• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Confer ‘Possessory Title’: SC

Latest Articles

Back

Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Confer ‘Possessory Title’: SC

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  04 Feb 2019     Views:2462

While clearly and convincingly holding that possessory title over property cannot be claimed merely on the basis of ‘casual possession’, the Supreme Court in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Poona Ram v. Moti Ram (D) Th. LRs & Ors. In Civil Appeal No. 4527 of 2009 authored by Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar for himself and Justice NV Ramana on January 29, 2019 observed that a casual act of possession does not have the effect of interrupting the possession of the rightful owner. Very rightly so! Who can deny it?

                                First and foremost, the ball is set rolling in para 1 wherein it is observed that, “The judgment dated 28.08.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in Civil Second Appeal No. 97 of 1984 and the concurrent judgment dated 10.10.2006 in Civil Review Petition No. 18 of 2006, dismissing the same, are called in question in this appeal by the unsuccessful defendants.”

                                      To recapitulate, it is then pointed out in para 2 that, “The brief facts leading to this appeal are as under:

     A suit came to be filed for declaration of title and for possession by Respondent No. 1 herein. Undisputedly, the plaintiff  Moti Ram had no document of title to prove his possession, but claimed possessory title based on prior possession for a number of years. However, according to the plaintiff, he had been wrongly dispossessed by defendants on 30.04.1972 which was within the 12 years preceding the filing of the present suit. The Trial Court decreed the suit and the First Appellate Court reversed the findings of the Trial Court. The First Appellate Court dismissed the said suit on the ground that the defendants had proved their title and possession over the suit property.”

                                       Going forward, it is then eloquently mentioned in para 3 that, “As mentioned supra, the plaintiff did not have any title deed with respect to the suit property. He based his claim mainly on his alleged long possession over the property, and claimed that there was nobody with better title over it than him. Per contra, the defendants relied on two sale deeds, viz., Ex. A-6 dated 06.02.1956, executed by the original owner Khoom Singh in favour of Purkha Ram, and Ex. A-2 dated 21.06.1966, executed by Purkha Ram in favour of the appellant/Defendant No. 1. It was also not disputed that the plaintiff did not have possession as on the date of filing of the suit, inasmuch as he has alleged that he was wrongly dispossessed by the defendant on 30.04.1972 prior to filing the suit.”

                                   To be sure, it is then revealed in para 4 that, “The only questions to be decided in this appeal are whether the plaintiff had better title over the suit property and whether he was in settled possession of the property, which required dispossession in accordance with law.”

                         As it turned out, para 5 while elaborating on what the appellant contended states specifically that, “Ms. Christi Jain, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/Defendant No. 1 taking us through the material on record, contends that there is nothing on record to show that the plaintiff was in possession of the property at any point of time, much less for a longer time lawfully. There is no material to show that the plaintiff has possessory title over the suit property. Additionally, she argues that the sale deeds mentioned supra relied upon by the defendants would clearly reveal that the defendants were in possession of the property as owner thereof, from the date of purchase of the suit property.”

                                      It cannot be lost on us that it is then unfolded in para 6 that, “Undisputedly and as duly admitted by both parties, the property in question originally belonged to Jagirdar Khoom Singh of Barmer. The property in question is part of a larger property under the Jagirdari system, a few parts of which were rented out or sold. After the system of Jagirdari was abolished, these jagirs were resumed in the year 1955-56. While a few persons continued in illegal possession, others had purchased parts of the land from the Jagirdar, and the remaining land vested in the State Government and municipalities. After the resumption of the jagir, it seems that the Barmer Municipality established a planned and well-managed colony named Nehru Nagar on the said land. Ex. 12, Ex. 13 and Ex. 14 are the survey maps of the Municipality. A perusal of Ex. 12 (first survey) reveals that Moti Ram was in possession of the land, the plot to the east of which was possessed by Nawala Harijan and in the east of Nawala Harijan’s plot, possession of Purkha Ram (to recall, predecessor-in-interest of the defendants) on the site has been indicated. Further, the possession of Purkha Ram has also been indicated on a plot to the south of the land duly possessed by Moti Ram. Thus, it is clear that the plots of land owned by Khoom Singh, in possession of these persons, were not uniformly situated. However, after the Municipality took over possession, it seems that orderly formation of the plots was undertaken. Though there was some confusion raised by the plaintiff with regard to the boundaries of the property in question, the First Appellate Court being the final court of fact, on due appreciation of the entire material on record, gave a definite finding that the Trial Court was not justified in decreeing the suit, and observed that Purkha Ram was in possession of the property in question even prior to 1966, and had sold the same through registered sale deed in June 1966 vide Ex. A-2. This sale deed shows the measurement of the land, which corresponds to the plots in question approximately. The judgment of the First Appellate Court reveals that the Municipality had let out only three plots to the Jagirdar, and those three plots together measured 32 x 66 hands (unit of measurement). Thus, each plot measured 32 x 22 hands. These were numbered as Plot No. 4, Plot No. 5 and Plot No. 7. The disputed site is Plot No. 7.”   

                                   Truth be told, para 7 then goes on to disclose that, “The official record (survey map), Ex. 14, which relates to the plot in question, i.e., Plot No. 7, reveals that it was owned by Poona Ram, who is Defendant No. 1 and the appellant herein. It is also relevant to note that sanction for constructing the house was given to Purkha Ram in the year 1957. Obviously, such sanction would have been accorded only on the basis of title and possession of the property.”

                                     To put things in perspective, para 8 then goes on to elucidate while explaining the concept behind suit based on possessory title that, “Section 64 of the Limitation Act, 1963 contemplates a suit for possession of immovable property based on previous possession and not on title, if brought within 12 years from the date of dispossession. Such a suit is known in law as a suit based on possessory title as distinguishable from proprietary title. It cannot be disputed and is by now well settled that ‘settled possession’ or effective possession of a person without title entitles him to protect his possession as if he were a true owner.”    

                                  It would be pertinent to now mention here that para 9 then goes on to illustrate specifying that, “The law in India, as it has developed, accords with jurisprudential thought as propounded by luminaries like Salmond. Salmond on Jurisprudence (12 Edn. at paras 59-60) states:-

    “These two concepts of ownership and possession, therefore, may be used to distinguish between the de facto possessor of an object and its de jure owner, between the man who actually has it and the man who ought to have it. They serve also to contract the position of one whose rights are ultimate, permanent and residual with that of one whose rights are only of a temporary nature.

x                        x                     x                      x                        x

In English law possession is a good title of right against any one who cannot show a better. A wrongful possessor has the rights of an owner with respect to all persons except earlier possessors and except the true owner himself. Many other legal systems, however, go much further than this, and treat possession as a provisional or temporary title even against the true owner himself. Even a wrongdoer, who is deprived of his possession, can recover it from any person whatever, simply on the ground of his possession. Even the true owner, who takes his own, may be forced in this way to restore it to the wrongdoer, and will not be permitted to set up his own superior title to it. He must first give up possession, and then proceed in due course of law for the recovery of the thing on the ground of his ownership. The intention of the law is that every possessor shall be entitled to retain and recover his possession, until deprived of it by a judgment according to law.

Legal remedies thus appointed for the protection of possession even against ownership are called possessory, while those available for the protection of ownership itself may be distinguished as proprietary. In the modern and medieval civil law the distinction is expressed by the contrasted terms petitorium (a proprietary suit) and possessorium (a possessory suit)”.”

                                 Back home, it is then worthily recalled in para 10 about the relevant past noteworthy judgments that, “As far back as 1924, in the case of Midnapur Zamindary Co. Ltd. V. Naresh Narayan Roy, AIR 1924 PC 144, the learned Judge observed that in India, persons are not permitted to take forcible possession; they must obtain such possession as they are entitled to through a court. Later, in the case of Nair Service Society Ltd. V. K.C. Alexander, AIR 1968 SC 1165, this Court ruled that when the facts disclose no title in either party, possession alone decides. It was further held that if Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 (corresponding to the present Section 6) is employed, the plaintiff need not prove title and the title of the defendant does not avail him. When, however, the period of six months has passed, questions of title can be raised by the defendant, and if he does so the plaintiff must establish a better title or fail. In other words, such a right is only restricted to possession in a suit under Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act (corresponding to the present Section 6) but does not bar a suit on prior permission within 12 years from the date of dispossession, and title need not be proved unless the defendant can provide one.”

                                           Now turning to para 11, it goes on to then add further that, “It was also observed by this Court in Nair Service Society Ltd (supra) that a person in possession of land in assumed character of owner and exercising peaceably the ordinary rights of ownership has a perfectly good title against the entire world except the rightful owner. In such a case, the defendant must show in himself or his predecessor a valid legal title and probably a possession prior to the plaintiffs and thus be able to raise a presumption prior in time.”

                                     Not stopping here, it is then pointed out in para 12 that, “In the case of Rame Gowda (dead) by Lrs. v. M. Varadappa Naidu (dead) by Lrs. and another, (2004) 1 SCC 769, a three-Judge Bench of this Court, while discussing the Indian law on the subject, observed as under:-

   “8. It is thus clear that so far as the Indian law is concerned the person in peaceful possession is entitled to retain his possession and in order to protect such possession he may even use reasonable force to keep out a trespasser. A rightful owner who has been wrongfully dispossessed of land may retake possession if he can do so peacefully and without the use of unreasonable force. If the trespasser is in settled possession of the property belonging to the rightful owner, the rightful owner shall have to take recourse to law; he cannot take the law in his own hands and evict the trespasser or interfere with his possession. The law will come to the aid of a person in peaceful and settled possession by injuncting even a rightful owner from using force or taking law in his own hands, and also by restoring him in possession even from the rightful owner (of course subject to the law of limitation), if the latter has dispossessed the prior possessor by use of force. In the absence of proof of better title, possession or prior peaceful settled possession is itself evidence of title. Law presumes the possession to go with the title unless rebutted. The owner of any property may prevent even by using reasonable force a trespasser from an attempted trespass, when it is in the process of being committed, or is of a flimsy character, or recurring, intermittent, stray or casual in nature, or has just been committed, while the rightful owner did not have enough time to have recourse to law. In the last of the cases, the possession of the trespasser, just entered into would not be called as one acquiesced to by the true owner”.”

                                In essence, it is then summarized in para 13 laying down that, “The crux of the matter is that a person who asserts possessory title over a particular property will have to show that he is under settled or established possession of the said property. But merely stray or intermittent acts of trespass do not give such a right against the true owner. Settled possession means such possession over the property which has existed for a sufficiently long period of time, and has been acquiesced to by the true owner. A casual act of possession does not have the effect of interrupting the possession of the rightful owner. A stray act of trespass, or a possession which has not matured into settled possession, can be obstructed or removed by the true owner even by using necessary force. Settled possession must be (i) effective, (ii) undisturbed, and (iii) to the knowledge of the owner or without any attempt at concealment by the trespasser. There cannot be a straitjacket formula to determine settled possession. Occupation of a property by a person as an agent or a servant acting at the instance of the owner will not amount to actual legal possession. The possession should contain an element of animus possidendi. The nature of possession of the trespasser is to be decided based on the facts and circumstances of each case.”

                                        Having said this, let us now see what para 14 enunciates. It enunciates that, “As mentioned supra, Purkha Ram had purchased three plots from Jagirdar Khoom Singh. In sale deed Ex. A-6, three plots have been mentioned as plots of three houses. One of these, being Plot No. 7, was sold by Purkha Ram to the appellant, one plot being Plot No. 4 was sold to Teja Ram and the third plot being Plot No. 5 was retained by Purkha Ram.”

                             It would be pertinent to mention here that para 15 then stipulates that, “In order to prove possession of the property, the plaintiff relied upon the rent note Ex. 1, which shows that the plot in question was let out by the plaintiff to one Joga Ram in the year 1967. On 12.05.1967, a fire broke out and the entire fodder stored on the plot got burnt. Thereafter, the plot was kept vacant. DW-7, who has been referred to in order to establish spreading of the fire, stated that the fire started due to sparks coming from a railway engine. But there was no railway line adjacent to the disputed land which could have caused a fire. Even otherwise, the rent note Ex. 1 does not refer to the plot in question, and its boundaries have also not been mentioned. Merely on doubtful material and cursory evidence, it cannot be held that the plaintiff was ever in possession of the property, and that too in settled possession.”       

                           While strongly rebutting the tall claims of the plaintiff, it is then pointed out in para 16 that, “The plaintiff/Respondent No. 1 makes much of the old body of a motor vehicle belonging to him lying on the property. Ex. 2 clearly reveals that one part of the motor vehicle was lying on the disputed property and another part was lying on the plot of the plaintiff. The said body of the motor vehicle is about 3 to 4 feet in length only and the same was lying on the boundary of the disputed property. But the plaintiff/Respondent No. 1 claims possession of the entire plot based on such fact. Absolutely no material is found to show that the plaintiff/Respondent No. 1 was in actual possession, much less continuous possession, of the property for a longer period which may be called settled possession or established possession. As mentioned supra, mere casual possession, that too relying on a motor vehicle body lying on a part of the property, would not prove settled possession of the plaintiff.”          

                     To say the least, it is then clarified in para 17 that, “The plaintiff has to prove his case to the satisfaction of the Court. He cannot succeed on the weakness of the case of the defendant. Even otherwise, there is no confusion at all regarding the identity of the property in question and on the basis of material on record, the First Appellate Court has correctly ruled that the appellant/Defendant No. 1 has proved his title and possession over the suit property since the date of his purchase of the property. Prior to the purchase, his predecessor-in-interest was in possession of the same.”

                                      After considering the position of law and facts of the case, it is then spelt out in para 18 that, “Having regard to the position of law and facts of the case, we are of the considered opinion that the High Court was not justified in interfering with the judgment of the First Appellate Court, which has come down very heavily on the procedure adopted by the trial Judge in deciding the matter, more particularly when no fault can be found on facts with the judgment of the First Appellate Court.”

                                   In this same para 18, it is then also spelt out that, “Generally, it is not open to the High Court to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by the First Appellate Court when such findings are based on the evidence on record, and are not perverse or against the material on record.”

                                    More importantly, it is then held in para 19 that, “The conclusion arrived at by the High Court and the reasons assigned for the same are not correct inasmuch as there is absolutely no material in favour of the case of the plaintiff to show possessory title. In order to claim possessory title, the plaintiff will have to prove his own case, and also will have to show that he has better title than any other person. Since there is no documentary proof that the plaintiff was in possession of the suit property, that too for a long period, he cannot be allowed to succeed based on minor discrepancies in the evidence of the defendants. Accordingly, the appeal succeeds and is allowed.”

                           Finally, we see that in the last para 20, it is then held that, “The impugned judgment of the High Court dated 28.08.2006 and its review stands set aside and the judgment of the First Appellate Court is restored. Consequently, suit stands dismissed.” No doubt, this latest, landmark and laudable judgment leaves no room of doubt for anyone to reach the foregone conclusion that casual act of possession over property does not confer possessory title. We all must also always bear it in mind along with other salient points highlighted so brilliantly in this significant and laudable judgment!


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  04 Feb 2019     Views:2462

Articles Updates

Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:867
Post-Merger Vision: HDFC Bank to Prioritize Profit...
01 Aug 2024     Views:781
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:971
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:873
The Mandal Verdict: Indra Sawhney and Its Lasting ...
22 Jul 2024     Views:1094
Supreme Court Emphasizes Direct and a Specific Ple...
22 Jul 2024     Views:879
Bail and Punishment Provisions of NDPS matters...
05 Apr 2023     Views:4311
The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:5150
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:5403
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:5478
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:5615
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:10048
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:5051
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:5351
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:5773
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:5590
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:2882
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:2499
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:2083
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:4984
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:21386
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:8217
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:4590
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:4134
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:8838
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:3940
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:3732
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:4800
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:3555
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1867
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2656
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2208
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1880
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:56272
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1794
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1922
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2113
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2064
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:6349
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1564
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1577
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1665
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:31175
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6348
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:3182
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:5928
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:10760
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3364
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2736
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:7761
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:54829
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1857
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1454
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1738
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1879
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1686
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:3423
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:1455
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:6338
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1842
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2126
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:1813
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:3403
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:12432
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1719
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1821
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:3281
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:4582
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:2392
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:10703
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:1524
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:6323
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2322
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2356
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2671
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:26090
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:4844
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1726
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:33444
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:1727
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:6615
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:1750
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:3791
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1703
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2898
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:19820
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1603
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1592
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1500
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1876
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2274
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1912
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1452
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1403
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1341
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1414
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:7040
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1771
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1616
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1354
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1666
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1853
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1503
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1356
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1416
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1802
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1704
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1406
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1549
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:8979
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1836
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1540
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1513
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1520
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:9960
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1582
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1457
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1439
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:1642
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:3323
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1355
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1388
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1740
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2456
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:1796
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:1943
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2080
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1511
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2742
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1620
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2143
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1451
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1691
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1709
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1695
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1543
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1429
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2747
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:6174
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:3946
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1909
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2141
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:2178
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:2090
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:2157
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:2671
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2077
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2028
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2671
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2235
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:5120
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:5875
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2252
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2352
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:1986
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:2301
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:2826
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:35441
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:4155
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:1935
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:1946
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:2012
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:2599
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1691
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:1711
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:2027
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:3408
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:2271
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:4082
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2085
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:2353
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:1773
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:1808
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:1728
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:1604
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:1391
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:1509
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:2369
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:1442
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:1673
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:1418
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1636
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1352
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:4753
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:4944
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:2458
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:1519
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:1619
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:5008
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:4610
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2354
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2301
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2213
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1655
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1504
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:2035
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1535
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2104
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1732
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1643
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1632
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1467
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1567
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1567
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1532
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1664
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1506
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1743
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1517
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1500
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:1447
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2159
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1603
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1522
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1545
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1940
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1858
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1391
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2994
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1802
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1704
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1519
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1573
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1758
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1677
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1741
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1701
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1926
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1505
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1750
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:1710
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1781
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1493
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1409
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2066
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1813
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:2076
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1608
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1462
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1494
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:5762
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:2323
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:1517
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:1558
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:1771
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:1474
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:1503
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:1427
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1794
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1947
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:1444
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:1572
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:1330
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:2024
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:1390
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:1578
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:2423
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2750
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2734
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2870
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1366
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1674
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:4954
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:2742
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:1892
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:2228
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:5725
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:1660
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:8979
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:1526
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:1745
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:1456
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:3199
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:1549
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:1392
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:3530
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4342
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:7357
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:6623
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1801
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1588
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2139
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2307
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2394
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2426
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1439
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1891
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2607
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3131
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2863
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3158
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1587
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1654
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3233
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:2545
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:3221
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2462
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2709
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2783
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:2054
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:2173
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2221
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2842
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1739
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1612
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1503
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:6688
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1646
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1819
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:12045
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:3795
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:1587
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2589
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2277
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2680
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:3258
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1865
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:2393
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:2005
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:2302
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2433
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2487
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2346
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:4473
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1599
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1724
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1574
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1510
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:3141
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1971
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2734
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2545
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3818
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2863
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1747
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2807
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1987
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1762
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2292
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2131
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:2441
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:3233
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:4166
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2514
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1781
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1850
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1788
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1955
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:2278
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:3124
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1871
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2347
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2128
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:1803
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1952
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1952
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2112
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:2156
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:2120
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:2433
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2400
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1900
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:1993
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1864
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3237
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3231
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3083
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2352
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1690
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1640
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2194
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2170
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1932
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:4765
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3345
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2664
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2255
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1649
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1543
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1704
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1529
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:2706
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2125
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2547
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:3136
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2225
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2307
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:1835
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:1586
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1747
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3533
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1574
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2994
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1517
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1878
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1765
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1930
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2125
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1947
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:1659
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:1788
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1573
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1531
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1653
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:2127
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1682
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1604
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:2987
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1574
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1842
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1580
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1603
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2154
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1674
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1714
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:1734
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:2254
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:2098
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:1774
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1539
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1567
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:2048
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:2212
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:1542
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1809
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1638
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2568
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1748
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2558
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1654
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2142
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2388
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1814
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1841

Most Read Articles

  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:56272
  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:54829
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:35441
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:33444
  • VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER
    On 20 Apr 2020    Views:31175
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.