• +91 9632247247
  • Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Confer ‘Possessory Title’: SC

Latest Articles

Back

Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Confer ‘Possessory Title’: SC

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  04 Feb 2019     Views:1413

While clearly and convincingly holding that possessory title over property cannot be claimed merely on the basis of ‘casual possession’, the Supreme Court in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Poona Ram v. Moti Ram (D) Th. LRs & Ors. In Civil Appeal No. 4527 of 2009 authored by Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar for himself and Justice NV Ramana on January 29, 2019 observed that a casual act of possession does not have the effect of interrupting the possession of the rightful owner. Very rightly so! Who can deny it?

                                First and foremost, the ball is set rolling in para 1 wherein it is observed that, “The judgment dated 28.08.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in Civil Second Appeal No. 97 of 1984 and the concurrent judgment dated 10.10.2006 in Civil Review Petition No. 18 of 2006, dismissing the same, are called in question in this appeal by the unsuccessful defendants.”

                                      To recapitulate, it is then pointed out in para 2 that, “The brief facts leading to this appeal are as under:

     A suit came to be filed for declaration of title and for possession by Respondent No. 1 herein. Undisputedly, the plaintiff  Moti Ram had no document of title to prove his possession, but claimed possessory title based on prior possession for a number of years. However, according to the plaintiff, he had been wrongly dispossessed by defendants on 30.04.1972 which was within the 12 years preceding the filing of the present suit. The Trial Court decreed the suit and the First Appellate Court reversed the findings of the Trial Court. The First Appellate Court dismissed the said suit on the ground that the defendants had proved their title and possession over the suit property.”

                                       Going forward, it is then eloquently mentioned in para 3 that, “As mentioned supra, the plaintiff did not have any title deed with respect to the suit property. He based his claim mainly on his alleged long possession over the property, and claimed that there was nobody with better title over it than him. Per contra, the defendants relied on two sale deeds, viz., Ex. A-6 dated 06.02.1956, executed by the original owner Khoom Singh in favour of Purkha Ram, and Ex. A-2 dated 21.06.1966, executed by Purkha Ram in favour of the appellant/Defendant No. 1. It was also not disputed that the plaintiff did not have possession as on the date of filing of the suit, inasmuch as he has alleged that he was wrongly dispossessed by the defendant on 30.04.1972 prior to filing the suit.”

                                   To be sure, it is then revealed in para 4 that, “The only questions to be decided in this appeal are whether the plaintiff had better title over the suit property and whether he was in settled possession of the property, which required dispossession in accordance with law.”

                         As it turned out, para 5 while elaborating on what the appellant contended states specifically that, “Ms. Christi Jain, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/Defendant No. 1 taking us through the material on record, contends that there is nothing on record to show that the plaintiff was in possession of the property at any point of time, much less for a longer time lawfully. There is no material to show that the plaintiff has possessory title over the suit property. Additionally, she argues that the sale deeds mentioned supra relied upon by the defendants would clearly reveal that the defendants were in possession of the property as owner thereof, from the date of purchase of the suit property.”

                                      It cannot be lost on us that it is then unfolded in para 6 that, “Undisputedly and as duly admitted by both parties, the property in question originally belonged to Jagirdar Khoom Singh of Barmer. The property in question is part of a larger property under the Jagirdari system, a few parts of which were rented out or sold. After the system of Jagirdari was abolished, these jagirs were resumed in the year 1955-56. While a few persons continued in illegal possession, others had purchased parts of the land from the Jagirdar, and the remaining land vested in the State Government and municipalities. After the resumption of the jagir, it seems that the Barmer Municipality established a planned and well-managed colony named Nehru Nagar on the said land. Ex. 12, Ex. 13 and Ex. 14 are the survey maps of the Municipality. A perusal of Ex. 12 (first survey) reveals that Moti Ram was in possession of the land, the plot to the east of which was possessed by Nawala Harijan and in the east of Nawala Harijan’s plot, possession of Purkha Ram (to recall, predecessor-in-interest of the defendants) on the site has been indicated. Further, the possession of Purkha Ram has also been indicated on a plot to the south of the land duly possessed by Moti Ram. Thus, it is clear that the plots of land owned by Khoom Singh, in possession of these persons, were not uniformly situated. However, after the Municipality took over possession, it seems that orderly formation of the plots was undertaken. Though there was some confusion raised by the plaintiff with regard to the boundaries of the property in question, the First Appellate Court being the final court of fact, on due appreciation of the entire material on record, gave a definite finding that the Trial Court was not justified in decreeing the suit, and observed that Purkha Ram was in possession of the property in question even prior to 1966, and had sold the same through registered sale deed in June 1966 vide Ex. A-2. This sale deed shows the measurement of the land, which corresponds to the plots in question approximately. The judgment of the First Appellate Court reveals that the Municipality had let out only three plots to the Jagirdar, and those three plots together measured 32 x 66 hands (unit of measurement). Thus, each plot measured 32 x 22 hands. These were numbered as Plot No. 4, Plot No. 5 and Plot No. 7. The disputed site is Plot No. 7.”   

                                   Truth be told, para 7 then goes on to disclose that, “The official record (survey map), Ex. 14, which relates to the plot in question, i.e., Plot No. 7, reveals that it was owned by Poona Ram, who is Defendant No. 1 and the appellant herein. It is also relevant to note that sanction for constructing the house was given to Purkha Ram in the year 1957. Obviously, such sanction would have been accorded only on the basis of title and possession of the property.”

                                     To put things in perspective, para 8 then goes on to elucidate while explaining the concept behind suit based on possessory title that, “Section 64 of the Limitation Act, 1963 contemplates a suit for possession of immovable property based on previous possession and not on title, if brought within 12 years from the date of dispossession. Such a suit is known in law as a suit based on possessory title as distinguishable from proprietary title. It cannot be disputed and is by now well settled that ‘settled possession’ or effective possession of a person without title entitles him to protect his possession as if he were a true owner.”    

                                  It would be pertinent to now mention here that para 9 then goes on to illustrate specifying that, “The law in India, as it has developed, accords with jurisprudential thought as propounded by luminaries like Salmond. Salmond on Jurisprudence (12 Edn. at paras 59-60) states:-

    “These two concepts of ownership and possession, therefore, may be used to distinguish between the de facto possessor of an object and its de jure owner, between the man who actually has it and the man who ought to have it. They serve also to contract the position of one whose rights are ultimate, permanent and residual with that of one whose rights are only of a temporary nature.

x                        x                     x                      x                        x

In English law possession is a good title of right against any one who cannot show a better. A wrongful possessor has the rights of an owner with respect to all persons except earlier possessors and except the true owner himself. Many other legal systems, however, go much further than this, and treat possession as a provisional or temporary title even against the true owner himself. Even a wrongdoer, who is deprived of his possession, can recover it from any person whatever, simply on the ground of his possession. Even the true owner, who takes his own, may be forced in this way to restore it to the wrongdoer, and will not be permitted to set up his own superior title to it. He must first give up possession, and then proceed in due course of law for the recovery of the thing on the ground of his ownership. The intention of the law is that every possessor shall be entitled to retain and recover his possession, until deprived of it by a judgment according to law.

Legal remedies thus appointed for the protection of possession even against ownership are called possessory, while those available for the protection of ownership itself may be distinguished as proprietary. In the modern and medieval civil law the distinction is expressed by the contrasted terms petitorium (a proprietary suit) and possessorium (a possessory suit)”.”

                                 Back home, it is then worthily recalled in para 10 about the relevant past noteworthy judgments that, “As far back as 1924, in the case of Midnapur Zamindary Co. Ltd. V. Naresh Narayan Roy, AIR 1924 PC 144, the learned Judge observed that in India, persons are not permitted to take forcible possession; they must obtain such possession as they are entitled to through a court. Later, in the case of Nair Service Society Ltd. V. K.C. Alexander, AIR 1968 SC 1165, this Court ruled that when the facts disclose no title in either party, possession alone decides. It was further held that if Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 (corresponding to the present Section 6) is employed, the plaintiff need not prove title and the title of the defendant does not avail him. When, however, the period of six months has passed, questions of title can be raised by the defendant, and if he does so the plaintiff must establish a better title or fail. In other words, such a right is only restricted to possession in a suit under Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act (corresponding to the present Section 6) but does not bar a suit on prior permission within 12 years from the date of dispossession, and title need not be proved unless the defendant can provide one.”

                                           Now turning to para 11, it goes on to then add further that, “It was also observed by this Court in Nair Service Society Ltd (supra) that a person in possession of land in assumed character of owner and exercising peaceably the ordinary rights of ownership has a perfectly good title against the entire world except the rightful owner. In such a case, the defendant must show in himself or his predecessor a valid legal title and probably a possession prior to the plaintiffs and thus be able to raise a presumption prior in time.”

                                     Not stopping here, it is then pointed out in para 12 that, “In the case of Rame Gowda (dead) by Lrs. v. M. Varadappa Naidu (dead) by Lrs. and another, (2004) 1 SCC 769, a three-Judge Bench of this Court, while discussing the Indian law on the subject, observed as under:-

   “8. It is thus clear that so far as the Indian law is concerned the person in peaceful possession is entitled to retain his possession and in order to protect such possession he may even use reasonable force to keep out a trespasser. A rightful owner who has been wrongfully dispossessed of land may retake possession if he can do so peacefully and without the use of unreasonable force. If the trespasser is in settled possession of the property belonging to the rightful owner, the rightful owner shall have to take recourse to law; he cannot take the law in his own hands and evict the trespasser or interfere with his possession. The law will come to the aid of a person in peaceful and settled possession by injuncting even a rightful owner from using force or taking law in his own hands, and also by restoring him in possession even from the rightful owner (of course subject to the law of limitation), if the latter has dispossessed the prior possessor by use of force. In the absence of proof of better title, possession or prior peaceful settled possession is itself evidence of title. Law presumes the possession to go with the title unless rebutted. The owner of any property may prevent even by using reasonable force a trespasser from an attempted trespass, when it is in the process of being committed, or is of a flimsy character, or recurring, intermittent, stray or casual in nature, or has just been committed, while the rightful owner did not have enough time to have recourse to law. In the last of the cases, the possession of the trespasser, just entered into would not be called as one acquiesced to by the true owner”.”

                                In essence, it is then summarized in para 13 laying down that, “The crux of the matter is that a person who asserts possessory title over a particular property will have to show that he is under settled or established possession of the said property. But merely stray or intermittent acts of trespass do not give such a right against the true owner. Settled possession means such possession over the property which has existed for a sufficiently long period of time, and has been acquiesced to by the true owner. A casual act of possession does not have the effect of interrupting the possession of the rightful owner. A stray act of trespass, or a possession which has not matured into settled possession, can be obstructed or removed by the true owner even by using necessary force. Settled possession must be (i) effective, (ii) undisturbed, and (iii) to the knowledge of the owner or without any attempt at concealment by the trespasser. There cannot be a straitjacket formula to determine settled possession. Occupation of a property by a person as an agent or a servant acting at the instance of the owner will not amount to actual legal possession. The possession should contain an element of animus possidendi. The nature of possession of the trespasser is to be decided based on the facts and circumstances of each case.”

                                        Having said this, let us now see what para 14 enunciates. It enunciates that, “As mentioned supra, Purkha Ram had purchased three plots from Jagirdar Khoom Singh. In sale deed Ex. A-6, three plots have been mentioned as plots of three houses. One of these, being Plot No. 7, was sold by Purkha Ram to the appellant, one plot being Plot No. 4 was sold to Teja Ram and the third plot being Plot No. 5 was retained by Purkha Ram.”

                             It would be pertinent to mention here that para 15 then stipulates that, “In order to prove possession of the property, the plaintiff relied upon the rent note Ex. 1, which shows that the plot in question was let out by the plaintiff to one Joga Ram in the year 1967. On 12.05.1967, a fire broke out and the entire fodder stored on the plot got burnt. Thereafter, the plot was kept vacant. DW-7, who has been referred to in order to establish spreading of the fire, stated that the fire started due to sparks coming from a railway engine. But there was no railway line adjacent to the disputed land which could have caused a fire. Even otherwise, the rent note Ex. 1 does not refer to the plot in question, and its boundaries have also not been mentioned. Merely on doubtful material and cursory evidence, it cannot be held that the plaintiff was ever in possession of the property, and that too in settled possession.”       

                           While strongly rebutting the tall claims of the plaintiff, it is then pointed out in para 16 that, “The plaintiff/Respondent No. 1 makes much of the old body of a motor vehicle belonging to him lying on the property. Ex. 2 clearly reveals that one part of the motor vehicle was lying on the disputed property and another part was lying on the plot of the plaintiff. The said body of the motor vehicle is about 3 to 4 feet in length only and the same was lying on the boundary of the disputed property. But the plaintiff/Respondent No. 1 claims possession of the entire plot based on such fact. Absolutely no material is found to show that the plaintiff/Respondent No. 1 was in actual possession, much less continuous possession, of the property for a longer period which may be called settled possession or established possession. As mentioned supra, mere casual possession, that too relying on a motor vehicle body lying on a part of the property, would not prove settled possession of the plaintiff.”          

                     To say the least, it is then clarified in para 17 that, “The plaintiff has to prove his case to the satisfaction of the Court. He cannot succeed on the weakness of the case of the defendant. Even otherwise, there is no confusion at all regarding the identity of the property in question and on the basis of material on record, the First Appellate Court has correctly ruled that the appellant/Defendant No. 1 has proved his title and possession over the suit property since the date of his purchase of the property. Prior to the purchase, his predecessor-in-interest was in possession of the same.”

                                      After considering the position of law and facts of the case, it is then spelt out in para 18 that, “Having regard to the position of law and facts of the case, we are of the considered opinion that the High Court was not justified in interfering with the judgment of the First Appellate Court, which has come down very heavily on the procedure adopted by the trial Judge in deciding the matter, more particularly when no fault can be found on facts with the judgment of the First Appellate Court.”

                                   In this same para 18, it is then also spelt out that, “Generally, it is not open to the High Court to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by the First Appellate Court when such findings are based on the evidence on record, and are not perverse or against the material on record.”

                                    More importantly, it is then held in para 19 that, “The conclusion arrived at by the High Court and the reasons assigned for the same are not correct inasmuch as there is absolutely no material in favour of the case of the plaintiff to show possessory title. In order to claim possessory title, the plaintiff will have to prove his own case, and also will have to show that he has better title than any other person. Since there is no documentary proof that the plaintiff was in possession of the suit property, that too for a long period, he cannot be allowed to succeed based on minor discrepancies in the evidence of the defendants. Accordingly, the appeal succeeds and is allowed.”

                           Finally, we see that in the last para 20, it is then held that, “The impugned judgment of the High Court dated 28.08.2006 and its review stands set aside and the judgment of the First Appellate Court is restored. Consequently, suit stands dismissed.” No doubt, this latest, landmark and laudable judgment leaves no room of doubt for anyone to reach the foregone conclusion that casual act of possession over property does not confer possessory title. We all must also always bear it in mind along with other salient points highlighted so brilliantly in this significant and laudable judgment!


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  04 Feb 2019     Views:1413

Articles Updates

The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:783
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:588
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:629
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:991
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:2384
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:755
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:1122
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:1075
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:1156
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:959
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:1224
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:820
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:3246
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:18438
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:5875
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:2813
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:2756
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:6777
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:2547
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:2544
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:2939
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2082
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:967
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1477
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1059
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:866
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:38602
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:760
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:928
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1120
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1071
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:3154
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:728
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:680
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:725
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:16408
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:5129
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:2136
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:3975
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:9273
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2063
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:1670
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:5755
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:49668
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:698
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:650
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:692
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:832
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:790
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:2303
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:660
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:4662
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:887
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1114
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:856
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:2062
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:10386
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:832
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:743
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:1822
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:2770
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:1467
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:8015
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:743
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:4083
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1215
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1324
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1603
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:23649
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2051
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:763
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:24506
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:849
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:3826
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:882
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:2496
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:737
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1344
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:15033
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:609
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:682
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:674
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:683
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1219
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:973
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:642
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:617
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:585
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:578
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:4460
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:679
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:686
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:564
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:726
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:846
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:603
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:562
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:596
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:821
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:769
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:572
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:645
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:5332
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:647
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:702
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:647
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:575
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:4445
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:683
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:596
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:646
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:751
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1525
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:561
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:656
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:700
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1138
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:527
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:804
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:875
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:628
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1189
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:635
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1126
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:660
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:605
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:744
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:892
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:668
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:623
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1132
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:3687
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:2878
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:990
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1190
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:1148
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:993
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:1183
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:1633
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:1144
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:1081
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1578
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1175
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:3689
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:3586
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1244
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1245
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:1040
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:1296
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:1753
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:29212
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:2594
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:942
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:1011
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:919
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1236
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:800
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:743
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:974
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:1894
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:1321
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2511
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:1094
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:1072
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:816
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:884
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:856
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:654
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:624
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:695
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:996
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:658
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:690
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:598
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:818
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:577
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:3148
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:3084
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:1085
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:778
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:859
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:3117
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2977
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:1303
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1231
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1215
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:899
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:663
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:706
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:688
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:951
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:836
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:737
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:772
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:611
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:724
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:701
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:641
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:672
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:651
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:908
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:665
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:667
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:618
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:932
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:699
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:750
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:668
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:742
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:950
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:702
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2009
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:800
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:772
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:667
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:705
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:844
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:767
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:772
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:576
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:936
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:680
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:862
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:746
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:949
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:680
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:663
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1053
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:808
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:998
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:715
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:691
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:667
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:4766
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:1143
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:653
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:651
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:778
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:572
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:560
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:660
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1022
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1235
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:655
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:702
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:583
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:1007
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:568
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:799
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:1232
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1449
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1335
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1545
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:638
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:676
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:1948
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:1605
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:954
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:1306
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:4104
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:701
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:6116
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:704
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:646
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:700
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:1919
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:687
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:683
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:2229
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:2726
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:3631
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4224
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:899
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:767
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1346
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1328
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1416
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1324
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:750
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1040
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1641
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1921
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1742
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2002
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:790
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:811
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1793
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:1523
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:2217
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1413
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1581
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1805
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:1104
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:1273
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1376
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1739
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:870
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:745
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:706
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:3147
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:765
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:858
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:9296
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:2167
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:783
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1520
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1388
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1639
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2006
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:986
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:1044
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:1147
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:1197
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1425
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1502
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1364
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1255
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:793
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:713
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:769
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:712
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1264
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:988
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1669
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1602
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2772
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1936
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:939
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1569
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1127
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:740
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1232
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:726
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:1508
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:1940
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:3073
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1698
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:990
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1096
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1042
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1136
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:1294
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:1914
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1000
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1588
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1200
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:956
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1020
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1033
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1188
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:1126
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:1061
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:1383
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1382
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1097
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:966
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1057
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2164
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1962
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2152
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1526
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:894
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:838
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1032
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:937
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1058
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3078
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1778
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1654
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1366
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:801
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:740
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:765
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:830
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:1195
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1235
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1457
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:1835
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1391
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1513
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:987
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:833
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:835
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2222
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:799
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1479
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:763
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:838
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:869
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:950
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1015
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:806
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:837
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:874
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:748
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:744
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:817
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:1045
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:812
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:778
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1736
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:829
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:775
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:741
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:755
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1292
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:836
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:825
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:730
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:1100
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:1013
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:823
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:746
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:749
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:1062
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:1328
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:784
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:886
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:811
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1458
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:953
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1436
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:861
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1130
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:941
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:940
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:822

Most Read Articles

  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:49668
  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:38602
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:29212
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:24506
  • How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Liability?
    On 09 Apr 2020    Views:23649
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1127 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.