1628
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1546
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1565
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1965
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1878
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1413
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:3016
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1828
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1730
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1538
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1598
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1779
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1703
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1763
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1733
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1953
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1525
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1827
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:1729
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1805
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1511
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1430
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2086
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1838
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:2101
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1627
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1482
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1519
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:5787
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:2355
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:1545
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:1578
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:1801
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:1500
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:1531
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:1448
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1821
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1971
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:1465
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:1590
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:1356
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:2049
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:1415
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:1602
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:2447
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2786
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2770
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2907
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1396
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1694
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:5051
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:2769
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:1917
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:2259
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:5740
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:1685
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:9044
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:1555
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:1766
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:1477
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:3218
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:1576
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:1412
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:3554
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4383
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:8293
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:6700
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1824
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1608
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2159
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2322
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2418
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2445
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1459
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1911
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2627
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3151
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2882
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3183
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1612
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1677
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3269
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:2581
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:3246
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2489
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2737
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2813
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:2084
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:2196
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2246
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2859
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1770
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1636
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1525
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:6731
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1669
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1849
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:12066
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:3837
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:1611
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2617
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2303
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2700
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:3283
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1890
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:2414
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:2024
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:2318
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2453
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2513
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2373
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:4622
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1620
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1744
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1596
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1533
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:3173
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1994
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2756
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2566
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3836
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2880
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1764
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2844
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2010
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1788
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2323
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2150
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:2461
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:3265
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:4201
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2535
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1804
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1875
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1806
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1983
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:2318
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:3160
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1893
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2365
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2158
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:1821
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1979
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1982
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2131
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:2176
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:2144
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:2455
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2427
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1916
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:2017
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1889
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3266
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3255
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3104
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2380
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1716
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1657
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2221
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2199
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1957
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:4808
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3377
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2691
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2282
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1672
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1566
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1724
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1553
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:2733
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2146
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2565
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:3162
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2250
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2327
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:1856
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:1607
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1766
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3572
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1600
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3015
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1537
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1901
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1785
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1955
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2150
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1968
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:1678
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:1816
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1594
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1545
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1679
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:2159
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1706
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1623
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:3012
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1600
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1856
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1603
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1622
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2180
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1705
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1734
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:1760
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:2293
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:2143
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:1796
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1557
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1591
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:2077
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:2232
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:1561
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1828
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1660
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2591
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1769
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2594
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1679
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2160
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2411
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1830
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1861

Most Read Articles

  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:56344
  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:54885
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:35503
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:33508
  • VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER
    On 20 Apr 2020    Views:31310
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.