• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Confer ‘Possessory Title’: SC

Latest Articles

Back

Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Confer ‘Possessory Title’: SC

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  04 Feb 2019     Views:1644

While clearly and convincingly holding that possessory title over property cannot be claimed merely on the basis of ‘casual possession’, the Supreme Court in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Poona Ram v. Moti Ram (D) Th. LRs & Ors. In Civil Appeal No. 4527 of 2009 authored by Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar for himself and Justice NV Ramana on January 29, 2019 observed that a casual act of possession does not have the effect of interrupting the possession of the rightful owner. Very rightly so! Who can deny it?

                                First and foremost, the ball is set rolling in para 1 wherein it is observed that, “The judgment dated 28.08.2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan at Jodhpur in Civil Second Appeal No. 97 of 1984 and the concurrent judgment dated 10.10.2006 in Civil Review Petition No. 18 of 2006, dismissing the same, are called in question in this appeal by the unsuccessful defendants.”

                                      To recapitulate, it is then pointed out in para 2 that, “The brief facts leading to this appeal are as under:

     A suit came to be filed for declaration of title and for possession by Respondent No. 1 herein. Undisputedly, the plaintiff  Moti Ram had no document of title to prove his possession, but claimed possessory title based on prior possession for a number of years. However, according to the plaintiff, he had been wrongly dispossessed by defendants on 30.04.1972 which was within the 12 years preceding the filing of the present suit. The Trial Court decreed the suit and the First Appellate Court reversed the findings of the Trial Court. The First Appellate Court dismissed the said suit on the ground that the defendants had proved their title and possession over the suit property.”

                                       Going forward, it is then eloquently mentioned in para 3 that, “As mentioned supra, the plaintiff did not have any title deed with respect to the suit property. He based his claim mainly on his alleged long possession over the property, and claimed that there was nobody with better title over it than him. Per contra, the defendants relied on two sale deeds, viz., Ex. A-6 dated 06.02.1956, executed by the original owner Khoom Singh in favour of Purkha Ram, and Ex. A-2 dated 21.06.1966, executed by Purkha Ram in favour of the appellant/Defendant No. 1. It was also not disputed that the plaintiff did not have possession as on the date of filing of the suit, inasmuch as he has alleged that he was wrongly dispossessed by the defendant on 30.04.1972 prior to filing the suit.”

                                   To be sure, it is then revealed in para 4 that, “The only questions to be decided in this appeal are whether the plaintiff had better title over the suit property and whether he was in settled possession of the property, which required dispossession in accordance with law.”

                         As it turned out, para 5 while elaborating on what the appellant contended states specifically that, “Ms. Christi Jain, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/Defendant No. 1 taking us through the material on record, contends that there is nothing on record to show that the plaintiff was in possession of the property at any point of time, much less for a longer time lawfully. There is no material to show that the plaintiff has possessory title over the suit property. Additionally, she argues that the sale deeds mentioned supra relied upon by the defendants would clearly reveal that the defendants were in possession of the property as owner thereof, from the date of purchase of the suit property.”

                                      It cannot be lost on us that it is then unfolded in para 6 that, “Undisputedly and as duly admitted by both parties, the property in question originally belonged to Jagirdar Khoom Singh of Barmer. The property in question is part of a larger property under the Jagirdari system, a few parts of which were rented out or sold. After the system of Jagirdari was abolished, these jagirs were resumed in the year 1955-56. While a few persons continued in illegal possession, others had purchased parts of the land from the Jagirdar, and the remaining land vested in the State Government and municipalities. After the resumption of the jagir, it seems that the Barmer Municipality established a planned and well-managed colony named Nehru Nagar on the said land. Ex. 12, Ex. 13 and Ex. 14 are the survey maps of the Municipality. A perusal of Ex. 12 (first survey) reveals that Moti Ram was in possession of the land, the plot to the east of which was possessed by Nawala Harijan and in the east of Nawala Harijan’s plot, possession of Purkha Ram (to recall, predecessor-in-interest of the defendants) on the site has been indicated. Further, the possession of Purkha Ram has also been indicated on a plot to the south of the land duly possessed by Moti Ram. Thus, it is clear that the plots of land owned by Khoom Singh, in possession of these persons, were not uniformly situated. However, after the Municipality took over possession, it seems that orderly formation of the plots was undertaken. Though there was some confusion raised by the plaintiff with regard to the boundaries of the property in question, the First Appellate Court being the final court of fact, on due appreciation of the entire material on record, gave a definite finding that the Trial Court was not justified in decreeing the suit, and observed that Purkha Ram was in possession of the property in question even prior to 1966, and had sold the same through registered sale deed in June 1966 vide Ex. A-2. This sale deed shows the measurement of the land, which corresponds to the plots in question approximately. The judgment of the First Appellate Court reveals that the Municipality had let out only three plots to the Jagirdar, and those three plots together measured 32 x 66 hands (unit of measurement). Thus, each plot measured 32 x 22 hands. These were numbered as Plot No. 4, Plot No. 5 and Plot No. 7. The disputed site is Plot No. 7.”   

                                   Truth be told, para 7 then goes on to disclose that, “The official record (survey map), Ex. 14, which relates to the plot in question, i.e., Plot No. 7, reveals that it was owned by Poona Ram, who is Defendant No. 1 and the appellant herein. It is also relevant to note that sanction for constructing the house was given to Purkha Ram in the year 1957. Obviously, such sanction would have been accorded only on the basis of title and possession of the property.”

                                     To put things in perspective, para 8 then goes on to elucidate while explaining the concept behind suit based on possessory title that, “Section 64 of the Limitation Act, 1963 contemplates a suit for possession of immovable property based on previous possession and not on title, if brought within 12 years from the date of dispossession. Such a suit is known in law as a suit based on possessory title as distinguishable from proprietary title. It cannot be disputed and is by now well settled that ‘settled possession’ or effective possession of a person without title entitles him to protect his possession as if he were a true owner.”    

                                  It would be pertinent to now mention here that para 9 then goes on to illustrate specifying that, “The law in India, as it has developed, accords with jurisprudential thought as propounded by luminaries like Salmond. Salmond on Jurisprudence (12 Edn. at paras 59-60) states:-

    “These two concepts of ownership and possession, therefore, may be used to distinguish between the de facto possessor of an object and its de jure owner, between the man who actually has it and the man who ought to have it. They serve also to contract the position of one whose rights are ultimate, permanent and residual with that of one whose rights are only of a temporary nature.

x                        x                     x                      x                        x

In English law possession is a good title of right against any one who cannot show a better. A wrongful possessor has the rights of an owner with respect to all persons except earlier possessors and except the true owner himself. Many other legal systems, however, go much further than this, and treat possession as a provisional or temporary title even against the true owner himself. Even a wrongdoer, who is deprived of his possession, can recover it from any person whatever, simply on the ground of his possession. Even the true owner, who takes his own, may be forced in this way to restore it to the wrongdoer, and will not be permitted to set up his own superior title to it. He must first give up possession, and then proceed in due course of law for the recovery of the thing on the ground of his ownership. The intention of the law is that every possessor shall be entitled to retain and recover his possession, until deprived of it by a judgment according to law.

Legal remedies thus appointed for the protection of possession even against ownership are called possessory, while those available for the protection of ownership itself may be distinguished as proprietary. In the modern and medieval civil law the distinction is expressed by the contrasted terms petitorium (a proprietary suit) and possessorium (a possessory suit)”.”

                                 Back home, it is then worthily recalled in para 10 about the relevant past noteworthy judgments that, “As far back as 1924, in the case of Midnapur Zamindary Co. Ltd. V. Naresh Narayan Roy, AIR 1924 PC 144, the learned Judge observed that in India, persons are not permitted to take forcible possession; they must obtain such possession as they are entitled to through a court. Later, in the case of Nair Service Society Ltd. V. K.C. Alexander, AIR 1968 SC 1165, this Court ruled that when the facts disclose no title in either party, possession alone decides. It was further held that if Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 (corresponding to the present Section 6) is employed, the plaintiff need not prove title and the title of the defendant does not avail him. When, however, the period of six months has passed, questions of title can be raised by the defendant, and if he does so the plaintiff must establish a better title or fail. In other words, such a right is only restricted to possession in a suit under Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act (corresponding to the present Section 6) but does not bar a suit on prior permission within 12 years from the date of dispossession, and title need not be proved unless the defendant can provide one.”

                                           Now turning to para 11, it goes on to then add further that, “It was also observed by this Court in Nair Service Society Ltd (supra) that a person in possession of land in assumed character of owner and exercising peaceably the ordinary rights of ownership has a perfectly good title against the entire world except the rightful owner. In such a case, the defendant must show in himself or his predecessor a valid legal title and probably a possession prior to the plaintiffs and thus be able to raise a presumption prior in time.”

                                     Not stopping here, it is then pointed out in para 12 that, “In the case of Rame Gowda (dead) by Lrs. v. M. Varadappa Naidu (dead) by Lrs. and another, (2004) 1 SCC 769, a three-Judge Bench of this Court, while discussing the Indian law on the subject, observed as under:-

   “8. It is thus clear that so far as the Indian law is concerned the person in peaceful possession is entitled to retain his possession and in order to protect such possession he may even use reasonable force to keep out a trespasser. A rightful owner who has been wrongfully dispossessed of land may retake possession if he can do so peacefully and without the use of unreasonable force. If the trespasser is in settled possession of the property belonging to the rightful owner, the rightful owner shall have to take recourse to law; he cannot take the law in his own hands and evict the trespasser or interfere with his possession. The law will come to the aid of a person in peaceful and settled possession by injuncting even a rightful owner from using force or taking law in his own hands, and also by restoring him in possession even from the rightful owner (of course subject to the law of limitation), if the latter has dispossessed the prior possessor by use of force. In the absence of proof of better title, possession or prior peaceful settled possession is itself evidence of title. Law presumes the possession to go with the title unless rebutted. The owner of any property may prevent even by using reasonable force a trespasser from an attempted trespass, when it is in the process of being committed, or is of a flimsy character, or recurring, intermittent, stray or casual in nature, or has just been committed, while the rightful owner did not have enough time to have recourse to law. In the last of the cases, the possession of the trespasser, just entered into would not be called as one acquiesced to by the true owner”.”

                                In essence, it is then summarized in para 13 laying down that, “The crux of the matter is that a person who asserts possessory title over a particular property will have to show that he is under settled or established possession of the said property. But merely stray or intermittent acts of trespass do not give such a right against the true owner. Settled possession means such possession over the property which has existed for a sufficiently long period of time, and has been acquiesced to by the true owner. A casual act of possession does not have the effect of interrupting the possession of the rightful owner. A stray act of trespass, or a possession which has not matured into settled possession, can be obstructed or removed by the true owner even by using necessary force. Settled possession must be (i) effective, (ii) undisturbed, and (iii) to the knowledge of the owner or without any attempt at concealment by the trespasser. There cannot be a straitjacket formula to determine settled possession. Occupation of a property by a person as an agent or a servant acting at the instance of the owner will not amount to actual legal possession. The possession should contain an element of animus possidendi. The nature of possession of the trespasser is to be decided based on the facts and circumstances of each case.”

                                        Having said this, let us now see what para 14 enunciates. It enunciates that, “As mentioned supra, Purkha Ram had purchased three plots from Jagirdar Khoom Singh. In sale deed Ex. A-6, three plots have been mentioned as plots of three houses. One of these, being Plot No. 7, was sold by Purkha Ram to the appellant, one plot being Plot No. 4 was sold to Teja Ram and the third plot being Plot No. 5 was retained by Purkha Ram.”

                             It would be pertinent to mention here that para 15 then stipulates that, “In order to prove possession of the property, the plaintiff relied upon the rent note Ex. 1, which shows that the plot in question was let out by the plaintiff to one Joga Ram in the year 1967. On 12.05.1967, a fire broke out and the entire fodder stored on the plot got burnt. Thereafter, the plot was kept vacant. DW-7, who has been referred to in order to establish spreading of the fire, stated that the fire started due to sparks coming from a railway engine. But there was no railway line adjacent to the disputed land which could have caused a fire. Even otherwise, the rent note Ex. 1 does not refer to the plot in question, and its boundaries have also not been mentioned. Merely on doubtful material and cursory evidence, it cannot be held that the plaintiff was ever in possession of the property, and that too in settled possession.”       

                           While strongly rebutting the tall claims of the plaintiff, it is then pointed out in para 16 that, “The plaintiff/Respondent No. 1 makes much of the old body of a motor vehicle belonging to him lying on the property. Ex. 2 clearly reveals that one part of the motor vehicle was lying on the disputed property and another part was lying on the plot of the plaintiff. The said body of the motor vehicle is about 3 to 4 feet in length only and the same was lying on the boundary of the disputed property. But the plaintiff/Respondent No. 1 claims possession of the entire plot based on such fact. Absolutely no material is found to show that the plaintiff/Respondent No. 1 was in actual possession, much less continuous possession, of the property for a longer period which may be called settled possession or established possession. As mentioned supra, mere casual possession, that too relying on a motor vehicle body lying on a part of the property, would not prove settled possession of the plaintiff.”          

                     To say the least, it is then clarified in para 17 that, “The plaintiff has to prove his case to the satisfaction of the Court. He cannot succeed on the weakness of the case of the defendant. Even otherwise, there is no confusion at all regarding the identity of the property in question and on the basis of material on record, the First Appellate Court has correctly ruled that the appellant/Defendant No. 1 has proved his title and possession over the suit property since the date of his purchase of the property. Prior to the purchase, his predecessor-in-interest was in possession of the same.”

                                      After considering the position of law and facts of the case, it is then spelt out in para 18 that, “Having regard to the position of law and facts of the case, we are of the considered opinion that the High Court was not justified in interfering with the judgment of the First Appellate Court, which has come down very heavily on the procedure adopted by the trial Judge in deciding the matter, more particularly when no fault can be found on facts with the judgment of the First Appellate Court.”

                                   In this same para 18, it is then also spelt out that, “Generally, it is not open to the High Court to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by the First Appellate Court when such findings are based on the evidence on record, and are not perverse or against the material on record.”

                                    More importantly, it is then held in para 19 that, “The conclusion arrived at by the High Court and the reasons assigned for the same are not correct inasmuch as there is absolutely no material in favour of the case of the plaintiff to show possessory title. In order to claim possessory title, the plaintiff will have to prove his own case, and also will have to show that he has better title than any other person. Since there is no documentary proof that the plaintiff was in possession of the suit property, that too for a long period, he cannot be allowed to succeed based on minor discrepancies in the evidence of the defendants. Accordingly, the appeal succeeds and is allowed.”

                           Finally, we see that in the last para 20, it is then held that, “The impugned judgment of the High Court dated 28.08.2006 and its review stands set aside and the judgment of the First Appellate Court is restored. Consequently, suit stands dismissed.” No doubt, this latest, landmark and laudable judgment leaves no room of doubt for anyone to reach the foregone conclusion that casual act of possession over property does not confer possessory title. We all must also always bear it in mind along with other salient points highlighted so brilliantly in this significant and laudable judgment!


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  04 Feb 2019     Views:1644

Articles Updates

Bail and Punishment Provisions of NDPS matters...
05 Apr 2023     Views:1007
The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:2144
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:1845
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:1926
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:2417
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:5286
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:1967
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:2361
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:2474
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:2533
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:1601
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:1550
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:1073
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:3659
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:19718
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:6944
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:3258
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:3175
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:7518
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:2934
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:2896
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:3523
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2546
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1136
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1701
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1284
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1052
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:47883
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:930
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1102
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1279
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1283
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:4132
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:889
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:836
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:873
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:22744
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:5404
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:2310
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:4812
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:9695
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2557
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:1903
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:6421
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:52742
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:858
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:794
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:833
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1003
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:942
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:2500
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:806
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:5270
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1067
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1301
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:1008
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:2381
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:11259
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:993
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1076
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:2200
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:3418
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:1649
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:9182
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:906
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:5375
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1572
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:1483
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1811
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:24618
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2927
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:966
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:30528
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:1011
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:4656
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:1061
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:2901
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:887
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1755
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:17246
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:770
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:832
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:840
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:845
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1478
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1150
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:767
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:749
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:724
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:730
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:5357
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:816
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:837
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:693
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:876
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1121
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:761
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:685
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:784
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:993
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:953
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:696
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:803
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:7104
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:831
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:848
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:774
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:719
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:6278
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:824
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:744
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:796
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:891
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2023
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:677
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:775
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:871
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1402
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:869
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:1066
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:1025
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:772
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1602
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:803
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1327
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:821
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:745
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:900
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1049
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:814
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:748
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1642
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:4663
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:3139
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1172
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1387
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:1348
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:1246
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:1415
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:1876
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:1328
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:1254
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1807
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:1387
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:4116
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:4800
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1416
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:1475
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:1233
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:1479
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:2051
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:33216
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:3005
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:1105
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:1190
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:1088
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1527
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:977
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:896
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:1178
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:2380
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:1549
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2964
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:1312
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:1594
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:971
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:1092
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:1040
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:859
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:760
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:834
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:1627
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:803
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:865
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:743
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:963
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:704
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:3598
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:3653
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:1369
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:919
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:1018
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:3612
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:3418
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:1487
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1427
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1401
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1061
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:867
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:857
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:832
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1092
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1016
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:876
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:928
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:763
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:900
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:853
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:786
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:848
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:775
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1053
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:801
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:822
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:736
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1062
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:888
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:884
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:813
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:868
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1102
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:834
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2272
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1006
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:929
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:824
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:862
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1008
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:931
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:946
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:708
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1111
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:818
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1053
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:905
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1101
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:818
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:811
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1314
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:971
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1164
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:867
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:828
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:801
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:4967
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:1338
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:766
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:792
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:938
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:714
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:845
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:806
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1157
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1392
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:774
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:864
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:716
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:1246
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:718
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:926
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:1575
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1777
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1653
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:1889
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:761
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:855
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:2921
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:1868
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:1145
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:1544
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:4756
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:886
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:7378
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:857
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:997
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:861
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:2094
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:834
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:826
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:2473
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:3095
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4571
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4940
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1048
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:902
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1527
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1557
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1646
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1540
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:896
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1180
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1876
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2184
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1990
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2284
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:998
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:949
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2175
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:1750
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:2462
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1644
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:1807
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2006
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:1319
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:1502
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1547
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2144
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1086
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:890
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:842
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:5062
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:901
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1037
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:10716
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:2706
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:913
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1782
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:1549
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1824
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2342
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1124
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:1353
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:1326
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:1374
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1715
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1705
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1515
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1582
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:931
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:840
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:929
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:845
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1945
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1193
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1922
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:1840
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3054
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2161
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1105
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1798
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1325
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1082
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1423
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1510
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:1702
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:2151
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:3378
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1889
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1123
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1237
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1181
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1291
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:1575
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:2360
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1173
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1768
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1384
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:1097
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1227
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1195
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1346
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:1397
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:1259
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:1662
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1602
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1251
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:1154
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1219
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2414
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2131
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2469
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1675
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1051
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:960
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1216
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1081
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1222
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3569
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2352
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1880
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1562
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:977
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:890
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:953
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:989
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:1960
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1443
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:1826
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:2212
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1545
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:1667
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:1136
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:977
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:956
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2579
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:936
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2091
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:885
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1028
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1065
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1127
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1241
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1211
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:966
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:1014
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:886
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:861
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:940
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:1259
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:959
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:906
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:2167
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:944
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:932
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:883
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:885
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1426
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:970
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:975
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:869
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:1304
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:1209
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:956
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:875
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:893
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:1264
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:1454
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:906
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1082
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:943
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1702
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1091
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1679
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1001
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1279
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1462
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1128
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:968

Most Read Articles

  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:52742
  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:47883
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:33216
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:30528
  • How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Liability?
    On 09 Apr 2020    Views:24618
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

Allow Cookies!

By using our website, you agree to the use of cookies

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1127 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.